Rape victims should have free access to court transcripts, says MP
The Ministry of Justice's 12-month pilot of the service is due to conclude at the end of May and ministers are assessing its uptake before outlining future plans.
The scheme allows victims of rape and sexual offences, whose cases are heard at crown court in England and Wales, to request a free copy of the sentencing remarks made by judges in their case.
Liberal Democrat MP Sarah Olney will aim to put the scheme on a permanent footing under the terms of her Victims of Rape and Serious Sexual Offences (Free Access to Sentencing Remarks) Bill to be presented in the House of Commons on Wednesday.
A separate Commons motion tabled by Ms Olney, and signed by 13 other MPs, warned the 'extortionate costs' associated with obtaining court transcripts act as a 'barrier to justice' and pointed to instances where victims were charged 'up to £22,000'.
Ms Olney, the MP for Richmond Park, said: 'The experiences that these survivors have been through are utterly harrowing and to then place a price tag on getting closure is indefensible.
'By failing to extend this scheme, the Government risks extending the unimaginable pain of thousands of victims.
'Most victims do not attend trial, making court transcripts essential in providing the clarity necessary to aid a victims recovery and understand how a verdict was reached. It beggars belief to charge victims these obscene amounts to access that closure.
'The Government will have failed these victims if it does not extend this scheme. It could not be more urgent with just two weeks till the cliff edge when this support falls away.
'Ministers need to accept my Bill immediately and get victims the justice they deserve.'
Justice minister Alex Davies-Jones, responding to a written question from Ms Olney, said HM Courts and Tribunals Service received 498 applications under the pilot between May 2024 and April.
She said: 'The pilot is due to conclude at the end of May 2025.
'We recognise the value that transcripts can have for victims of crime. Victims of rape and sexual offences were chosen for the pilot due to the particular difficulties they face when attending court.
'We are actively exploring opportunities to use technology to reduce the cost of transcripts of hearings in the criminal courts in future, but maintaining a high degree of accuracy will always be of paramount importance.
'We are currently assessing the pilot's uptake and impact and will be able to say more on our plans for future provision in due course.'
Ms Olney's Bill faces a battle to become law due to a lack of parliamentary time to discuss proposals from backbench MPs.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
32 minutes ago
- The Independent
Could Angela Rayner's squeeze on landlords hurt the very people it's supposed to help?
On the face of it, Angela Rayner's Renters' Rights Bill has some benefits – not least that Section 21 no-fault eviction notices will be scrapped, giving tenants more security. But experts are now warning that, as part of Labour's reforms currently making their way through parliament, landlords would be prevented from re-listing their properties as rentals for a year if they try – and fail – to sell up. Which, therefore, also means they'll have to forgo rent for a year. Failed sales are not unusual – and with the latest Rightmove stats on the housing market, things are looking especially bleak for homeowners in London and the South East. If they are forced to hold onto their property under these new provisions, not only will they as landlords be out of pocket, we'll end up with even more empty properties gathering dust. Right away, you can see the problem: Britain already has too many of those and this may lead to an even bigger shortage of housing during what the National Rental Landlords Association (NRLA) describes as 'an unprecedented supply and demand crisis'. Indeed, the organisation puts the number of empty properties in the rental sector at roughly half a million in England alone, using data from the government's English Housing Survey. 'We are concerned that the government does not recognise the risk that the number of empty homes in the private rented sector may substantially increase if this proposal passes into law,' says Meera Chindooroy, the trade body's deputy director of campaigns, policy and public affairs. So, has the government lost the plot? Not quite. I can see the method in Rayner's apparent madness. Let me explain… The problem with the private rental market is that the balance between tenant and landlord has been out of whack for too long. The current system, which allows for tenants to be booted out with a couple months' notice at the end of a year's tenancy, can leave them in a horrible jam if the owner decides that it's time to book a quick profit when the property market gets hot. Rayner's policy aim with the bill is to create a situation where this doesn't happen because most landlords will be professional – in it for the long haul, rather than hobbyists who buy themselves a flat or two to fatten up their pensions. The re-listing ban is an explicit attempt to make landlords think very carefully before putting their properties on the market. It makes that option a risky move for them. Other provisions included in the Bill that the NRLA describes as 'the biggest change to renting in over 30 years' include a protected 12 months at the start of a tenancy, where a landlord will be barred from evicting a tenant for the purposes of selling. As also mentioned, there will be the abolition of Section 21 notices, better known as 'no-fault' evictions. A national database for the private rented sector will be created, and there will be an ombudsman to handle disputes. Landlords will no longer be able to discriminate against families or benefit recipients – nor will they be able to create bidding wars. Some of these policies were first mooted by Michael Gove, when housing was part of his portfolio. And while the current chancellor Rachel Reeves introduced a 5 per cent 'second home' stamp duty surcharge, the drive to professionalise the sector began with former Tory chancellor George Osborne. He restricted the tax relief residential landlords could claim on mortgage interest payments to the basic rate of 20 per cent. These measures ramped up costs for the small fry and many left the market as a result. As you can see, there has been a degree of cross-party consensus on the need for reforms aimed at improving life for private sector tenants, who are often left feeling as if they're lost in a swamp with no map and no mobile phone reception. As a package, the reforms should, in theory, improve life for them. If an owner is in it for the long term, the renter can make a home of their tenancy, as often happens on the continent. Needless to say, a long term tenant could also improve life for the landlord, because they will likely be more inclined to look after the place (if you've ever been house-hunting, the ex-rentals stand out – and not in a good way). However, at this point I feel obliged to trot out one of those old sayings: 'The road to hell is paved with good intentions.' You don't help renters if you end up with fewer properties on the market. Constricting supply will inevitably add rocket fuel to rental prices, which are already too high. According to the quarterly tracker by Rightmove, the average advertised rent of homes outside of London rose to a record £1,349 in the first three months of the year. London, meanwhile, recorded its 14th consecutive record, with monthly rents increasing to £2,698. It is true that Rightmove noted a (welcome) increase in supply, but that doesn't mean there isn't still a shortage overall. There are some good things in Rayner's reform package. But facts are facts and markets are markets – and if she squeezes landlords too hard, she will hurt the market and end up squeezing tenants – the last thing anyone wants, least of all her. Banning rents for a year after a failed attempt to sell is a measure that demands a rethink, however well-intentioned.
Daily Record
2 hours ago
- Daily Record
Fettes College may cut jobs after Government's VAT decision
The private school in Edinburgh said it needs to run its operations "as efficiently as possible". Jobs at a prestigious Scots private school may be lost as it looks to cut costs following the UK Government's introduction of VAT on school fees. Fettes College in Edinburgh said the decision was one of the reasons it took the 'difficult' decision to 'right size our staffing model'. The Scotsman reported that the school – attended by former prime minister Tony Blair – has opened a consultation process for both teaching and operational staff in order to reduce numbers. The most recent accounts show 751 students in August 2024, down from 780 the previous year. academic year, inclusive of VAT. The Labour government imposed VAT on private education and boarding fees, effective from January 1. Ministers argue that removing the VAT exemption will benefit the wider education sector, including the 94% of pupils who attend state schools. A spokesman for Fettes College said the sector is facing a 'tough time' and appealed for privacy for the staff involved. Join the Daily Record WhatsApp community! Get the latest news sent straight to your messages by joining our WhatsApp community today. You'll receive daily updates on breaking news as well as the top headlines across Scotland. No one will be able to see who is signed up and no one can send messages except the Daily Record team. All you have to do is click here if you're on mobile, select 'Join Community' and you're in! If you're on a desktop, simply scan the QR code above with your phone and click 'Join Community'. We also treat our community members to special offers, promotions, and adverts from us and our partners. If you don't like our community, you can check out any time you like. To leave our community click on the name at the top of your screen and choose 'exit group'. If you're curious, you can read our Privacy Notice. The spokesman said: 'Various factors have conspired to increase costs on all organisations and schools are not immune, particularly with the recent imposition of VAT on school fees and rise in national insurance contributions. 'Despite being financially very well managed with a strong student roll, these factors are having an impact on our costs and numbers, and we are obliged to run our operations as efficiently as possible. 'These headwinds obviously affect our families too and our parents need to be certain that we are taking the necessary decisions to run the school efficiently and to use their money effectively. 'A consultation process began in May to right size our staffing model. This difficult decision may result in some redundancies. 'We will continue to provide the highest standard of educational experience, delivering our innovative vision for the school and maintaining our position as a leader in the sector.'
North Wales Chronicle
2 hours ago
- North Wales Chronicle
Rantzen warns peers not to hamper progress of assisted dying law
The Terminally Ill Adults (End Of Life) Bill cleared the Commons with a majority of 23 votes on Friday, but opponents have vowed to continue their resistance in the unelected chamber. The legislation could face a difficult passage through the Lords, with critics poised to table amendments to add further restrictions and safeguards to the Bill. Dame Esther told BBC Radio 4's Today: 'I don't need to teach the House of Lords how to do their job. They know it very well, and they know that laws are produced by the elected chamber. 'Their job is to scrutinise, to ask questions, but not to oppose. 'So yes, people who are adamantly opposed to this bill, and they have a perfect right to oppose it, will try and stop it going through the Lords, but the Lords themselves, their duty is to make sure that law is actually created by the elected chamber, which is the House of Commons who have voted this through.' Dame Esther, who turns 85 on Sunday and has terminal cancer, acknowledged the legislation would probably not become law in time for her to use it and she would have to 'buzz of to Zurich' to use the Dignitas clinic. Paralympian and crossbench peer Baroness Tanni Grey-Thompson told BBC Breakfast: 'We're getting ready for it to come to the Lord's and from my personal point of view, about amending it to make it stronger. 'We've been told it's the strongest Bill in the world, but to be honest, it's not very high bar for other legislation. 'So I do think there are a lot more safeguards that could be put in.' Conservative peer and disability rights campaigner Lord Shinkwin said the narrow Commons majority underlined the need for peers to take a close look at the legislation. He told Today 'I think the House of Lords has a duty to expose and to subject this Bill to forensic scrutiny' but 'I don't think it's a question of blocking it so much as performing our duty as a revising chamber'. He added: 'The margin yesterday was so close that many MPs would appreciate the opportunity to look at this again in respect of safeguards as they relate to those who feel vulnerable, whether that's disabled people or older people.' Labour MP Kim Leadbeater, who steered the Bill through the Commons, told the PA news agency she hoped peers would not seek to derail the legislation, which could run out of parliamentary time if it is held up in the Lords. She said: 'I would be upset to think that anybody was playing games with such an important and such an emotional issue.' A group of 27 Labour MPs who voted against the legislation said: 'We were elected to represent both of those groups and are still deeply concerned about the risks in this Bill of coercion of the old and discrimination against the disabled, people with anorexia and black, Asian and minority ethnic people, who we know do not receive equitable health care. 'As the Bill moves to the House of Lords it must receive the scrutiny that it needs. Not about the principles of assisted dying but its application in this deeply flawed Bill.' Meanwhile, one of the leading opponents of the Bill, Conservative Danny Kruger, said 'these are apocalyptic times'. In a series of tweets on Friday night, the East Wiltshire MP – who is at odds with his mother, Great British Bake Off judge Dame Prue Leith in her support for legalisation – accused assisted dying campaigners of being 'militant anti-Christians' who had failed to 'engage with the detail of the Bill'.
