logo
The Sunday Independent's View: Time is running out for the Government to get a grip on housing

The Sunday Independent's View: Time is running out for the Government to get a grip on housing

For the Government, it offers an opportunity for reflection as it nears the halfway stage of its own first year. What has been achieved since coming into office again in January?
The administration has been accused of seeming less like a new broom than a threadbare old brush; not so much sweeping clean as brushing the country's problems under a rug to be tidied up later.
But defenders of the Fianna Fáil/Fine Gael-led Coalition would no doubt argue it has been faced with a series of obstacles since the start of the year, most notably the still unresolved threat of tariffs from Donald Trump.
There is also the worsening international ­situation, which last week saw Ireland join other countries in pulling embassy staff from Iran as the conflict with Israel continues.
These, however, are matters with which all our partners are having to deal. It is no excuse for not dealing robustly with domestic matters.
The legislation programme for the summer term of the Oireachtas lists a number of bills as a priority, including the Defence (Amendment) Bill which will remove the so-called triple-lock on Irish troops serving abroad, as well as measures tackling air pollution, cyber security and terrorism. All important matters, no question about it.
The logjam in planning and services is well documented
But none directly addresses the deepest issue confronting the country: that is, of course, the lack of supply, and crippling cost, of housing.
Last week there was more bad news as the Central Bank revised downward its forecast for the number of houses that will be built between now and 2027 — also the midway point of the 34th Dáil, a date which the Government may find itself careening towards at an alarming pace.
This year, it now expects 32,500 homes to be built, well short of what is needed to make a significant dent in the target of 300,000 by 2030.
The logjam in planning and services is well documented. Historically, it has often felt as if Irish bureaucracy stymies rather than stimulates innovation. No wonder we lag far behind comparable EU states when it comes to infrastructure.
The apparent lack of urgency to break through these roadblocks remains a bigger concern.
The Government already seems to have ­retreated into explaining rather than doing, as if seeking to justify in advance the failure to meet its own target, which it has already accepted is inevitable.
The appointment of the former HSE chief ­executive as chair of the newly revamped An ­Coimisiún Pleanála may make a difference.
If anyone has experience of cutting through red tape, it is Paul Reid. Health is another area where much-needed change sadly comes a cropper.
Ministers must act swiftly to hand him the power to green-light the infrastructure projects needed to house an estimated population of six million by 2040.
No other achievements by this Government will be worth a penny candle if the crisis in housing does not ease dramatically.
The summer recess is set to begin less than a month from now, on July 18. When TDs and senators return in September, all eyes will be on the presidential election and it will be the winter solstice before we know it.
It is still not too late to get a grip on housing, but it soon might be if more time is wasted.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

US launches strikes on three Iranian nuclear sites in high stakes war move
US launches strikes on three Iranian nuclear sites in high stakes war move

Irish Daily Mirror

timean hour ago

  • Irish Daily Mirror

US launches strikes on three Iranian nuclear sites in high stakes war move

The United States launched airstrikes on three Iranian sites on Sunday, joining Israel's ongoing conflict aimed at dismantling Iran's nuclear programme in a high-risk move to weaken a longstanding adversary, despite concerns of a wider regional conflict. In a statement from the White House, President Donald Trump claimed that Iran's key nuclear sites had been "completely and fully obliterated." However, there was no independent assessment of the damage. It remained unclear whether the US would continue to attack Iran alongside Israel, which has been engaged in a nine-day conflict with Iran. Trump warned Iran that any retaliation against the US would be met with further strikes. "There will either be peace or there will be tragedy for Iran," he stated, reports the Daily Record. The Atomic Energy Organisation of Iran confirmed that attacks had taken place on its Fordo, Isfahan, and Natanz sites but insisted that its work would not be halted. The decision to directly involve the US in the conflict comes after over a week of Israeli strikes on Iran, aimed at systematically destroying the country's air defences and offensive missile capabilities while damaging its nuclear enrichment facilities. However, US and Israeli officials believed that American stealth bombers and the 30,000-pound bunker-buster bomb they carry offered the best chance of destroying heavily fortified sites connected to the Iranian nuclear programme buried deep underground. "We have completed our very successful attack on the three Nuclear sites in Iran, including Fordow, Natanz, and Esfahan," Trump announced in a statement on social media. "All planes are now outside of Iran air space. A full payload of BOMBS was dropped on the primary site, Fordow. All planes are safely on their way home." In another emphatic social media post, Trump declared: "This is an HISTORIC MOMENT FOR THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ISRAEL, AND THE WORLD. IRAN MUST NOW AGREE TO END THIS WAR. THANK YOU!" Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu chimed in with acclamation for Trump's decisive move. In a video address, Netanyahu stated: "Your bold decision to target Iran's nuclear facilities, with the awesome and righteous might of the United States, will change history,". Trump had nothing but praise for US forces involved in the operation, proclaiming, "has done what no other country on earth could do." While officials were not forthcoming with specifics, Fox News host Sean Hannity revealed after his 9 p. m. broadcast that he had spoken directly with the President. Sharing exclusive intel, Hannity specified that the attack entailed six bunker-buster bombs being used on Fordo, while US submarines some 400 miles away fired a volley of 30 Tomahawk missiles towards Natanz and Isfahan's nuclear establishments. The intensity of military strikes has escalated dangerously due to Iran's promise to strike back at any US involvement in the Israeli conflict, posing international risks and personal jeopardy to Trump. His presidency was largely built on a promise to keep America free from costly foreign entanglements and his criticism of interventionist policies. U.N. Secretary-General Antonio Guterres conveyed his grave worries, saying he's "gravely alarmed" by the "dangerous escalation" resulting from US action. "There is a growing risk that this conflict could rapidly get out of control - with catastrophic consequences for civilians, the region, and the world," he highlighted in a formal statement. Friday saw President Trump assure journalists that he wasn't planning to send ground forces to Iran, describing ground troop deployment as "the last thing you want to do." He indicated earlier that his final decision would come within the next fortnight. Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, Iran's top authority, issued a stern warning to the US on Wednesday, asserting any attacks on the Islamic Republic would "result in irreparable damage for them." Esmail Baghaei Hamaneh, speaking for the Iranian Foreign Ministry, cautioned against US involvement suggesting it could lead to full-scale war in the area. Trump has repeatedly insisted that he will stop Iran from obtaining nuclear weapons, initially believing that the threat of military action would prompt Iran to peacefully abandon its nuclear programme. On Saturday, the Israeli military announced preparations for a potentially prolonged conflict, while Iran's foreign minister warned before the US strike that American military involvement "would be very, very dangerous for everyone." Tensions escalated as Iranian-backed Houthi rebels in Yemen vowed to resume targeting US vessels in the Red Sea if the Trump administration joined forces with Israel's military campaign, having previously halted such attacks in May under a US agreement. The US ambassador to Israel revealed that the US had initiated "assisted departure flights," marking the first such flights from Israel since the Hamas-led assault on 7 October 2023 that triggered the war in Gaza. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt announced on Thursday that Trump intended to make a decision on the strikes within a fortnight; however, he launched the strikes just two days later. It seems Trump made the decision - possibly swayed by Israeli officials and numerous Republican lawmakers - that Israel's operation had created a favourable situation, potentially offering a unique chance to significantly hinder Iran's nuclear programme, perhaps even permanently. Iran's capabilities impaired According to Israeli sources, their offensive has already significantly hampered Iran's air defences, allowing them to inflict considerable damage on several Iranian nuclear sites. However, in order to obliterate the Fordo nuclear fuel enrichment plant, Israel sought Trump's aid, specifically the bunker-busting American bomb known as the GBU-57 Massive Ordnance Penetrator. This bomb uses its weight and sheer kinetic force to target deeply buried sites before exploding and is currently only delivered by the B-2 stealth bomber, exclusive to the American arsenal. If used in the attack, it would mark the first combat use of the weapon. The bomb carries a conventional warhead and is believed to be capable of penetrating roughly 200 feet (61 meters) beneath the surface before detonating. The bombs can be dropped consecutively, effectively drilling deeper with each subsequent explosion. The International Atomic Energy Agency has confirmed that Iran is producing highly enriched uranium at Fordo, which raises the possibility of nuclear material being released into the area if the GBU-57 A/B were used to strike the facility. Previous Israeli strikes on another Iranian nuclear site, Natanz, specifically on a centrifuge site, have only caused contamination at the site itself, not the surrounding area, according to the IAEA. Trump's choice for direct U.S. military intervention comes after a two-month failed attempt by his administration, which included high-level talks with Iran, to get Tehran to curb its nuclear programme. For months, Trump professed his dedication to a diplomatic effort to convince Iran to give up its nuclear aspirations. He managed to persuade Netanyahu twice, in April and again at the end of May, to hold off on military action against Iran to give diplomacy more time. In recent days, the U.S. has been positioning military aircraft and warships around the Middle East to protect Israel and American bases from potential attacks by Iran. Trump has swung between expressing hope for Iran's "second chance" at a deal and issuing direct threats towards Khamenei, along with demands for Tehran's unconditional capitulation. "We know exactly where the so-called 'Supreme Leader' is hiding," Trump announced on social media. "He is an easy target, but is safe there - We are not going to take him out (kill! ), at least not for now." Seven years after Trump pulled the U.S. out of the 2015 nuclear agreement, which he dubbed the "worst deal ever.", he still faces military tensions with Iran. The 2015 agreement, which involved Iran, the U.S., and other world powers, aimed to provide a long-term solution to limit Tehran's uranium enrichment in exchange for lifting sanctions. Trump criticised the Obama-era deal, condemning it for being overly generous to Iran without addressing their non-nuclear malevolent actions. Facing backlash from his own MAGA base, including influential conservative commentator Tucker Carlson, Trump is dealing with suggestions that any further American involvement contradicts his pledge to stop U.S. participation in costly, protracted conflicts.

US strikes three Iranian nuclear sites
US strikes three Iranian nuclear sites

Irish Examiner

time3 hours ago

  • Irish Examiner

US strikes three Iranian nuclear sites

President Donald Trump said that the United States military struck three sites in Iran, directly joining Israel's effort to decapitate the country's nuclear programme in a risky gambit to weaken a longtime foe amid Tehran's threat of reprisals that could spark a wider regional conflict. Iran's state-run IRNA news agency, quoting a provincial official, confirmed attacks on Fordo, Isfahan and Natanz nuclear sites. The decision to directly involve the US in the war comes after more than a week of strikes by Israel on Iran that have moved to systematically eradicate the country's air defences and offensive missile capabilities, while damaging its nuclear enrichment facilities. US and Israeli officials have said that American stealth bombers and the 30,000-pound (13,500-kg) bunker buster bomb they alone can carry offered the best chance of destroying heavily-fortified sites connected to the Iranian nuclear programme buried deep underground. 'We have completed our very successful attack on the three Nuclear sites in Iran, including Fordow, Natanz, and Esfahan,' Mr Trump said in a post on social media. 'All planes are now outside of Iran air space. A full payload of BOMBS was dropped on the primary site, Fordow. All planes are safely on their way home.' Mr Trump added in a later post that he would address the national audience at 10pm eastern time, writing: 'This is an HISTORIC MOMENT FOR THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ISRAEL, AND THE WORLD. IRAN MUST NOW AGREE TO END THIS WAR. THANK YOU!' Trump said B-2 stealth bombers were used but did not specify which types of bombs were dropped. The White House and Pentagon did not immediately elaborate on the operation. The strikes are a perilous decision for the US as Iran has pledged to retaliate if it joined the Israeli assault, and for Mr Trump personally, having won the White House on the promise of keeping America out of costly foreign conflicts and scoffed at the value of American interventionism. Trump told reporters on Friday that he was not interested in sending ground forces into Iran, saying it's 'the last thing you want to do.' He had previously indicated that he would make a final choice over the course of two weeks, a timeline that seemed drawn out as the situation was evolving quickly. Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei warned the United States on Wednesday that strikes targeting the Islamic Republic will 'result in irreparable damage for them'. Iranian foreign ministry spokesman Esmail Baghaei declared 'any American intervention would be a recipe for an all-out war in the region'. Trump has vowed that he would not allow Iran to obtain a nuclear weapon and he had initially hoped that the threat of force would bring the country's leaders to give up its nuclear program peacefully. Israel 's military said Saturday it was preparing for the possibility of a lengthy war, while Iran's foreign minister warned before the U.S. attack that American military involvement 'would be very, very dangerous for everyone.' The prospect of a wider war threatened, too. Iranian-backed Houthi rebels in Yemen said they would resume attacks on U.S. vessels in the Red Sea if the Trump administration joins Israel's military campaign. The Houthis paused such attacks in May under a deal with the US. The US ambassador to Israel announced the US had begun 'assisted departure flights,' the first from Israel since the Hamas-led attack on October 7, 2023, that sparked the war in Gaza. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said at Thursday's press briefing that Trump had said: 'I will make my decision whether or not to go within the next two weeks.' Instead, the U.S. president struck just two days later. Trump appears to have made the calculation — at the prodding of Israeli officials and many Republican lawmakers — that Israel's operation had softened the ground and presented a perhaps unparalleled opportunity to set back Iran's nuclear program, perhaps permanently. The Israelis say their offensive has already crippled Iran's air defences, allowing them to already significantly degrade multiple Iranian nuclear sites. But to destroy the Fordo nuclear fuel enrichment plant, Israel appealed to Trump for US bunker-busting bomb, which uses its weight and sheer kinetic force to reach deeply buried targets and then explode. The penetrator is currently only delivered by the B-2 stealth bomber, which is only found in the American arsenal. The bomb carries a conventional warhead, and is believed to be able to penetrate about 200 feet (61 meters) below the surface before exploding, and the bombs can be dropped one after another, effectively drilling deeper and deeper with each successive blast. The International Atomic Energy Agency has confirmed that Iran is producing highly enriched uranium at Fordo, raising the possibility that nuclear material could be released into the area if the GBU-57 A/B were used to hit the facility. Previous Israeli strikes at another Iranian nuclear site, Natanz, on a centrifuge site have caused contamination only at the site itself, not the surrounding area, the IAEA has said. Mr Trump's decision for direct US military intervention comes after his administration made an unsuccessful two-month push — including with high-level, direct negotiations with the Iranians — aimed at persuading Tehran to curb its nuclear programme. For months, Mr Trump said he was dedicated to a diplomatic push to persuade Iran to give up its nuclear ambitions. And he twice — in April and again in late May — persuaded Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to hold off on military action against Iran and give diplomacy more time. The US in recent days has been shifting military aircraft and warships into and around the Middle East to protect Israel and US bases from Iranian attacks. All the while, Mr Trump has gone from publicly expressing hope that the moment could be a 'second chance' for Iran to make a deal to delivering explicit threats on Mr Khamenei and making calls for Tehran's unconditional surrender. 'We know exactly where the so-called 'Supreme Leader' is hiding,' Mr Trump said in a social media posting. 'He is an easy target, but is safe there – We are not going to take him out (kill!), at least not for now.' The military showdown with Iran comes seven years after Mr Trump withdrew the US from the Obama-administration brokered agreement in 2018, calling it the 'worst deal ever'. The 2015 deal, signed by Iran, US and other world powers, created a long-term, comprehensive nuclear agreement that limited Tehran's enrichment of uranium in exchange for the lifting of economic sanctions. Mr Trump decried the Obama-era deal for giving Iran too much in return for too little, because the agreement did not cover Iran's non-nuclear malign behaviour. Mr Trump has bristled at criticism from some of his Maga faithful, including conservative pundit Tucker Carlson, who have suggested that further US involvement would be a betrayal to supporters who were drawn to his promise to end US involvement in expensive and endless wars.

Your questions answered: ‘My brand new €46,000 car constantly needs repairs. What are my options?'
Your questions answered: ‘My brand new €46,000 car constantly needs repairs. What are my options?'

Irish Independent

time4 hours ago

  • Irish Independent

Your questions answered: ‘My brand new €46,000 car constantly needs repairs. What are my options?'

Plus, your rights as a consumer under package holiday legislation Q I bought a new car in January for €46,095. I'd cashed in an old pension and got a credit union loan so I didn't need to use a PCP. I was meant to collect it on January 2, but this was delayed because I was told there was a manufacturing issue with the ball joints in the front suspension. Since then, it's been one problem after another. Initially, the rear camera wasn't working, and I had to take time off work to bring the car in to the dealership to get it fixed. At the end of February, the indicators stopped working. On April 7, it broke down completely. The car company arranged a recovery truck and a replacement car. On May 12, the dealership rang to say it was down to the gearbox, which needed replacing. It's ready for collection now. As I've been without the car for almost half the time since I bought it, I contacted the dealership, the carmaker and even its CEO on several occasions. I'm terrified that if I take the car back, something else will go wrong and I'll have to start this whole exhausting complaint process all over again. What can I do? Noreen, Limerick A When you bought the car, you entered into a sales contract with the dealership. Under consumer law, the dealer is obliged to provide a car that's fit for purpose and has the durability you would normally expect from a new car, taking account of factors like the car's make, its durability, any need for servicing or maintenance, and how far and how often you drive the car. If an issue with a car arises in the first year, the dealer must show that the car was not faulty when you received it. The dealership has already carried out several repairs to your car. If a business repairs a fault and the same or a different fault occurs afterwards, you can reject further repairs if you can't be reasonably confident in the business's ability to fix the car. Complain to the dealer in writing, outlining the issues with the car and request the remedy that you feel is most appropriate. If you don't want further repairs, you can seek a reduction in the price you paid for the car, or you can ask to cancel the sales contract and request a refund. You can get further information on your consumer rights for car purchases on our website. If the dealer doesn't give you a satisfactory response, you can choose to pursue the matter through the courts. We suggest you get independent legal advice. Given your safety concerns, you can report the problems to the Road Safety Authority (RSA) who can then assess if the model of your car needs to be recalled or recalled for repair. ADVERTISEMENT 'We had to cancel our package holiday to Spain. Can we get the tax back?' Q My wife and I, who are in our 80s, booked an all-inclusive package holiday to Spain for 10 days in May. We booked through a Germany tour operator via its Irish branch in February, paying €2,000. But my wife became seriously ill in April, and had to be hospitalised. The medical advice was that she was unfit to travel on the holiday – so we asked the tour operator to reschedule it, a week before we were due to travel. They refused. Our travel insurer reimbursed us, minus an excess of €300. But we believe that the holiday company should return the Vat, which we assumed was included in the total price of the holiday. Are we legally entitled to get these taxes back? Tom, Dundalk A I'm sorry to hear of your wife's illness and hope she is making a good recovery. The holiday you booked is covered under package holiday legislation. When you book such a holiday, you enter into a contract with the tour operator. You should receive all the essential information about your holiday before you agree to this contract. This includes the total price, including taxes and fees, and the tour operator's terms and conditions regarding cancellations. You can find more information about your rights under package holiday legislation on our website, at It's unfortunate your tour operator refused to reschedule your holiday on medical grounds. However, you were wise to have taken out travel insurance so you could claim back most of your holiday costs. A consumer generally has the option to apply for a refund of airfare taxes and charges directly from an airline for a cancelled flight. But the claim usually needs to be made within a set timeframe after the flight – within 30 days, for example. The airline may charge an administrative fee to process the refund. As you bought a package holiday, you should first refer to the terms and conditions in your holiday contract and then speak to your tour operator to confirm if you are eligible to claim back the tax on the flight portion of your package. You can also contact the airline about a refund but you'd need to inform them that the flights were booked as part of a package holiday. Gráinne Griffin is director of communications at the Competition and Consumer Protection Commission. You can email your questions to

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store