
Chris Bryant: 'I've got a terrible confession'
'I've got a terrible confession,' Chris Bryant tells me over lunch. He leans forward, intense and conspiratorial, and whispers, 'It's to do with the Pet Shop Boys.'
As confessions go, this one – an embarrassing failure to recognise lead singer Neil Tennant at some event, despite the band's hit song 'It's a Sin' once feeling like Bryant's private anthem – barely meets the definition. But the word seems apt, somehow, for our conversation – and for the tangle of concealment and self-confidence that have defined Bryant's political life.
The 62-year-old minister for the creative industries, arts, tourism, data protection and telecoms has just published a book full of confessions. A Life and A Half: The Unexpected Making of a Politician is a memoir, not of his time in politics as the Labour MP for Rhondda in South Wales, but of everything that came before. His childhood, partially spent Franco's Spain, and dominated by a distant working-class father and an erratic, alcoholic mother. His struggles with his sexuality (it was Bryant's girlfriend in his twenties who told him he was gay; he married his husband Jared in 2010 in the first civil partnership ceremony to be held in parliament) and how the shame of being a gay man in the Eighties and Nineties shaped him; his time as an Anglican priest, grappling with the Church of England's tortured stance on homosexuality and with his own shifting faith. And his experience of being sexually assaulted by Michael Croft, the founder of the National Youth Theatre – a story he has kept secret for 46 years.
'None of my friends know that story. I'm a bit frightened of how they will react to it,' he tells me, adding that he hopes maybe going public will be helpful to others who experienced similar at the hands of the theatre legend. Croft died in 1986, and Bryant – newly ordained – conducted his funeral. The contradictory emotions around a multi-decade friendship that persevered despite a horrific abuse of power are hard to untangle.
Four decades later, Bryant found himself chairing the Commons committee on standards, crusading against sexual harassment in parliament and attempting to tackle bad behaviour among MPs. 'All of which I always thought was very ironic, because I don't think of myself as a very judgemental person.' He switches from a sombre tone to one of exaggerated campness. 'I mean I might say, 'Oooh I wouldn't have worn that shirt.'' He glances at my shirt and pretends to be horrified of causing offence. 'I'm not saying that to you, sorry!'
This is the rhythm as our lunch at the Garden Museum Café across the river from Westminster progresses: Bryant launching forth on weighty topics – the anger and guilt he still feels regarding his mother's alcoholism, how he dealt with her illness as a teenager after his father left, the spectre of authoritarianism – then changing to a lighter key just as things get serious. On two occasions he breaks into song; first a rendition of 'Do You Hear The People Sing' in the original French (he claims to have introduced Les Misérables to Peter Mandelson, who was so taken with it he used the rousing anthem as his campaign tune in Hartlepool), then Silvio Rodríguez's 'Ojalá' in Spanish. The latter word conveys the sentiment of 'if only' or 'I wish', which Bryant says has driven through a politics – a politics that has always been partially lived on stage, and as performance.
A Life And A Half ends in 2001, when Bryant was first elected. The news stories Bryant is best known for during his decades in public life – his furious crusade against phone-hacking, or (less favourably) the revelations about his property shenanigans unearthed during the 2009 expenses scandal – barely feature. Instead, we get his political journey, from leaving the public school his working-class parents sent him to and joining the Oxford University Conservative Association (he studied English), through the poverty of the Thatcher era and a stint as a young priest in Latin America getting a front-row seat to the realities of inequality, to the point where he campaigned for the Labour Party in 1992 and now says, 'I would call myself a socialist.'
Subscribe to The New Statesman today from only £8.99 per month Subscribe
That's a self-definition with which some of Bryant's Labour colleagues might take issue. He jokes that in a production of The Emperor's New Clothes he once played a guard 'the main characteristic of whom is that he doesn't know his left from his right. And I think there's plenty of people who would say that I don't either.' Bryant rode the New Labour wave into politics, although he has doubts that Tony Blair ever really trusted him. His experience, both of Labour's 1992 defeat and of the party's 14 years out in the parliamentary wilderness cemented his pragmatic tendencies. To those who would prefer Labour to take a more ideologically purist stance, he says simply: 'It's about getting things done… If you're in opposition, all you're really doing is throwing snowballs at the guys on the bridge. It doesn't get you anywhere.'
This emphasis on actions over ideology dates back to Bryant's time on his post-ordination 'gap year' that took him to Christian ministries in Latin America. As is his style, the account is full of reeling juxtapositions: encountering grinding poverty on the streets of Peru, realising the blurriness of Christian theology by being asked to take Catholic mass despite being an Anglican when there were no priests available, meeting victims of torture in Argentina, smuggling a video tape of police abusing protestors out of Chile disguised as Disney's Fantasia – and, on one memorable occasion, taking three buses to the rough outskirts of town to follow a young man he'd met at a bar home for sex, only for their efforts to be interrupted by an earthquake. ('Nothing ventured, nothing gained!' he tells me when I bring up this high-risk endeavour.)
In Chile in particular, during the dying days of the Pinochet regime, Bryant recalls learning from a group of left-wing nuns to take ego out of activism. 'Change required serious organisation and discipline, not maverick pride,' he writes in the book. 'You could take two things from that political experience of being in Latin American,' he tells me back at the Garden Café. 'One is you could become an ardent fundamentalist about politics and campaign for a particular version of socialism or communism. What I took away from it was something slightly different which was you had to make your socialism work with the grain of humanity.'
Nowhere are the contradictions of Bryant's political life more apparent than in his victory in becoming the MP Rhondda – or, as he calls it, the Rhondda (now Rhondda and Ogmore, to use the full constituency name). How did a gay, former Tory, ex-public schoolboy who grew up in Spain and had an English name end up representing a constituency in the heart of the Valleys of South Wales? Bryant recalls in the book the assessment of Tom Baldwin (now Keir Starmer's biographer) after his selection in 2000: 'It would be difficult to find a Labour candidate less in keeping with the traditional image of the Rhondda.' But, Bryant adds, 'Maybe that said more about other people's preconceptions about the Rhondda.'
The story of the 2001 election campaign, from Bryant's perspective, is those preconceptions being proved wrong. He remembers a relentless focus on his sexuality (with newspapers constantly referring to him as 'exotic' or 'Labour's openly gay candidate') descending into innuendo, or on one occasion running the headline 'How pink was my valley?' He compares the novelty of his candidacy then with the situation today: 'I wouldn't be able to list the LGBT MPs to you now.' ('Too many?' I ask, obviously meaning too many too count. 'Far too many,' he replies, then goes for another joke. 'But I don't think we're going to cull them.')
Whatever the newspaper editors might have presumed about the view in the Valleys on homosexuality, the people of Rhondda had other ideas. Bryant won decisively, dashing Plaid Cymru's hopes of taking the seat off Labour. He has been there ever since, finding the community 'generous and accepting' when he and his partner moved in. With all this in mind, I ask what he makes of the stereotypes of the Valleys bandied around Westminster. Nigel Farage has his eye on Wales in next year's Senedd elections, hoping his brand of populism will find eager ears in the old industrial mining towns abandoned by the political establishment for the past half century.
'There is a very patronising understanding of what the Welsh Valleys are like,' Bryant replies. 'Both Jeremy Corbyn and Nigel Farage have called for all the mines to be reopened in the Valleys. Everybody in the Rhondda certainly just blew a raspberry! They said, 'How patronising can you get? Why can't we be setting up AI companies or doing something fabulously modern?'' Instead of sending their children down the mines to 'die of pneumoconiosis and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease', they want decent, stable jobs in the communities so people don't have to move away for work. And, like Bryant himself, they want fairness.
'I think voters look for politicians who are human and that they can identify with. I'm not sure how much they care about what school they went to, but what they do care about is whether people could come and have a drink with them or not, have an open proper chat in a language that they understand.' He pauses, then clarifies he means 'a human language', rather than Welsh.
This is the reflective, pensive side of Bryant. The mischievous side involves sleight of hand and distraction – when asked a question he doesn't want to answer given his role as a government minister, he deflects by pointing out, apropos of nothing, 'There's quite a lot of sex in the book!' He name-drops shamelessly, from pointing out that Cilla Black came to his civil partnership to a horrifying anecdote about one of the women from the Rhondda Labour party meeting Bill Clinton at an event at Labour Party Conference and asking the former US President and special guest of Tony Blair 'Why didn't you get rid of that dress?'
The book similarly revels in playing with expectations. One chapter begins with a page-long musing on why gay men love gym changing rooms, and how, for London gays in the Nineties, the YMCA – or 'Y' – gym in Tottenham Court Road was a particular favourite. Just as the reader is wondering what this foray into homosexual pick-up culture could possibly have to do with Bryant's political journey, he reveals that, 'It was in the changing room at the Y that I met Peter Mandelson.' 'He knows how to talk round corners,' Bryant says when asked about his friendship with Mandelson, the maverick mastermind behind New Labour. Was he surprised when Keir Starmer picked him to be ambassador to the US? 'I texted him to congratulate him' – which we both know is not an answer.
But the most outlandish juxtapositions concern Bryant's relationship with the Church of England and the realities of life as a closeted Anglican priest. The knots the Church tied itself in over homosexuality, even when so many of its own clergy were gay, is tackled with his characteristic blend of rage and humour. One paragraph describes a church dinner where 'an ordinand paraded around in a variety of ever more elaborate vestments before dressing up in leathers and a harness to go to a club' – a 'particularly favourite combination', Bryant tells me – 'while an archdeacon fondled his lover and everyone chatted about the best place to pick up a handsome Guards officer'. Two lines later Bryant recounts how a fellow student at his theological college suddenly died. 'We all knew Aids had taken him… and nobody ever uttered a word.'
I ask Bryant what he makes of the Church of England now, and how far it has come since he chose to leave behind an alternative career as a vicar 34 years ago. 'One day it will just get its act together and go love is love,' he says, evoking once more the spirit of 'Ojalá'. Yet he is overwhelmingly glad to have left when he did. Had he remained a closeted clergyman, unable to enjoy a proper relationship without being terrified into secrecy, he fears he would have become 'a vicious, queeny, sharp, vindictive, unhappy, lonely, gin-and-lace vicar somewhere'. It's not an irrational fear – he saw it happen.
On the prolonged appointment process for the next Archbishop of Canterbury, he notes that, while a non-political appointment, 'the irony of it is you'd be engaged in more realpolitik than the British ambassador to the United Nations' given the tensions within the global Anglican community regarding, among other things, LGBT rights. Byrant himself has never been orthodox in his Christianity. 'I quite like that the fact that our national church doesn't really believe anything too strongly. I think that's a good thing, not a bad thing.'
And yet, Bryant does believe in things strongly. He believes in fairness, with childlike outrage where it is found to be warning – from the Church's stubbornness on homosexuality to the lockdown parties held in Downing Street when people were banned from attending funerals. He believes in democracy, which he calls a 'fragile flower', having seen up-close the authoritarian regimes of Franco's Spain and Pinochet's Chile. 'Every time anybody gets frustrated with democracy they say let's have a different system. That's dangerous.' Suggestions from politicians like Farage of appointing ministers from a pool of technocrats rather than elected MP horrify him: 'Oh so we're just binning democracy, are we? That's the way we're going?'
And he believes in seeing the humanity in people. 'Quite often when someone gets into trouble in politics, I'll drop them a note saying I hope they're OK,' he says, the former crusading chair of the standards committee now channelling the forgiving vibe of a C of E priest – or, perhaps, the 16-year-old boy tasked with nursing an alcoholic mother unwilling or unable to escape her addiction. That's in part what the book is about: an MP's memoir that stops as soon as he actually arrives in parliament, focusing instead on the much more human story of how he got there. MPs are human, even if some might rarely seem it.
Most of all, perhaps, he believes in compromise; grounded not in low expectations or apathy, but in pragmatism, and a belief that in any great institution – whether Parliament, or the Church of England – there should be room for people with differing views of how to make the world a better place. In his ideal world, he says, 'some people would waggle a tambourine and some people would waggle a thurible'. Ever the performer, he pauses for dramatic effect and then corrects himself. 'Swing a thurible. I don't think you can waggle a thurible.'
[See also: Trade unionist Joe Rollin: 'Orgreave was a trap, and we fell for it']
Related
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Scotsman
9 minutes ago
- Scotsman
Why Jeremy Clarkson's discovery of 'genuinely alarming' effects of climate change is so important
Sign up to our daily newsletter – Regular news stories and round-ups from around Scotland direct to your inbox Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... For a long time, I quite liked the bloke-ish bonhomie of the 'classic' Top Gear, with Jeremy Clarkson, James May and Richard Hammond. I didn't particularly mind Clarkson's near-to-the-knuckle jokes, dodgy comments about truck drivers or his dismissal of climate change. He could sometimes make me laugh – and you can't agree about everything. However, his horrendous 'slope' remark – about an Asian man on a bridge they had built over the River Kwai – and his decision to punch a Top Gear producer because of the lack of hot food after a day's shooting both created a sour taste that has lingered. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad It wasn't just the potential racism of the slur. It was also the fact that this was a man who had laboured alongside them; it was a sneering betrayal. And as someone who has worked with people known, in all seriousness, as 'the talent' – who were sometimes anything but and comically so – I almost felt that highly entitled punch myself. READ MORE: Demise of hybrid cars in Norway shows how UK is falling behind in technological race Jeremy Clarkson has been a vocal campaigner during farmers' protests about Labour's changes to inheritance tax but is also voicing the concerns of many about the effects of the changing weather on food production (Picture: Carl Court) | Getty Images Clarkson facing 'catastrophic' harvest But Clarkson is still not without redeeming features, including a willingness, for all his bombastic on-screen persona, to change his mind. In 2019, he revealed he had encountered a 'graphic demonstration of global warming' after getting stuck on a boat in a dried-up river in Cambodia. He told The Sunday Times: 'It's the first time that we've ever admitted to there being global warming. It was alarming, genuinely alarming.' More recently, his Prime Video show, Clarkson's Farm, appears to have done a great deal to educate people about the reality of farming and has also revealed a different side to his personality. Last year, while rather optimistically suggesting 'science will solve it eventually, always does', Clarkson told the Guardian that working on his farm, Diddly Squat (a great and very 'Clarkson' name), had made him realise that the effects of climate change were 'happening really fast'. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad 'That's what always surprises me. In the last five years, I've noticed a dramatic change here... It hasn't snowed for five years. We probably get a minute of sleet. We used to get snowed in every year,' he said. While saying this, he apparently smirked and said to his interviewer 'I'm like a Guardian reader's wet dream, aren't I?' – a remark that sounds like a jibe but is begrudgingly conciliatory to people he normally disagrees with. On Friday last week, he wrote on social media: 'It looks like this year's harvest will be catastrophic. That should be a worry for anyone who eats food. If a disaster on this scale had befallen any other industry, there would be a lot of wailing and gnashing of teeth... Normal weather would help. It never stopped raining in 2024 and never started in 2025.' Many farmers have been hit by floods, drought or both in recent years (Picture: Carl Court) | Getty Images Farms hit by extreme weather It is a message that many farmers would like the rest of us, particularly those living in cities, insulated as we are from the realities of food production, to hear. A survey published last month by the Energy and Climate Intelligence Unit (ECIU) found that 86 per cent of farmers had been affected by extreme rainfall, 78 per cent by drought and more than half by heatwaves. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Just 2 per cent had not experienced some kind of extreme weather. Some 84 per cent had experienced a reduction in crop yields or livestock output, and three-quarters had seen a fall in their incomes. Tom Lancaster, the ECIU's land, food and farming analyst, said: 'Farmers are on the front line of climate change and this research reveals what impact that is having on them and their businesses. From lost crops and livestock to soil erosion, farmers are battling these impacts across more fronts than most with repeated heatwaves, droughts and periods of extreme rainfall all taking a toll on farmer confidence.' This, he said, called the UK's food security into question. 'We need to be taking these risks more seriously, with more support for farming to adapt and build resilience, as well as more urgent action to help farmers reduce their own emissions.' Global food prices set to rise Similar problems are being faced by farmers all over the world. In a study published in June by the leading journal Nature, Stanford University academics estimated that, for every degree Celsius of global warming, the world's ability to produce food would fall by 120 calories per person per day. One of the researchers, Professor Solomon Hsiang, warned that 'when global production falls, consumers are hurt because prices go up and it gets harder to access food and feed our families'. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad It is currently thought the world is on track for about 2.7C of warming by 2100 – well above the 1.5C and 2C limits suggested by scientists to avoid 'dangerous' consequences. Unless and until we reduce carbon emissions to net zero, our climate will keep on getting hotter, less temperate and less benign. While many viewers, including me, may have thought that Clarkson was being himself on Top Gear, he has spoken about playing a caricature of himself, 'a comic creation'. However, his Clarkson's Farm persona seems more like the real person and, fortunately, that is someone who, when confronted by the reality that our climate really is changing, is able to see it for what it is. Ironically, his Top Gear character may help him persuade people – who, for various reasons, are still reluctant to accept that climate change is a problem – to face the increasingly obvious facts that farmers are confronted with on a regular basis.


Spectator
5 hours ago
- Spectator
Why I don't pity short men
I couldn't help sniggering when I read in the Guardian that Tony Robinson, the diminutive (5'4) droll most famous for being in Blackadder, is venting his miniature wrath over the tendency of women on dating apps to desire men taller than them: 'Nowadays, you don't pick on people's looks, do you? It's like kind of a new understanding over the last ten or 15 years, you don't deride people for what they look like' he scolded on Elizabeth Day's How to Fail podcast, admitting he had seen his shorter than average height as 'a problem in life.' A quick peek at his Wikipedia shows that Sir Tony (a long-time member of the Labour party, knighted in the 2013 Queen's Birthday Honours) has been gainfully employed as an actor since the age of 13 in the theatre, radio, television, films and as an advertising voice-over for cleaning products, including Vanish. But far from vanishing, at the ripe old age of 78, he's still going strong. To say he's had a successful career in a profession where around 90 per cent are out of work at any given time is to utilise classic English understatement somewhat. Because of this, he is a wealthy man with homes both here and abroad. Sir Tony has been no slack in his private life, either. Three times married, his current wife Louise Hobbs is some 35 years younger than him. I'm not pointing the finger, as Mr Raven is some 13 years junior to myself, but it's one of those amusing situations comparable to Stephen Fry and his spouse in that when you see a photograph of them together, you do initially think 'isn't it lovely to see someone that close to their adult child!' before looking a bit closer and thinking 'Ah…but not that close, perhaps. Silly me!' You'd think having a gorgeous young wife would have rendered Sir Tony totally uncaring about what the youngsters get up to. But he gets in a right kerfuffle about the girls on Love Island: 'Look at Love Island, every woman who is asked what bloke they want will always start by saying 'I want a tall man' and then everyone else will laugh in collusion.' Why is a 78-year-old man watching Love Island – and would he watch it if the bikini-clad babes doing all that mugging and hugging were of his vintage? Of course, the Guardian is keen to back up the miserable old leftie: 'Studies over decades show heightism leads to bias, yet it appears even today to be more socially acceptable than other forms of physical prejudice. The term 'heightism' was first coined by the sociologist Saul Feldman in 1971. Dr Erin Pritchard, a senior lecturer in sociology and disability studies at Liverpool Hope University, believes much heightism is subconscious, but that it is ingrained. It has also not benefited from widespread acceptance movements. 'You had the fat acceptance movement, and while there's still issues, you would never go, 'Well, how much do you weigh?' But it's perfectly acceptable for people to go, 'How tall are you'?'' But also recently in the Guardian – or the Good News Gazette, as I think of it – there was a fat girl having a moan about models being thin, so it's basically any poor-me in a storm. 'Live and let live' used to be a popular liberal tenet before liberals decided that telling everyone else what they should be doing and thinking was a lot more fun. I'd bring it back and add a new one; like and let like, or even love and let love. Don't try to push your way into dating groups that don't fancy you; go and find a dating group that's keen on your kind. It's going to save a lot of aggro and hurt feelings all around. Just as some people are going to be better runners – or writers – than others, some people are going to be more physically attractive. Babies smile at photographs of conventionally attractive people more; are we going to start re-educating them about beauty before they can count to two? Besides, very few apparent gifts are free in this life; with beauty comes the curse of witnessing its loss, either by natural decay or unnatural injections of plastic which invariably rob the most fantastic face of what made it special in the first place. Before I was in a wheelchair, I was 5'9. I loved being tall. It suited me; I was a swaggering, swashbuckling show-off. Sometimes I used to actually pat my shorter friends on the head. I'm about four feet tall now; it's weird seeing life from a child's point of view. But I'll have to grin (and occasionally) grizzle and bear it. I don't believe for a moment that anyone should have to find people in wheelchairs as attractive as those striding along on their long healthy legs. I don't see many public figures in wheelchairs – but I don't believe for a moment that if I did, it would make being in a wheelchair any less annoying. In my opinion, the phrase 'If you can't see it, you can't be it' is one of the silliest of modern sayings. Rosa Parks never saw someone do what she did; neither did Barack Obama. Looking to others for approval (unless it comes in the obvious shape of getting paid) is one of the surest ways to court under-underachievement, self-loathing and mediocrity. But if 'Sir' Tony really does 'need' to see an example of a rich, successful shorter man date/bang/marry a taller woman, there are many to choose from. The tall young starlet with the short mega-millionaire is a long-standing cliche, from Bernie Eccleston to Rod Stewart, who far preferred girls who towered over him. As he gamely chortled in 'Blondes Have More Fun': 'You can keep your red heads/ You can keep your brunettes too/I wanna girl that's semi-intelligent/Gimme a blonde that's six feet two.' The blonde he finally settled for, the ex-model Penny Lancaster, has been vice president of the Royal National Institute of Blind People and a fully-qualified Special Constable with the City of London police. She's the catch, as much as him; when you can't tell the difference, I guess they call it love. So contrary to what Dr Prichard says – 'We need more voices like Tony Robinson coming out and saying it, to show this is not all woke nonsense, [to] just sort of sit down and listen to what they have to say and go, OK, these are their lived experiences' – we need, in the sexual arena, more people who don't feel outraged at not being found attractive by those more attractive, and taller, than they are.


Scottish Sun
a day ago
- Scottish Sun
The Wheel contestant loses out on huge jackpot over tricky geography question – but did you know it?
Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) A CONTESTANT on Michael McIntyre's The Wheel saw a massive jackpot slip through their fingers after stumbling on a devilishly tricky geography question. The unlucky player had been cruising towards a life-changing win before the final question threw them completely off track. Sign up for the Entertainment newsletter Sign up 4 Tom Skinner failed to get the Geography question right Credit: BBC 4 Contestant Mark missed out on a whopping £96,000 Credit: BBC Michael McIntyre kept the laughs coming as celebrity guests Motsi Mabuse, Jon Richardson, Tom Skinner, Carol Vorderman, Joe Marler, Rav Wilding and Joanne McNally spun into action, each hoping to guide the contestants to glory. But with the pressure cranked up and the questions getting tougher, even this star-studded line-up couldn't stop the night's biggest prize from slipping away. With the cash pot hanging in the balance, they were faced with a head-scratcher that left the studio gasping — and viewers at home shouting the answer at their TVs. Michael couldn't hide his shock as the contestant locked in their choice, only to watch the correct answer light up on the board seconds later. The heartbreaking miss meant walking away with nothing, despite being just one question from the jackpot. Contestant Mark opted for the highest jackpot question for a chance to win a massive £96,000. But the high-risk failed to pay off as he got a Geography question massively wrong. Could you get it right under the time pressure? The question read: "Of these New Zealand towns and cities, which one is on the South Island? Auckland, Rotorua, Wellington or Queenstown?" Contestant Mark admitted: "I don't really know exactly, but my feeling is Wellington." Tricky Oscars question wipes out The Wheel finalist - would you have won? The Apprentice star Tom Skinner couldn't help Mark, as he confessed: "I've got no idea. You've got one in four chance here. Sorry." As the question lit up red, Michael revealed the right answer was Queenstown, before adding: "What a tough question!" However, Mark got another chance at the Wheel, for a chance to win a smaller jackpot of £48,000, with help from Strictly judge Motsi Mabuse. The question read: "Which of these words appears in the traditional vows used in Church of England wedding ceremonies? Marry, Cherish, Life or Forever?" Hardest Quiz Show Questions Would you know the answers to some of quizzing TV's hardest questions Who Wants To Be A Millionaire - Earlier this year, fans were left outraged after what they described as the "worst" question in the show's history. Host Jeremy Clarkson asked: 'From the 2000 awards ceremony onwards, the Best Actress Oscar has never been won by a woman whose surname begins with which one of these letters?' The multiple choice answers were between G, K, M and W. In the end, and with the £32,000 safe, player Glen had to make a guess and went for G. It turned out to be correct as Nicole Kidman, Frances McDormand and Kate Winslet are among the stars who have won the Best Actress gong since 2000. - Earlier this year, fans were left outraged after what they described as the "worst" question in the show's history. Host Jeremy Clarkson asked: 'From the 2000 awards ceremony onwards, the Best Actress Oscar has never been won by a woman whose surname begins with which one of these letters?' The multiple choice answers were between G, K, M and W. In the end, and with the £32,000 safe, player Glen had to make a guess and went for G. It turned out to be correct as Nicole Kidman, Frances McDormand and Kate Winslet are among the stars who have won the Best Actress gong since 2000. The 1% Club - Viewers of Lee Mack's popular ITV show were left dumbfounded by a question that also left the players perplexed. The query went as follows: "Edna's birthday is on the 6th of April and Jen's birthday falls on the 15th of October, therefore Amir's birthday must be the 'X' of January." It turns out the conundrum links the numbers with its position in the sentence, so 6th is the sixth word and 15th is the fifteenth word. Therefore, Amir's birthday is January 24th, corresponding to the 24th word in the sentence. - Viewers of Lee Mack's popular ITV show were left dumbfounded by a question that also left the players perplexed. The query went as follows: "Edna's birthday is on the 6th of April and Jen's birthday falls on the 15th of October, therefore Amir's birthday must be the 'X' of January." It turns out the conundrum links the numbers with its position in the sentence, so 6th is the sixth word and 15th is the fifteenth word. Therefore, Amir's birthday is January 24th, corresponding to the 24th word in the sentence. The Chase - The ITV daytime favourite left fans scratching their heads when it threw up one of the most bizarre questions to ever grace the programme. One of the questions asked the player: "Someone with a nightshade intolerance should avoid eating what?" The options were - sweetcorn, potatoes, carrots - with Steve selecting sweetcorn but the correct answer was potatoes. Mark said: "My feeling is Cherish." Motsi agreed: "My feeling is also Cherish." Feeling confident, Mark swiftly locked it in... and he was thrilled when it lit up gold, meaning it was the correct answer. Mark cheered and punched the air as Michael and the celebrities applauded and celebrated with him. He walked away with £48,000, and Motsi was left in tears. Mark concluded: "Nothing like this has ever happened to me in my life. It's pretty unbelievable." The Wheel is available to watch on BBC iPlayer. 4 Mark managed to win £43,000 Credit: BBC