
Najib given DNAA in SRC money laundering case
KUALA LUMPUR : Former prime minister Najib Razak has been granted a discharge not amounting to an acquittal (DNAA) in his RM27 million SRC International Sdn Bhd money laundering case.
Justice K Muniandy made the ruling in the High Court this morning.
'In the present case there is nothing to show that the prosecution is able to proceed with the case for the time being, or proceed within a reasonable time.
'Thus, it is unlikely that the case could proceed expeditiously in the short future.
'The deputy public prosecutor had graciously considered in this Court a question put to him if the prosecution would be prejudiced if an order of DNAA as requested for by counsel for the accused is allowed—and his answer was a resounding no.
'Thus, the circumstances of the case lean in favour of the accused whereby the prosecution as of today is not ready to proceed with the trial of the preferred charges against the accused,' the judge said in his brief judgement.
Muniandy also took note that for six years since the case was brought against Najib in 2019, no witness testimony has been pursued but only a plethora of postponements, indicating that the prosecution is not ready with the prosecution of the case.
'Once the accused is charged in court, the charge cannot be hanging over its head for an indeterminate or indefinite period.
That would be harsh and illegal,' he said.
Last week, Najib's counsel Shafee Abdullah submitted that it was unfair for his client to wait indefinitely for a fixed trial date as the prosecution was unable to provide a timeline to gather exhibits used in the previous SRC trial.
The court was told that 807 exhibits were tendered in the earlier SRC trial.
Najib, 71, had asked for the three money laundering charges, brought against him in February 2019, to be withdrawn.
In a later case which began on April 3, 2019, Najib was slapped with seven charges of abuse of power, money laundering and criminal breach of trust involving RM42 million in SRC funds.
On July 28, 2020, the High Court convicted the former prime minister of all seven charges. His appeals from conviction and sentence were dismissed by the Court of Appeal on Dec 8, 2021 and the Federal Court on Aug 23, 2022.
He received a partial pardon in January last year and is currently serving a reduced six-year prison term.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Sun
3 hours ago
- The Sun
Defamation case: Caprice ordered to ‘archive' 31 posts
KUALA LUMPUR: The High Court has ordered rapper Caprice to archive 31 allegedly defamatory Instagram posts targeting entrepreneur Muhammad Asyraf Khalid. Judge Datuk Anand Ponnudurai granted an ex-parte ad-interim injunction following a suit filed by Muhammad Asyraf, stepson of Datuk Seri Siti Nurhaliza Tarudin. Lawyer Abdul Hakeem Aiman confirmed the posts must be archived immediately until the inter-parte injunction hearing on September 2. Caprice, whose real name is Ariz Ramli, has yet to file a defence statement in response to the lawsuit. Muhammad Asyraf initiated the suit on August 4, citing defamatory posts published between July 30 and August 2. The posts allegedly portrayed Muhammad Asyraf negatively for hosting Murad Zaidi, his personal trainer, on a podcast. 'I invited Murad to discuss gym management challenges and clarify his Instagram statements denying allegations,' said Muhammad Asyraf. The posts also insinuated that Muhammad Asyraf misused family influence as the son of Datuk Seri Khalid Mohammad Jiwa. Despite not airing the full podcast episode, Caprice continued attacking Muhammad Asyraf publicly. The lawsuit claims Caprice's actions led to public backlash and tarnished Muhammad Asyraf's reputation. Muhammad Asyraf seeks an injunction to prevent further defamatory posts and demands their removal within 24 hours. He also requests a public video apology from Caprice across all social media platforms. The plaintiff is seeking general damages, aggravated damages, and legal costs. The case will proceed with an inter-parte hearing on September 2. - Bernama


New Straits Times
6 hours ago
- New Straits Times
Malaysia hopes cross-border e-hailing with Singapore can be implemented, says Loke
KUALA LUMPUR: Malaysia is open to introducing cross-border e-hailing services with Singapore, but the initiative must be pursued jointly by both countries, said Transport Minister Anthony Loke. "In principle, we hope that cross-border e-hailing can be implemented," he told the Dewan Rakyat today. He was responding to Tebrau member of parliament Jimmy Puah's question on cross-border traffic congestion and e-hailing drivers. Loke said that the government was ready to discuss the matter further with Singapore, but cautioned that it could not be a unilateral decision. "As a matter of principle and policy, we are ready to discuss with Singapore to enhance cross-border connectivity, but this cannot be carried out unilaterally. Both parties must agree before it can be implemented," he added. The minister explained that any proposal to allow cross-border e-hailing required in-depth discussions at the government-to-government level. "We hope to continue these discussions and hope that Singapore will respond positively so that this idea can become a reality," he said. On Aug 3, it was reported by a news portal that cross-border e-hailing services were one of the matters discussed between Johor Menteri Besar Datuk Onn Hafiz Ghazi and Singapore Acting Transport Minister Jeffrey Siow on Aug 1. However, the island state's Land Transport Authority (LTA) clarified that no decision was made on the issue and that it has no plans to fully liberalise Singapore-Malaysia cross-border point-to-point transport via ride-hail services.


Malaysiakini
6 hours ago
- Malaysiakini
Hanipa backs Muda's Zahid re-indictment push, Umno leaders cry foul
Former deputy law minister Hanipa Maidin has thrown his weight behind Muda's campaign to reopen corruption charges against Deputy Prime Minister Ahmad Zahid Hamidi, while Umno leaders accuse the party of judicial interference and opportunism. In a statement today, Hanipa said that Muda has 'every right' to launch its re-indictment campaign, citing the legal principle that a prima facie case had already been established against Zahid before he was granted a discharge not amounting to an acquittal (DNAA) in September 2023.