
2.7 million - the number of Ukrainian and Russian soldiers lost; Killnet, Palach Pro, User Sec, and Beregini hackers break into Ukraine's General Staff computer system
These figures do not include the number of civilians killed or injured. Their numbers are estimated to run into several thousands.
While Ukraine's military does not publicly reveal the casualty figures, the number of dead and missing soldiers are based on the information obtained by Russian hackers who broke into the digital database of the Ukrainian Armed Forces General Staff. The breached database reportedly included details like military ids of soldiers killed and missing, their photographs and other documents like passports, death certificates, and even dog tags, according to an article by Russian news outlet voennoedelo.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Remember Him? Sit Down Before You See What He Looks Like Now
33 Bridges
Undo
According to the hacked data, which has been denied by Ukraine, a total of 118,500 soldiers were killed in 2022, the first year of the war. The numbers rose dramatically to 405,400 in 2023, and reached 595,000 in 2024. With Russia pushing forward along the 750-mile long frontline in recent months, the Ukrainian casualties have been mounting at a rapid pace. The hackers claim 621,000 Ukrainian soldiers have been killed in 2025 alone with almost five months still left for the year to end.
Also Read:
Days after Trump–Putin summit, US F-16 jets intercept Soviet-era spy plane near Alaskan skies
Live Events
The hacked data also includes personal details of the top brass of Ukraine's defense forces including the Special Operations Forces (SSO) and the Main Intelligence Directorate (GUR).
Volodymyr Zelenskyy, the Ukrainian President, had in early 2025 in an interview to America's CBS News had claimed that only 46,000 Ukrainian soldiers had been killed in the war against Russia since 2022. He had put the number of injured soldiers at 38,000.
Russian casualties since 2022
Moscow, too, has been accused of downplaying the number of soldiers lost in the war. Independent military analysts and western media have consistently claimed the Russian losses are manifold the numbers claimed by Vladimir Putin's regime.
A report by The Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS), a US policy research organization, released on June 3, 2025, stated that nearly 250,000 Russian soldiers have been killed in the war. When the number of soldiers injured or missing is added, the figure reaches over 950,000.
Also Read:
Female James Bond? No way, the super spy has to be a guy, says 'feminist' Helen Mirren; check the list of actors who have played the iconic character
"Russia will likely hit the 1 million casualty mark in the summer of 2025 - a stunning and grisly milestone," the CSIS report states. "Russia has suffered roughly five times as many fatalities in Ukraine as in all Russian and Soviet wars combined between the end of World War II and the start of the full-scale invasion in February 2022. In addition, Russian fatalities in Ukraine (in just over three years) are 15 times larger than the Soviet Union's decade-long war in Afghanistan and 10 times larger than Russia's 13 years of war in Chechnya," it adds.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Time of India
12 minutes ago
- Time of India
Trump Publicly ‘Humiliates' EU Chief; ‘BOOTS OUT' Ursula From White House
EU chief Ursula von der Leyen raised abducted Ukrainian children in talks. She called it a moral duty to bring them home, speaking 'as a grandmother.' But Trump told her he thought they were there for a 'different reason.' The dismissive remark shocked EU leaders at the White House meet. It raised doubts on how seriously Trump treats humanitarian crises. Bundestag Vice President also said Trump also asked EU Chief to leave the White House meeting room a few times. Read More
&w=3840&q=100)

Business Standard
12 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Putin demands Donbas, no NATO or Western troops in Ukraine: Report
Vladimir Putin is demanding that Ukraine give up all of the eastern Donbas region, renounce ambitions to join NATO, remain neutral and keep Western troops out of the country, three sources familiar with top-level Kremlin thinking told Reuters. The Russian president met Donald Trump in Alaska on Friday for the first Russia-US summit in more than four years and spent almost all of their three-hour closed meeting discussing what a compromise on Ukraine might look like, according to the sources who requested anonymity to discuss sensitive matters. Speaking afterwards beside Trump, Putin said the meeting would hopefully open up the road to peace in Ukraine - but neither leader gave specifics about what they discussed. In the most detailed Russian-based reporting to date on Putin's offer at the summit, Reuters was able to outline the contours of what the Kremlin would like to see in a possible peace deal to end a war that has killed and injured hundreds of thousands of people. In essence, the Russian sources said, Putin has compromised on territorial demands he laid out in June 2024, which required Kyiv to cede the entirety of the four provinces Moscow claims as part of Russia: Dontesk and Luhansk in eastern Ukraine - which make up the Donbas - plus Kherson and Zaporizhzhia in the south. Kyiv rejected those terms as tantamount to surrender. In his new proposal, the Russian president has stuck to his demand that Ukraine completely withdraw from the parts of the Donbas it still controls, according to the three sources. In return, though, Moscow would halt the current front lines in Zaporizhzhia and Kherson, they added. Russia controls about 88 per cent of the Donbas and 73 per cent of Zaporizhzhia and Kherson, according to US estimates and open-source data. Moscow is also willing to hand over the small parts of the Kharkiv, Sumy, and Dnipropetrovsk regions of Ukraine it controls as part of a possible deal, the sources said. Putin is sticking, too, to his previous demands that Ukraine give up its NATO ambitions and for a legally binding pledge from the US-led military alliance that it will not expand further eastwards, as well as for limits on the Ukrainian army and an agreement that no Western troops will be deployed on the ground in Ukraine as part of a peacekeeping force, the sources said. Yet the two sides remain far apart, more than three years after Putin ordered thousands of Russian troops into Ukraine in a full-scale invasion that followed the annexation of the Crimean peninsula in 2014 and prolonged fighting in the country's east between Russian-backed separatists and Ukrainian troops. Ukraine's foreign ministry had no immediate comment on the proposals. President Volodymyr Zelenskiy has repeatedly dismissed the idea of withdrawing from internationally recognised Ukrainian land as part of a deal, and has said the industrial Donbas region serves as a fortress holding back Russian advances deeper into Ukraine. "If we're talking about simply withdrawing from the east, we cannot do that," he told reporters in comments released by Kyiv on Thursday. "It is a matter of our country's survival, involving the strongest defensive lines." Joining NATO, meanwhile, is a strategic objective enshrined in the country's constitution and one which Kyiv sees as its most reliable security guarantee. Zelenskiy said it was not up to Russia to decide on the alliance's membership. The White House and NATO didn't immediately respond to requests for comment on the Russian proposals. Political scientist Samuel Charap, chair in Russia and Eurasia Policy at RAND, a US-based global policy think-tank, said any requirement for Ukraine to withdraw from the Donbas remained a non-starter for Kyiv, both politically and strategically. "Openness to 'peace' on terms categorically unacceptable to the other side could be more of a performance for Trump than a sign of a true willingness to compromise," he added. "The only way to test that proposition is to begin a serious process at the working level to hash out those details." TRUMP: PUTIN WANTS TO SEE IT ENDED Russian forces currently control a fifth of Ukraine, an area about the size of the American state of Ohio, according to US estimates and open-source maps. The three sources close to the Kremlin said the summit in the Alaskan city of Anchorage had ushered in the best chance for peace since the war began because there had been specific discussions about Russia's terms and Putin had shown a willingness to give ground. "Putin is ready for peace - for compromise. That is the message that was conveyed to Trump," one of the people said. The sources cautioned that it was unclear to Moscow whether Ukraine would be prepared to cede the remains of the Donbas, and that if it did not then the war would continue. Also unclear was whether or not the United States would give any recognition to Russian-held Ukrainian territory, they added. A fourth source said that though economic issues were secondary for Putin, he understood the economic vulnerability of Russia and the scale of the effort needed to go far further into Ukraine. Trump has said he wants to end the "bloodbath" of the war and be remembered as a "peacemaker president". He said on Monday he had begun arranging a meeting between the Russian and Ukrainian leaders, to be followed by a trilateral summit with the US president. "I believe Vladimir Putin wants to see it ended," Trump said beside Zelenskiy in the Oval office. "I feel confident we are going to get it solved." Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov said on Thursday that Putin was prepared to meet Zelenskiy but that all issues had to be worked through first and there was a question about Zelenskiy's authority to sign a peace deal. Putin has repeatedly raised doubts about Zelenskiy's legitimacy as his term in office was due to expire in May 2024 but the war means no new presidential election has yet been held. Kyiv says Zelenskiy remains the legitimate president. The leaders of Britain, France and Germany have said they are sceptical that Putin wants to end the war. SECURITY GUARANTEES FOR UKRAINE Trump's special envoy Steve Witkoff was instrumental in paving the way for the summit, and the latest drive for peace, according to two of the Russian sources. Witkoff met Putin in the Kremlin on August 6 with Kremlin aide Yuri Ushakov. At the meeting, Putin conveyed clearly to Witkoff that he was ready to compromise and set out the contours of what he could accept for peace, according to two Russian sources. If Russia and Ukraine could reach an agreement, then there are various options for a formal deal - including a possible three-way Russia-Ukraine-US deal that is recognised by the UN Security Council, one of the sources said. Another option is to go back to the failed 2022 Istanbul agreements, where Russia and Ukraine discussed Ukraine's permanent neutrality in return for security guarantees from the five permanent members of the UN Security Council: Britain, China, France, Russia and the United States, the sources added. "There are two choices: war or peace, and if there is no peace, then there is more war," one of the people said.
&w=3840&q=100)

First Post
12 minutes ago
- First Post
Does Putin really want to meet Zelenskyy? Lavrov says Europe promoting its own agenda
Sergei Lavrov rejected Volodymyr Zelenskyy's offer to meet Vladimir Putin, accusing Kyiv and Europe of sidelining Moscow's concerns and warning against European troop deployment in Ukraine. This handout photograph published on August 21, 2025, on the official Telegram channel of the head of the Zakarpattia Regional Military Administration Myroslav Biletsky shows smoke emanating over buildings following a Russian air attack in Mukachevo, Zakarpattia region.- AFP Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov on Thursday dismissed Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy's latest offer to meet Vladimir Putin, accusing Kyiv and its European allies of pursuing an agenda that sidelines Moscow's concerns. Lavrov said Ukraine's leadership was 'not interested' in a genuine peace settlement and was instead focused on securing Western guarantees that Russia views as incompatible with its demands. 'The Ukrainian regime and its representatives directly show they are not interested in a sustainable, fair, long-term settlement,' Lavrov said. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD He argued that Europe was trying to 'undermine' efforts at a sustainable peace formula by extending security guarantees to Kyiv. 'Europe is promoting its own agenda, focusing only on guarantees and ignoring the root causes,' he said, stressing that Moscow would continue to follow the policy course decided jointly with Washington. Lavrov also warned that any move by European states to deploy troops in Ukraine would cross a red line. 'This would be absolutely unacceptable for the Russian Federation,' he said, calling such an initiative 'foreign intervention in part of Ukrainian territory.' The remarks came after Zelenskyy suggested he was prepared to meet Putin, but only once Ukraine had received firm commitments on security. He floated Switzerland, Austria or Turkey as possible venues and even proposed a trilateral format with US President Donald Trump. 'We want to have an understanding of the security guarantees architecture within 7–10 days, and based on that understanding, we aim to hold a trilateral meeting,' Zelenskyy told reporters. Moscow, however, portrayed Zelenskyy's overture as a political ploy. Lavrov pointed out that the Ukrainian leader had previously ruled out talks with Putin, even signing an executive order to that effect. 'Now his proposal is only a tactic, he fears attention to his personality may drop and wants to appear constructive,' Lavrov said. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD While stressing that President Putin remained open to talks, Lavrov raised doubts over 'the legitimacy of the person who signs the agreement on the Ukrainian side,' hinting at questions over Zelenskyy's standing at home and abroad. The exchange highlighted the deep mistrust that continues to block direct dialogue between Moscow and Kyiv with Zelenskyy conditioning talks on Western guarantees, and Russia insisting that peace cannot be built on terms crafted by Europe.