logo
Epping council goes to High Court to remove migrants from hotel

Epping council goes to High Court to remove migrants from hotel

Telegraph3 days ago
Epping Forest district council has applied to the High Court to stop asylum seekers being housed at a hotel that has been at the centre of protests.
The local authority has asked for an interim injunction to prohibit the use of the Bell Hotel as asylum seeker accommodation for a fortnight.
The leader of the council said it had taken the action because ' the current situation cannot go on', adding that the Home Office 'continues not to listen'.
Protests have been taking place outside the hotel since last month, after an Ethiopian asylum seeker was charged with sexually assaulting a schoolgirl days after arriving in Britain.
Hadush Gerberslasie Kebatu, 38, denied the charge when he appeared at Chelmsford magistrates' court, and has been remanded in custody.
In a statement on Tuesday, Cllr Chris Whitbread said: 'The current situation cannot go on. If the Bell Hotel was a nightclub, we could have closed it down long ago.
'So far as the council is aware, there is no criminal record checking of individuals who might only have been in the country a matter of days before being housed at the hotel.
'There are five schools and a residential care home within the vicinity of the hotel.
'The use by the Home Office of the premises for asylum seekers poses a clear risk of further escalating community tensions already at a high, and the risk of irreparable harm to the local community. We are frustrated that the Home Office continues not to listen.'
The Conservative-led council is claiming that placing asylum seekers in the Bell Hotel is a 'clear breach of planning permission' because it is not being used as a hotel.
Cllr Whitbread said he hoped that, should an interim injunction be granted, it would be a 'catalyst to the prohibition of the use of the Bell Hotel' to house migrants.
At the end of last month, Essex Police said 14 people had been charged in connection with protests outside the hotel, and there had been 23 arrests.
Protesters opposing the use of the hotel to house migrants have also been faced by counter-protests, at times leading to hundreds of demonstrators in the area.
Since the demonstrations began in Epping, there have been other migrant protests cropping up in other parts of the country, including at Heathrow and the financial area of Canary Wharf.
Cllr Holly Whitbread, responsible for Epping Forest district council's finances, told PA: 'In terms of the community impact and the pressure on local infrastructure, it's just completely unsustainable, particularly also in light of the amount of police resource which has been required around some of the protests which I know have been largely peaceful.'
'In theory, the Home Office are supposed to foot the bill for those within the hotel, but I think the reality is often different'.
Meanwhile, Ricard Tice, the Reform UK deputy leader, claimed migrants were 'leering and jeering' at mothers taking their children to school.
He told Times Radio: 'We are seeing an increase in numbers of sexual assaults, leering and jeering, coincidentally around asylum seeker hotels. When I campaign up and down the country, I hear this from concerned residents close to these hotels time and time again. Around primary schools, as mums take their youngsters to school.'
Other local authorities have previously sought injunctions against the use of hotels as asylum accommodation. Councils including Ipswich borough council, East Riding of Yorkshire council, Fenland district council and Stoke-on-Trent city council had interim injunctions granted but not continued.
In January 2023, the High Court decided to continue an injunction from the previous in Great Yarmouth, Norfolk, where a seafront hotel had been lined up to house asylum seekers.
The court noted that the area's local plan had a policy to protect the seafront, and that hostels were not permitted there.
Matt Vickers, the shadow policing minister, said Epping Forest district council 'is absolutely right to take a stand'.
He added: 'Communities like Epping should not be forced to carry the burden of Labour's broken asylum policy. Local residents have every right to feel safe in their own streets and every right to object to this accommodation in their community.
'This is the direct result of Labour's decision to throw open Britain's borders and tear up the deterrents the Conservatives put in place. The Conservatives will remove all illegal arrivals immediately and put a proper deterrent in place so that towns like Epping are never put in this position again.'
A Home Office spokesman said: 'It would be inappropriate to comment while legal proceedings are ongoing.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Police will not endorse activities of volunteer ‘force' launching patrols
Police will not endorse activities of volunteer ‘force' launching patrols

The Independent

time16 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Police will not endorse activities of volunteer ‘force' launching patrols

A police force said it will not endorse the activities of volunteers in Bournemouth who have set up a uniformed 'force' to patrol the streets, adding a review of their vetting processes highlighted 'areas of significant concern'. Safeguard Force, whose volunteers will wear branded bibs, said it aims to create 'safer, more supportive communities by providing visible, compassionate and non-confrontational patrols' which were set to start on August 11. The move follows two high-profile murder cases in the town as well as the local police force having to introduce dispersal powers on the seafront after a disturbance involving a 'large group of people' on June 30 which left a teenage girl and two officers injured. Dorset Police said a multi-agency meeting was held with Safeguard Force on Friday and 'a review of their vetting processes has highlighted areas of significant concern'. Assistant Chief Constable Mark Callaghan, of Dorset Police, said: 'Following a multi-agency meeting on Friday 15 August 2025, which involved Dorset Police, other emergency services, the local authority and representatives of Safeguard Force, we will not be endorsing their activities. 'We have engaged with the group extensively and a review of their vetting processes has highlighted areas of significant concern. The organisers have been unable to provide reassurance that this group has sufficient safeguards in place to ensure volunteers are adequately vetted, trained, and equipped to undertake high-visibility patrols in the community. 'Safeguard Force's policies provided to police contain insufficient details in relation to the use of body-worn cameras, publishing of photographs of members of the public, administration and recording of any force used or first aid provided and limited evidence of any training provided. 'We welcome the responsible use of volunteers, who wish to carry out public service and there are many ways in which this can be facilitated in a safe way, including becoming a Special Constable, joining the street pastor programme, or via established Watch schemes. 'All these initiatives have appropriate policies and processes in place, particularly around the vetting of individuals and safeguarding of vulnerable people. 'Dorset Police continues to carry out high-visibility patrols, with 289 foot patrols taking place in the past seven days throughout Bournemouth town centre, gardens and seafront. 'This resulted in arrests being made and dispersal notices being issued, stop searches for drugs or weapons, anti-social behaviour incidents attended, intelligence gathered and almost 1,200 conversations with members of the public and 131 businesses and local premises visited. 'We would encourage members of the public to speak to our officers and report incidents and crimes directly to us so we're able to effectively respond and investigate.' In March, Nasen Saadi was jailed for life to serve a minimum of 39 years at Winchester Crown Court for the murder of Amie Gray and attempted murder of Leanne Miles on Bournemouth beach on May 24 2024. And in January 2023, Afghan asylum seeker Lawangeen Abdulrahimzai was jailed for life to serve a minimum of 29 years at Salisbury Crown Court for the murder of 21-year-old Thomas Roberts outside a Subway takeaway shop in Bournemouth in March 2022.

Why a sonic boom was heard in parts of England
Why a sonic boom was heard in parts of England

The Independent

time16 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Why a sonic boom was heard in parts of England

A sonic boom was heard across parts of Essex, Cambridgeshire, Suffolk, Kent, and London on Friday morning. The loud bang was caused by two RAF Typhoon fighter jets that were scrambled from RAF Coningsby, Lincolnshire. The jets were launched to intercept a San Marino-registered private aircraft that had lost contact with air traffic control. The civilian aircraft was safely escorted to Stansted Airport, where communications were re-established. Essex Police confirmed that officers on the ground found nothing of concern after the aircraft landed.

Kate Forbes ban venue forced into a humiliating U-turn after public funds threat
Kate Forbes ban venue forced into a humiliating U-turn after public funds threat

Daily Mail​

time17 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Kate Forbes ban venue forced into a humiliating U-turn after public funds threat

The Edinburgh Festival Fringe venue at the centre of the Kate Forbes cancel culture row has performed a dramatic U-turn after threats to its public funding. Summerhall Arts, which was recently awarded £608,000 in grants, climbed down over an apparent ban on deputy First Minister because of her gender critical views. Bosses had claimed her appearance last week in a political talk was an 'oversight' and gave a 'guarantee' it wouldn't happen again. But after their statement was condemned by senior SNP figures, including ex First Minister Nicola Sturgeon, the charity chiefs said no politician would be banned after all. Chief executive Sam Gough told the Mail: 'No one is banned from appearing on the stages. Summerhall is a collection of things in this building, including stages and venues. We have not banned anyone.' Mr Gough's uncaveated comments went further than a statement issued earlier in the day by the organisation, which put a pre-condition on future appearances. It said there would be no ban on anyone 'assuming they adhere to our zero tolerance regarding discrimination'. The damage limitation exercise followed an outcry over censorship with both the Government and arts quango Creative Scotland appearing to wash their hands of it. Ministers said they had no role in 'individual funding decisions', while Creative Scotland, which gave Summerhall £608,302 in January, claimed it had no part in 'programming decisions'. The Scottish Conservatives said both were missing the point - that taxpayers' cash was supporting an organisation that appeared to be breaking the law by stifling free speech. A condition of Summerhall's state funding that it must 'comply with all applicable laws'. Ms Forbes, a devout Christian who opposed the SNP's botched gender self-ID reforms, spoke at the venue last week. Summerhall apologised to performers just hours ahead of her appearance as it was concerned about 'the safety and wellbeing of LGBTQ+ artists, staff and audiences by attracting those who share her 'views' and said 'we have work to do to repair the damage'. They even provided a 'designated relaxed space' or 'safe room' said to be 'terrified' of the 5ft 2in Skye MSP. The row coincided with controversies over gender critical authors being excluded from the state-backed Edinburgh Book Festival and a best-selling book of gender critical essays, The Women Who Wouldn't Wheest, being pulled from a National Library of Scotland exhibition. Finance Secretary Shona Robison called Summerhall's reaction 'unwise and unnecessary', while Ms Sturgeon said she didn't agree with cancel culture or the venue's actions. The Scottish Tories demanded Summerhall's public funding be cut for potentially discriminating against people because of their beliefs. In 2023, the Stand comedy club had to back down after trying to cancel a Fringe show by then SNP MP Joanna Cherry KC because of her gender critical views, admitting its original decision was 'unfair and constituted unlawful discrimination'. Last year Creative Scotland axed £84,555 of public funding from the live arts project Rein after a plan to include real sex acts was deemed a breach of contract. Bowing to pressure yesterday, the venue said 'no-one is banned from the Summerhall building or by Summerhall Arts' and it would 'not be banning politicians or anyone else'. It was a marked departure from its message to artists eight days earlier, which an insider downplayed as merely an 'email to performers', not an official statement. Scottish Tory equalities spokeswoman Tess White said there had been too much 'craven buck-passing' by the Government and Creative Scotland. She said: 'This latest clear-as-mud statement from Summerhall just underlines the need for SNP ministers to step in and order the venue to get its act together. 'Summerhall's shameful decision to suppress free speech didn't occur in a vacuum. 'For years the SNP have been pushing their reckless and unlawful self-ID policy on Scotland's public bodies and pandering to gender extremists. 'As a result, organisations funded by taxpayers think it's okay to silence those who have the moral courage and legal vindication to stand up for women's rights. It's totally unacceptable. 'John Swinney and Creative Scotland, which has form for financing dodgy projects, should remove funding from any group or venue that blocks legitimate free speech.' It emerged yesterday that Summerhall Arts had known since April that Ms Forbes would appear in an event run by the Herald newspaper but did not object. Just 48 hours before the event, managers raised fears about 'hate speech'. SNP Culture Secretary Angus Roberson yesterday told the Herald he was 'a strong supporter of the freedom of speech and of expression at our festivals'. He said: 'It will not be easy all of the time to please everybody. 'But I think keeping an eye on the principle of freedom of expression and the expression of different views is an established and important part of our national life.' Mr Robertson is the MSP for Edinburgh Central, which is home to many cultural organisations, and he said he does not make decisions about their funding to avoid conflicts of interest. He has specifically 'recused himself from decisions in relation to Summerhall', which are taken by employment minister Richard Lochhead instead. A Creative Scotland spokesman said: 'Creative Scotland does not play a role in the programming decisions of funded organisations.' A Scottish Government spokesman said: 'Creative Scotland is an arms-length funding body and Ministers have no role in individual funding decisions.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store