logo
Federal judge deems Ottawa's refusal of Jordan's Principle funds to renovate mouldy home 'unreasonable'

Federal judge deems Ottawa's refusal of Jordan's Principle funds to renovate mouldy home 'unreasonable'

CBC17-07-2025
Social Sharing
A federal court has overturned and granted a judicial review of Indigenous Services of Canada's (ISC) decision to deny an Oneida Nation of the Thames woman funding to renovate her mould-contaminated home, which she says has caused her grandchildren's asthma symptoms to worsen.
In her written decision, Justice Ann Marie McDonald said ISC took an "unreasonably narrow approach" in its refusal for funding Joanne Powless requested through Jordan's Principle as the primary caregiver for her granddaughters, aged eight and 10.
The program is designed to ensure First Nations kids get the medical care and social services supports they need in a timely manner, with the provinces and Ottawa later sorting out jurisdictional battles over who is responsible for the bill.
Powless, who lives on the territory west of London, Ont., has spent three years asking the agency to cover renovation costs of almost $200,000 to remove mould and fix deteriorating ceilings and walls in her home, along with temporary relocation, food and personal hygiene items.
Despite documentation from the children's pediatrician, and contractors explaining the scale of the mould and how its affecting their health, Ottawa rejected Powless's application twice. It explained that mould remediation services are outside the scope of Jordan's Principle criteria because they're also not available to the general Canadian public.
"It was unreasonable for ISC to deny the request by narrowly framing it as a housing remediation request, rather than assessing it through a substantive equality lens and the health and best interests of the children, as Jordan's Principle requires," McDonald wrote in her July 10 decision.
"The request was grounded in serious health concerns, and the evidence shows that no viable alternatives were available. ISC relied on the $200,000 cost as a reason for denial, but this reliance was misplaced."
McDonald said there is no evidence that Jordan's Principle has monetary limits or that the quoted cost was inflated or unreasonable, and ordered ISC to reconsider its decision which she said "reflects an inconsistent application" of the program.
ISC uses substantive equality to assess whether requests should be funded, which requires the responses to be tailored to unique causes of a specific group's historical disadvantage, geographical and cultural needs and circumstances, its website states.
Changed needed to how Jordan's Principle is applied
Powless's lawyer David Taylor said McDonald's decision indicates minimal progress and he hopes ISC will make a quick decision ruling in his client's favour this time.
"This is obviously a very concerning situation. This house has been compromised by mould for more than three years," he said. "Hopefully [ISC's] decision will be an approval based on the federal court found were very serious circumstances these kids are facing."
Powless previously told CBC News that her granddaughters frequently get sick, with multiple visits to the emergency room and have missed school as a result.
"It's very frustrating and I feel bad as a grandma that I have to keep living here with these two little girls. I wish I could just pick up and leave and take them to a healthy place but I got nowhere else to take them," she said in May.
Housing shortages and overcrowding have been ongoing issues on Oneida Nation of the Thames for many years. It's also had a boil-water advisory in effect since 2019 that became long-term in September 2020.
Taylor said this case speaks to a growing pattern of "similarly narrow perspectives" in denials of Jordan's Principle funding, especially in recent months.
"There's a real need for Indigenous Services Canada to be taking a serious look at its current approach to Jordan's principle and that's in particular because we're dealing with First Nations kids who by definition are in vulnerable circumstances," he said.
"We should not be waiting for more judicial decisions to have to continue highlighting this, it's something that should be addressed directly and promptly."
The family, meanwhile, is waiting for ISC's redetermination with the hopes of getting the money so the renovation work can be finished before winter, said Taylor.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

‘Stop using immediately': Health Canada issues recall for baby nests
‘Stop using immediately': Health Canada issues recall for baby nests

CTV News

time24 minutes ago

  • CTV News

‘Stop using immediately': Health Canada issues recall for baby nests

Health Canada issued a recall for BChic and Chicure model baby nests sold under the 'eleven' brand by CHIC BABY, warning the products pose a risk of fall, strangulation and entrapment. The recalled products include a head pillow and were sold in a variety of printed fabrics. Each nest has a tag with the brand name 'eleven.' The Chicure model also folds into a portable handbag with a handle. CHIC BABY reported that 3,007 units of the affected products were sold in Canada between February 2020 and July 2025. As of July 18, 2025, the company has not received any reports of injuries or incidents related to the use of these products in Canada. Health Canada is reminding parents and caregivers that the safest place for a baby to sleep is on their back, on a firm, flat surface intended for sleep. More information is available in the department's safe sleep guidelines for infants. Consumers are advised to immediately stop using the recalled baby nests and to dispose of them safely to ensure they cannot be reused. For more information, consumers can contact CHIC BABY by email at info@ or visit the company's website. Health Canada also encourages consumers to report any health or safety incidents involving this or other consumer products by filling out the Consumer Product Incident Report Form.

Smoke from wildfires triggers special air quality statement in Ontario
Smoke from wildfires triggers special air quality statement in Ontario

CTV News

time2 hours ago

  • CTV News

Smoke from wildfires triggers special air quality statement in Ontario

A haze from the western wildfires as seen from Waterloo Region on June 5, 2025. The long weekend may be a smoky one for people in most of Ontario. Environment Canada issued a special air quality statement at 1:28 p.m. Saturday, warning of poor air quality and reduced visibility. 'Smoke from forest fires is expected to continue to spread south into southern Ontario this afternoon and evening. The wildfire smoke may persist for much of the weekend for parts of southern Ontario,' the notice read. The smoke is billowing from wildfires burning in the Prairies. Environment Canada warns air quality and visibility could fluctuate over short distances and vary 'considerably' from hour to hour. People living in the effected areas, including Waterloo Region, Wellington County, Brant County, Perth County and Oxford County, were encouraged to limit time outdoors and consider reducing or rescheduling outdoor activities. The weather office said some people are more likely to be impacted by the smoke, including people aged 65 or older, pregnant people, infants and young children, and people with pre-existing conditions. Anyone working outdoors for long periods of time could also feel the effects. Some people may experience eye, nose and throat irritation, headaches or a mild cough. Rare, but less common, symptoms include wheezing, chest pain and severe coughs.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store