
How India foiled Pak's attack, turned its missiles, drones into duds
Rattled by India's "focused, measured, and non-escalatory" operation Sindoor on Wednesday (May 7), a desperate Pakistan attempted to strike multiple military targets across Northern and Western India on the intervening nights of May 7 and 8. But, the Pakistani misadventure, that targeted at least 15 Indian military sites, was short-lived. The Pakistani swarm of drones and missiles fell like dead flies. Their shattered remains are now strewn across Indian soil, from Awantipora in Jammu and Kashmir to Bhuj in the Rann of Kutch.advertisementThe Ministry of Defence said on Thursday that the Pakistani drones and missiles were quickly engaged and neutralised by India's Integrated Counter UAS Grid and Air Defence systems.What is this shield that helped India fend off an attack spread across 1,800 km of aerial distance of Indian territory? What are India's Integrated Counter-UAS Grid and Air Defence systems that managed to fend off such a major attack from Pakistan?WHAT AND HOW OF INDIA'S INTEGRATED COUNTER-UAS SYSTEM GRID
Firstly, Integrated Counter-Unmanned Aircraft Systems (C-UAS) are comprehensive defence mechanisms designed to detect, track, identify, and neutralise unauthorised drones.These systems employ a combination of technologies, including radar, radio frequency sensors, optical cameras, and acoustic detectors, to monitor airspace for potential threats.When a threat is identified, a C-UAS platform can deploy various countermeasures. They include signal jamming, GPS spoofing, or kinetic interceptors, to mitigate the risk posed by hostile unmanned aerial systems, according to Dedrone, a US-based company specialising in counter-drone and airspace security technologies.advertisementHowever, India's air defence is challenging and particularly complex due to its vast size, over 3.2 million square kilometres. Not every part of the country is equally vulnerable, but maintaining constant surveillance and readiness across such a large geography is daunting. This is where such grids come into play.So, in order to destroy such unidentified hostile unmanned aerial interceptions simultaneously, India has a network of such systems in place, called the Integrated Counter-Unmanned Aircraft System (C-UAS) Grid.The grid is a sophisticated network of such systems designed to detect, track, and neutralise unauthorised drones and missiles. It factors in the incoming speeds and sizes of the incoming hostile drones and missiles. In turn, based on that assessment, it deploys an appropriate weapon, such as a missile from its arsenal, to neutralise it.Though India has several such systems in the grid, a system uses its own unique variants. That is because different systems don't talk to (communicate with) one another. Like Apple products, they too form an ecosystem.Having said that, India's air defence systems are progressively becoming more interconnected, but significant challenges remain in achieving full integration.That's because India's air defence structure consists of a combination of indigenous and imported systems. Those imported are from various countries, like Russia, the US, Israel, and France. Some components are from the Soviet era too. Each system has its own hardware and software, which is a hindrance to holistic integration.advertisementThe Indian air defence grid's successful neutralisation of incoming Pakistani missiles underscores the extent of its deployment across Indian territory to safeguard critical assets, including airbases, marking what appears to be a successful real-world test of the system.WHAT ARE AIR DEFENCE SYSTEMS USED BY INDIA?India's unsung heroes, its air defence systems, are individual set-ups to deal with threats that come in many forms, including aircraft, drones, and missiles, requiring a multi-layered defence strategy to ensure comprehensive protection on its territory.At the forefront of India's air defence is the S-400 system, a long-range missile defence system imported from Russia. With a range of up to 450 km, the S-400 forms the outermost layer of India's defence, capable of intercepting advanced threats before they can reach critical targets.India has received three S-400 Triumf air defence system squadrons from Russia, with two more squadrons expected by early 2026, delayed from an initial 2025 timeline due to the war in Ukraine. In total, India ordered five squadrons under a $5.43 billion deal signed in 2018.
India's S-400 system can track aerial threats from as far as 600 kilometres and destroy them at ranges of up to 400 kilometres.
advertisementFor medium-range interception, India relies on the MR-SAM (Medium Range Surface-to-Air Missile) and Barak 8 systems, developed jointly by India's DRDO and Israel's IAI. These systems cover a range of 70 to 150 km and are deployed on both land and naval platforms.Complementing this is the Akash system, an indigenous short-to-medium-range defence system that covers distances of 30 to 50 km.At the short-range level, the Spyder system, an Israeli-made defence solution with a range of 8–10 km, adds another layer of protection, particularly for sensitive areas. India also utilises legacy systems like the Soviet-era Pechora and OSA-AK, though these are being phased out due to their obsolescence.For very close-in threats, India has VSHORAD (Very Short Range Air Defense) systems, such as shoulder-fired missiles and gun-based platforms like the Shilka and Tunguska.Together, these systems form a layered, concentric air defence network, designed not just for interception but also for deterrence and kill.Tune InMust Watch

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Economic Times
32 minutes ago
- Economic Times
Congress presses Modi to talk to Trump on 'atrocities' against Indians after viral video
Prime Minister Narendra Modi should immediately talk to US President Donald Trump to appeal for intervention on the "mistreatment and atrocities" against Indians, the Congress said on Tuesday after a video emerged showing an Indian student being handcuffed and pinned to the floor at a US airport. Congress leaders shared the video and pictures of an Indian student handcuffed and pinned to the floor at USA's Newark Airport before he was allegedly deported. The Consulate General of India in New York has said it is in touch with local authorities after the video surfaced online showing the young Indian man being handcuffed and allegedly being deported. "We have come across social media posts claiming that an Indian national is facing difficulties at Newark Liberty International Airport. We are in touch with local authorities in this regard," the Indian Consulate said in a post on X. Congress general secretary in-charge communications Jairam Ramesh alleged that the Modi government is continuously failing to protect the honour of India and Indians. "For the first time in history, a US head of state has announced a ceasefire between India and Pakistan in Washington DC. The US President is continuously claiming credit for maintaining pressure on India. Meanwhile, Prime Minister Modi has not been able to summon the courage to speak - either on the ceasefire or on the atrocities being perpetrated against Indians in the US," Ramesh said in a post on X. Protecting the honour of India and Indians is one of the most important responsibilities of the Prime Minister of India, he asserted."We demand that Prime Minister Modi should talk to President Trump and appeal for intervention in the atrocities happening against Indians and the fear that has gripped lakhs of Indian students in America," Ramesh said. He called on the PM to appeal to Trump for intervention on the "mistreatment and atrocities" being committed against Indians in America. Congress' media and publicity department head Pawan Khera tagged a post on X carrying the video, which was posted online by an Indian-American social entrepreneur Kunal Jain. The video shows the Indian man pinned to the ground by Port Authority Police and being handcuffed."I witnessed a young Indian student being deported from Newark Airport last night - handcuffed, crying, treated like a criminal. He came chasing dreams, not causing harm. As an NRI, I felt helpless and heartbroken. This is a human tragedy," Jain said in his post. Tagging Jain's post, Khera said, "This is too painful, too humiliating and too distressing to watch. As a country, why should we tolerate this humiliation?" "From the days where we showed the muscle to the US during the Devyani Khobragade issue to now seeing our citizens being treated like animals, do we have no goodwill left in the world?" the Congress leader said.


Indian Express
35 minutes ago
- Indian Express
From the Urdu Press: Rahul Gandhi's match-fixing charge, PM Modi's challenges at G 7
The Urdu press weighed in on claims by Leader of the Opposition in the Lok Sabha Rahul Gandhi, also made in an op-ed in The Indian Express, that the Maharashtra Assembly election results were rigged by the ruling BJP, a charge that has been denied by the Election Commission. The dailies also highlighted the challenges for Prime Minister Narendra Modi when he attends the G7 conference in Canada later this month. URDU TIMES In its June 9 editorial titled 'Is the Election Commission a threat to democracy?', Urdu Times notes that the EC has not officially denied Gandhi's statement, with poll panel sources saying the commission would first wait for the Congress MP to write to them or seek a meeting so far on poll data. The editorial adds: 'During his visit to Bihar, Rahul Gandhi said the 'match-fixing' of Haryana and Maharashtra will now be repeated in Bihar as well. Though the Election Commission is giving its clarification on the issue, BJP leaders are getting uncomfortable. The Chief Minister of Maharashtra even said that those who people rejected electorally are blaming the government elected by the people.' The daily writes that the Congress counter is that the party has been seeking party-level voting data since 2023. 'We have moved the court for this. The court had also ordered that the data be provided. After dilly-dallying, the Election Commission has now said that it is ready to provide the data,' Urdu Times writes, adding that as Congress general secretary and Rajya Sabha MP Randeep Singh Surjewala has called 'the silence and inaction of the Election Commission are an alarm bell for the democratic system'. 'And now the Election Commission's agreement to provide the data is proof that the EC is not an independent institution but is working on someone's instructions,' the editorial says. ROZNAMA RASHTRIYA SAHARA Prime Minister Narendra Modi faces a challenge at the G7 conference in Canada where he is headed, notes the Rashtriya Sahara in its editorial dated June 9. It goes on to note that Modi did not get an invite initially, with the Congress party dubbing this a diplomatic blunder. While Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney eventually did invite his Indian counterpart, pointing to India's status as the fifth largest economy in the world, the editorial says, there is no denying the steep deterioration in India-Canadian ties in the recent past. 'Now, questions are being raised about the invite to PM Modi for the meeting. Apart from the Canadian political party NDP, the World Sikh Organization has also raised questions about Carney's decision,' the daily writes. PM Modi is set to be under scrutiny over Operation Sindoor, which India launched to hit terror targets across the border in retaliation to a Pahalgam terror attack, the editorial says. 'US President Donald Trump has repeatedly announced that he has brokered a ceasefire between India and Pakistan. India has never confirmed or denied Donald Trump's claim. Opposition parties have also strongly criticised as to why the ceasefire was suddenly declared when the Army was doing well, wondering whether this was due to US intervention.' The daily adds that their meeting at the G7 would be Modi and US President Donald Trump's first after Operation Sindoor, and wonders what strategy would Modi adopt to address concerns back home and internationally.


Time of India
36 minutes ago
- Time of India
How and why China, not Donald Trump may be bigger threat to Apple's make in India plans for iPhones
Representative Image Apple 's ambitious plans to shift iPhone production from China to India face a new and potentially more formidable obstacle than President Donald Trump's tariff threats: Beijing itself is actively blocking the transition by restricting Chinese engineers and suppliers from supporting Apple's Indian operations. While Trump has publicly demanded that Apple manufacture iPhones in America rather than India, threatening 25% tariffs if the company doesn't comply, a recent Bloomberg analysis reveals that China poses a more fundamental threat to Apple's diversification strategy. Beijing has begun preventing crucial experienced employees from traveling to India and Southeast Asia, effectively sabotaging Apple's efforts to replicate its Chinese manufacturing ecosystem elsewhere. The restrictions come as Apple's Indian operations have shown remarkable growth, with production value jumping 60% to $22 billion in the past year, according to Bloomberg. Over $17 billion worth of iPhones are now exported from India. China is 'interfering' in manufacturing operations of Apple's Chinese suppliers in India by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Dream Kitchen Within Reach? See How HomeLane Get Quote Undo Beijing's interference stems from viewing Apple's India project as a strategic threat to its manufacturing dominance. According to Bloomberg Opinion columnist Mihir Sharma, many crucial Chinese engineers and suppliers who would normally help establish new production lines have found themselves "forbidden to travel to India and Southeast Asia." This represents a significant escalation in China's response to Apple's diversification efforts. Former Financial Times journalist Patrick McGee, author of "Apple in China," argues that Beijing now recognizes how American technology transfer helped build China's manufacturing prowess and is determined to prevent similar knowledge transfer to India. The restrictions are particularly damaging because Apple's success in China relied heavily on Chinese engineers and suppliers who gained expertise through decades of collaboration with American counterparts. As McGee notes in his book, this technology transfer ultimately contributed to China's " Made in China 2025 " plan, making Beijing wary of repeating the process elsewhere. China's stranglehold extends beyond engineering talent to the fundamental building blocks of smartphone manufacturing. The country controls over 90% of the global supply chain for rare earth permanent magnets, while processing the majority of materials essential for iPhone components like batteries and screens. With an iPhone containing roughly 2,700 different parts sourced from 187 suppliers across 28 countries—and China manufacturing the majority of components—Beijing's ability to disrupt Apple's operations extends far beyond restricting personnel movement. Trump's tariff threats add political pressure President Trump has escalated his demands for Apple to abandon Indian manufacturing in favor of American production. During a state visit to Qatar, Trump revealed his conversation with CEO Tim Cook: "I don't want you building in India," adding that Apple should focus on US production instead. On Truth Social, Trump threatened: "I expect their iPhone's that will be sold in the United States of America will be manufactured and built in the United States, not India, or anyplace else. If that is not the case, a Tariff of at least 25% must be paid by Apple." However, manufacturing experts suggest Trump's demands face insurmountable structural challenges. As Cook told Fortune magazine in 2017, Apple's reliance on countries like China isn't about cheap labor but "the skill and the quantity of skill in one location." The US lacks the concentrated engineering expertise that China developed over decades. India remains Apple's only viable alternative despite obstacles Despite the dual pressures from Washington and Beijing, Apple appears committed to its Indian strategy. Foxconn recently announced an additional $1.5 billion investment in Indian operations, with plans for a new campus housing 30,000 employees, the largest such effort in India's recent history. Indian officials remain confident in Apple's commitment. "There is no change in Apple's investment plans in India," a government source told CNBC-TV18, noting that Apple has "assured the Indian government" of continued investment. The economic logic supporting India remains compelling. Bank of America analysts estimate Apple could produce about 25 million iPhones in India this year, potentially meeting 50% of American demand while avoiding the higher tariffs on Chinese imports.