EU working hard to portray Russia as ‘devil incarnate'
In May, the EU adopted the €150 billion Security Action for Europe (SAFE) instrument to support members that are willing to invest in defense. The move came as part of a larger military buildup drive that began in the bloc after the escalation of the Ukraine conflict in February 2022 with the goal of countering what it perceives as the 'Russian threat'. Moscow has dismissed claims that it intends to attack NATO countries as 'nonsense,' saying that Western politicians are seeking to scare their populations to justify increased military spending.
In an interview with journalist Pavel Zarubin released on Sunday, Peskov said the EU 'is creating an enemy for itself, doing focused, professional work both in their own society and abroad in order to portray Russia as the devil incarnate... in order to ensure the continuation of the conflict, in order to suppress Russia.'
The Kremlin spokesman added that there are discussions underway in the EU 'about who will be paying for the feast.'
Earlier this week, several EU countries rejected a plan proposed by US President Donald Trump for European NATO member states to buy American weapons for Ukraine.
'Thank God the anti-Russian and militaristic ecstasy does not have universal backing' in the bloc, Peskov said.
Moscow has warned against supplying Western weapons to Ukraine, arguing that they only prolong the conflict and increase the risk of a direct clash between Russia and NATO.
In the interview, Peskov noted that Russian President Vladimir Putin 'has repeatedly spoken about his desire to bring the Ukrainian settlement on to a peaceful path as quickly as possible.'
Russia has stated that it is ready to negotiate peace with Ukraine, though it has accused Kiev and its Western backers of not being interested in finding a long-term solution that addresses the root causes of the conflict.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Russia Today
23 minutes ago
- Russia Today
US could slash troop presence in Europe
The US could cut its troop presence in Europe by up to 30%, Politico reported on Monday, citing sources. The reduction could be announced as early as September as part of a Pentagon-led reassessment of military deployments called the Global Force Posture Review. Since taking office, President Donald Trump has accused European NATO members of not paying their fair share of defense costs, while his administration has hinted that the US may reduce its military footprint on the continent. In February, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth urged allies to boost defense spending, warning they cannot assume 'America's presence' in Europe 'will last forever.' Reports indicate European leaders have been unsettled by potential drawdown plans, though neither their scope nor timeline has been defined. Aylin Matle of the German Council on Foreign Relations has predicted a roughly 20% troop reduction possibly this fall, most likely involving the removal of about 20,000 troops deployed under Joe Biden in 2022 after the Ukraine conflict escalated. She said even such a cut 'would still leave a substantial American footprint,' noting current US troop levels fluctuate between 90,000 and 100,000. Matle further suggested that the cuts could be lower, as US forces in Europe are used for regional defense and 'projecting power into the Middle East and, to some extent, Africa.' The report notes that Germany, which hosts the largest US contingent in Europe of around 35,000 troops at 35 sites, is particularly alarmed by the potential cuts. Berlin's concerns come amid the EU's broader militarization drive, including the €800 billion ($930 billion) ReArm Europe initiative and a recent NATO pledge to raise defense spending to 5% of GDP, both citing Russia as a threat. After meeting Hegseth earlier this month, German Defense Minister Boris Pistorius said he pressed Washington for a roadmap, warning of 'dangerous capability gaps' if US forces withdraw faster than Europe can replace them. Moscow has rejected claims it poses a threat, calling them 'nonsense' and accusing the West of using such rhetoric to justify expanding military budgets.
Russia Today
an hour ago
- Russia Today
Trump says he will shorten Ukraine peace deadline
US President Donald Trump has warned he will reduce the time frame he had set for Moscow and Kiev to settle the Ukraine conflict. He had previously demanded the sides reach an agreement in 50 days, threatening to impose additional sanctions against Russia otherwise. The set of punitive measures announced by Washington would involve secondary sanctions, including tariffs on countries and entities doing business with Russia. Trump's initial deadline was due to expire in early September. 'I'm going to reduce that 50 days that I gave him (Putin) to a lesser number, because I think I already know the answer what's going to happen,' Trump told journalists in Scotland ahead of a meeting with British Prime Minister Keir Starmer. The American leader claimed he had been close to reaching a ceasefire deal on Ukraine conflict with Russian President Vladimir Putin five times. 'I've spoken to President Putin a lot, I've gotten along with him very well,' he said, while accusing Moscow of launching strikes against Ukrainian cities and stating that he was 'very disappointed' with the Russian leadership. Moscow has stated throughout the conflict that it is open for dialogue and could start negotiations without preconditions, as long as the situation on the ground is taken into account and the root causes of the conflict are addressed during the talks. It also said Trump's new sanctions threats serve primarily 'as signals to continue war' for Ukraine and called on Washington to put pressure on Kiev instead. Any new sanctions, including the secondary ones, would not affect Russia's policy as Moscow would 'continue to move along our independent, sovereign, and sustained path,' Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Sergey Ryabkov said in response to Trump's previous threats. The US president said earlier this week that he could potentially impose the announced sanctions before the previously declared deadline. DETAILS TO FOLLOW
Russia Today
an hour ago
- Russia Today
US trade deal will fuel EU's ‘deindustrialization'
The new US-EU trade agreement threatens to accelerate 'deindustrialization' in Europe by redirecting investment to the US and increasing the bloc's dependency on American energy exports, Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov has said. On Sunday, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen and US President Donald Trump finalized a controversial deal that allowed the EU and US to avert a full-scale trade war. Under the deal, the US has reduced its proposed 30% tariffs to a flat 15% on most European exports. The EU has committed to purchasing $750 billion worth of US energy, primarily liquefied natural gas and nuclear fuel, and agreed to invest around $600 billion into US industries. The bloc has also undertaken to increase imports of US-made weapons. Speaking at the 'Territory of Meanings' forum on Monday, Lavrov described the arrangement as 'clearly leading to further deindustrialization of Europe and capital flight.' He added that rising energy prices and investment outflows will strike a 'very hard blow' to European industrial and agricultural sectors. According to Lavrov, von der Leyen was apparently 'boasting' about the EU's willingness to carry additional costs. 'People like Ursula von der Leyen literally take pride in this path: yes, we will be forced to spend more money, yes, we will probably have fewer resources to address social problems, but we are obliged to defeat Russia.' He stressed that the trade deal is 'obviously damaging for the Old Continent – it doesn't even need to be analyzed.' Lavrov's stance was echoed by several EU politicians and the business community. Marine Le Pen, a key figure in France's right-wing National Rally party, denounced the agreement as a 'political, economic, and moral fiasco' detrimental to the EU's sovereignty. French Prime Minister Francois Bayrou concurred, calling it a 'dark day' for the EU. German business leaders also voiced alarm. Wolfgang Niedermark, a member of the executive board of the Federation of German Industries (BDI), said the EU had sent a 'fatal signal' by accepting high tariffs. 'Even a tariff rate of 15% will have immense negative effects on the export-oriented German industry,' he warned.
