I'm a proud American who wanted to stay on the frontlines in Ukraine rather than come home to Columbia University
I'm a proud American patriot — I love this country to death. That's why I enlisted in the US Air Force for six years as soon as I graduated high school in North Carolina.
I spent three weeks this summer volunteering on the frontlines in Ukraine with the relief group Help is on the WayUA, providing supplies to the frontlines.
Advertisement
We survived getting shelled, being attacked by drones and skirted artery fire 24/7.
4 US Air Force veteran Sam Nahins just returned from three weeks of volunteering in Ukraine.
Courtesy of Sam Nahins
But when it was over, my feeling was, 'I don't want to come home.'
Advertisement
Just look at my school's recent history.
Last month, the notorious group Unity of Fields — the same group which took over Columbia's Butler Library — posted on X an image of mass veterans coffins draped in American flags accompanied by a heart emoji and caption reading, 'soon inshallah.' It means 'G-d willing.'
That's who I'm going to school with. Of course I'm not going to feel welcome.
Veterans aren't looking for a thank you. We just don't want to be called baby killers anymore. We don't want to be threatened and disrespected like this.
Advertisement
4 Nahins says he was trapped inside Butler Hall when a mob of anti-Israel protesters invaded.
REUTERS
My friend, fellow veteran and Columbia classmate, Brandon Christie, stopped attending classes in the weeks following Oct. 7, 2023 – and ultimately took his own life.
So when Columbia sits by as Veterans Day is hijacked for Martyrs Day and laud groups like Unity of Fields, you start to get the picture.
My motivation for going to Ukraine was simple: I've flown drones for the US Air Force, flying a plane remotely somewhere in the Middle East fighting ISIS and al Qaeda.
Advertisement
4 Nahins, a Columbia student, said he felt more at ease in Ukraine than New York.
Courtesy of Sam Nahins
I served overseas in Afghanistan, Pakistan, Syria, Iraq, and Yemen. But I'd never actually been to a warzone.
I needed that perspective.
I was getting shelled and attacked by drones while embedded with Ukraine's 25th battalion. But I was in good hands. No one was trying to stab me in the back — at least I knew what the enemy was.
Turns out, I felt more at ease in Ukraine than I do in New York.
As a grad student at Columbia, where 20-year-olds who have never seen a war in their lives call me 'baby killer,' 'murderer' and 'colonizer,' I feel like my own school and city don't have my back.
In Ukraine, people proudly wave American flags. By contrast, at Columbia, we had Martyrs Day on Veterans Day. It's crazy.
Advertisement
Here in New York, it feels like everyone hates each other. In Ukraine you have a full spectrum of individuals and yet somehow they're all united.
We need a lot more of that.
In America, we have this feeling of 'Oppression Olympics,' but the Ukrainians in no way want to be pitied. Sure, the people want and need support, but they're not playing the victim game.
4 Nahins alleges he was called a 'baby killer' by fellow students.
Courtesy of Sam Nahins
Advertisement
My experience felt sobering: Ukrainians love America more than Americans.
They joke, 'Where is your Iraqi scarf?' They know how ridiculous Columbia is.
I'm not giving up on my school or city – and definitely not my country. But I feel very unwanted here.
Before I left Ukraine, I put my resume out there, and was offered three jobs for non-military positions. I'm still deciding whether to go back.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
11 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Fox News' Mark Levin shrugs off starvation in Gaza because malnourished Palestinian baby has pre-existing health issues
Fox News host Mark Levin suggested that the widespread famine gripping Gaza is being grossly exaggerated, specifically referencing a New York Times story about a malnourished Palestinian child with pre-existing health conditions to make his point. Levin, a pro-Israel hawk and member of Donald Trump's Homeland Security Advisory Council, also railed against international leaders accusing Israel of conducting a campaign of starvation in Gaza, complaining that the Israelis shouldn't be 'told you need to feed the enemy while you defeat the enemy' amid a defensive war. In recent weeks, there has been a sea change both domestically and internationally when it comes to Israel's war against Gaza. With more and more reports of Palestinian children dying of malnutrition as Israel blocks most food aid from entering the war-torn territory, the Israelis have faced mounting pressure to break the Gaza blockade and agree to a lasting ceasefire. Earlier this week, British Prime Minister Keir Starmer said that his country would recognize a Palestinian state in September unless Israel ends the war and 'takes substantive steps to end the appalling situation in Gaza.' Starmer's declaration – which came amid criticism from within his own party to take a tougher line on Israel – followed French President Emmanuel Macron's similar proclamation days earlier. Starmer's decision sparked fury from Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who claimed it 'rewards Hamas's monstrous terrorism and punishes its victims' while asserting that the 'jihadist state on Israel's border today will threaten Britain tomorrow.' At the same time, Netanyahu has extraordinarily denied that Gaza is currently suffering through famine, calling it a 'bold faced lie' that Israel is trying to starve the territory. 'There is no policy of starvation in Gaza and there is no starvation in Gaza,' he said this week, adding that Israel had 'enabled the amount (of aid) required by international law to come in' and that Hamas was stealing the aid. While Trump has appeared to break from Netanyahu and acknowledged 'real starvation' in Gaza, Levin appears willing to back the Israeli prime minister's position that the famine is largely a fiction that's been peddled by Hamas propaganda. During a Wednesday appearance on America's Newsroom, Levin groused about Starmer's declaration, saying that he's 'sick and tired of these Western Europeans lecturing the state of Israel on how to fight a war.' He also justified Israel's actions in Gaza by referencing the bombing of Dresden, Germany, in World War II, as well as the dropping of nuclear bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. 'If you listen to that man and think about what he is asking Israel to do, it's an impossibility. Have peace in Gaza without Hamas and make sure the people are fed. Well, isn't that lovely?!' Levin griped. 'Exactly what have the Brits done to accomplish that? What have the French done to accomplish that? Everything they are saying and everything they are doing is giving aid and comfort to Hamas, just like they gave aid and comfort to Iran when President Trump decided to deal with Iran.' At that point, he took issue with the New York Times over its recent story about Gazans dying of starvation after 21 months of conflict with Israel, which featured interviews with Palestinians who are suffering through the prolonged famine. 'The Gaza Ministry of Health has reported more than 40 hunger-related deaths this month, including 16 children, and 111 since the beginning of the war, 81 of them children. The data could not be independently verified,' the Times reported. The paper also included a photograph of Mohammed Zakaria al-Mutawaq, an 18-month-old child who was diagnosed with severe malnutrition, according to his mother. The Times would later add an update from the child's doctor, who pointed out that he also had pre-existing medical conditions. 'Mohammed, according to his doctor, had pre-existing health problems affecting his brain and his muscle development,' according to the Times. 'But his health deteriorated rapidly in recent months as it became increasingly difficult to find food and medical care, and the medical clinic that treated him said he suffers from severe malnutrition.' Levin, meanwhile, suggested that this updated information about a malnourished child proved that the reports of starvation in Gaza were inflated and overstated. 'You've got the New York Times that does a photo of this poor Palestinian kid who is all skin and bones, and they're basically assigning the responsibility on the starvation in Palestine,' he exclaimed. 'Turns out he has cystic fibrosis, and it has absolutely nothing to do with the Israelis!' The Fox News star continued: 'This isn't the first time that Hamas has done this and that the European newspapers, the New York Times, and the Washington Post run it.' Levin went on to blast the Washington Post for noting in a recent article that while the Gaza Health Ministry has estimated roughly 60,000 Palestinians have died since the war began, the total is likely an undercount. 'They keep using these Hamas numbers. Then they list thousands of children who have been killed. Who is killing them?!' Levin fumed. 'Hamas can surrender tomorrow. Give the Israelis their people back. The bodies of the people they have killed back. It will be over in two seconds! But they don't do it. Hamas needs this!' After once again claiming that the numbers of Palestinian casualties are likely inflated, Levin grumbled over the growing international calls for more humanitarian aid to be allowed into Gaza to feed the starving citizens in the territory. 'This is the only country in the history of modern warfare that has fed the citizens of its enemy in a time of war,' he said, adding: 'They're fighting a defensive war and they're being told enough is enough, you need to feed the enemy while you defeat the enemy!'Meanwhile, at the end of Levin's lengthy rant about Gaza, Fox News anchor Dana Perino appeared to side with her colleague, at least when it came to the New York Times' story. 'On that New York Times correction, just to point out to everybody the New York Times has tons of followers on its regular [X] account,' she concluded. 'When they do a correction, they do it through their PR account, which has only 40,000 views. So, I know you helped amplify that last night.'
Wall Street Journal
11 minutes ago
- Wall Street Journal
The Laws of Economics Apply to the Late Show
Ben Sasse is right that the cancellation of 'The Late Show with Stephen Colbert' illustrates the decline of a common American culture ('Colbert and the End of Late-Night TV,' op-ed, July 21). That's not something to celebrate. But the failure of the show illustrates another point that is exciting: Leftist cultural icons aren't immune to the laws of economics. Mr. Colbert put leftist political comedy first, effectively alienating at least half the country. He seems to have assumed that, given his lofty cultural perch and the elite deference shown to people like him, he was insulated from any potential decline in viewership. But losing your audience means losing revenue, and while studio executives tolerated him for a time, the losses became too steep to ignore.
The Hill
12 minutes ago
- The Hill
US citizenship test to get a Trump-era update: What to know
(NewsNation) — The Trump administration will soon move forward with changes to the U.S. citizenship test, which the new head of U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services has called too easy. President Donald Trump has referred to naturalization as 'one of the most priceless gifts ever granted by human hands' — an honor his administration will soon make harder to obtain. Recently appointed USCIS Director Joseph Edlow told The New York Times the current test doesn't have a high enough difficulty level. 'The test, as it's laid out right now, it's not very difficult,' Edlow told the Times. 'It's very easy to kind of memorize the answers. I don't think we're really comporting with the spirit of the law.' According to USCIS, 90% of applicants pass the test on their first try. What's in the current US citizenship test? Currently, the test includes an English exam and a civics portion. Participants are required to answer orally and need to correctly answer six of 10 questions about US history, randomly selected from a bank of 100 questions. What is Mexico's 'supercartel,' and what does it mean for crime? Edlow said he plans to revert to the 2020 citizenship test, which would increase the pool of questions to 128 and the number of correct answers needed to pass to 12 of 20. USCIS has also proposed that the new test add a speaking section to assess English skills. An officer would show photos of ordinary scenarios — like daily activities, weather or food — and ask the applicant to describe them. Edlow said these changes would help participants better understand American civics — but some questions have proven difficult to answer, even for American-born citizens who may have forgotten their U.S. history lessons. Want to test your knowledge? You can access the current questions and answers here. Citizenship test changes concern immigrant advocates USCIS reported nearly 820,000 immigrants became U.S. citizens last year, and more than a million have done so since 2022. It's a privilege many immigrants say is worth studying hard for. 'I feel very proud, and I think this is a very big achievement and a big milestone in my life,' one new citizen said. Mechelle Perrott, citizenship coordinator at San Diego Community College District's College of Continuing Education in California, told the Associated Press changing the format could make it much more difficult for those with test-taking limitations. 'We have a lot of students that are refugees, and they're coming from war-torn countries where maybe they didn't have a chance to complete school or even go to school,' Perrot said. 'It's more difficult learning to read and write if you don't know how to do that in your first language. That's my main concern about the multiple-choice test; it's a lot of reading.' Edlow told the Times the revisions would happen soon, but a timeline has not yet been set.
