Fact Check: These sadhus were NOT attacked for hiding cameras in a temple changing room
India Today Fact Check, however, found that while a similar incident did occur in Ghaziabad last year, the viral clip is actually from West Bengal.Our ProbeReverse-searching keyframes from the viral video led us to an article containing its screenshot, which stated that the video was from January 2024, when people stripped and beat up sadhus in West Bengal's Purulia district. Many on social media had shared this video along with other footage of the incident at the time.The article also contained a post by the Purulia District Police dated January 13, 2024. It stated that on January 11, 2024, a misunderstanding took place between three Gangasagar-bound sadhus and local minor girls. Locals then manhandled the sadhus and vandalised their vehicle, alleging a kidnapping attempt. Twelve people were arrested, and there was no communal angle to it. We also found many news reports about the 2024 incident from Purulia.pic.twitter.com/f0E8Mdi3IA— Purulia Police (@PuruliaPolice) January 13, 2024We then looked for news reports about the incident in Uttar Pradesh, as mentioned in viral posts. We found that a similar incident occurred in Ghaziabad in May 2024. At the time, a hidden camera was found in a women's changing room near a temple in Muradnagar, Ghaziabad, on May 21, 2024.An FIR was lodged against temple caretaker Mukesh Goswami for allegedly installing the camera and watching its live feed. Mukesh absconded, and a reward of Rs 1 lakh was announced for his arrest.Police also demolished the changing room while removing encroachments at the site of the incident. However, in October 2024, the Allahabad High Court granted anticipatory bail to Goswami.The DCP of the Rural Commissionerate, Ghaziabad, on August 4 also posted that the viral video was unrelated to the Ghaziabad incident and that police had already taken action in the matter.So, while a similar incident did take place in Ghaziabad last year, the video of people beating up sadhus has nothing to do with it.- EndsMust Watch
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
33 minutes ago
- Time of India
'Parasakthi' producer Aakash Baskaran's Tasmac case, Madras High Court slaps Rs. 30,000 fine on ED
In April, enforcement officials conducted raids at the Tasmac headquarters and several liquor factories in connection with a large-scale fraud allegedly taking place at the Tasmac Corporation. Authorities said that a fraud of around ₹1,000 crore had taken place at that time. Searches were conducted at the homes and offices of 'Parasakthi' producer Aakash Baskaran and businessman Vikram Ravindran in connection with the matter. At the end of the investigation, Vikram Ravindran's assets were sealed. Here's a detailed report. Aakash Baskaran and Vikram Ravindran move court to lift asset seal Aakash Baskaran and Vikram Ravindran filed a case in the Madras High Court against this action. In this case, they demanded that the enforcement department's action be stayed and that the seal placed on their properties be removed. According to Nakkheeran, during the trial, Aakash Baskaran was ordered to return the seized documents, and an order was issued to temporarily halt further proceedings. ED seeks more time during August 6 hearing The case came up for hearing again on August 6. On this occasion, the lawyer appearing for the Enforcement Directorate said that the reply petition has not yet been prepared. Therefore, he requested more time. The judges expressed their strong dissatisfaction with this. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Mr. Bala's Powerful Intraday Strategy Revealed – No More Guesswork TradeWise Learn More Undo The judges also strongly criticized that not responding even after being granted time twice was not proper practice. Court imposes Rs. 30,000 fine on ED for procedural lapse The Enforcement Directorate stated that it was required to file a joint response and requested that time be granted only this time. But the judges opposed it and imposed a fine of Rs. 10,000 each, for a total of ₹30,000 on the enforcement department. The court ordered that this amount be paid to the Chief Justice of the Madras High Court's relief fund and adjourned the next hearing of the case to the 20th.
The Print
37 minutes ago
- The Print
ED attaches Rs 29,176 from bank account used to receive ISIS funds for 2022 Mangaluru IED blast
At one time, the account received more than Rs 3 lakh of which the terror module had spent more than Rs 2 lakh. It was part of the overall funds passed on to terror accused Mohammed Shariq and his aides, including Syed Yasin, the ED spokesperson said. The bank account was used to allegedly fund various nefarious activities such as online purchase of items to assemble an Improvised Explosive Device (IED), hiring hideouts in Mysuru city as well as in conducting reconnaissance of different places in Tamil Nadu, Kerala and Karnataka, an ED spokesperson said Wednesday. New Delhi: The Enforcement Directorate (ED) has attached the money lying in the bank account of the 2022 Mangaluru bomb blast accused, who allegedly used to receive funds from his ISIS handler. The account came under the ED lens after the Karnataka police booked Shariq alias Premraj, a resident of Shivamogga district, for orchestrating an IED blast near Kankanady railway station in Mangaluru on 20 November, 2022. From the spot, the local police had found a pressure cooker, 9-volt batteries and circuits generally used for assembling IEDs. In the further course of investigation, chemicals, mechanical tools and electrical items—required to assemble IEDs—were seized from Shariq's rented accommodation in Mysuru. Days later, the case was handed over to the National Investigation Agency (NIA). In its charge sheet, the NIA submitted that Shariq was on the way to plant the IED concealed in pressure cooker outside Manjunatha temple in Dharmasthala. However, the IED went off because the timer was set at nine seconds instead of an initially planned time of 90 minutes, leaving Shariq with 40 percent burn injuries. All these accused are in judicial custody and are now facing trial. Also Read: 'Bare allegations'—how Malegaon ruling debunked ATS & NIA's theories on RDX, conspiracy meetings Online DIY classes A couple of months before the blast, the Shivamogga police booked Shariq, Yasin and Munir Ahmed alias Maz on the charge of hatching a conspiracy to spread the ISIS ideology. The trio, according to the FIR, was working to bring Sharia law as they believed India never really got independent. The trio had stored explosives and exploded a bomb outside Yasin's house in Shivamogga, it added. The NIA registered a case on 15 November, 2022—five days before the Mangaluru IED blast mistakenly triggered by Shariq. An ISIS handler with the pseudonym 'Colonel' radicalised the trio along with at least nine other youth from across Karnataka and gave them instructions through applications such as Wickr and Telegram on how to assemble IEDs, according to the counter-terrorism agency. The handler, it said, had also trained them online on carrying out reconnaissance of sensitive targets such as power sub-stations, railways, telephone access points, as well as business and industries belonging to individuals of the Hindu community. The handler had arranged payment channels through cryptocurrency, which were sold and deposited into mule bank accounts opened with Fino Payments Bank, the NIA alleged. Through the same method, the accused received Rs 2.86 lakh, while funds amounting to Rs 41,680 were collected in cash from PoS (Point of Sale) agents. The money was used to purchase items online to assemble the IED, for hiring hideouts in Mysuru city and other locations, and also for conducting reconnaissance in Tamil Nadu, Kerala, and Karnataka, the NIA said. The police seized Rs 39,228 in cash from Shriq's bag when he was admitted to a hospital after being injured in the IED blast. The remaining Rs 29,176 in Yasin's bank account was disabled on the ED's instruction. (Edited by Tony Rai) Also Read: Web of spoof sites, scam call centres. Crypto theft racket modus operandi in focus amid ED crackdown
Scroll.in
an hour ago
- Scroll.in
Lakhimpur Kheri violence: SC questions UP Police inaction on witness' complaint of threat, bribe
The Supreme Court on Thursday questioned the Uttar Pradesh Police for not acting on a witness' complaint that he was threatened with 'dire consequences' and offered a bribe not to testify in the 2021 Lakhimpur Kheri violence case involving former Union minister Ajay Mishra's son Ashish Mishra, Live Law reported. A bench comprising Justices Surya Kant, Ujjal Bhuyan and N Kotiswar Singh directed the police to verify the allegations. On June 20, Baljinder Singh filed a written complaint alleging that an unidentified person offered him Rs 1 lakh and threatened him with consequences if he testified in the case, Advocate Prashant Bhushan, appearing for the complainant, told the court. Bhushan added that despite the written complaint, no first information report had been registered, Live Law reported. The Uttar Pradesh Police reportedly claimed that Singh had not appeared in person, which is why the FIR was not filed. The court said this explanation was unsatisfactory. 'In case the complainant has been reluctant in coming forward in support of his complaint, some senior police officer can be deputed to visit the complainant…to verify if complaint has been made by him,' Live Law quoted the bench as saying. 'If such contents are acknowledged it is imperative for police to investigate.' The court also directed the senior superintendent of police in Lucknow to verify the complaint and file an affidavit along with a fresh status report. The case pertains to the death of eight persons, including four farmers, on October 3, 2021, as violence had broken out after a vehicle belonging to Ashish Mishra had allegedly run over a group of demonstrators. The violence had taken place in Lakhimpur Kheri district of Uttar Pradesh during a protest against the Union government's farm laws that were later repealed. During the hearing on Thursday, Bhushan also said that if Singh's allegations were found to be credible, Ashish Mishra's bail would have to be cancelled. He was granted bail by the Supreme Court in July 2024. Ashish Mishra's counsel opposed this, claiming the allegations lacked evidence. He told the court that 20 witnesses had already been examined by the trial court, while another 20 had been dropped by the prosecution. He also claimed that although the trial court was hearing the case thrice a month, 'nobody turns up'. While Bhushan requested a day-to-day hearing, the bench declined, saying it could impact other pending cases.
