Former police officer sentenced to 33 months for violating civil rights of Breonna Taylor
US
president
Donald Trump's
justice department had asked the judge to imprison him for just a single day.
Ms Taylor, a Black woman, was shot and killed by police in Kentucky in March 2020 after they used a no-knock warrant at her home.
Her boyfriend, believing they were intruders, fired on the officers with a legally owned firearm, prompting them to return fire.
Ms Taylor's death, along with the murder of
George Floyd
in Minneapolis at the hands of a white police officer, sparked racial justice protests across the US over the treatment of people of colour by police departments.
US District Judge Rebecca Grady Jennings, who handed down the sentence on Monday, criticised prosecutors for making a '180-degree' turn in their approach to the case and said political factors appeared to have influenced its recommendation for a one-day prison sentence.
'This sentence will not and cannot be measured against Ms Taylor's life and the incident as a whole,' Judge Jennings said.
Protests erupted in Louisville, Kentucky in 2021 after a grand jury declined to directly charge officers for the killing of Breonna Taylor (26). Photograph: Chang W. Lee/The New York Times
The sentence was at the low end of the 33 to 41 months called for under federal sentencing guidelines, but far more severe than the justice department had sought.
Ms Taylor's mother, Tamika Palmer, several other family members and Kenneth Walker, her boyfriend at the time, all spoke in court to ask the judge to impose the maximum penalty.
'A piece of me was taken from me that day. You have the power to make today the first day of true accountability,' Ms Palmer told the judge.
During president
Joe Biden's
administration, the justice department brought criminal civil rights charges against the officers involved in both Ms Taylor and Mr Floyd's deaths.
Hankison was convicted by a federal jury last November of one count of violating Taylor's civil rights, after the first attempt to prosecute him ended with a mistrial. He was separately acquitted on state charges in 2022.
Former Louisville police officer Brett Hankison. Photograph: Timothy D Easley/AP
In a brief statement to the court, Hankison apologised to Ms Taylor's family and friends. He said he would have acted differently if he had known about issues with the preparation of the search warrant that led police to Ms Taylor's home that night.
'I never would have fired my gun,' he said.
The justice department's sentencing memo for Hankison downplayed his role in the raid at Ms Taylor's home, saying he 'did not shoot Ms Taylor and is not otherwise responsible for her death'.
The memo was notable because it was not signed by any of the career prosecutors – those who were not political appointees – who had tried the case. It was submitted on July 16th by Harmeet Dhillon, a political appointee by Mr Trump to lead the justice department's civil rights division, and her counsel Robert Keenan.
Mr Keenan previously worked as a federal prosecutor in Los Angeles, where he argued that a local deputy sheriff convicted of civil rights violations, Trevor Kirk, should have his conviction on the felony counts struck and should not serve prison time.
The department's sentencing recommendation in the Hankison case marks the latest effort by the Trump administration to put the brakes on the department's police accountability work.
Harmeet Dhillon was a political appointee of US president Donald Trump to lead the justice department's civil rights division. Photograph: Rebecca Noble/The New York Times
Earlier this year, Ms Dhillon nixed plans to enter into a court-approved settlement with the Louisville Police Department, and rescinded the Civil Rights Division's prior findings of widespread civil rights abuses against people of colour.
Attorneys for Ms Taylor's family called the department's sentencing recommendation for Hankison an insult, and urged the judge to 'deliver true justice' for her. – Reuters
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RTÉ News
20 minutes ago
- RTÉ News
Putin-Trump summit: what we know so far
US President Donald Trump and his Russian counterpart, Vladimir Putin, are set to hold talks in a bid to end the war in Ukraine, triggered by Russia's February 2022 invasion. Mr Trump has spent his first months in office trying to broker peace - after boasting he could end the war in 24 hours - though multiple rounds of peace talks, phone calls and diplomatic visits have failed to yield a breakthrough. Here is what we know about the summit so far: When? Both sides have confirmed preparations for a summit are underway and that a meeting could take place next week - though no firm date has been set. Mr Trump said Wednesday that a face-to-face meeting with Mr Putin could occur "very soon". "They would like to meet with me, and I'll do whatever I can to stop the killing," he then said yesterday, speaking of both Mr Putin and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky. Mr Putin said yesterday, "both sides showed interest" in a US-Russia top-level meeting, while Kremlin aide Yuri Ushakov said "next week has been set as a target date." Will Zelensky be involved? Mr Zelensky is pushing to make it a three-way summit and has frequently said meeting Mr Putin is the only way to make progress towards peace. Mr Trump's special envoy, Steve Witkoff, proposed a trilateral meeting when he held talks with Mr Putin earlier this week, but the Russian leader has appeared to rule out meeting his Ukrainian counterpart. "I have nothing against it in general, it is possible, but certain conditions must be created for this. But unfortunately, we are still far from creating such conditions," Mr Putin told reporters yesterday. At talks in Istanbul in June, Russian negotiators said a Putin-Zelensky meeting could only take place at the "final phase" of negotiations, once the two sides had agreed terms for peace. Asked if Mr Putin had to meet Mr Zelensky as a prerequisite for their summit, Mr Trump said: "No, he doesn't." Where? There is no confirmed venue yet. The Kremlin's Mr Ushakov said both sides have agreed the place "in principle", but did not name a host, while Washington rejected reports that a venue had been agreed. Mr Putin named the United Arab Emirates (UAE) as a potential contender, calling the Gulf state "one of the quite suitable places". Turkey - which hosted three rounds of Ukraine-Russia talks this year - is also in the running, as is Saudi Arabia, where US officials held separate talks with Russian and Ukrainian diplomats in February and March. China has been mentioned in media reports as a possible venue, amid speculation both Mr Trump and Putin could travel there in early September, with Xi Jinping playing host. The Kremlin last month did not rule out such a meeting. Ukraine's allies and NATO members - like Finland, where Mr Putin and Mr Trump met for a summit in 2018 - are seen as unlikely candidates. The International Criminal Court (ICC) arrest warrant for Mr Putin, which obligates members to detain the Russian leader if he visits their country, could also restrict possible venues. Negotiating positions Despite the flurry of diplomacy and multiple rounds of peace talks, Russia and Ukraine appear no closer to agreeing an end to the fighting. Mr Putin has rejected calls by the United States, Ukraine and Europe for an immediate ceasefire. At talks in June, Russia demanded Ukraine pull its forces out of four regions Moscow claims to have annexed, demanded Ukraine commit to being a neutral state, shun Western military support and be excluded from joining NATO. Kyiv wants an immediate ceasefire and has said it will never recognise Russian control over its sovereign territory, though it acknowledged it would have to try to secure the return of land captured by Russia through diplomacy, not on the battlefield. Kyiv is also seeking security guarantees from its Western backers, including the deployment of foreign troops as a peacekeeping contingent to enforce any ceasefire.
Irish Times
an hour ago
- Irish Times
Intel chief hits out at ‘misinformation' after Trump calls on him to resign
Intel's chief executive Lip-Bu Tan has hit out at 'misinformation' over his career after Donald Trump alleged the semiconductor industry veteran was 'highly conflicted' and should resign. In a letter to Intel staff published late on Thursday, Mr Tan said that Intel was 'engaging' with the Trump administration 'to address the matters that have been raised and ensure they have the facts'. 'There has been a lot of misinformation circulating about my past roles . . . I want to be absolutely clear: Over 40 years in the industry, I've built relationships around the world and across our diverse ecosystem – and I have always operated within the highest legal and ethical standards,' Mr Tan wrote. Mr Tan's move to reassure staff at Intel, the only US-headquartered company capable of manufacturing advanced chips, came hours after Mr Trump had demanded his resignation in a post on Truth Social. READ MORE Mr Trump did not detail Mr Tan's alleged conflicts of interest but the US president's broadside followed a letter from Tom Cotton, the Republican head of the Senate intelligence committee, to Intel's chair expressing 'concern about the security and integrity of Intel's operations' and Mr Tan's ties to China. Mr Tan has been a prolific investor in Chinese tech companies through his San Francisco-based venture capital firm as well as companies based in Hong Kong. His past investments have included Semiconductor Manufacturing International Corp, China's largest chip manufacturer. Before being appointed Intel chief earlier this year, Mr Tan ran California-based Cadence Design Systems, which last week admitted to violating US export controls by selling its chip design tools to a Chinese university with close ties to the military. Since taking the top job, Mr Tan has launched a major cost-cutting programme and last month warned that Intel might be forced to abandon development of its next-generation manufacturing technology if it could not secure a large customer. In the letter, Mr Tan said that Intel's board was 'fully supportive' of 'the work we are doing to transform our company'. He added that he 'fully share[s] the President's commitment to advancing US national and economic security'. 'The United States has been my home for more than 40 years. I love this country and am profoundly grateful for the opportunities it has given me. I also love this company,' Mr Tan noted. – Copyright The Financial Times Limited 2025
Irish Examiner
an hour ago
- Irish Examiner
Ukrainian troops have little hope for peace as Trump deadline for Russia arrives
Ukrainian soldiers have expressed little hope for a diplomatic solution to the war with Russia, as Donald Trump's deadline for the Kremlin to stop the killing arrived and he eyed a possible meeting with Vladimir Putin to discuss the conflict. The US president's efforts to pressure Mr Putin have so far delivered no progress. Russia's bigger army is slowly advancing deeper into Ukraine at great cost in troops and armour while it relentlessly bombards Ukrainian cities. Russia and Ukraine are far apart on their terms for peace. Ukrainian forces are locked in intense battles along the 620-mile front line from north-east to south-east Ukraine. It is impossible to negotiate with them. The only option is to defeat them The Pokrovsk city area of the eastern Donetsk region is taking the brunt of punishment as Russia looks to break out into the neighbouring Dnipropetrovsk region. Ukraine has significant manpower shortages. Intense fighting is also taking place in Ukraine's northern Sumy border region, where Ukrainian forces are engaging Russian soldiers to prevent reinforcements being sent from there to Donetsk. In the Pokrovsk area, one commander said Moscow is not interested in peace. 'It is impossible to negotiate with them. The only option is to defeat them,' Buda, the Spartan Brigade commander, told the Associated Press. He used only his call sign, in keeping with the rules of the Ukrainian military. 'I would like them to agree and for all this to stop, but Russia will not agree to that, it does not want to negotiate. So the only option is to defeat them,' he said. In the southern Zaporizhzhia region, a howitzer commander using the call sign Warsaw, said troops are determined to thwart Russia's invasion. 'We are on our land, we have no way out,' he said. 'So we stand our ground, we have no choice.' Donald Trump is hoping for a meeting with Vladimir Putin (Pablo Martinez Monsivais/AP) Mr Trump said on Thursday that he would meet Mr Putin even if the Russian president will not meet his Ukrainian counterpart Volodymyr Zelensky. That has stoked fears in Europe that Ukraine could be sidelined in efforts to stop the continent's biggest conflict since the Second World War. The Institute for the Study of War, a Washington think tank, said: 'Putin remains uninterested in ending his war and is attempting to extract bilateral concessions from the United States without meaningfully engaging in a peace process. 'Putin continues to believe that time is on Russia's side and that Russia can outlast Ukraine and the West.' Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban said on Friday that Europe should take the lead in efforts to end the conflict. He said the leaders of Germany and France should go to Moscow 'to negotiate on behalf of Europe', or 'we will be sidelined in managing the security issues of our own continent'. Mr Orban, who is a harsh critic of the European Union to which his country belongs, said Europe's concerns that a Trump-Putin summit might not address the continent's interests meant it should seize the diplomatic initiative. 'This war cannot be ended on the front line, no solution can be concluded on the battlefield,' he said. 'This war must be ended by diplomats, politicians, leaders at the negotiating table.'
