logo
‘The Fantastic Four: First Steps' is a grown-up glow-up for the superhero genre

‘The Fantastic Four: First Steps' is a grown-up glow-up for the superhero genre

'The Fantastic Four: First Steps' slots into summer blockbuster season like a square peg in a round popcorn bucket. Prestige TV director Matt Shakman ('WandaVision') isn't inclined to pretzel himself like the flexible Reed Richards to please all four quadrants of the multiplex. His staid superhero movie plays like classic sci-fi in which adults wearing sweater vests solemnly brainstorm how to resolve a crisis. Watching it, I felt as snug as being nestled in the backseat of my grandparents' car at the drive-in.
This reboot of the Fantastic Four franchise — the third in two decades — is lightyears closer to 1951's 'The Day the Earth Stood Still' than it is to the frantic, over-cluttered superhero epics that have come to define modern entertainment. Set on Earth 828, an alternate universe that borrows our own Atomic Age decor, it doesn't just look old, it moves old. The tone and pace are as sure-footed as globe-gobbling Galactus, this film's heavy, purposefully marching into alt-world Manhattan. Even its tidy running time is from another epoch. Under two hours? Now that's vintage chic.
'First Steps' picks up several years after four astronauts — Reed (Pedro Pascal), his wife, Sue (Vanessa Kirby), his brother-in-law Johnny (Joseph Quinn) and his best friend Ben (Ebon Moss-Bachrach) — get themselves blasted by cosmic rays that endow them with special powers. You may know the leads better as, respectively, Mr. Fantastic, the Invisible Woman, the Human Torch and the Thing. For mild comic relief, they also pal around with a robot named H.E.R.B.I.E., voiced by Matthew Wood.
Skipping their origin story keeps things tight while underlining the idea that these are settled-down grown-ups secure in their abilities to lengthen, disappear, ignite and clobber. Fans might argue they should be a bit more neurotic; screenplay structuralists will grumble they have no narrative arc. The mere mortals of Earth 828 respect the squad for their brains and their brawn — they're celebrities in a genteel pre-paparazzi time — but these citizens are also prone to despair when they aren't sure Pascal's workaholic daddy will save them.
Lore has it Stan Lee was a married, middle-aged father aging out of writing comic books when his beloved spouse, Joan, elbowed him to develop characters who felt personal. The graying, slightly boring Reed was a loose-limbed version of himself: the ultimate wife guy with the ultimate wife.
But Hollywood has aged-down Lee's 'quaint quartet,' as he called them, at its own peril. Make the Fantastic Four cool (as the movies have repeatedly tried and failed to do) and they come across as desperately lame. This time, Shakman and the script's four-person writing team of Josh Friedman, Eric Pearson, Jeff Kaplan and Ian Springer valorize their lameness and restore their dignity. Pascal's Mr. Fantastic is so buttoned-down that he tucks his tie into his dress shirt.
The scenario is that Sue is readying to give birth to the Richards' first child just as the herald Shalla-Bal (Julia Garner), a.k.a. the Silver Surfer, barrels into the atmosphere to politely inform humanity that her boss Galactus (voiced by Ralph Ineson) has RSVP-ed yes to her invitation that he devour their planet. In a biologically credible touch, the animators have added tarnish to her cleavage: 'I doubt she was naked,' Reed says evenly. 'It was probably a stellar polymer.'
Typically, this threat would trigger a madcap fetch-this-gizmo caper (as it did in the original comic). Shakman's version doesn't waste its energy or our time on that. Rather, this a lean showdown between self-control and gluttony, between our modest heroes and a greedy titan. It's at the Venn diagram of a Saturday morning cartoon and a moralistic Greek myth.
The film is all sleek lines, from its themes to its architecture to its images. The visuals by the cinematographer Jess Hall are crisp and impactful: a translucent hand snatching at a womb, a character falling into the pull of a yawning black hole, a torso stretched like chewing gum, a rocket launch that can't blast off until we get a close-up of everyone buckling their seatbelts. Even in space, the CG isn't razzle-dazzle busy. Meanwhile, Michael Giacchino's score soars between bleats of triumph and barbershop-chorus charm, a combination that can sound like an automobile show unveiling the first convertible with tail fins.
There is little brawling and less snark. No one comes off like an aspiring stand-up comic. These characters barely raise their voices and often use their abilities on the mundane: Kirby's Sue vanishes to avoid awkward conversations, Moss-Bachrach's Ben, in a nod to his breakout role as the maître d' on 'The Bear,' uses his mighty fists to mash garlic. Johnny, the youngest and most literally hotheaded of the group, is apt to light himself on fire when he can't be bothered to find a flashlight. He delivers the meanest quip in a respectful movie when he tells Reed, 'I take back every single bad thing I've been saying about you … to myself, in private.'
Yes, my audience giggled dutifully at the jiggling Jell-O salads and drooled over the groovy conversation pits in the Richards' living room, the only super lair I'd ever live in. The color palette emphasizes retro shades of blue, green and gold; even the extras have coordinated their outfits to the trim on the Fantasticar. Delightfully, when Moss-Bachrach's brawny rock monster strolls to the deli to buy black-and-white cookies, he's wearing a gargantuan pair of penny loafers.
If you want to feel old, the generation of middle schoolers who saw 2008's 'Iron Man' on opening weekend are now beginning to raise their own children. Thirty-seven films later, the Marvel Cinematic Universe has gotten so insecure about its own mission that it's pitching movies at every maturity level. The recent 'Thunderbolts*' is for surly teenagers, 'Deadpool & Wolverine' is the drunk, divorced uncle at a BBQ, and 'First Steps' extends a sympathetic hand to young families who identify with Reed's frustration that he can't childproof the entire galaxy.
Here, for a mass audience, Kirby gets to reprise her underwatched Oscar-nominated turn in 'Pieces of a Woman,' in which she extended out a 24-minute, single-take labor scene. This karaoke snippet is good (and even a little operatic when the pain makes her dematerialize). I was as impressed by the costumer Alexandra Byrne's awareness that even super moms won't immediately snap back into wearing tight spandex. (By contrast, when Jessica Alba played Sue in 2007's 'Fantastic Four: Rise of the Silver Surfer,' the director notoriously asked her to be 'prettier' when she cried.)
This reboot's boldest stride toward progress is that it values emotionally credible performances. Otherwise, Pascal aside, you wouldn't assemble this cast for any audience besides critics and dweebs (myself included) who keep a running list of their favorite not-quite-brand-name talents who are ready to break through to the next level of their career while yelling, 'It's clobbering time!'
Still, this isn't anyone's best role, and it's a great movie only when compared to similarly budgeted dreck. Yet it's a worthy exercise in creating something that doesn't feel nostalgic for an era — it feels of an era. Even if the MCU's take on slow cinema doesn't sell tickets in our era, I admire the confidence of a movie that sets its own course instead of chasing the common wisdom that audiences want 2½ hours of chaos. Studio executives continuing to insist on that nonsense deserve Marvel's first family to give them a disappointed talking-to, and send them to back their boardrooms without supper..
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

‘Weapons' Director Zach Cregger on David Fincher's Advice, Sequel Plans and What His ‘Resident Evil' Movie Will Look Like
‘Weapons' Director Zach Cregger on David Fincher's Advice, Sequel Plans and What His ‘Resident Evil' Movie Will Look Like

Yahoo

time2 days ago

  • Yahoo

‘Weapons' Director Zach Cregger on David Fincher's Advice, Sequel Plans and What His ‘Resident Evil' Movie Will Look Like

SPOILER ALERT: This article contains minor spoilers about 'Weapons,' now playing in theaters. Director Zach Cregger's sophomore feature, 'Weapons,' is a story about a small town overtaken by a malevolent force. One night, all of the kids from a specific classroom run away, and the townspeople become increasingly furious that the police have no leads. The narrative follows several locals — including troubled teacher Justine (Julia Garner), whose class went missing; Paul, a cop (Alden Ehrenreich); Archer (Josh Brolin), whose son is one of the missing kids; and a young burglar (Austin Abrams) — as they get pulled into the central mystery. More from Variety Box Office: 'Weapons' Makes $5.7 Million in Previews, 'Freakier Friday' Has $3.1 Million New Movies Out Now in Theaters: What to See This Week Box Office: 'Freakier Friday' and 'Weapons' Battle for First Place Over 'Fantastic Four' Although he was unable to talk about any specific spoilers at the end of the film, Cregger broke down many key elements in 'Weapons,' Including the film's use of humor, gore and that surreal moment with the floating assault weapon. I think the idea for the structure came very early on. I knew once I got out of the cold open and started with Justine that she was not going to be the only perspective of this story. I was pretty instantly excited about the idea of having a novelistic structure where we follow different protagonists, but I wanted to set a rule for myself that I would never go back. Once I moved on, their chapter was done. If I could hold fast to that, the movie would be better for it, and it was not an easy thing for me to do, but for better or worse, I committed to that structure. And that's not really the structure that 'Magnolia' follows. 'Magnolia' is more of a reference point for me because of the scale and the tone of it. And John C. Reilly's mustache is in my movie on Alden's face. Honestly, there's something about the John C. Reilly stuff where he loses the gun and he's searching for it in the rain that felt like a North Star. Just the vibe of that, I want to live in that, so I wanted to write a movie that feels like it's moving in that direction. No. I mean, it doesn't work that way. Somebody dies, and you're gonna feel that absence for the rest of your life. Maybe the sting can kind of lessen, but I don't know if that's time or community or what. I don't think making this movie has exorcised any demons. It's just given me an opportunity to engage with those feelings in a healthy, constructive way. Rather than going and drinking myself to death, I'm able to write a character that drinks herself into a problem. I can take my anger and have Josh Brolin freak out, and that's better than me freaking out. I don't know. It's a very important moment for me in this movie, and to be frank with you, I think what I love about it so much is that I don't understand it. I have a few different ideas of what it might be there for, but I don't have the right answer. I like the idea that everyone is probably going to have their own kind of interaction or their own relationship with that scene, whether they don't give a shit about it and it's boring, or whether they think it's some sort of political statement, or whether they think it's just cool. I don't really care. It's not up to me. I just like that it's there. You have to just let them come organically to the situation that you're writing and not try to inject anything funny into the movie. There are a couple of jokes I wrote into the movie where I thought I was being clever, and they're all on the cutting room floor. The rule I've learned for myself is to let the situation dictate the humor. Let the movie ask me for the humor, don't try to put it in. Be in service of the story, don't try to be clever. I got everything. I mean, it's not that grisly. I guess I could thank 'Terrifier 3' for coming out and totally raping everybody's eyes so that anything I'm going to do is going to feel PG. Yeah, but I'm still working on that because I tried it in 'Barbarian' and I didn't get it right, and I'm trying it in 'Weapons.' I didn't quite get it, but one day I'm going to get that 'Irreversible' fire extinguisher head smash. That's my white whale. I've got to try it again. He's just a very helpful guy. He was available to me during prep, and then he was very available during the post process. He watched the movie and had a lot of really constructive thoughts and gave me a ton of ideas. He helped me learn more about the editing process and how to think about it in a new way that wasn't available to me when I was making 'Barbarian.' So he just opened my mind up a lot. There are things I thought I had to just settle for. I thought, 'Well, that's the take I have. That's the best take. And it's not perfect, but by God, nothing is.' Dave's attitude is, 'It can always be better, and there are a lot of tools that you have at your disposal that you might not be thinking about.' So, from reframing to stabilization to ADR to all sorts of things, it was really cool. Honestly, I learned a lot about how to prep, what lenses to use. I shot this mostly anamorphic, and I didn't quite respect how limiting anamorphic is in the post process. So stuff like that, technical stuff. I've seen their work, so I know what tones they can take. I know Josh can be really funny and really serious — I've seen 'No Country for Old Men,' and I've seen 'Hail, Caesar!' I know what he can do. Julia in 'The Assistant' … I watched that and thought, 'This is what I need. This is amazing.' She's amazing, but that movie tipped the scales for me. Alden, I've been a massive fan since I saw 'Hail, Caesar!' Austin Abrams is a miracle, and I woke up to him when I saw 'Brad's Status,' which is a Mike White movie that he was in. I was like, 'Who is this kid that has total courage in this movie, and he does nothing, and it just rocks?' And then Amy Madigan, I'm a huge fan. I got to collect people that I've always loved watching. Definitely. I've actually … it's funny you asked that. I can't help it: I have another idea for something in this world that I'm kind of excited about. I'm not going to do it next, and I probably won't do it after my next movie, but I do have one and I'd like to see it on the screen one day. Those games pioneered something special. The pacing of those games is so unique and effective, and just being locked in with one character moving from point A to point B, knowing you're going to pass through this gauntlet of terror, and you've got to be methodical and thoughtful about it. That's cool. That's cinematic. So I want to tell the story in the world of the games that honors the lore of the games, but it's a new story. Best of Variety 'Blue Velvet,' 'Chinatown' and 'Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas' Arrive on 4K in June All the Godzilla Movies Ranked 'House of the Dragon': Every Character and What You Need to Know About the 'Game of Thrones' Prequel Solve the daily Crossword

'Weapons' tops North American box office for 2nd weekend
'Weapons' tops North American box office for 2nd weekend

UPI

time2 days ago

  • UPI

'Weapons' tops North American box office for 2nd weekend

1 of 3 | Julia Garner's "Weapons" is the No. 1 movie in North America for a second week. File Photo by Jim Ruymen/UPI | License Photo Aug. 17 (UPI) -- Julia Garner's Weapons is the No. 1 movie in North America for a second weekend, earning an additional $25 million in receipts this Friday through Sunday, announced. Coming in at No. 2 is Freakier Friday with $14.5 million, followed by Nobody 2 at No. 3 with $9.3 million, The Fantastic Four: First Steps at No. 4 with $8.8 million and The Bad Guys 2 at No. 5 with $7.5 million. Rounding out the top tier are Superman at No. 6 with $5.3 million, The Naked Gun at No. 7 with $4.8 million, Jurassic World: Rebirth at No. 8 with $2.9 million, F1 at No. 9 with $2.7 million and Coolio at No. 10 with $2.5 million.

THE FANTASTIC FOUR: FIRST STEPS Concept Art Shows Off Deleted Super-Apes Scene and More of Reed's Stretchy Powers — GeekTyrant
THE FANTASTIC FOUR: FIRST STEPS Concept Art Shows Off Deleted Super-Apes Scene and More of Reed's Stretchy Powers — GeekTyrant

Geek Tyrant

time2 days ago

  • Geek Tyrant

THE FANTASTIC FOUR: FIRST STEPS Concept Art Shows Off Deleted Super-Apes Scene and More of Reed's Stretchy Powers — GeekTyrant

Some new concept art from Marvel artist Wesley Burt just dropped, and it gives us an even clearer look at the wild deleted Fantastic Four: First Steps scene featuring Red Ghost and his Super-Apes. The image shows Pedro Pascal's Reed Richards in the middle of a brawl with three of the Super-Apes. Igor, the shape-shifting baboon, is chomping down on Reed's rubbery face. Peotor, the orangutan with magnetic powers, is clinging to his arm, and Reed is tangled up with Miklho, the most well-known of the bunch. Fans got a quick glimpse of Peotor during the movie, but this concept art makes it painfully obvious how much more we missed out on. Originally, the full scene included John Malkovich as Red Ghost, but it ended up on the cutting room floor. According to director Matt Shakman, the decision to remove the sequence was 'heartbreaking,' but necessary. He explained, 'We had so many characters to introduce this whole world, this whole other universe, and it just became too much backstory.' In the final cut, Red Ghost and the Super-Apes only get a quick name drop as part of the Fantastic Four's past victories. With artwork this cool, fans are definitely hoping that Marvel drops the full deleted scene soon.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store