Near-record nitrate levels in Des Moines, Iowa-area rivers threaten drinking water
Local officials warned more than half a million Iowans in the state's capital city and suburbs on Thursday that near-record level of pollutants in its rivers could make drinking water dangerous if immediate steps are not taken to reduce demand.
But the officials declined to explain what they believe has caused the surge in nitrate levels, which has historically been tied to runoff from farmland draining into Des Moines-area rivers.
The water utility, Central Iowa Water Works, issued a first-ever ban on lawn watering for the region after seeing the highest levels of nitrates in the river water since 2013. Federal regulations require a maximum nitrate level of 10 milligrams per liter. The current level being provided to 600,000 customers is 9, local officials said.
'If we end up in a space where we're well over that … threshold, we're really going to start worrying about our pregnant women and our children under the age of six months,' said Juliann Van Liew, public health director for Polk County.
Van Liew warned that could drinking water with too-high levels of nitrate could potentially cause birth defects and a condition when an infant's blood doesn't have enough oxygen, commonly known as blue baby syndrome.
Tami Madsen, executive director of Central Iowa Water Works, said it is not unusual to see an increase given Iowa's 'nitrate seasons' but noted this year has been unusually high. Still, she deferred on an explanation of what is driving the higher rates.
'Unfortunately, this is a first and this is not history that anyone should be proud of,' Madsen said of the ban on lawn watering.
She urged cooperation. 'If we continue on the path we're on today, where people are still choosing to water their lawn over producing water that meets safe drinking water standards, we'll be back here to talk to you all about a violation of the Safe Drinking Water Act,' Madsen said.
Officials made clear the water currently meets regulations and is safe to drink. But while the water utility works to treat the water to reduce nitrate pollutants to a safe level, Des Moines metro residents' demand is higher than the amount they are able to treat. The utility said it has been treating water for 55 days, at a cost of between $14,000 and $16,000 a day.
In the past, the high cost to Des Moines and the rest of Polk County has led officials to go to farmers directly, to the statehouse and to court in a tug-of-war with the state's dominant agricultural industry. The officials have long complained that nitrates and phosphorous from farm fertilizers pour off fields, leaving rivers so polluted that even the utility's sophisticated and costly equipment can't keep up with purifying.
In 2015, the utility took the issue to court to ask for the millions of dollars it was being forced to spend to filter unsafe levels from drinking water taken from the Des Moines and Raccoon rivers. A judge ultimately dismissed the lawsuit against three northwest Iowa counties, ruling the issue was one for the Legislature to address.
The state's Republican leaders at the time lauded the ruling, saying the lawsuit wasn't necessary to improve water quality because farmers and government subdivisions already are taking steps to ensure water quality.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Scientists pinpoint way to check if you're going to get early-onset colon cancer with up to 92% accuracy
A little-known at-home test can detect early-onset colon cancer before symptoms develop, increasing the chance of surviving a disease that is surging among young people. The fecal immunochemical test (FIT) costs $49 and screens a person's feces for flecks of blood, a warning sign of the cancer — as tumors cause bleeding. The test is FDA-approved and allows younger people a chance to screen for colon cancer before they reach the recommended age for a colonoscopy, 45 years. If blood is detected, a colonoscopy is performed, increasing the chances of catching colon cancer early when it is more treatable. And the American College of Surgeons says it is generally accurate, able to detect about 80 percent of all cases. If someone opts for the $600 FIT with DNA screening, which checks for abnormal changes in cells' DNA, accuracy rises to 92 percent. A colonoscopy is about 99 percent accurate at detecting all cancers. A recent study found people that use the FIT method between the ages of 40 to 49 years old are 39 percent less likely to die from colon cancer than their peers who wait to get the test until they are 50 years old or above. An increasing number of younger people are seeking screening, as the US experiences a surge in colon cancer among people under 50, with young patients today about twice as likely to be diagnosed with the disease than their grandparents. The rising rates are prompting some physicians to urge Americans to start getting screened for the disease before the age of 45 years, which is when US doctors recommend. For the test, which can be ordered online, customers are sent a package containing a collection tube. They are asked to collect a sample of their feces from the toilet bowl, place it in the tube and mail it to a lab. Results take about five days to come back. In the lab, scientists expose the feces to antibodies that can bind to human hemoglobin - a protein found in red blood cells. If they bind to an area of the feces, a positive test result is issued - and patients are advised to undertake further screening. In the FIT with DNA, scientists also analyze cells found in the stool for abnormal changes - which could indicate cancer. Patients over 45 years old who have an average risk — meaning no family history of the disease — may be recommended the test, which is free for the group under health insurance plans. But people can also buy the test, which is sold by labs like Everlywell for $49, or opt for other tests like Cologuard, which is priced at $121. While the test can be extremely helpful, doctors caution that about five to 10 percent of patients who get a positive result do not have colon cancer or advanced polyps. The number of false positives after a colonoscopy is below one percent. It is important to follow up with a doctor to discuss results. Patients undertaking the test are recommended to do it every year, as this can help to catch early-onset cancers which are typically slower growing. Among patients to have their cancer caught after using an at-home stool-based test is Christine Bronstein, who was diagnosed with the cancer at age 48. The Hawaii local exercises regularly, and avoids sugar and alcohol. But after seeing blood in her stool in 2021, she became concerned and ordered a stool-based test. After results came back positive, she rushed to see her doctor and was eventually approved for a colonoscopy - which led to a stage three colon cancer diagnosis with a two-inch tumor found in her rectum. Bronstein told TODAY: 'I'm very lucky that I did my test when I did. This thing really takes people down right in their prime... I think the problem why this is becoming the No.1 killer for younger people is because their symptoms get denied.' Colon cancer cases are surging among under-50s in the US in an uptick that has stunned researchers, with adults born in the 1980s having double the risk of suffering from the cancer compared to their parents. Among adults aged 25 to 29 years, colon cancer cancer rates have spiked 85 percent in two decades according to CDC data. At the same time, over the last 30 years cases have dropped among over-50s by 30 percent.
The Independent
2 hours ago
- The Independent
Here's where the national mental health hotline is used the most
The 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline was launched in 2022 to help strengthen crisis response and has received more than 16 million calls, texts, and chats ever since. It is funded by the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration and administered by the mental health company Vibrant Emotional Health, connecting Americans with counselors at more than 200 crisis centers who are available 24 hours a day, every day. Now, new data shared by researchers at New York University and Johns Hopkins Medicine reveals the states that have utilized this lifeline the most. 'At the state-level, past-year 988 contact incidence rates ranged from highs of 45.3 and 40.2 per 1,000 population in Alaska and Vermont, respectively, to lows of 12.5 and 14.4 per 1000 population in Delaware and Alabama, respectively,' the authors of the research letter published in the journal JAMA Network Open said. Regionally, the highest number of calls, text messages, and chats was recorded in the West. The lowest volume was in the South, and the same was true for the previous year's estimate. New York and Colorado were also high on the list, according to a map revealing use during that time frame. The authors noted that demographic information was not available when they estimated the 988 use prevalence. 'We then adjusted these prevalence estimates to reflect assumptions about repeat contacts to 988,' the authors wrote. 'Using data on repeat contacts to the Crisis Text Line to inform our assumptions, we adjusted the lifetime prevalence estimate to reflect the assumption that every person who contacted 988 used it a mean of 2.0 times and adjusted the past-year prevalence estimate to reflect the assumption that every person who contacted 988 used it a mean of 1.5 times.' They found that there is still an opportunity to increase use, highlighting that the contact rate is less than half the rate of adult emergency department visits that include a mental health diagnosis. The authors said state variation in use was consistent with state variation in funding and legislative attention. 'Lower rates of 988 use in the South, which is more politically conservative than other regions, is also consistent with prior research showing less favorable attitudes toward 988 among Republicans than Democrats,' they wrote. Notably, funding for the crisis line's specialized services for LGBT+ youth is on the chopping block. Although the Health and Human Services fiscal year 2026 budget proposal maintains funding for the lifeline. Lawmakers have spoken out in opposition to the cuts to the services that they say get an average of 2,100 contacts per day. Some one in four U.S. adults had a mental illness in the past year and nearly three in 10 high school students reported poor mental health, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
The Independent
2 hours ago
- The Independent
I visited a tech-free retreat with my partner to see if the no-screen rule could bring us closer together
I have a confession: every single day begins and ends with my phone. It's the first thing I think of in the morning and the last thing I gaze upon before I close my eyes at night. My partner of 15 years doesn't get a look in. There's no chance of spontaneous sex – we're parents, I'm tired, overwhelmed and honestly, I'm looking for an effortless, fast dopamine fix. I'd rather scroll mindlessly on Vinted and social media than genuinely connect or enrich my mind with a good book or activity. I can feel how bad it is for me, and for my relationship, but it's an addiction and one that, if we're being realistic here, you probably have too. A smartphone relationship survey undertaken by SellCell has revealed that 71 per cent of people spend more of their personal time with their phone than their partner. Compounding this is the fact that 'no phone zones' don't exist in 82 per cent of homes, meaning phones are being used in the bedroom, which has been proven to disrupt sleep as well as meaningful connection. Relationship coach and psychotherapist Ashley Parker is one of many experts who believes excessive screen time inevitably removes our presence in relationships. She explains that, 'healthy interaction in relationships requires our full presence. When we're distracted, there's a lack of eye contact, we miss non-verbal cues which is a huge proportion of our communication and we miss opportunities for connection.' Parker says couples frequently complain about a lack of connection in her sessions because of time spent on screens, resulting in less talking and even less sex. 'It's not uncommon for couples to have some of their most meaningful interactions at bedtime, but with the rise in scrolling, this is often overtaken and means that those crucial times are being replaced. There's definitely an element of avoidance too. It's easy to gloss over difficult interactions or conflict by picking up your phone and drifting off into another world.' Sometimes to break the habit, regardless of what the habit is, you have to get out of the environment where you've become comfortable feeding it. So, to get clean from the screen we decided to leave our son for a few nights for the first time in eight years, and head to a luxury, low-tech retreat in Cotignac. Provincial French resort Lou Calen is not quite The White Lotus – they don't confiscate your phones and laptops on arrival but eschewing them is encouraged. There are no TVs in the bedrooms and you're immersed in nature – the estate comprises olive trees, fragrant flowers and an enchanting chorus of twittering birds, frogs and insects. The fruits and vegetables growing everywhere might end up on your plate at dinner at the retreat's Michelin starred restaurant. Plus, there are activities like locally grown wine tasting and traditional crafting workshops every week, developed specifically to bring you back to reality. It was astonishing to notice the anxiety the impending screen ban brought up. Despite heading off on what we both knew was likely to be a wonderful and well-earned break, I kept thinking of all the reasons I needed to be online – what if I got an urgent work email? What about taking and uploading photos for my friends and family to see on social media? What about needing to video call our son? Parker explains that calling out too much screen time is sometimes met with defensiveness and nerves, but approaching the topic with compassion and curiosity is key. 'Screen time doesn't have to be eradicated completely, but having some parameters around when both people will be completely present is important. This might look like ditching the phones at bedtime and in the morning – this is a prime time to reinvest energy in reflecting on your day. Or sharing what your hopes are for the coming day.' Realistically screens are always going to be a big part of our lives at home. But I hoped that perhaps by having this break and instigating a change, we might be able to develop healthier relationship with our phones, and each other. Going screen free was hard, and I'll admit. There were many times I reached for my phone to start scrolling out of habit, and felt irritable and anxious when I couldn't. But as we had scheduled calls home and I was officially OOO, I forced myself to keep the phone out of reach, and keep the laptop – which I did bring 'in case of emergency' – switched off. Over the course of three days, it felt like a weight had been lifted. Each morning, we woke and instead of immediately reading the news and checking notifications we connected with each other. We interpreted our dreams like we used to when we first met, talked about our plans and hopes and worries for the day ahead, and even had the chance to be physically intimate – definitely a better mood and energy boost than finding new likes on an Instagram post. It was certainly easier being in the stunning and carefully curated environment of Lou Calen than it would have been at home. Back in Scotland, where we live, we've fallen into what I now recognise as pretty depressing lifestyle habits. Constant chores and childcare always feels as though there's never enough time for self care, to exercise or to enjoy a hobby. Suddenly with screen time gone there were several more hours to play with. In Provence we swam in the outside pool, went to a wine tasting, played tennis, explored the village and learned its fascinating history. If we'd arrived a little earlier, we could have joined one of the retreat's drawing classes, learned to weave baskets or create flower wreaths. In the evenings we went for meals and actually spent the whole time in conversation – something 1 in 4 people, who say they play on their phone while eating with their partner, can't attest to. When we returned to our room, without our usual Netflix binge, we chose to read and make love. Admittedly, this last part might have been the hardest. The urge to bed rot while watching a TV series until the damning question, 'are you still watching…?' pops up on the screen is very real. Somehow, the idea of taking time to meditate or draw, or knit or read feels like it's going to be an effort rather than relaxing, even though I know from my own experience and the endless research papers exploring downtime demonstrates quite the opposite. All I wanted to do after dinner was put on an episode of Peep Show that we'd watched a thousand times before, and stare at memes. But it turns out, when forced, getting lost in a good book is still really nice, like it always used to be. Funnily enough, so is having sex and actually making that a priority. Maybe if I'd been forward thinking enough to bring some more activities with me, doodling, crafting or colouring in would have been pretty great too. Despite feeling a little jonesy, I ended up going to sleep earlier, waking feeling more refreshed and, here's the crazy twist: I did feel genuinely relaxed and happy, without the edge of despair and self-loathing that comes after a good scroll sesh. Parker says there's an immediacy in scrolling that becomes addictive, which is a large part of the reason we continue to do this to ourselves, rather than seek meaningful connection and true relaxation. Until recently, the term 'addiction' has typically defined behaviours related to substances, but given our widespread, problematic use of popular platforms such as Instagram, Facebook, Twitter and TikTok, this has now changed. A first of its kind study, conducted by the UCLA, scanned the brains of 32 teenagers (who often have the most susceptible brains) while they used what they were told was a small social network similar to Instagram. The teenagers were shown 148 photos over the course of 12 minutes, including 40 photos each that they had submitted themselves. When they saw a large number of 'likes' on their own photos, the scan lit up in the brain's reward circuitry. Very often couples will be watching other people doing the things they want to do, so why not invest the energy into actually doing that instead? Ashley Parker This constant synthetic use of our reward system has been linked to potential desensitisation and raised tolerance levels to feel-good chemicals, such as dopamine. This means that, just like an addiction, the more we use social media to get an approval fix, the more we feel we need to experience that happy feeling. Something that might have given us a healthy sense of satisfaction and enjoyment before, like reading or sex, would then be far less likely to. 'There's also a level of escapism and a low-level energy required,' Parker explains. 'Choosing screen time over connecting with your partner isn't necessarily a sign that the relationship is over, but perhaps more that the scrolling is serving as an avoidance or distraction. It can be really useful to consider what each person is actually getting from the screen time. What are you watching? What takes your interest? This really boils down to a deeper question – what are you both missing? You could think about how you might bring some of those interests into real life. Very often couples will be watching other people doing the things they want to do, so why not invest the energy into actually doing that instead?' Leaving Lou Calen feeling refreshed, romantic and with a strong incentive to lay off the screens back at home, I still knew there was a long way to go before we were able to kick the habit. Of course, as soon as we landed we uploaded the photos we took, we checked our messages and that night, we watched TV. But we've since deleted our social media apps and implemented a 'no phone zone' in the bedroom. It's baby steps, but having had a taste of freedom, I'm keen for us to break out of our virtual reality and relearn how to be present, and how to be happy with each other.
