
Manchester City set for contract talks with Pep Guardiola's key backroom staff after delay in offering new deals
Pep Guardiola 's backroom staff are ready for talks with Manchester City over contract renewals ahead of next season.
Mail Sport understands that no offers to any of Guardiola's closest allies at the club had been forthcoming before victory on the final day of the campaign at Fulham secured Champions League qualification.
Sources have said that City have started the process of discussing fresh terms with coaches this week, a fortnight out from flying to the United States for the Club World Cup. Existing deals expire in the middle of that tournament.
The delay in negotiations for coaches on 12-month deals had created some confusion among the backroom team, which includes four key personnel who have been by Guardiola's side since his appointment in 2016.
New director of football Hugo Viana will be formulating a view on the coaching set-up, as well as how much business needs doing in the transfer market, as he continues a handover with Txiki Begiristain before spearheading a new era at City.
Guardiola's coaching staff have been tightknit over the years, with a core group alongside him remaining the same throughout his tenure.
Head of analyst Carles Planchart, fitness coach Lorenzo Buenaventura and head of player protocol Manel Estiarte all joined from Bayern Munich with the manager.
Xabier Mancisidor, the goalkeeping coach, moved to the Etihad Stadium under Manuel Pellegrini in 2013.
Carlos Vicens, promoted to the first-team group four years ago, has an offer from Braga to become the Portuguese side's new manager.
Assistant manager Juanma Lillo, whom Guardiola deems a mentor, re-joined City after the Treble campaign alongside Inigo Dominguez.
Enzo Maresca, Mikel Arteta and Domenec Torrent were all previous No 2s and took top jobs elsewhere with success.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mirror
30 minutes ago
- Daily Mirror
Man City eye transfer for Newcastle star with Pep Guardiola keen on deal
Pep Guardiola is looking to reshape his Manchester City squad this summer after ending season without silverware for first time in eight years and Newcastle star Tino Livramento is admired Manchester City are eyeing a surprise move for Newcastle defender Tino Livramento, according to reports. Pep Guardiola is looking to revamp his squad ahead of a renewed assault on all fronts next season after the club went without silverware for the first time in eight years. And Livramento, 22, is being looked at despite Newcastle having no appetite to sell a player who has three years left on his contract, as per the Daily Mail. The ex-Chelsea academy player arrived from Southampton in 2023 for £40m and was handed a senior England call-up earlier this year. City are also pushing ahead with a move to bring in Rayan Ait-Nouri from Wolves, with an expectation that he could sign in time for the Club World Cup later this month. City are also in talks with Lyon over a move for Rayan Cherki and they have already submitted a £55m bid for AC Milan midfielder Tijjani Reijnders. Chairman Khaldoon Al Mubarak last week said City would come back stronger next season having finished 13 points behind champions Liverpool. It was the first campaign in eight that City did not win a single piece of silverware, while the club's legal battle with the Premier League rumbles on in the background. And Al Mubarak said: "We will be back. This season is a season that's now behind us. Today is a new day. We start working and preparing for next season. And by the way, we've been doing that since January. "And we will take all the good things and the not so good things from this season, and learn from it, improve from it and get better. "I can assure you, this club will do everything possible to come back to the standards that we know we all can achieve - and that we know we will achieve. "Because really, if there's one thing I'd like right now, it's to turn that page from last season and just immediately start focusing on next season. All the players, they're excited about coming back. Nobody feels good about how we finished the season. "They want to come back, and they want to come back hungry. And I can see the hunger. Normally these players are off and they're starting to think about vacation time etc. Honestly, every player I spoke to was telling me, 'we're coming back'. "That's the attitude you want - and that's exactly why you see me so positive. We're going to come back strong, with a lot of positivity."


The Herald Scotland
44 minutes ago
- The Herald Scotland
Here is the real reason River City is being axed by BBC bosses
The letter's subject was BBC Scotland cancelling River City, an act I had previously described as cultural vandalism. My correspondent had a cooler disposition and a better way with words. Summing up how the soap had been brought low in recent years, she wrote: 'Its viewing figures were adversely affected by stop/start production runs, erratic scheduling and a general lack of promotion.' Spot on. And then came this: 'I began watching River City out of loyalty to my city, but came to the view that it makes an important contribution to the culture of central Scotland.' BBC Scotland HQ at Pacific Quay Watching out of loyalty to my city. How wonderful, how generous, how Scottish is that? Of the thousands of words written and spoken about River City, all the BBC statements, the petition to save the show, the debate in the Scottish Parliament, not one sentence hits home as hard as that contribution. Watching out of loyalty to my city. There writes someone who 'gets' what River City means, and why it is not just another programme that can be binned by BBC Scotland because its face no longer fits. But what do you know, no one is listening. Not to my correspondent, not to those who have signed the petition, not to MSPs, or ministers. It seems the main arguments in favour of keeping River City - that it provides jobs and training for working-class Scots who might otherwise never get a start in TV, as well as being a pretty decent drama beloved by its audience - are not enough for BBC Scotland to change its mind. We know this because the executive who made the decision appeared before Holyrood's culture committee at the end of May and said so. Hayley Valentine, director of BBC Scotland, told MSPs that River City, with its 200,000 viewers in Scotland compared to Shetland's 700,000 'did not pass the value for money test'. But the money saved by axing River City would help to fund three new short-run dramas, she confirmed. Though these will 'absolutely cost more to make', the BBC would 'expect' them to deliver much bigger audiences than River City and 'really hope' they will. Expectations and hope. In other words, BBC Scotland is taking a punt. Making all those people redundant on a gamble. Having said that axing River City was a creative decision, it really does come down to money. As for River City being a way into TV, Ms Valentine said opportunities would still be offered across a wide range of other programmes. So that's okay then. Nothing more to see here, folks. Except it is not okay. It is very far from okay. Cancelling River City has always been about more than the end of one programme. It's about BBC Scotland fighting Scotland's corner within the corporation, and making sure the BBC represents and is reflective of all those who pay for it. Read more On the former, was London asked for more money to fund the short-run dramas? Was there ever a chance of building on the UK-wide iPlayer audience for River City by running a promotion campaign? Where are the figures showing potential job and training opportunities lost versus those created? Was there any analysis or was this simply a case of executives thinking they knew best? I understand BBC Scotland's ambition. It wants another Baby Reindeer. It wants the next Adolescence. But it doesn't have the money of a Netflix or an Apple+, which makes it all the more important to ensure that it is making decisions for the right reasons. When it comes to River City, I'm not sure it is. Just as to govern is to choose, running the BBC is all about choice. Who is out and who is in, who gets the money and who doesn't. BBC Scotland decided, ultimately, that River City was expendable. It has made the arguments about viewing figures and opportunities offered elsewhere, but I think there is another factor at work here. For my money - £174.50 licence fee - River City was vulnerable because it was a Scottish working-class soap made by working-class casts and crews. No one thought there would be the backlash there has been. It wasn't like cancelling Question Time with its well-connected panellists and audiences (now there's an idea). The class ceiling exists in the media in general - heck, in society as a whole. It's not just BBC Scotland. Indeed, BBC Scotland has done more than most to widen access and should be commended for it. Now and then, a youngster will appear who doesn't sound like your typical BBC sort. They thrive on the attention and encouragement, but then at some point they hit that class ceiling. They don't get invited into the room where it happens, so they can't shape the corporation's future, and the story of inequality rumbles on. Representation matters. As the old saying goes, if you can see it, you can be it. For many working-class Scots, River City was 'their' soap, and therefore 'their' way into TV. Doors opened that had too often been closed, and if it could happen for the guy down the road, it could happen for you. You cannot put a price on that kind of positive PR. The same goes for viewer loyalty. Fans of River City have had their patience tested to a degree that would not have happened with any other show. Yet they've kept faith with the programme. Even now, they trust executives will repay that faith and cancel the cancellation, but will they? Back to you, BBC Scotland. Alison Rowat is a senior politics and features writer on The Herald. Contact


North Wales Chronicle
an hour ago
- North Wales Chronicle
Wednesday's briefing: Bruno Fernandes says no to Saudi and Fran Kirby retires
England's hopes of Women's Nations League glory were dashed by world champions Spain in their Group A3 decider while Euro 2022 winner Fran Kirby announced she was retiring from international football. Caoimhin Kelleher completed his move from Liverpool to Brentford in the hunt for regular first-team action. Manchester United skipper Bruno Fernandes has confirmed he turned down a money-spinning move to Saudi Arabia because he wants to 'stay at the highest level'. The 30-year-old midfielder has been the subject of speculation linking him with a £100million switch to Al Hilal, with the Saudi Pro League side reportedly prepared to pay him £700,000 per week, but he rejected the opportunity after speaking to head coach Ruben Amorim and his family. Fernandes said: 'I simply want to stay at the highest level, playing in the big competitions, because I still feel capable of that. 'I want to continue to be happy and do what I love most. I'm still very passionate about this sport. It's my way of seeing football and I'm happy with my decision.' England missed out on a place in the Women's Nations League finals after Claudia Pina's brace earned Spain a 2-1 comeback win in Barcelona. Alessia Russo put England ahead on her 50th international appearance. But substitute Pina spearheaded the comeback for the world champions, finding an equaliser only moments after being brought on before adding a second 10 minutes later. Defeat meant England finished second in Group A3, while top-of-the-table Spain secured their spot in October's semi-finals. England midfielder Fran Kirby has announced her retirement from international football on the eve of the Euro 2025 finals. The 31-year-old, a veteran of the Lionesses' victorious European Championship campaign in 2022, has brought an end to her international career after 77 caps and 19 goals. Brighton's Kirby wrote on social media: 'After being in the England team since I was 21, it's time to close that chapter of my life. 'I didn't ever want this day to come, but I cannot tell you how proud I am it happened. It's been the biggest honour to represent my country, one that I had only dreamt about as a young girl.' Brentford completed the signing of Republic of Ireland goalkeeper Caoimhin Kelleher from Liverpool in an £18million deal having seen Mark Flekken join Bundesliga side Bayer Leverkusen. Kelleher made 20 appearances last season – largely in two spells when Alisson Becker was injured – and collected a Premier League winners' medal to go with his two Carabao Cup successes, but wanted more first-team football. The 26-year-old told the club's official website: 'I felt for my own career that the time was right for me to go, to be a number one and to play every week.' 🏆 #NationsLeague Finals Matchweek! 🙌🤩🎉 — UEFA Nations League DE (@EURO2024DE) June 2, 2025 Germany and Portugal go head-to-head in the first Nations League semi-final with either Spain or France awaiting the winners. Meanwhile the early transfer window rumbles on, with Tottenham's Son Heung-min the latest player said to be attracting interest from Saudi Arabia, Brentford forward Bryan Mbeumo linked with a move to Manchester United, Cesc Fabregas reportedly in line for the vacant Inter Milan job and AC Milan goalkeeper Mike Maignan a rumoured target for Chelsea.