logo
‘My stomach just dropped': foreign students in panicked limbo as Trump cancels visa interviews

‘My stomach just dropped': foreign students in panicked limbo as Trump cancels visa interviews

The Guardian30-05-2025
Students around the world who were gearing up to study in the United States this fall face growing uncertainty after the Trump administration temporarily halted student visa appointments this week.
On Tuesday, a state department directive ordered US embassies globally to immediately stop scheduling visa interviews for foreign students while it prepares to implement expanded social media screening for all international visa applicants.
While interview appointments that were already scheduled can proceed, the announcement sparked panic among students who have yet to secure interviews. Students who spoke with the Guardian expressed anxiety over delays in visa processing that could jeopardize scholarships, on-campus housing, their ability to start classes on time – and their very academic futures.
'My stomach just dropped,' said Oliver Cropley, 27, a student at the University of East Anglia in the United Kingdom, who is meant to attend the University of Kansas beginning this August for a year abroad.
The directive came amid a series of recent policy shifts targeting international students at US universities. This week, the Trump administration issued new measures targeting Chinese students, announcing it would focus on the visas of those studying in 'critical fields' and of students with ties to the Chinese Communist party, and implement heightened scrutiny for all future applicants from China and Hong Kong.
Last week, the Department of Homeland Security said it would immediately ban Harvard University from enrolling international students, forcing the university's international student body to either transfer or leave the country. A federal judge blocked that effort on Thursday, but its long-term outcome remains uncertain.
The changes have left many international students who are planning to come to the US for the 2025-2026 academic year scrambling and in limbo.
Cropley said that he paid all of the application fees for the US visa including the last administrative fee last week to schedule his visa interview, but he has been unable to schedule it or reach anyone at the US embassy.
'I was looking forward to Kansas. I love America, the wildlife, the culture,' Cropley said
'It has demoralized me,' Cropley said. 'It's a stressful enough process, and then to get this sort of knockback at this stage … I'm supposed to be there on August 4.'
The scholarship he received to go study in the US is also now in flux, he said, as it is contingent on him traveling.
As he awaits updates from the US embassy, Cropley said he is exploring his options – inquiring about the possibility of re-enrolling at his home university in the UK and completing the year there instead of in the US. But he said 'it's quite late' to be picking classes and modules and finding accommodation.
'I'm sort of stuck in between the two different universities with no guarantee of getting into either,' Cropley said. 'Essentially, it's just a waiting game.'
Another UK student, who has been accepted to Harvard for the fall, told the Guardian that they were in 'disbelief' over the administration's attempt to block Harvard from enrolling international students.
'In your head, you have the next kind of five years knowing where you'll be, and then suddenly, overnight, that changes,' they said, speaking anonymously out of fear their comments could affect their visa approval
The student said that their visa interview was already scheduled when the directive was issued, so they hope their interview is still going ahead.
The recent decisions by the Trump administration 'raise a lot of uncertainty for the future', they said, adding that the situation at Harvard feels 'very fragile'.
'We may still be able to go, but at any moment, that could change,' they said. 'And if you're going to this place, to do work, but your mind is consumed with a fear of how grounded you can be, will things change, that's also difficult to deal with.'
Sign up to This Week in Trumpland
A deep dive into the policies, controversies and oddities surrounding the Trump administration
after newsletter promotion
They said that if they get their visa, they still plan on enrolling at Harvard.
The Guardian last week invited scholars in the US and students poised to study in the US to share their experiences navigating the Trump administration's recent actions targeting higher education. More than 100 people responded, many saying they were reconsidering their academic future in the country. Several international students who wrote in declined follow-up interviews with the Guardian, citing fear of repercussions.
Alfred Williamson, ​​a Harvard undergraduate from Wales in Denmark for the summer, told Reuters this week that he fears he may not be able to return to the US. 'We're being used like pawns in the game that we have no control of,' he said. 'We're being caught in this crossfire between the White House and Harvard, and it feels incredibly dehumanising.'
Some universities have advised students who are already enrolled not to leave the US for the summer in case they won't be allowed back.
There are currently more than 1.1 million international students in the US, comprising about 6% of the US higher education population, according to the Institute of International Education. They typically pay two to three times the tuition of domestic students, and for the 2023-2024 academic year international students contributed $43.8bn to the US economy, according to Nafsa.
In a court filing on Wednesday as part of a Harvard lawsuit against the Trump administration's efforts to ban international students at the school, Maureen Martin, Harvard's director of immigration services, described 'profound fear, concern, and confusion' among students and faculty as a result of the action.
Faculty and administrators, she said, have been 'inundated' with inquiries from current international students about their status and options, and several foreign consulates in the US have contacted the university seeking clarity on how the policy affects their nationals who are enrolled.
Martin said that many international students are experiencing 'significant emotional distress that is affecting their mental health and making it difficult to focus on their studies'.
Some, she said, are avoiding graduation ceremonies for fear of immigration action, while others have canceled travel plans due to concerns they might not be allowed back into the US. 'Too many international students to count' have inquired about the possibility of transferring to another institution, she said.
Martin said that several current Harvard visa holders have also faced increased scrutiny at airports.
The Guardian reached out for comment to a number of universities with large foreign student populations. Most said they were monitoring the situation and would do what they could to support their students.
'We have a robust set of resources for our incoming and current international students, as well as contingency plans for those who might experience disruptions to their learning,' said Renata Nyul, the vice-president for communications at Northeastern University.
A spokesperson for Arizona State University, which has more than 17,000 international students, said that the university is 'monitoring the situation closely and remains committed to fully supporting all international students in completing their degree programs'.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Rubio says both Russia and Ukraine ‘have to make concessions' for peace deal
Rubio says both Russia and Ukraine ‘have to make concessions' for peace deal

The Guardian

timean hour ago

  • The Guardian

Rubio says both Russia and Ukraine ‘have to make concessions' for peace deal

In a combative series of interviews on Sunday, the US secretary of state, Marco Rubio, said that 'both sides are going to have to make concessions' for there to be a peaceful resolution to the war that erupted when Russia invaded Ukraine in 2022. 'You can't have a peace agreement unless both sides make concessions – that's a fact,' the Trump administration's top diplomat said Sunday on ABC's This Week. 'That's true in virtually any negotiation. If not, it's just called surrender. And neither side is going to surrender. So both sides are going to have to make concessions.' Rubio said the recent talks in Alaska between Russian president Vladimir Putin and his US counterpart Donald Trump toward ending the war had 'made progress in the sense that we identified potential areas of agreement – but there remains some big areas of disagreement'. 'We're still a long ways off,' Rubio added. 'We're not at the precipice of a peace agreement. We're not at the edge of one. But I do think progress was made and towards one.' He declined to go into specific areas of agreement or disagreement, or outline what Trump has described as 'severe consequences' for Russia if its aggression toward Ukraine continued. 'Ultimately, if there isn't a peace agreement, if there isn't an end of this war, the president's been clear – there are going to be consequences,' Rubio remarked. 'But we're trying to avoid that. And the way we're trying to avoid those consequences is with an even better consequence, which is peace, the end of hostilities.' Rubio agreed that no agreement was possible without both sides – including that of Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelenskyy – being at the table. 'You're not going to reach a ceasefire or a peace agreement in a meeting in which only one side is represented,' Rubio told ABC News. 'That's why it's important to bring both leaders together – and that's the goal here.' Rubio confirmed that a ceasefire – or, as Trump now reportedly prefers, a straight-to-peace deal – 'is going to be difficult', despite the White House's openly demanding one. The war, he said, has been 'going on for three and a half years'. 'You have two very entrenched sides, and we're going to have to continue to work and chip away at it,' Rubio said. Separately, on NBC's Meet the Press, Rubio said a ceasefire was 'not off the table', though he added: 'It was agreed by all that the best way to end this conflict is through a full peace deal.' He said the US had advocated for a ceasefire, but 'unfortunately, the Russians as of now have not agreed to that. 'But the ideal here, what we're aiming for here is not a ceasefire,' he said. 'What we ultimately are aiming for is an end to this.' Nonetheless, Rubio said he doubted that a new set of western sanctions on Russia would force Moscow to agree to any deal. He also denied that Trump, as critics claim, had merely given the aggressor in the conflict, Putin, an unwarranted place on the world stage. 'Putin is already on the world stage,' Rubio said on ABC News. 'The guy's conducting a full scale war in Ukraine. 'That doesn't mean he's right about the war. That doesn't mean he's justified about the war. You're not going to end a war between Russia and Ukraine without dealing with Putin. That's just common sense. So people can say whatever they want.' On NBC's Meet the Press, the Democratic US senator Chris Murphy of Connecticut countered on Sunday that the Trump-Putin 'meeting was a disaster'. 'It was an embarrassment for the United States,' Murphy said. 'It was a failure. Putin got everything he wanted.' Murphy said that Trump had given Putin 'that photo-op' he wanted and to 'be absolved of his war crimes in front of the world. 'War criminals are not normally invited to the United States of America,' Murphy remarked. Secondly, he said, Putin had not been forced to give up anything. 'President Trump said he wanted a ceasefire – it appears the ceasefire wasn't even seriously discussed,' Murphy added. 'And then, third, there's no consequences. 'Trump said, 'If I don't get a cease fire, Putin is going to pay a price.' And then he walked out of that meeting saying, 'I didn't get a ceasefire. I didn't get a peace deal, and I'm not even considering sanctions.''

Ghislaine Maxwell files will not be released despite Trump order
Ghislaine Maxwell files will not be released despite Trump order

Telegraph

timean hour ago

  • Telegraph

Ghislaine Maxwell files will not be released despite Trump order

Ghislaine Maxwell 's grand jury transcripts will not be released, a federal judge has ruled, saying the Trump administration 's request to do so is a 'diversion'. Paul Engelmayer, a Manhattan District Court judge, suggested the Department of Justice (DOJ) had requested the transcripts be released to create the 'illusion' of transparency. The judge said the files would not reveal any new information, adding that they 'do not discuss or identify any client of Epstein's or Maxwell's'. The decision will come as a blow to Donald Trump, who continues to grapple with the fallout after his administration closed the Jeffrey Epstein case. The administration's refusal to release information surrounding Epstein, the late financier and convicted paedophile, prompted a backlash from some of Mr Trump's most loyal supporters. In an effort to placate his base Mr Trump ordered Pam Bondi, the US attorney general, to seek the release of grand jury testimony related to the case in July. However, in a ruling filed on Monday, Mr Engelmayer said none of the arguments made by the DoJ for unsealing the transcripts met the requirements to authorise the disclosure of grand jury materials. 'The Court's review confirmed that unsealing the grand jury materials would not reveal new information of any consequence,' Mr Engelmayer wrote. He added: 'A member of the public, appreciating that the Maxwell grand jury materials do not contribute anything to public knowledge, might conclude that the Government's motion for their unsealing was aimed not at 'transparency' but at diversion — aimed not at full disclosure but at the illusion of such.' In the 31-page order, Mr Engelmayer said the DoJ's argument that the unsealing of the documents was necessary because of public interest 'fails at the threshold'. He said the suggestion that the transcripts would bring 'meaningful new information' about Epstein and Maxwell's crimes was 'demonstrably false'and the public 'would thus learn nothing new' from their disclosure. The judge said the files 'do not discuss or identify any client of Epstein's or Maxwell's' and 'do not reveal any heretofore unknown means or methods of Epstein's or Maxwell's crimes'. He added: 'They do not reveal new venues at which their crimes occurred. They do not reveal new sources of their wealth. They do not explore the circumstances of Epstein's death. They do not reveal the path of the government's investigation.' Weeks before the Trump administration announced it would not release the so-called Epstein files, Mr Trump was reportedly told his name came up several times in the documents, according to Wall Street Journal. Being mentioned in the files is not a sign of wrongdoing, and the Trump administration said the story was 'fake news'.

Library book returned 82 years after being borrowed with plea for no late fee: ‘Grandma won't be able to pay for it anymore'
Library book returned 82 years after being borrowed with plea for no late fee: ‘Grandma won't be able to pay for it anymore'

The Independent

timean hour ago

  • The Independent

Library book returned 82 years after being borrowed with plea for no late fee: ‘Grandma won't be able to pay for it anymore'

A book has been returned to the San Antonio Public Library almost 82 years after it was loaned out, according to a new report. The book — a copy of "Your Child, His Family, and Friends" by marriage and family counselor Frances Bruce Strain, was returned with a note saying "I hope there is no late fee for it because Grandma won't be able to pay for it anymore." The book was checked out in July 1943 and was returned in June from someone living in Oregon, according to the library. The person who returned the book noted in their letter that they obtained the book after their father died. 'After the recent death of my father, I inherited a few boxes of books he left behind,' the individual wrote. The book gives parents advice for helping their children navigate relationships. The individual's father would have been approximately 11 years old when "grandma" checked the book out in 1943. 'The book must have been borrowed by my Grandmother, Maria del Socorro Aldrete Flores (Cortez),' the person who returned the book reasoned. 'In that year, she transferred to Mexico City to work at the US Embassy. She must have taken the book with her, and some 82 years later, it ended up in my possession.' The book's interior bears a stamp warning borrowers that the overdue fine was three cents a day. Without inflation, that would put the overdue fine at around $900, and with inflation it would be approximately $16,000. Thankfully for the returner, the library stopped charging overdue fines in 2021. The library said that the book was in "good condition" and plans to put it on display in the city's central library through the end of August. After that, the book will be donated to the Friends of San Antonio Public Library and sold to help benefit the library. While 82 years is certainly a long time to wait to return an overdue book, it's not even close to the record for library book returns. According to Guinness World Records, that record was set by a book that was returned to Sidney Sussex College at England's University of Cambridge in 1956. That book was reportedly borrowed from the university in 1668, meaning it was out for approximately 288 years and was overdue for longer than the U.S. has existed as a nation.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store