Portugal police arrest crime ring over fraudulent permits for 10,000 foreigners
LISBON, May 8 (Reuters) - Portuguese police have arrested 13 people they believe provided an estimated more than 10,000 foreigners with residence permits and documents allowing them to stay in Portugal and the European Union in exchange for bribes, police said on Thursday.
A spokesperson for the Judicial Police force said the bribes paid to the group, which included a foreign ministry employee, a lawyer and several entrepreneurs, averaged 15,000 euros ($16,950) per person.
The foreigners paid to obtain bogus labour contracts that allowed them to stay in the country and then get residence permits, open bank accounts and access the social security system. Many of them have since left for other EU member states, police said.
Portugal's centre-right government has toughened some immigration rules in the past year, reflecting attempts elsewhere in Europe to fend off the rise of the far-right, and on Saturday vowed to deport 18,000 illegal migrants in the coming months.
It was not immediately clear if those who benefited from the illegal scheme counted among those.
Still, the country remains relatively open to migrants, particularly from Portuguese-speaking countries in Africa and from Brazil. Many experts argue that growing immigration has stoked economic growth.
While anti-immigration sentiment is expected to play a role in an early election on May 18, far-right party Chega has been steady or declining in opinion polls after a surge in the previous election last year. The centre-right Democratic Alliance of Prime Minister Luis Montenegro looks set to win the most votes.
($1 = 0.8850 euros)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
Germany hopes for EU deal on sending failed asylum seekers to third countries, minister says
BERLIN, May 31 (Reuters) - Germany's interior minister is hoping the European Union can reach a bloc-wide agreement on sending failed asylum seekers who cannot go home to safe countries near their original homelands. Chancellor Friedrich Merz's conservatives won February's national election on a promise to bring down immigration levels, which opinion polls showed many voters regarded as being out of control, although numbers have been falling for over a year. In an interview with the Welt am Sonntag newspaper published on Saturday, Interior Minister Alexander Dobrindt said the approach of using third countries could work only if there was a Europe-wide consensus. "We need third countries that are prepared to take migrants who are objectively unable to return to their home countries," he told the newspaper. Earlier this month, the EU's executive Commission proposed a scheme that would let member states reject asylum applications from migrants who passed through a "safe" third country on their way to the bloc. The proposals, criticised by rights groups, have yet to be adopted by national governments or the European Parliament. "No individual EU member state can create this model on its own: it will have to happen on an EU level," Dobrindt said. "We are preparing the foundations for that right now." Dobrindt's initial promises to tighten border controls on taking office angered neighbours who protested at plans to return to their territory those migrants found not to have a right to enter Germany. An Italian plan to process asylum seekers picked up at sea in Albania has stalled amid Italian court challenges. A scheme by Britain, which is not an EU member, under its previous Conservative government to send asylum seekers who arrived in Britain without permission to Rwanda was scrapped by Prime Minister Keir Starmer when he took office last year.
The Guardian
2 hours ago
- The Guardian
Only two European states have net zero military emissions target, data shows
Just two of 30 European countries have set a date to stop their militaries from emitting planet-heating emissions, a Guardian analysis has found, raising concerns about the carbon cost of Europe's coming rearmament wave. Austria and Slovenia are the only countries whose defence ministries have committed to reaching net zero military emissions, according to an analysis of 30 European countries, with only about one-third having worked out the size of their carbon footprint. The findings confirm a 'longstanding blind spot' in assessments of global emissions, said Florian Krampe, who leads climate research at the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (Sipri). 'Ignoring military emissions is not just concerning with regard to climate change,' he said. 'It ignores the growing recognition of climate change being a serious security risk for Europe and beyond.' Researchers estimate the world's militaries account for 5.5% of global emissions – more than flying but less than steel making – but international climate treaties do not require governments to report their emissions. Campaigners have argued this 'military exceptionalism' will harm long-term security by further heating the planet and increasing conflicts over resources such as water and food. The analysis of military climate plans from the 27 EU member states and the UK, Norway and Switzerland – all of whom have committed to reaching net zero emissions by 2050 – found nearly all their defence ministries lacked short-term targets to sharply cut emissions and long-term goals to bring their net climate impact to zero. The defence ministries of countries such as Germany, the Netherlands, Greece and the UK said they were 'contributing' to their national net zero goals but had not set their own targets to do so. 'Our overriding goal is and remains the preservation of peace,' said a spokesperson for the German Ministry of Defence. 'Climate protection must not come at the expense of the performance of our weapon systems.' The British Royal Air Force has set itself an ambitious net zero target of 2040 – a decade earlier than the country's national climate pledge – but other parts of the armed forces have not. A UK government spokesperson said the defence ministry would contribute to the country's national climate goal 'while maintaining or enhancing operational advantage'. Some countries' armed forces have set net zero targets that cover only part of their output. Belgium's defence ministry is targeting climate-neutral infrastructure by 2040, while Portugal's aims to become carbon neutral in 'mission support activities' by 2050. 'Fully replacing all weapon systems or offsetting their emissions is economically unfeasible, which is why efforts are focused on support areas where this objective is attainable,' a spokesperson for the Portuguese defence ministry said. Other countries have set 2030 targets but not set a date to reach net zero. Norway plans to cut emissions by 20% from 2019 levels by the end of the decade, while Ireland is aiming for a 51% cut from 2016-18 levels. Campaigners say the efforts being made to cut military carbon emissions greatly lag behind other sectors of the economy and are likely to be insufficient to compensate for a rise in spending on fuel, infrastructure and equipment. Ellie Kinney, a military emissions campaigner at the Conflict and Environment Observatory, said there had been 'considerable momentum' behind decarbonising militaries over the last two years that was now being threatened by Europe's rush to rearm. 'Military decarbonisation is essential for our future security,' she said. 'We call on governments to set clear emissions reduction targets and publish thorough and transparent reporting of military greenhouse gas emissions.' While the military's carbon intensity is likely to fall as the global economy grows cleaner, experts say the heavy fossil fuel consumption of vehicles such as planes, ships and tanks will require serious effort to clean up. Military sources say many actions that are being taken today – such as investing in solar panels, heat pumps and fuel-efficient vehicles – are driven by a desire to save money, though factors such as cutting pollution, reducing emissions and increasing energy independence also play a role. A spokesperson for the Austrian defence ministry, which is targeting climate neutrality in 2040, said it had made the most progress in decarbonising buildings through actions such as buying green electricity and expanding district heating. 'However, reducing emissions in military mobility remains a major challenge, at least until civilian technological advancements become applicable to military operations,' they said. The defence ministries of Bulgaria, Hungary and Slovakia did not respond to requests for comment. Italy, Spain and the Czech Republic declined to comment. Total military spending in Europe rose by 17% to $693bn in 2024, according to data from Sipri, as part of a rearmament wave that comes after years of European Nato members failing to meet a spending commitment of 2% of their GDP. The political shift, which was triggered by Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine, has taken on new urgency in recent months after Donald Trump has cast doubt on US support for the defence of Ukraine. The challenge is ensuring that these defence investments do not further weaken climate commitments, said Krampe. 'The defence sector can no longer be a blind spot in climate action,' he said. 'Rising military spending should drive green innovation, not lock in carbon dependence.'
The Guardian
3 hours ago
- The Guardian
More than €1bn in EU funds used in discriminatory projects, report says
Hundreds of millions in European Union funds have been used in projects that violate the rights of marginalised communities, a report alleges, citing initiatives such as segregated housing for Roma, residential institutions for children with disabilities and holding centres for asylum seekers. The report, based on information compiled by eight NGOs from across Europe, looks at 63 projects in six countries. Together these projects are believed to have received more than €1bn in funding from the European Union, laying bare a seemingly 'low understanding' of fundamental rights across the bloc, according to one of the authors of the EU-funded report. While the report focused on six countries, those behind the analysis suggested that similar projects were probably widespread across the EU. 'This is really just the tip of the iceberg,' said Ines Bulic of the European Network on Independent Living, describing it as 'unacceptable' that funds provided by European citizens could have been used to amplify the discrimination and segregation of communities that already ranked among the bloc's most marginalised. She pointed to a school in Greece for people with disabilities and special needs, which had been part of a wider EU investment in special vocational schools, as an example. 'What we would like to see is investment in inclusive education, which is very much needed in all of the EU, such as accessible schools, investments in support teachers and other services that allow children to attend regular schools,' she said. Another example she gave was of an institution for children with disabilities in Romania, which had received €2.5m in funding, where children were being sent to live rather than being provided with support to remain with their families. 'This of great concern. It is a right of all children, disabled or not, to grow up in their families.' Other examples highlighted in the report include the construction of social housing for Roma in Romania on the edge of a city. Far from any public service, the homes are built from shipyard containers and do not meet the minimum requirements for thermal or sound insulation and sanitation, the report notes. Several reception centres for asylum seekers across Greece were also flagged for their extremely remote locations and poor living conditions. Those behind the report cited several reasons to explain how millions of euros had ended up being allocated to projects seen as discriminatory. One was a seemingly 'low understanding' of fundamental rights across some governments and parts of the EU, said Andor Urmos of Bridge EU, the organisation that had worked with various civil society groups across Europe to prepare the report. 'That's what we need to tackle in the future,' he said. 'To have a common view, a common understanding that building a segregated school for Roma children is a violation of fundamental rights, as is building a residential institution for people with disabilities or locking up people in reception centres like what is happening in Greece.' The findings dovetail with a raft of recent reports. This week, the Council of Europe said that school segregation was resulting in lower-quality education for Roma, noting that the high concentration of Roma children in certain schools 'appears to be the result of residential segregation, but also of continuing practices by school authorities to educate Roma children in separate classes or buildings'. Last year an EU agency found that the number of people with disabilities who were living in segregated, at times harmful, settings had increased in many EU member states, while civil society organisations have repeatedly accused EU-funded refugee centres of violating people's rights. When contacted, the European Commission said it was aware of the findings of this week's report and was looking into it. 'It is important to highlight that the commission does not fund any organisation that does not fully respect fundamental rights and values,' a spokesperson said. 'In case of violation of the applicable conditions, we have means to terminate the cooperation and recover the money, as necessary.' The report listed projects that were under shared management, meaning the commission relied on national authorities to ensure the legality and regularity of operations, it said. 'Both the EU and its member states must continuously ensure that projects which are incompatible with European values or pursue an illegal agenda, do not receive support from government and European funds,' the spokesperson added. The report highlighted serious shortcomings in how EU funds are being managed and monitored, said Steven Allen of the Validity Foundation, a disability rights organisation that also contributed to the document. 'We can see that both the EU member states, as well as the European Commission, are failing to prevent EU taxpayers money from facilitating and financing serious violations of the rights of multiple marginalised populations,' he said. The report's release was carefully timed to come before planning takes place for the EU's next budget, set to take effect in 2028. Its findings made it clear that the voices of those who often go unheard needed to be included in the decision-making, said Allen. Doing so could help unlock the transformative powers of EU funding, offering the potential to build inclusive education systems or overhaul areas such as public housing, where grievances have been linked to the rise of the far right. 'EU funds do have the potential to be a powerful tool and to provide real, tangible benefits of the EU project to the most marginalised populations on the continent today,' he said. 'And they can indeed be used as an antidote against the rise of creeping nationalism and far-right extremist politics. The funds must be better targeted.'
