Philippines' Marcos says China 'misinterpreted' his comments on Taiwan
China accused Marcos of "playing with fire" after the Philippine leader said during a visit to India that "there is no way that the Philippines can stay out of it" due to its proximity to the democratically governed island.
"We are, I think for propaganda purposes, misinterpreted," Marcos told a press briefing.
"I'm a little bit perplexed why it would be characterized as such, as playing with fire," he added.
China's embassy in Manila did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Marcos said Filipinos working and living in Taiwan will have to be evacuated if a conflict does arise but maintained that he wishes to avoid confrontation and war.
Over a hundred thousand Filipinos live and work in Taiwan, according to Philippine government data.
"War over Taiwan will drag the Philippines kicking and screaming into the conflict. That is what I was trying to say," Marcos said.
Marcos' comments come at a time of heightened tensions between Manila and Beijing over territorial disputes in the South China Sea.
A 2016 ruling of an international arbitral tribunal voided Beijing's sweeping claims in the region, saying they had no basis under international law, a decision China rejects.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
31 minutes ago
- Reuters
Trump asked Polish President Nawrocki to replace Tusk in Ukraine meeting
WARSAW, Aug 13 (Reuters) - U.S. President Donald Trump at the last minute requested MAGA-allied Polish President Karol Nawrocki join the Ukraine teleconference with European leaders on Wednesday, according to centrist Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk, Nawrocki's bitter political rival who had been expected to attend. Nawrocki, a conservative nationalist and eurosceptic, is an ally of Trump's right-wing populist MAGA political movement and visited the White House during Poland's presidential election campaign this year. He defeated the candidate of Tusk's pro-European, centrist party in June. "Just before midnight yesterday we received information, alongside our European partners, that the American side would prefer that Poland was represented by the president in contacts with President Trump," Tusk told a news conference. The White House did not comment whether the U.S. requested Nawrocki rather than Tusk take part in the call. A Polish government spokesperson said on Tuesday that Tusk, a former head of the European Council of leaders, would attend the call with Trump. But Nawrocki foreign policy adviser Marcin Przydacz told reporters he had "no information that Prime Minister Donald Tusk had previously planned to participate." He said Tusk's team showed it did not have good contacts with the Trump administration because it was under the impression Tusk would take part. Government spokesman Adam Szlapka said Tusk was representing Poland in two calls on Wednesday with European leaders but not Trump. Przydacz said the offices of the president and prime minister would exchange information about the meetings. European leaders and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy spoke to Trump ahead of the U.S. president's summit with Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin in Alaska on Friday, stressing the need to protect Kyiv's interests. Krzysztof Izdebski, policy director at the Batory Foundation, said having two political opponents represent Poland created a risk of mixed messages. "This shows that, even in foreign policy, in such a key issue of security, we are simply hostage to internal politics and a certain competition between various state bodies," he said. He said this would undermine Poland's effort to present itself as a modern country working with leading nations on international political issues. Nawrocki and PiS are strong supporters of Ukraine in its war with invading Russian forces, as is Tusk and his government, but they differ on issues such as abortion, family values and the rule of law. Tusk said that he respected the U.S. request to keep contacts at the presidential level, but this should not be used to "play Poles against each other".
Times
35 minutes ago
- Times
Tulip Siddiq ‘used influence over her aunt to acquire land for family'
Tulip Siddiq used her 'special power' as an MP in Britain to exert influence over her aunt, the former prime minister of Bangladesh, to acquire state-owned land, an anti-corruption trial was told. Prosecutors in Bangladesh allege that Siddiq applied pressure on Sheikh Hasina, who was deposed as the country's leader last year, to secure plots of land for her mother, brother, and sister. Siddiq, 42, resigned as the anti-corruption minister in Sir Keir Starmer's government in January over 'reputational risks' from her family's links with the Hasina regime. The MP is not attending the trial at Dhaka Special Judge Court 4, which formally began on Wednesday, and has described the case against her as 'persecution and a farce'. • Joy and trepidation in Bangladesh a year since ousting of Sheikh Hasina She claims to have become 'collateral damage' in a power struggle between her aunt and Muhammad Yunus, Hasina's replacement as leader in the south Asian country. Officials from the Anti-Corruption Commission (ACC) told the court that Siddiq played a central role in acquiring plots of land for relatives in the diplomatic zone of Dhaka in 2022. The court was told that Siddiq had learnt that her aunt had 'used her power' to acquire plots in the Purbachal New Town Project, a long-running land development programme operated by a government agency, Rajuk. Siddiq is then said to have 'simultaneously used her special power to exert pressure and influence on her aunt', according to Afnan Jannat Keya, an ACC assistant director. He said that this led to plots being allotted to her mother, Sheikh Rehana; her sister, Azmina Siddique; and her brother, Radwan Mujib Siddiq. • Tulip Siddiq's flyers found in palace of deposed Bangladesh leader Siddiq is also accused of seeking to influence the secretary of the Ministry of Housing and Public Works and other officials on the instructions of her aunt to acquire a plot for her sister. 'In view of this, the Ministry of Housing and Public Works issued a letter to the chairman of Rajuk to proceed with the allotment,' the court heard. Siddiq is alleged to own a flat in the upmarket Gulshan neighbourhood of the capital, Dhaka, which investigators say should have ruled her out from availing of the award of land under the scheme. The ACC is examining claims that Hasina and her family misappropriated billions of pounds of state money during her 15-year reign. Hasina, who is living in exile in India after fleeing during mass protests, faces trial in absentia for crimes against humanity during her time in power. Judge Muhammad Rabiul Alam heard the opening statements from three ACC officials relating to three cases on Wednesday. SM Rashidul Hasan, another ACC assistant director, named Tulip Siddiq among 16 people who are accused of offences, including her brother and aunt. The judge set aside August 28 for the next stage in the trial, when prosecution witnesses and evidence will be presented. In a statement published on Monday, Siddiq claimed that she had yet to receive a summons, adding: 'No fair legal process should begin with a media headline. Unfortunately that's what I have been handed out. No engagement. No evidence. Not even a response to legitimate inquiries from my lawyers.' In an interview in The Guardian, she said: 'I'm yet to see a summons … I'm supposedly days away from a showcase trial in a foreign country, and I still don't know what the charges are. 'I feel a bit like I'm trapped in this Kafkaesque nightmare where I've been put on trial and I genuinely haven't found out what the allegations are.' The ACC's prosecutor, Muhammad Tariqul Islam, said Bangladeshi authorities had served notices on each of the accused, instructing them to appear before the court as the trial began. 'If any of them want to contest the allegations, they must appear before the court,' he told reporters outside the courtroom. None of those accused has engaged counsel to represent them at the trial. Prosecutors have separately disputed Siddiq's claims not to have Bangladeshi citizenship, claiming they have unearthed her Bangladeshi passport and identity card. In 2017 she said: 'I am not Bangladeshi.' Asked about her nationality, Mohammad Sultan Mahmud, another ACC prosecutor, said all necessary documents relating to Siddiq and her family would be produced during the trial. Siddiq's lawyers, from Stephenson Harwood, denied that such documents existed and said that she has not had a Bangladeshi passport since she was a child. The MP for Hampstead & Highgate has always denied wrongdoing and accused the Bangladeshi authorities of a 'targeted and baseless' campaign against her. 'I'm collateral damage, because of this feud between Muhammad Yunus and my aunt,' she said. 'These are wider forces that I'm battling against.' She resigned from the Labour frontbench after referring herself to the ministerial standards adviser after reports that she had lived in London properties with links to Hasina. Siddiq had initially claimed that a £650,000 flat in King's Cross in London was given to her by her parents. It later transpired, however, that the flat had been paid for by a developer and associate of figures in the Awami League, Hasina's party.
Daily Mail
35 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Insider shares insights on Trump's diplomatic tactics
As crunch talks were underway between the United States and China in Donald Trump 's first term, Xi Jinping 's negotiating team used every trick in the book to unsettle the American side. Shortly before a key meeting took place, as the U.S. team was about to set out from their embassy in Beijing , the Chinese delivered a follow-up to a carefully prepared negotiating document for the talks. It was in Chinese, without an English translation. Then, when Trump's negotiating team got to the Diaoyutai State Guesthouse for the meeting, they discovered there were one too few chairs for them. One of the U.S. negotiators had to leave the room. 'We're sitting in a secure facility, a team of tens of people that have come over from the U.S., and we looked at the document they provided. It was in Chinese, it was not at all responsive to the draft we sent before travelling to Beijing,' Mitchell Silk, former Assistant Secretary of the Treasury, told the Daily Mail. Silk shared his insights on Trump's diplomatic tactics ahead of the president's historic showdown with Vladimir Putin in Alaska on Friday. 'They completely disregarded our document. They delivered up something that they wanted to use for the negotiations,' Silk said of the Chinese ahead of the 2019 summit with Trump. In his upcoming book 'A Seat at the Table,' Silk, who speaks two dialects of Chinese, recounts how he quickly translated the document in the car en route to the talks with Secretary of the Treasury Steven Mnuchin. When they got there Mnuchin made it clear the Americans weren't meeting for the sake of it. 'He was just very short and very simple, he was perfectly gracious in, thanking the Vice Premier for his kind and warm welcome. He acknowledged receipt of the document, and he just took our document, waved it around, and said, thank you but I think we're going to be using our document for these discussions, and that's exactly what we did,' said Silk. 'There was no funny business. There were no games. We were there to do business, and we weren't having any of it.' He added :'If it had been another administration, another time, and this is probably what was happening in these endless, meaningless meetings prior to Trump, somebody would have said, well, you know, maybe we should we use their document? There was none of that. Psychologically, we weren't having it, and we made that very clear.' During the talks, which led to Trump's first trade deal with China in 2020, every little detail of protocol had been worked out over preceding weeks, including who was going to sit where. But when everybody sat down, right before the then Chinese Vice Premier Liu He spoke, it was clear that there was one chair missing. Someone on the American side had to leave the room, and one of the dedicated career civil servants took the fall. Later, outside of the main room, Silk engaged with the head of protocol from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs. It emerged that the Chinese felt snubbed because the Vice Premier had not been granted an Oval Office audience when he was in Washington just weeks prior. 'Our understanding was the chair was their way of getting back at us, rather petty,' said Silk. Ultimately, the head of the Chinese central bank, Yi Gang, was walking by and Silk told him: 'Mr. Governor, when you are next in Washington, please join me at my house for a dinner. I will put out a lavish spread for you with the finest of drink and the finest of food, and you can have as many chairs as you like.' The American team got their chair back. It was yet another example of the psychological games that Trump will face in his upcoming tariff negotiations with the Chinese. This week, President Trump extended a trade truce with China for another 90 days, delaying a dangerous showdown between the world's two biggest economies. The previous deadline was set to expire at 12:01am on Tuesday. Had that happened the U.S. could have ratcheted up taxes on Chinese imports from an already high 30 percent, and Beijing could have responded by raising retaliatory levies on U.S. exports to China. Key has been the use of executive power to deploy tariffs as leverage. 'He's come out swinging, using tariffs imposed under executive order, so presidential authority, as an economic weapon, and he started that literally in the first days of the administration,' said Silk. 'The heavy and the quick action certainly rattled the markets, but I believe that the president was playing for long-term economic leverage.' The tariffs have been 'much sharper, they're more targeted, and they're higher than before.' Behind that was a strategy to 'clear the decks' of other trading partners, securing quick deals with them, so that he could focus on China. 'My take is that the initial move was designed to get initial action out of a certain set of countries (including the UK, EU, Japan and South Korea), and push a second group of countries further down the road, try to pick them off one by one.' He added: 'And then you've got the most difficult countries, and the number one, without a close second in that group, is China.' Realistically, the China negotiation is probably a 12-to-18 month process, he said.
