NYC mayor Adams kicks off re-election bid with jabs at Mamdani, vows to ‘fix what soapbox socialists only tweet about'
NEW YORK, June 27 — New York mayor Eric Adams launched his re-election campaign Thursday by taking direct aim at the credentials of his presumed Democratic opponent, Zohran Mamdani.
'It's a choice between a candidate with a blue collar and one with a suit and a silver spoon,' Adams, who was elected in 2021 as a Democrat but is running as an independent, told supporters outside City Hall.
Adams, 64, is now facing off against 33-year-old Mamdani, a self-declared socialist who on Tuesday surprisingly beat out former governor Andrew Cuomo in the Democratic Party primary.
Mamdani's win has yet to be certified, but Adams is already campaigning against him with accusations of empty idealism and false promises of 'giving everything to everyone for free.'
'They have a record of tweets. I have a record on these streets. A record of results. They talk about problems? I fix them. That's the difference. You don't lead this city from a soapbox,' Adams said of Mamdani.
Mamdani's surprise win resonated as a political thunderclap, drawing the ire of US President Donald Trump and his collaborators, who accuse the left-leaning Democrat of being a radical extremist.
In response Thursday, Mamdani said he launched his campaign to target Adams's corruption and his failure to address affordability.
'New Yorkers have been suffocated by a cost of living crisis and this mayor has taken almost every opportunity to exacerbate it, all while partnering with Donald Trump to tear our city apart,' Mamdani said.
He promised to 'end this era of corruption, incompetence and the betrayal of working class New Yorkers.'
Adams faced a series of major federal corruption charges, but they were dropped by the Justice Department after Trump took office in January.
Mamdani and other New Yorkers have accused Adams of allowing the Trump administration to conduct immigration raids in exchange for burying the charges.
Polling currently shows Mamdani ahead of Adams and Republican candidate Curtis Sliwa for the November election.
Cuomo, though defeated in the primary, is still weighing a possible run as an independent, which could further complicate the race. — AFP
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Focus Malaysia
21 minutes ago
- Focus Malaysia
US may extend tariff suspension ahead of July 8 deadline
THE United States may prolong its current pause on reciprocal tariffs, which is due to lapse next month, according to a White House spokesperson on Thursday. Karoline Leavitt, speaking during a press briefing and cited by Yonhap news agency, said the decision is ultimately up to President Donald Trump. Her comments come as negotiations continue between Washington, Seoul, and other nations to reduce or prevent the potential effects of the planned tariffs. 'It might be extended, but that call lies with the president,' Leavitt noted. The suspension, which temporarily halts 25% tariffs on South Korean imports, is scheduled to conclude on July 8. South Korea is actively seeking to finalise an agreement with the US before that deadline. The reciprocal tariffs were first introduced by Trump on April 2, intended to match the trade levies other countries place on American goods. Although the tariffs took effect on April 9, they were immediately put on hold for a 90-day period to allow room for diplomatic discussions. —June 27, 2025 Main image: AFP Pic
Malay Mail
an hour ago
- Malay Mail
When will the West learn? — Sheila Ramalingam
JUNE 27 — The world once again watched in alarm as the United States launched military strikes against Iran, citing concerns over its nuclear weapons development. The international reaction has been largely cautious, with many nations urging diplomacy over aggression. But for those who remember the early 2000s, this latest development feels eerily familiar. History, it seems, is repeating itself; and the lessons of the past remain unheeded. In 2003, the United States, backed by Britain, Australia, and other allies, invaded Iraq under the claim that Saddam Hussein possessed weapons of mass destruction (WMDs). That assertion was later proven to be false. No WMDs were ever found, and the war, arguably based on a fabricated premise, led to the deaths of hundreds of thousands of Iraqis, destabilised an entire region, and fuelled a generation of extremism. Yet, two decades later, not a single senior figure from the United States or Britain faced civil or criminal liability. No tribunal, no sanctions, no legal consequences for initiating what some international law experts have labelled a 'crime of aggression'. The architects of the war continued their careers, published memoirs, gave lectures, and disappeared into quiet obscurity. Justice, for Iraq and for the world, was never served. Now, the same narrative is playing out with Iran. Allegations of nuclear weapons development, despite Iran's repeated insistence that its nuclear program is civilian in nature, are being used to justify military action. Meanwhile, the same countries that invaded Iraq with righteous fury remain silent about North Korea, a nation that has not only developed nuclear weapons but has conducted multiple missile tests aimed at showcasing its long-range strike capabilities. North Korea's Hwasong-14 and -15 missiles, launched in 2017, demonstrated potential range to strike United States territories. As recently as 2024, North Korea conducted mock nuclear warhead launches and fired dozens of short-range ballistic missiles in defiance of US-South Korean military drills. Despite these provocations, the United States has refrained from military strikes. Why the double standard? U.S. Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, U.S. Air Force General Dan Caine, speaks during a press conference on Iran's nuclear sites at the Pentagon in Arlington, Virginia, U.S., June 26, 2025. — Reuters pic The answer may lie in geography, risk, and resources. North Korea, while dangerous, does not sit atop vast oil reserves. It is also bordered by China, a military and nuclear superpower, making any aggressive miscalculation potentially catastrophic. Iran and Iraq, on the other hand, are oil-rich nations located in a region where the United States has long sought influence through both diplomacy and force. Control of oil routes, access to resources, and support for regional allies like Israel and Saudi Arabia have all contributed to the Middle East being a frequent target of Western military interventions. But what is often overlooked in this calculus is the human and cultural cost of these interventions. Iraq is not just a battlefield: it is Mesopotamia, the cradle of civilisation, home to some of the world's earliest writings, laws, and cities. Iran is not merely a 'nuclear threat': it is Persia, a land of poets, scientists, and empires that shaped human history. To reduce these nations to talking points in a geopolitical chess game is to insult their legacy and ignore their potential. If we continue to allow military might to dictate global norms without accountability, we not only erode the principles of international law, we risk destroying civilisations that have enriched humanity for millennia. The world deserves better than a system where power excuses everything and history is rewritten by the victors. The cradle of Mesopotamia, the gardens of Persia, the philosophies, the poetry, the science – these are not threats. They are treasures. And if they are lost, it will not be the fault of tyrants alone, but of those who stood by while empires masked greed as justice. Let us finally hold to account those who manipulate truth to justify violence. If the West is sincere in its pursuit of justice, it must understand that peace is not imposed; it is earned through humility, restraint, and the courage to see others as equals. * Dr Sheila Ramalingam is the Deputy Executive Director of UMLEAD, International Institute of Public Policy and Management (INPUMA), and Senior Lecturer, Faculty of Law, Universiti Malaya. ** This is the personal opinion of the writer or publication and does not necessarily represent the views of Malay Mail.
Malay Mail
an hour ago
- Malay Mail
Burglars raid Brad Pitt's LA mansion as he promotes new ‘F1' movie abroad
LOS ANGELES, June 27 — Burglars broke into Brad Pitt's Los Angeles home on Thursday, ransacking the property and fleeing with stolen items while the Oscar-winning actor was traveling to promote his new racing thriller F1, US media reported. A Los Angeles Police Department spokesperson told NBC News that a break-in took place at a residence in the Los Feliz neighbourhood around 10.30pm (1.30pm Malaysian time today), without officially confirming who owned the home. Police sources told NBC News and the Los Angeles Times that three suspects climbed over a front fence and broke in through the home's front window before ransacking the location and fleeing with some belongings. The value of the stolen items has not been disclosed. Pitt was not home at the time, as he has been on a global promotional tour for his new movie F1. The 61-year-old actor attended the film's premiere in London this week. The property was purchased by Pitt in 2023 for US$5.5 million (RM23.26 million), according to Variety magazine. Pitt is the among the most recent celebrities to have their Los Angeles homes burglarised. About US$500,000 of jewellery was allegedly stolen from the home of French striker Olivier Giroud of MLS side Los Angeles FC in a burglary in February. That same month, Nicole Kidman and Keith Urban's residence was reportedly burglarised. — AFP
