Big 12 schools ranked academically by U.S. News for 2025
The academic year for most universities in the Big 12 wrapped up earlier this month and with four new schools, the conference now has a sense of how it stacks up academically.
Arizona State, Arizona, Colorado and Utah are not scholastic powerhouses, but on the field showed that they belonged in the conference. The Sun Devils came from projected to finish last in the Big 12 to winning the title and making a run in the College Football Playoff. Aside from football, the four new programs won multiple conference titles, including Arizona women's golf, Utah women's gymnastics, Arizona State men's and women's swimming and diving and Arizona State volleyball.
In the classroom, the 16-member conference is not top tier in that regard, but it holds its own as proven by several schools with strong Academic Progress Rate performance.
Another major indicator is U.S. News & World Report's latest 2025 academic rankings. The Big 12 does not have a school ranked higher than No. 91 unlike its power conference counterparts, the ACC and Big Ten.
City: Morgantown, West Virginia
National Ranking: No. 220 (tie)
Acceptance rate: 88%
West Virginia has never really been known for their academics and that continues in 2025 with the lowest ranking in the conference.
City: Lubbock, Texas
National Ranking: No. 214 (tie)
Acceptance rate: 71%
Texas Tech is seventh in Academic Progress Rate but falls behind when it comes to the U.S. News ranking. The Red Raiders join West Virginia as the only Big 12 schools ranked over No. 200.
City: Stillwater, Oklahoma
National Ranking: No. 196 (tie)
Acceptance rate: 71%
OSU is tied with Georgia State, Hofstra, Indiana University (Indianapolis), UNC Greensboro, University of La Verne and Missouri University of Science and Technology at No. 196 overall.
City: Manhattan, Kansas
National Ranking: No. 165 (tie)
Acceptance rate: 80%
Kansas State maintains a large gap between them and the bottom three schools in the conference, but it is still a ways off from being considered a top-tier academic institution.
City: Lawrence, Kansas
National Ranking: No. 152 (tie)
Acceptance rate: 88%
Kansas is tied with 11 other schools as the No. 152 ranked university, including one other Big 12 school.
City: Cincinnati, Ohio
National Ranking: No. 152 (tie)
Acceptance rate: 88%
Surprisingly, Cincinnati was the top school when it came to Academic Progress Rate performance, but do not live up to the same standard when it comes to overall academics.
City: Houston, Texas
National Ranking: No. 144 (tie)
Acceptance rate: 70%
Houston is the first Big 12 school in the top 150 and is tied with three other schools for the No. 144 spot, including Oregon State.
City: Salt Lake City, Utah
National Ranking: No. 136 (tie)
Acceptance rate: 87%
One of the newcomers to the Big 12 along with Colorado, Arizona and Arizona State, the Utes come in as the lowest-ranked former Pac-12 school.
City: Orlando, Florida
National Ranking: No. 121 (tie)
Acceptance rate: 43%
UCF is tied with one other Big 12 school with the lowest acceptance rate in the conference. The Knights are also tied with three other Big 12 schools at No. 121.
City: Tempe, Arizona
National Ranking: No. 121 (tie)
Acceptance rate: 90%
ASU is tied with UCF and Iowa State for the eighth-best academic school in the conference. Nationally, the Sun Devils are ranked with South Carolina and Elon among several others. With just over 65,000 undergraduates Arizona State is the largest school in the Big 12.
City: Ames, Iowa
National Ranking: No. 121 (tie)
Acceptance rate: 89%
Iowa State is a medium-sized school that dominates the town of Ames. As one of the three Big 12 schools ranked at No. 121, the Cyclones are still on the outside looking in at being a top 100 institution.
City: Tucson, Arizona
National Ranking: No. 109 (tie)
Acceptance rate: 86%
One of two schools in the state of Arizona after the recent Big 12 expansion and according to U.S. News, the Wildcats are more prestigious. Coming in at No. 109, the Wildcats are also tied nationally with Tennessee, Oregon, Missouri, SDSU and one other Big 12 program.
City: Provo, Utah
National Ranking: No. 109 (tie)
Acceptance rate: 69%
BYU is a relatively new member of the Big 12 and is one of three private schools in the conference along with Baylor and TCU. Its 28% 4-year graduation rate is the lowest in the conference due to the fact most of its student body is required to complete a religious mission before graduation.
City: Fort Worth, Texas
National Ranking: No. 105 (tie)
Acceptance rate: 43%
TCU is the largest religious university associated with the Christian Church but is the smallest school in the Big 12 with only 10,915 undergraduates. The Horned Frogs are tied with Auburn, Illinois Institute of Technology and Saint Louis University at No. 105.
City: Boulder, Colorado
National Ranking: No. 98 (tie)
Acceptance rate: 81%
The University of Colorado is one of two Big 12 schools in the top 100. Coming in at No. 98, CU Boulder is tied with Iowa, Temple, Rutgers University (Camden), Gonzaga, FIU and Yeshiva University.
City: Waco, Texas
National Ranking: No. 91 (tie)
Acceptance rate: 51%
The top academic school in the Big 12 is Baylor University. Baylor is another religious university in the Big 12 along with BYU and TCU. It is one of the smaller schools in the conference with just over 15,000 undergrads. The Bears are tied with SMU, South Florida, American, Fordham, Loyola Marymount and Rochester Institute of Tech.
Follow Charlie Strella on X, Threads and Instagram.
Contact/Follow us @BuffaloesWire on X (formerly Twitter) and like our page on Facebook for ongoing coverage of Colorado news, notes and opinions.
This article originally appeared on Buffaloes Wire: Big 12 schools listed by 2025 US News academic ranking
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Urban Meyer unable to properly count Georgia's number of home games
Former Florida Gators and Ohio State Buckeyes head coach Urban Meyer discussed the Georgia Bulldogs' prospects for the 2025 college football season on "The Triple Option" podcast. The podcast features Meyer, former Alabama Crimson Tide running back Mark Ingram and fellow FOX college football analyst Rob Stone. Meyer emphasized the importance of scheduling and how it impacts a team's success. Advertisement "I am sitting here looking at Georgia's schedule. They are playing nine, this is an SEC schedule man, nine games at home," said Meyer. There's no doubt that Georgia scheduled a soft nonconference schedule in 2025. "Marshall, Austin Peay and Charlotte and they've got nine. Count them. Nine home games," added Meyer. "Come on Kirby (Smart) what in the world was that." Meyer fails to mention that Georgia plays Georgia Tech, as usual, in nonconference play. Ohio State Buckeyes former head coach Urban Meyer Well, we counted. We have a copy of Georgia's schedule and can clearly see that the Bulldogs play seven home games, which is very common in this era of college. Georgia does play a pair of neutral site games against Florida and Georgia Tech. The Bulldogs only have three true road games, so that's what Meyer is trying to get at. Advertisement It is a little embarrassing that Meyer, who obviously coached at Florida, did not realize that the Georgia-Florida game is played a neutral site on UGA's schedule. We also can see Ohio State's schedule from their 2024 national championship season, where the Buckeyes did actually play nine home games (includes one home game in the College Football Playoff). The Buckeyes played a three-game regular season nonconference slate of Akron, Western Kentucky and Marshall and had eight regular season games at home, which is a lot. As for Florida, the Gators had a challenging 2024 schedule that still featured seven home games. The Gators have six home games in 2025 while Ohio State had seven home games in 2025, which is the same amount as Georgia. Despite a weak nonconference schedule, Georgia's schedule is by no means easy. The Bulldogs play Alabama, Texas and Ole Miss at home and have road games against Auburn and Tennessee. Neutral site contests against Florida and Georgia Tech present significant challenges as well. Georgia football's 2025 schedule Head coach Kirby Smart of the Georgia Bulldogs Advertisement Follow UGAWire on Instagram! This article originally appeared on UGA Wire: Urban Meyer critical of Georgia football's 2025 schedule
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Rankings Georgia's opponents based on ESPN FPI
ESPN recently released their preseason Football Power Index (FPI) rankings. Georgia Bulldogs fans learned that the Dawgs are ranked No. 2 on FPI with a rating of 26.6. The Football Power Index is a predictive ranking system that quantifies team strength. It is used to predict games and season results in football. FPI is most useful in college football because team strength is tougher to gauge due to the high number of teams in Division I and the uneven strength of conferences. Advertisement FPI views the SEC as the strongest conference in football since the SEC has the top three teams and five of the top 10 teams in the FPI rankings. The Big Ten has three top 10 teams, the ACC has just one, and Notre Dame rounds out the list. ESPN's projections have Georgia making the College Football Playoff 78.9% of the time, which is the second most of any team outside of the Texas Longhorns. Georgia also has the second-highest odds to win the SEC and make the national championship. Even still, Georgia's projected record sits at 10.1-2.4, which ranks fourth behind Texas, Ohio State, and Penn State. They have a gauntlet of SEC opponents to face and a challenging 2025 schedule. Ranking each of the Georgia Bulldogs' 2025 opponents based on FPI Jan 1, 2025; Atlanta, GA, USA; Texas Longhorns quarterback Arch Manning (16) warms up before the Peach Bowl at Mercedes-Benz Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Brett Davis-Imagn Images Advertisement Note: Austin Peay isn't ranked in FPI because they're a Football Championship Subdivision (FCS) team, and FPI only ranks the Football Bowl Subdivision (FBS) teams. This article originally appeared on UGA Wire: Where Georgia's 2025 opponents rank based on ESPN Football Power Index
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Even after House v. NCAA settlement, college sports remain broken. But what else is new?
College sports are at an inflection point. Approval of the long-awaited House v. NCAA settlement was finally granted on Friday, a decision set to reshape the future of college sports. And yet, so much of the industry's future is still pinned to Congress and the hopes of federal legislation, all while private equity and 'super league' models circle overhead. President Donald Trump recently considered a commission that would explore the issues facing the NCAA and college athletics, with Nick Saban expected to be involved. Advertisement An enterprise that has long had too many cooks in the kitchen now has all three branches of government and outside financing getting involved. (Wherefore art thou 'stick to sports' crowd?) That's on top of the current power struggle over the future of the College Football Playoff, and the expanding competitive gap between the power conferences and everyone else. All of it underscores just how fractured and dysfunctional college athletics have become, with no quick fixes in sight. But for as dire as all of this might seem, it's not a death rattle, either. College sports are broken and in desperate need of reform. And college sports will be just fine. For too long the NCAA was trapped in amber, still trying to operate as a singular, all-encompassing, amateur production, while its most prominent sports and conferences leaned further into a big-money, professionalized business model. Prior court rulings and allowing athletes to earn name, image and likeness (NIL) compensation have chipped away at the old notion, but only after the NCAA got dragged along, kicking and screaming. The organization consistently opted for incremental half measures over effective reform, which is how we swung from full-ride athletic scholarships feeling grossly insufficient to the guardrails getting ripped off via lawless, pay-for-play NIL deals. Yet college sports keep hanging tough, resilient through change and mismanagement. Advertisement The House settlement is the latest example, a $2.8 billion agreement that peels away at the last remaining vestiges of amateurism in collegiate athletics by allowing schools to directly pay athletes, yet fails to solve the industry's biggest underlying issue: The NCAA is still ripe for litigation. To be fair, the House settlement an attempt to find that Goldilocks solution to athlete compensation, as well as revamp the broader governance of college athletics. It improves the status quo, most notably because more athletes will receive a bigger cut of the billions in revenue dollars that college sports generate. It also reflects a shift in posture by the NCAA since Charlie Baker took the reins from Mark Emmert as NCAA president in 2023, and the growing influence of the power conferences. Rather than risking more legal defeats (and financial ruin), the NCAA opted for compromise, bundling a trio of high-profile antitrust lawsuits into one agreement and footing a multi-billion-dollar bill. Except it doesn't change the fact that the NCAA and power conferences are still trying to live in two worlds at once — the old and the new — a luxury that even this pricey settlement can't buy. There are still questions about years of eligibility, collective bargaining, athlete employment status, conflicting state laws, Title IX, third-party NIL deals, and the likelihood of Congressional intervening on any of it. Unless Congress or this presidential commission — which is currently on pause — can drum up some legislative action in relatively short order, the House settlement does little to stop the onslaught of legal challenges that have kneecapped the NCAA's authority, again and again. 'The House settlement started with the goal of the NCAA putting an end to the losses it has taken in these litigations all over the country,' Cal Stein, a sports law lawyer, said in an interview with earlier this year. 'But the great irony is that it's really just going to lead to more lawsuits.' Advertisement This lack of harmony plagues college sports beyond the courtrooms, too. Yes, revenues keep climbing, and that money is a direct result of the continued popularity. But don't mistake it to mean every development has been fan friendly. Dollar signs also funded the Great Consolidation of conference realignment and power conference autonomy, dismantling so much of the regionality and tradition that makes college sports special. As fans continue to suffer lost rivalries and increasingly transient rosters (and whatever happens with the Playoff), it's reasonable to argue that enthusiasm has dipped as a result, at least in some corners. But what is unassailable, by any modern cultural standard, is that college sports remain extremely popular, warts and all. College football is the second most-watched sport in America behind the NFL. Men's basketball recently had its best TV audience since 2017 for a Final Four, featuring four No. 1 seeds from power conferences. Women's basketball has experienced exponential growth in the past few years. Nebraska women's volleyball filled a football stadium with 92,000 fans in 2023, breaking the world record for attendance of a women's sports event. Stanford softball set the sport's all-time attendance record this season. Times change. College sports plow on. There's more change ahead. What a much-needed reset actually looks like for the industry is up for debate, and competing voices can haggle over how to best restructure college sports and what role the NCAA should serve. But the House settlement required years of mountain-moving negotiations and billions of dollars in restitution that will totally upend the industry — only to reiterate more is needed. Advertisement '(The settlement is) not the end of the story,' SEC commissioner Greg Sankey said during a recent panel discussion. 'It is a chapter. It's a necessary chapter.' That's a nice way of saying the current Frankenstein approach isn't gonna cut it, and is merely delaying the inevitable. Until then, history tells us to expect more of the same resiliency from college sports in this post-settlement era … or if the College Football Playoff expands (again) to 16 teams … or if the NCAA Tournament expands to 76 teams … or if the President invokes an executive order … or if some version of the power conferences break away in football to form a super league. One of the few constants in college sports is the ability to prosper in spite of themselves. Though it would be nice if that didn't always have to be the case. This article originally appeared in The Athletic. College Football, Men's College Basketball, Sports Business, Women's College Basketball 2025 The Athletic Media Company
