African Parks: Charity linked to Prince Harry admits human rights abuses in Congo-Brazzaville
A major conservation charity linked to Prince Harry has admitted that human rights abuses were committed by its rangers in Congo-Brazzaville, following an independent review into allegations made by members of the Baka community against African Parks rangers.In a report published last year by the British newspaper the Mail on Sunday, community members accused African Parks rangers of beating, waterboarding and raping locals to stop them from accessing their ancestral forests, which are now in a conservation area.But despite commissioning an independent review into the actions of its rangers in Congo-Brazzaville, African Parks has not made the findings of the review public. Instead, it has published a statement acknowledging that human rights abuses occurred in the Odzala-Kokoua National Park, which it manages. It has excluded details of the abuse.
The review, carried out by Omnia Strategy LLP, a London-based law firm headed by Cherie Blair, was handed directly to African Parks. In a statement, Omnia said it has been carrying out an independent investigation into the alleged abuse in Odzala-Kokoua since December 2023.Its statement did not include its findings and recommendations, which it said had been sent directly to African Parks.
The BBC reached out to both Omnia and barristers from Doughty Street Chambers, which was involved in the investigation, to request their findings, but they declined to comment beyond their published statement.The BBC has also requested comment from Prince Harry.African Parks said it had improved its safeguarding processes in the past five years both in the Odzala-Kokoua National Park and institutionally. Additional measures it has put in place include appointing an anthropologist to ensure the Baka communities are better supported, working with local human rights NGOs to support the local community and it will carry out an independent human rights impact assessment.The charity Survival International, which lobbies for the rights of indigenous people, and raised the issue of the abuse of the Baka people with Prince Harry, criticised African Park's decision not to make the findings of the investigation public. Survival told the BBC "African Parks has committed to more reports, more staff and more guidelines – but such approaches have not prevented horrific abuses and violations of international human rights law in the decade or more that African Parks has known of these atrocities, and there is no reason to believe they will do so now".When the allegation were first made public last year, Survival said that African Parks had known about the alleged abuse of the Baka people since 2013. At the time, African Parks said it had reached out to Survival to find out more, but that the latter had refused to cooperate. Survival said it wished to protect its sources in the local community for fear of retaliation.African Parks, which is headquartered in Johannesburg, is arguably one of Africa's largest conservation charities. It manages 23 protected areas in 13 African countries, and is backed by powerful patrons.Prince Harry sits on its board and has been involved with the charity since 2016. In 2023, after serving six years as president, he was made a member of the Board of Directors, the governing body of the organisation.On its website, African Parks lists a number of high-profile donors including the European Union, Rob Walton, heir to the Walmart fortune, and Howard Buffett, son of Warren Buffet. In its 2023 annual report, the charity said its funders provided it with more than $500,000 (£375,000) per year.
Why leaving his own charity in Lesotho will matter so much to Prince HarryHarry's emotional avalanche hits the Royal FamilySlicing veggies, baking cakes - will Meghan's rebrand work?
Go to BBCAfrica.com for more news from the African continent.Follow us on Twitter @BBCAfrica, on Facebook at BBC Africa or on Instagram at bbcafrica
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scottish Sun
42 minutes ago
- Scottish Sun
Mum wins £11k payout from Premier League star who ‘helped his brother dodge child support payments to daughter, two'
PAID UP Mum wins £11k payout from Premier League star who 'helped his brother dodge child support payments to daughter, two' A MUM has won an £11,000 payout from a Premier League star accused of helping his brother dodge child support payments for his young daughter, she claims. Chelsea ace Tosin Adarabioyo allegedly funds older brother Fisayo's extravagant lifestyle, paying for a £2.9million mansion, giving him a monthly income and a credit card to go shopping with. Advertisement 5 Nadia Messaoud during a protest outside Chelsea's Stamford Bridge stadium Credit: Nadia Messaoud 5 Nadia has won an £11,000 payout from the Premier League star Credit: PP. 5 Tosin Adarabioyo allegedly funds older brother Fisayo's extravagant lifestyle Credit: Shutterstock Editorial The Sun snapped photos of flashy Fisayo, 30, a former pro-footballer, carrying a £3,140 Bottega Veneta leather briefcase. But despite his millionaire lifestyle, Fisayo has yet to pay a penny towards his two-year-old daughter Anara's upbringing after telling the Child Maintenance Service he's skint, it is claimed. Anara's struggling mum Nadia Messaoud, 41, who dated Fisayo for a year before they split in 2022, said she was forced to take action after being ignored. She took civil action against Chelsea defender Tosin for funding his brother while allegedly knowing of his sibling's obligations. Advertisement Legal documents relating to the civil action, seen by The Sun, state: 'The defendant (Tosin) has been knowingly providing his older brother, Fisayo Adarabioyo, with an income that is not being declared to HMRC or the child maintenance service. 'This is with the intention to obstruct my daughter's legal right to obtain child maintenance. 'My child has for the last three years been awarded the nil level of CMS.' Nadia also alleged that as well as thousands of pounds a month in cash income, Tosin also provides his brother with a credit card to spend on. Advertisement According to Land Registry documents, Tosin, 27, thought to be on £120,000 a week at Chelsea, owns the Cheshire mansion in which Fisayo lives. The Department of Work and Pensions has awarded unemployed Fisayo a "nil rate" on child support for the past three years because he claims he does not earn enough to pay. Nadia staged a protest outside Chelsea's Stamford Bridge stadium last month to raise awareness around her cause. She wore a vest top and held a sign both of which said: 'TOSIN #4 Women Matter, Children Matter, D.A (Domestic Abuse) survivors matter.' Advertisement She is backed by domestic abuse charity Women's Aid. Fisayo was convicted of harassment without violence in 2022 after turning up at Nadia's terraced home in Cheshire, banging on her door and leaving her terrified. He also bombarded her with texts, saying he hoped she miscarried the baby and threatened to kill her. After allegedly failing to respond to Nadia's legal claim, his brother Tosin has been ordered by the court to pay her £11,000. Advertisement However, Tosin's legal team told The Sun the order was a "default judgement" made in error "on the part of the court". Nadia said: "I've not received a penny from Fisayo to help with our daughter, while he's living a footballer's lifestyle thanks to his Chelsea playing brother. "I've been rebuffed at every opportunity which is why I decided to take legal action against both of them. "All I ever wanted was a reasonable level of financial support but Fisayo has claimed poverty. Now I know the truth. Advertisement "As a Premier League player Tosin is supposed to be a role model, but his actions have essentially blocked my daughter from receiving the financial support she's entitled to by law." Tosin's lawyers' statement added: "The Order arises from a default judgement which has been entered by the Court in a claim issued by Nadia Messaoud against our client ('the Claim'). Unfortunately, it would appear that our client's strike out application has not been properly processed by the Court and it has therefore allowed automatic default judgement to be entered in favour of Ms Messaoud. "This is a very serious administrative failing on the Court's part and one which we are addressing with the Court on our client's behalf. Advertisement Inappropriately, she made an application for judgement in default, despite being served with that application. "Your summary is not a fair and accurate report of anything that has taken place in the Court proceedings." They added that as well as "chasing" the court, they have also made an application on their client's behalf "to have the default judgement order set aside". "In summary therefore, the Order which you have seen is subject to an active challenge, and should never have been issued by the Court in the first place." Advertisement They said the claim is a "pattern of behaviour" by Ms Messaoud "to exert unwanted pressure on our client to provide further funding to her". "Our client has no relationship with Ms Messaoud and owes no legal or other duties or obligations to her," the statement adds. The Sun has also contacted Fisayo's lawyer and Chelsea for comment. 5 Fisayo Adarabioyo seen in January this year carrying a £3,140 Bottega Veneta leather briefcase Credit: PP. Advertisement
BBC News
an hour ago
- BBC News
Diddy ex-girlfriend 'Jane' testify for im sex-trafficking trial
For di fourth week of Diddy trial, we hia wetin one of im ex girlfriends "Jane" tok about dia relationship wey last from 2021 to 2024. She be di last woman wey di rapper, Sean "Diddy" Combs date bifor dem arrest am for 2024. According to di woman, dia relationship bin start for one girls trip wey she bin take go Miami. Di relationship come move from "head-over-heels" love enta relationship wey be say she must to dey sex prostitutes and even sef, e make am dey abuse drugs. Tori be say dis particular witness, fit take dis case enta Monday bifor even just di direct questioning sef go finish. She tell di court say di relationship bin start on wetin she call "exciting whirlwind" wia Diddy go carry am go holiday, and ogbonge restaurants dem. She later testify say Combs later ask am to do wetin prosecutors dey call "hotel nights". Dis na wen Combs go bring prostitute so e go fit to watch am dey nack anoda man. "Jane" tell di court say she bin reason say na just one time tin but e turn dia relationship to anoda tin. She tok say she do di oda hotel nights bicos she "really love am" and "bin wan make am happy". But she tok say she bin tell Combs say she bin no wan do again. She say Combs bin also give am drugs like ecstasy cocaine and ketamine from wen dia relationship bin first start. She also testify say she bin use di drugs wen she dey wit Combs and also for di hotel nights. Prosecutors bin show court text message from di both of dem for early in dia relationship wia "Jane" tok say she wan nack escort, but na bicos na Diddy fantasy. But later in dia relationship, around dat kain September 2023, she come dey message Combs say e be like di only reason wey e want am na for "hotel nights", say she no wan do am again but still feel like she need to do am so she go get house to live. Bicos by dat time, Combs don alreadi dey pay her $10,000 per month house rent for am for di past five months. Combs bin reply back say, "girl, stop." Wetin Jane say dey happun during di "hotel nights" "Jane" start to dey cry as she tell court how di mata of di "hotel nights" bin happun. Di jury even hear one recording wia Jane tok say she bin dey ask Combs weda she go fit use protection wit di prostitute. She tell di court say Combs bin dey disappointed wit dat question and na im bin dey control everytin wey bin dey happun for di "hotel nights". She say na Combs dey decide how many prostitutes go take part, how long e go last and wen she go finish. She also tok say sometimes, she go cry afta di marathon "hotel nights". She tok say she remember wen Combs call am make she come do one short one. Dat "short" one last for 18 hours. She say Combs bin give her drugs say, "I bin dey so high". She tell di court say Diddy look disgusted wen e see her as she dey cry and e bin wan comot but she beg am make e stay, as she explain am give court, "I bin just wan dey im arms". She tell di court say di longest "hotel night" bin last for three and half days. On a normal day, e fit last for 24 hours to 30 hours without any sleep. She tell court say na combination of drugs, caffeine and protein shakes. Jane tell court say her only rule na say make di prostitutes no take drugs bicos she bin no sure how e go affect dia control. But she tale am so di hotel nights go dey easier and feel less real. "Jane" remember say na just two times wey she decide say she no go do drugs to take do "hotel night". She tell court say na for October 2023, and she bin dey push Combs make e dey sober and healthier. E gree but say make dem do one last sobriety party wey last 12-18 hours. She say afta she run di "normal routine" wit two prostitutes, she go vomit for bathroom. Na so Combs go meet am for bathroom say e good say she don dey feel beta, from wia she don finish to dey throw up, e tell am say di third guy dey wait. As di testimony dey go on, Diddy just dey look "Jane" from im chair, sometimes e dey look di jury sha. "Jane" also tell di court tori of di network of employees wey Combs get wey dey help am get drugs. Dis dey come as one of di charges wey Combs dey face na racketeering. And prosecutors need to prove say e bin dey run criminal business and bin dey conspire to commit crimes. She say one time Combs Chief of Staff Kristina Khorram bin tell her to carry package of drugs form Los Angeles go Diddy mansion for Miami. She bin ask if e dey safe to which Khorram tell am say, "e dey fine, I dey do am all di time". "Jane" come tell court say na so she collect di package from one member of Comb security, carry am as check-in luggage go Miami, and na afta she land she find out say e bin dey full of ecstasy. "Jane" add for her testimony say she dey normally see Combs as e dey call im assistants and security say make dem carry drugs come di hotels wia she dey nack prostitutes.
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Global aid cuts are a massive wake-up call. It's time to give Africa a bigger voice
In less than a month, Seville will host the Fourth International Conference on Financing for Development in a climate of uncertainty following the abrupt decision by the US to dismantle its aid programmes. But Washington is not alone in this posture. The European Union agreed to reallocate €2 billion (£1.7bn) reallocation from development budgets in February 2024 —and many individual European countries have made cuts to their aid budget. It is a clear signal that the landscape of Overseas Development Assistance (ODA) is shifting. For Africa, this isn't just a reshuffle, it is a wake-up call for deep reflection and action: will we adapt, or will aid simply become a relic of the past? The timing is bad, the rationale questionable, and the ripple effects threaten to impact the lives and health of millions depending on aid programmes. Let's be honest: aid has had a mixed impact. The spectrum of aid's legacy in Africa, including my country, Guinea, runs from positive to disastrous. On the positive side, aid has contributed to infrastructure development – I'm thinking for instance about a project in northwest Guinea to replace an old ferry with a new road and bridge. During a visit, a cunning minister of public works convinced a skeptical partner to go on a very 'special' field trip via the old route, one that left a senior official so sore and tired that all doubters saw the project's true necessity. Once it was completed, traffic soared, proof that aid can work when it's aligned with real needs. But aid can fall flat. When I was serving as minister of finance, I led efforts to curb directly awarded contracts and boost transparency following an audit of public procurement procedures. The goal was to improve the quality and cost-effectiveness of public spending. But some donors were not willing to support this effort. I deplored one particular partner's failure to listen and, above all, a stubborn insistence on taking us backwards by ignoring our analysis. I said no to the help on offer. It was hard but necessary. Aid must serve the real priorities, not satisfy bureaucratic checkboxes. In a recent discussion with the director of an incubator to help small and medium-sized businesses grow – funded by a government donor – I was struck by the emergence of shortcomings I thought belonged to the past. These included a laziness to question one's own model for delivering results, despite warnings about the risks of inefficiency. We also see a narrow focus on so-called "easily accessible" geographic areas, such as capitals, and on disbursements. Aid, in many cases, has helped sustain corrupt elites or fostered unhealthy alliances with public administrations – perpetuating dependency rather than solving problems. When I look back on my own experience in development – a journey close to an out-of-body experience for an African – I realise we are at a critical juncture. It's the moment to question the very foundations of aid institutions inherited from the post-colonial era. Despite some positive reforms, such as untying aid, the core premise remains unequal. It is predominantly driven by the donors, with African countries still being passive recipients rather than active partners. How can this be changed? Change starts with listening. The 'receiving hand' is not dumb and has ideas. It knows its needs. Recipient countries, especially in Africa, must be at the centre of the discussions. Conversations largely driven by donors are a recipe for failure. Furthermore, African organisations and think-tanks must be active players. Decolonising aid must be more than just a buzzword. We are making progress, but it must be accelerated. We continue to see consultancies denied opportunities due to insufficient financial strength – despite their thorough knowledge of the field. It also means better coordination between donors. You would think this is obvious, and yet despite witnessing many innovative and pragmatic approaches, I still see some partners continue to burden governments' limited capacities by each imposing their own distinct systems and reporting requirements. This ends up being a distraction. Recipient governments are key and are the only ones who should replace any donor. I believe the cuts could be an opportunity to make fiscal compromises that (finally) prioritise the necessary and the productive over the superfluous and the personal gain of some actors. Aid must be used strategically and selectively. It should foster technical cooperation for Africa's economic transformation, its integration higher in global value chains. Aid should be a catalyst to reform the global financial architecture by leveraging innovation and the capital needed to finance our massive infrastructure programmes. It must be an instrument for the Africa Union's theme of the year: "Justice for Africans and People of African Descent Through Reparations'. It's time to make sure those people are at the table, and their voices are listened to.
