Goldman accuses 1MDB banker of ‘serial lies' ahead of sentencing
NEW YORK – Goldman Sachs Group Inc said the banker at the heart of a scandal linked to Malaysia's 1MDB investment fund engaged in 'serial lies' and deception about the fraud, days before he is scheduled to be sentenced.
In a letter to a US judge, Goldman said that Tim Leissner, the bank's former South-east Asia chairman, has never taken responsibility for his actions in the multibillion-dollar fraud that brought down the Malaysian government.
The letter comes after the US government asked for leniency when Leissner is sentenced next week.
The bank's general counsel, Ms Kathryn Ruemmler, wrote that Leissner's attempt to blame the financial industry for his crimes 'denigrates the countless law-abiding people who work in it and draws focus for the true motivation for Mr Leissner's crimes: greed.'
Leissner, who pleaded guilty in 2018 to his role in looting billions from 1MDB, became the US government's key witness.
Prosecutors say his testimony was central to the conviction of one of his Goldman colleagues and a US$2.9 billion (S$3.75 billion) fine against the bank, the largest ever in a foreign bribery case.
'Leissner spent years using offshore shell companies, personal email accounts and personal devices to engage in crime, evade detection and put Goldman Sachs at risk in the process,' Ms Ruemmler wrote in the letter, filed in Brooklyn, New York, Thursday.
Leissner, 53, faces as much as 25 years in prison after he became the face of the global financial scandal that led to investigations in six countries.
As part of the fraud, he admitted that he pocketed US$73.4 million from 1MDB and another US$80 million from Jho Low, the fugitive financier who was the architect of the fraud.
Mr Henry Mazurek, Leissner's lawyer, said that 'the chutzpah of Goldman Sachs's letter to the court today is astounding.'
'Mr Leissner spent the last several years cooperating with the Department of Justice to expose the corporate culture and institutional greed which fuelled the behaviour that corrupted the 1MDB project,' Mr Mazurek said in a statement.
Goldman and a spokesman for US prosecutors declined to comment.
Prosecutors said in their own court filing that Leissner continues to help with unidentified US investigations into 'other crimes,' in addition to the 1MDB case.
'Leissner provided information concerning the role of powerful individuals in a global scheme to bribe government officials in two countries and divert billions of dollars into bank accounts around the world,' prosecutors said in a filing earlier in May.
But the bank countered that 'from Goldman's perspective, Mr Leissner's efforts in this regard are deserving of sanction, not praise.'
In 2020, Goldman, which made US$600 million from the 1MDB transactions, entered into a deferred prosecution agreement with the US and its Malaysian unit pleaded guilty to violating US anti-bribery laws.
The New York-based investment bank said in the letter on May 22 that it didn't 'adequately address red flags and scrutinise the representations of certain members of the deal team.'
In his own filing, Leissner said that he should be spared any time in prison.
He said that he provided crucial evidence against former Malaysian Prime Minister Najib Razak, Abu Dhabi sheiks and Goldman and gave the US a roadmap to the complex money-laundering scheme at 1MDB.
'I know how terrible my crime was,' Leissner said in a letter to the judge. 'In the process of telling the government and the world about 1MDB, I have had to publicly face the fact that I helped steal billions of dollars not just from individuals, but from an entire nation.'
When he pleaded guilty in August, 2018, Leissner blamed Goldman's 'culture' as playing a role in the fraud when he described his crimes.
'During the course of the conspiracy, I conspired with other employees and agents of Goldman Sachs very much in line of its culture of Goldman Sachs to conceal facts from certain compliance and legal employees of Goldman Sachs, including Jho Low,' he said in court.
Leissner could still face legal actions in Malaysia.
The country's Home Minister, Saifuddin Nasution Ismail, said earlier in May that Malaysia has submitted an extradition request for Leissner's arrest with the US Justice Department. BLOOMBERG
Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Times
an hour ago
- Business Times
High-speed rail link proposal gets yet another airing
THE proposal for a high-speed rail (HSR) link between Singapore and Kuala Lumpur seems to be one of those ideas that refuse to die, despite all that has happened over the years. To go back a bit, a KL-Singapore HSR link was first mooted in the 1990s, with an estimated cost of about RM5 billion (S$1.5 billion today). It took more than 20 years for the project to be seriously considered, and by 2013 the estimated cost had ballooned to RM30 billion. The 350 km-long rail line, with purported train speeds of up to 350 kmh, finally led to a binding agreement with Singapore in December 2016. The aim was to have the line operational by 2026. The outbreak of Covid-19 and the election of a different coalition led to multiple postponements at Malaysia's request. Eventually, the agreement was abrogated in December 2020. Malaysia paid about S$102 million in compensation to Singapore for breaking the deal. Nevertheless, some important Malaysians want to revive the project and recent news reports say that three companies – YTL Corp, Berjaya Rail and China Railway Construction Corporation – have submitted detailed plans. Malaysia's Transport Minister Anthony Loke has ruled out any chance of government finance several times in the past. Even so, he said last month that the Anwar Ibrahim administration would make a final decision on the submissions by the end of this year. The timing of that decision seems elastic. Previously, it was reported that the deadline was the end of 2024. It is easy to understand the hesitation. Every HSR project in the world has been done with government financial backing. More importantly, few are operationally profitable, never mind the initial capital outlay. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up There is considerable Malaysian opposition to the prospect of a HSR for this very reason. Current estimates put the final figure of such an undertaking well north of RM80 billion. One Malaysian political wit sardonically suggested that it would be cheaper to give away free tickets for flights between the two cities than to borrow for the project. Democratic Action Party member Tony Pua based his calculations on information released by aviation data company OAG, which found that flights from Kuala Lumpur International Airport to Changi Airport were the busiest international route for 2023, at 4.9 million seats. Assuming each seat costs RM400, Pua said, it would add up to RM2 billion per year. At an interest rate of 5 per cent for an RM80 billion loan, the HSR project would cost the government RM4 billion in interest payments alone every year. 'So, the simple conclusion is, at RM4 billion interest cost for (the) HSR, the government might as well just pay for all flights between KL and Singapore and still save RM2 billion,' Pua said. Another critic argued that it would take 70 years for the proposed HSR to become financially viable, and pointed to European Union studies that had found financial justifications for such projects to be consistently overrated. Even in China, with its 48,000 km HSR network, only a handful of routes show operating profits. The rest run at a loss. It has also been argued that taxpayers from every other state in the Malaysian federation would have to foot the bill, while gains would be limited to those in the south of the peninsula. The Anwar government has good reason to fear being left holding the financial bag, if things go wrong. Clearly, then, it may serve its political interests to keep the idea of an HSR alive, but don't expect anything more.
Independent Singapore
12 hours ago
- Independent Singapore
Should you park more savings in ringgit? What weekly JB visitors need to know about hedging, FX rates, and Malaysian bank accounts
MALAYSIA: For Singaporeans who head to Johor Bahru every weekend to shop, dine, or stay overnight, the question of whether to 'hedge' against a rising ringgit is becoming a common personal finance dilemma. On Facebook, one frequent traveller to JB shared that he keeps RM10,000 (S$3,000) in cash as a hedge. 'I usually buy when the rate is 3.35, which is more favourable than 3.25 now. I go to JB to stay at a hotel once a week. Should I increase my hedge to RM20,000 or RM30,000? Should I open a ringgit account in a Malaysian bank to earn 3% interest if available?' he asked. The post has sparked lively debate online, touching on everything from the feasibility of opening a Malaysian bank account as a foreigner to whether ringgit deposits actually make sense in the long run. Why hedge in ringgit? For those who spend regularly across the Causeway, holding a stash of ringgit can act as a buffer against short-term fluctuations. If the currency strengthens from 3.35 to 3.25 against the Singapore dollar, those who stocked up earlier effectively lock in cheaper hotel stays, meals, and shopping. Some commuters liken it to 'prepaying' for future consumption, much like buying travel vouchers. The difference, however, is that the ringgit's track record is one of long-term depreciation, making such hedges inherently speculative. See also Ipoh - The Perfect Weekend Escape from Singapore Treat ringgit as spending money, not an investment Many online reactions stressed that the ringgit should be viewed as a convenience for spending, not a long-term hedge. 'It depends if you are going to spend it in M'sia. The ringgit generally depreciates against a basket of currencies. The interest rates are deceptively high — that still isn't enough to prop up the ringgit. I have money in both countries, but my M'sian deposits are only for spending in Malaysia, not investments (including hedging). The rest are in SGD and USD. Meanwhile, my M'sian friends invest in SGD instead,' one netizen said. The remark reflects a widely shared sentiment: even Malaysians often look outward to the Singapore dollar as a safer store of value. For Singaporeans, that reinforces the idea that holding large ringgit balances is more about easing weekend expenses than actually building wealth. Banking hurdles for foreigners Others pointed out that opening a bank account in Malaysia is not as straightforward as it sounds. 'Not as easy to open a Malaysian bank account if you're a foreigner post the 1mdb saga. Couple of conditions to satisfy from having a job to serving a housing loan. Best to check with the banks. I wouldn't go through the hassle to hedge,' a Facebook commenter said. See also It's June! Best time to hit the beach in Johor Bahru! The analysis here is sobering: the perceived 3% interest rate that might entice Singaporeans is largely out of reach unless one has the right residency or employment status. The banking restrictions act as a natural barrier, which means hedging strategies that rely on Malaysian deposits are impractical for the average JB weekender. The risk of holding too much cash A few users also warned against hoarding physical notes. 'Hope you're not buying via physical notes, I have a stack of ringgit from 80s that local money changer that refuse to take in. I have to go to Maybank in Malaysia to exchange…. This will never happen to SG currency… So I never think to hedge such [an] unstable currency unless you have huge business dealings using their currency,' one netizen shared. Their story highlights a hidden risk: Currency redesigns and policy changes can make old notes less liquid. For Singaporeans used to the Singapore dollar's stability, the idea of notes becoming unexchangeable at money changers can be bothersome. It highlights the reality that large ringgit stashes aren't just vulnerable to exchange rates, but also to the currency's weaker credibility over time. So, should you hedge in ringgit? For Singaporeans who cross into JB weekly, keeping a good sum of ringgit can provide convenience and certainty. It smooths out the volatility of daily exchange rates and saves the hassle of multiple trips to the money changer, but the consensus from online reactions is clear: treat ringgit holdings as a way to pre-pay for your future consumption, not as an investment. Those who try to turn this into a profit-making strategy may be overlooking two realities: that the ringgit has historically lost ground against the Singapore dollar and that Malaysia's tighter banking rules make it difficult for foreigners to truly benefit from higher interest rates. Add to this the risk of holding too much physical cash, and the idea of 'hedging' starts to look less like a smart investment play and more like a lifestyle convenience. Ultimately, the safer long-term bet is still to keep savings in stronger currencies such as the Singapore dollar or US dollar, while using the ringgit simply as a practical tool for weekends across the Causeway. Read also: Ringgit edges higher as US dollar weakens, buoyed by steady domestic demand
Straits Times
13 hours ago
- Straits Times
Malaysia scraps plans to buy Black Hawk helicopters derided by King as ‘flying coffins'
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox Malaysia signed a deal in May 2023 to lease four Black Hawk helicopters that were more than 30 years old from a local supplier. Malaysia has scrapped its plans to purchase four ageing Black Hawk helicopters after its King Sultan Ibrahim Iskandar alluded to them as 'flying coffins', according to media reports. Malaysian Armed Forces chief, General Mohd Nizam Jaffar, said it was the King's strongly worded take on the issue – delivered on the 60th anniversary of Malaysia's Special Service Regiment on Aug 16 – that tilted the balance. 'We will not propose (the procurement of) Black Hawk and have taken heed of His Majesty's concerns,' he was quoted as saying in a report that first appeared in the Malay-language daily Utusan Malaysia on Aug 19. According to p revious reports, Malaysia signed a deal in May 2023 to lease four Sikorsky UH-60A+ Black Hawk helicopters from local supplier Aerotree Defence and Services for RM187 million (S$57 million) over five years. Malaysia's Ministry of Defence issued a notice to cancel the order in November 2024, after Aerotree failed to deliver the first helicopter as agreed in October 2024, according to media reports. The ministry, however, later issued a new contract – published in August 2025 – that supposedly included the helicopters, Malaysian news outlet Malay Mail reported. In a stern admonition on Aug 16, Sultan Ibrahim said the Defence Ministry should scrap its plan to acquire Black Hawk helicopters that were more than 30 years old. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore NDP 2026 to be held at National Stadium to accommodate more Singaporeans Singapore Girl, 14, among 3 injured after minibus falls into Bukit Panjang canal Singapore What led to Changi Airport runway incident involving 2 China Eastern Airlines planes in Aug 2024 Singapore FairPrice apologises after woman finds worm in salmon bought from Bedok North outlet Singapore S'pore starts Stop Vaping microsite; Ong Ye Kung thanks influencers for taking stand against habit Singapore Live Singapore-raised seafood on sale at 3 Giant supermarkets from Aug 19 Singapore How we can beat the heat in Singapore He said the ministry should not repeat past mistakes, citing Malaysia's purchase of dozens of A-4 SkyHawk ground-attack aircraft in 1982 for US$1 million (S$2 million) each. Out of 88 that were acquired, only 40 of these Vietnam War-era warplanes were refurbished and put into service. The state news agency Bernama reported that the jets were later retired due to a high accident rate. 'Are we going to put our pilots in 'flying coffins'?' said Sultan Ibrahim on Aug 16, of the Black Hawk helicopters. He said purchasing snafus happen 'because the Defence Ministry is full of agents or former generals who have become salesmen'. 'We even have textile firms wanting to sell us drones,' he said. Sultan Ibrahim said the Defence Ministry should not 'waste time purchasing nonsense that does not fit the military's needs', and that there is a need to review its procurement process, 'in terms of pricing'. 'Several steps must be taken before determining the best acquisition method and expediting the process,' he was quoted as saying by the news outlet New Straits Times. He said those deciding on military acquisitions must be transparent and should not rely solely on agents and middlemen.
