Rushanara Ali: Humiliating demise for Labour minister after a most egregious case of double standards
She was Labour's minister for homelessness, for goodness' sake, yet she ejected tenants from her near-£1m town house and then hiked the rent.
A more egregious case of ministerial double standards it would be difficult to imagine. She had to go and was no doubt told by 10 Downing Street to go quickly.
'A heavy heart' - really?
MP for the East End constituency of Bethnal Green and Stepney, Ms Ali was the very model of a modern Labour minister: A degree in PPE from Oxford University.
In her resignation letter to Sir Keir Starmer, she said she is quitting "with a heavy heart". Really? She presumably didn't have a heavy heart when she ejected her four tenants.
She'd previously spoken out against "private renters being exploited" and said her government would "empower people to challenge unreasonable rent increases".
The now former minister was charging her four former tenants £3,300 a month. Yet after they moved out, she charged her new tenants £4,000 - a rent increase of more than 20%.
A fragile constituency for Labour?
In an area represented by the left-wing firebrand George Galloway from 2005 to 2010, Ms Ali had a majority of under 1,700 at the election last year.
Ominously for Labour, an independent candidate was second and the Greens third. No doubt Jeremy Corbyn's new party will also stand next time.
In her resignation letter to the PM, Ms Ali said continuing in her ministerial role would be a distraction. Too right.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sky News
26 minutes ago
- Sky News
'We will send you packing': Govt vows to deport foreign criminals immediately after sentencing
Foreign criminals will be deported from the UK immediately after they are sentenced, the justice secretary has said. The law change proposed by Shabana Mahmood could save taxpayers an average of £54,000 a year per prison place. The changes would apply to prisoners serving fixed-term "determinate" sentences. 12:16 Authorities would also retain their power not to deport a criminal but instead keep them in custody - with examples including if an offender is planning further crimes against the UK's interests or national security. The justice secretary's announcement goes further than a change to the law in June - expected to come into force in September - meaning prisoners face deportation 30% into their sentence rather than the current 50%. The government will need parliament to greenlight its proposal to bring this down to 0%. Foreign national offenders make up around 12% of the prison population. 0:51 Ms Mahmood said: "Our message is clear - if you abuse our hospitality and break our laws, we will send you packing." She added: "Deportations are up under this government, and with this new law they will happen earlier than ever before." Almost 5,200 foreign national offenders have been deported since July 2024, a 14% increase on the 12 months prior, according to the government. According to a Labour source, the previous Conservative government relied on prison transfer agreements with other countries to deport foreign national offenders, in deals which allow inmates to serve their custodial sentence in their "home" country. This saw 945 prisoners sent to jails abroad between 2010 and 2023, equal to fewer than two criminals per week. 11:15 Conservative shadow justice secretary Robert Jenrick said: "In Starmer's topsy-turvy world, investors are fleeing the country in their droves while record numbers of violent and sexual offenders from abroad are put up in our prisons. It's a farce. "Yet again Starmer has refused to confront our broken human rights laws. "He needs to grow a backbone and change them so we can actually deport these individuals. "The safety of the British public is infinitely more important than the 'rights' of sick foreign criminals. "If countries won't take back their nationals, Starmer should suspend visas and foreign aid. His soft-touch approach isn't working."
Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Anti-abortion campaigner is being probed for praying outside a clinic... for the THIRD time
An anti-abortion campaigner is being investigated after taking part in a silent prayer outside an abortion clinic. Isabel Vaughan-Spruce, a Catholic pro-life advocate, has been arrested twice before by West Midlands Police for campaigning outside the Birmingham clinic. She received a payout and apology on both occasions and earlier this year lodged a complaint against the police force. The campaigner accused them of harassing her for standing too close to a clinic in and praying in silence. But now she is being investigated for a third time, the Telegraph reports. Ms Vaughan-Spruce was arrested in November 2022 for silently praying in a 'buffer zone' around an abortion clinic in the Kings Norton area of Birmingham. In February 2023, the charity-worker was acquitted of all charges at Birmingham magistrates' court when the prosecution was unable to offer evidence to support the charge. But just weeks later the director of anti-abortion group March for Life UK was arrested for a second time and was told her silent prayer was an offence. After a six-month investigation, the police dropped the charges and she received a payout of £13,000 and an apology. Last year, a new law was introduced making it an offence for anyone within a 'buffer zone' to do anything that could influence someone's decision to use abortion services. They could not intentionally or recklessly obstruct, harass, alarm or distress anyone visiting or working at the clinics. Despite the new law, Ms Vaughan-Spruce, who has won support from US politicians including vice president JD Vance, has continued to pray silently outside the Birmingham clinic every week. She insisted her actions did not break the law and instead brought a formal complaint against the force. Ms Vaughan-Spruce issued a claim for two wrongful arrests and false imprisonments; assault and battery in relation to an intrusive search of her person; and for a breach of her human rights in 2022 and 2023. Her complaint was rebuked by the police force's Department for Professional Standards because she was the subject of a live investigation. The force also said officers were liaising with the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS), with an update expected next week. She told the publication: 'Despite being fully vindicated multiple times after being wrongfully arrested for my thoughts, it's unbelievable that two and a half years later, I am still being harassed by police for silently praying in that area, and yet again find myself under investigation for the same prayers I have said for twenty years. 'Silent prayer cannot possibly be a crime – everyone has the right to freedom of thought.' The anti-abortion campaigner is being supported by Alliance Defending Freedom (ADF) International, a charity committed to protecting freedom of expression that has campaigned against the buffer zones - areas around clinics cordoned off from anti-abortion campaigners. They claim to expand Christian religious stance through faith-based legal advocacy. The group claimed that the police were censoring Ms Vaughan-Spruce's beliefs. She has also met with lawyers from the US House Judiciary Committee to discuss restrictions being imposed on others silently pray outside clinics. The Daily Mail has approached ADF International and West Midlands Police for comment.
The Guardian
2 hours ago
- The Guardian
If boomers don't want wealth taxes they can give their time and skills
If we can't have your money, baby boomers, we want your time. And more specifically, those who qualify as fit and healthy should be asked to serve in a new national service, offering some free days to a nationwide programme, designed locally, to boost the economy. When a wealth tax is ruled out and council tax reform too difficult, leaving boomer incomes intact, No 10 should consider such a scheme, especially when it could help to mend a society splintered by almost two decades of austerity; not as a punishment for being the lucky generation, but to reuse and repurpose valuable skills, tackle loneliness and build community cohesion. Young people are often the target of those who believe in national service, and that too could be an important initiative when there are about 1 million 16- to 24-year-olds neither in work, education or training. But in 2025, asking boomers to put their shoulder to the wheel (one more time) matters because there could be more than half of the UK's 12 million retirees, many of them after taking early retirement, with good health, few outgoings and decent pots of money who could be part of a national programme tapping into their skills and benefiting local services. This would be a voluntary scheme and there should be some obvious grounds for exemption. Anyone who can show they regularly look after grandchildren, work in a community organisation or for a charity can opt out. Poor health would also provide a reason to withdraw. This is not Rishi Sunak's militaristic vision of national service. Army uniforms will be kept in the warehouse. There would be a range of options that pensioners – anyone who wants to give something back, or give more back after a lifetime of public service – should find enticing and want to join. The only element of coercion would be the need to actively opt out by attending a government office and saying no, thank you. Plenty of people will tick an opt-out box without a second's thought. But plenty of people might sign up if they could join a scheme where they could enjoy the company of others and were properly managed. It won't be easy to set up or to run. Ask National Trust staff about how they handle the many volunteers who turn up to garden or show visitors around the charity's many properties and they will say it's a challenge. Many of the jobs that need doing are in services that councils can no longer afford to provide. And before anyone says these should be paid jobs for young people, in most cases council funds will always be too stretched. Pensioners often complain that they are the target of intergenerational fairness campaigners who fail to understand how long they have worked and how diligently they have saved. It's true that the British pension system is unfair and was made much worse when it was largely privatised in the 1980s. Pensioner inequality is worse than the inequality we see in the working population. And there is the way the state pension age fails to acknowledge when people started work, unlike Spain's, which gives credit to those who started paying national insurance at 16 or 18. Poverty and inequality is a subject to be addressed by the new Pensions Commission. National service is more about achieving outcomes for the community by bringing people together as part of a government-supported programme. Lots of older people who report being lonely are also suffering from physical and mental health problems. A national service of support workers could help them to recover some joy in later life. In Japan, older people are encouraged to look after their peers in their community who are not so fit and healthy. It is a recognition that feeling well and being active in your 60s, while partly a result of good lifestyle choices, is mainly the outcome of good genes. Likewise, healthy pension pots are a matter of good luck: luck that you were born in an era when employers promised generous occupational retirement schemes or when stock markets soared, usually from the sheer weight of baby boomer cash deployed in equity investments. Many have enjoyed tax relief at 40% when building their pensions and pay tax at 20% in retirement, while poor pension savers have the same tax on the way in and on the way out of the pension system. Luck is not something many boomers like to admit is the reason for their comfortable financial situation. They prefer to pat themselves on the back for all their good decisions. They shouldn't. Better-off boomers will be wary of proposals for a wealth tax. They will vote against council tax reform, which would clobber them for living in large, high-value properties. So if they are not donating their money, let's encourage them to devote some of their time. An ageing population means that the very notion of retirement needs to be reconsidered. Raising the retirement age is one approach. A national service could be a more palatable alternative.
