Royal Stoke University Hospital could be heated by waste incinerator
Burning rubbish could help to heat Staffordshire's main hospital amid plans for a new incinerator.Proposals are being drawn up for the Royal Stoke University Hospital to receive both heat and electricity from a planned Energy Recovery Facility at Hanford, which is due to replace the existing waste incinerator by the end of the decade.Bosses at University Hospitals of North Midlands (UHNM), which runs Royal Stoke, said the scheme would help protect the hospital site from spiking global energy prices and reduce its carbon emissions. UHNM has been speaking to Stoke-on-Trent City Council and SSE Energy Solutions Ltd about the proposals.
The council has been developing a district heat network since 2014 to distribute heat to homes and businesses via a system of underground water pipes, the first 2.5 miles (4km) of which have been installed in Stoke and Shelton.A geothermal well has been proposed as the main source of heat but the local authority has also been looking at linking the network to other heat-producing sites, such as the Energy Recovery Facility.In a report to the UHNM board, chief executive Simon Constable said the scheme would bring numerous benefits, including "reducing emissions and protecting against energy market volatility"."The scheme will also create local jobs and deliver social value for the residents of the city," he added.According to a previous council report, the replacement Energy Recovery Facility has the potential to generate about 320 GWh of electricity and 400 GWh of heat, which could meet all the council's needs and generate £50m annually in commercial sales.
This news was gathered by the Local Democracy Reporting Service.
Follow BBC Stoke & Staffordshire on BBC Sounds, Facebook, X and Instagram.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
19 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Assisted dying Bill a ‘threat to patients', doctors tell MPs
The assisted dying Bill is a 'real threat to both patients and the medical workforce', around 1,000 doctors have warned MPs. Labour MP Kim Leadbeater's Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill will return to the Commons for debate on Friday, with MPs expected to consider further amendments. But in a letter published this week, doctors from across the NHS urged MPs to listen to those 'who would have to deliver the consequences of this deeply flawed Bill'. They warned that it 'poses a real threat to both patients and the medical workforce'. In its current form, the proposed legislation, which applies only to England and Wales, would mean terminally ill adults with only six months left to live could apply for assistance to end their lives, subject to the approval of two doctors and an expert panel. Last month, MPs approved a change in the Bill to ensure no medical staff would be obliged to take part in assisted dying. Doctors already had an opt-out, but the new clause extends that to anyone, including pharmacists and social care workers. Encouraging or assisting suicide is currently against the law in England and Wales, with a maximum jail sentence of 14 years. 'Urge you to vote against it' The letter to MPs said: 'As experienced medical professionals who regularly work with dying patients and who have reviewed the worldwide evidence on assisted dying, it is our opinion that this Bill poses a real threat to both patients and the medical workforce, and we urge you to vote against it. 'We are concerned that the private member's Bill process has not facilitated a balanced approach to the collection of evidence and input from key stakeholders including doctors, people with disabilities and other marginalised groups. 'This Bill will widen inequalities, it provides inadequate safeguards and, in our collective view, is simply not safe. 'This is the most important piece of healthcare legislation for 60 years and we urge you to listen to the doctors who would have to deliver the consequences of this deeply flawed Bill.'
Daily Mail
28 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
EXCLUSIVE Mounjaro made me look old: I've 'aged 15 years' since losing 7st - but here's why I don't care about having 'jab face'
A mother-of-two who lost seven stone thanks to weight loss jabs has been told her 'Mounjaro face' has aged her by 15 years - but she has no regrets. Ashley Nickson, 35, tipped the scales at 17st 10lbs after piling on the weight while she was pregnant with her children, Mally, six, and Charlie, two.
Daily Mail
36 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
More than 1,000 doctors write to MPs to demand they vote AGAINST 'unsafe' assisted dying laws that are 'a real threat to both patients and NHS staff'
More than 1,000 doctors have written to MPs to demand they vote against 'unsafe' assisted dying laws. In an open letter, doctors from across the NHS warned the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill poses a 'real threat to both patients and the medical workforce'. The Bill aims to allow terminally ill adults in England and Wales - with less than six months to live - to legally end their lives. But, while the doctors said it was 'entirely appropriate to have a national debate on how to address the issue of end-of-live care', they added the Bill 'is not the answer'. They said the 'deeply flawed' legislation, which is being spearheaded by Labour MP Kim Leadbeater, is 'simply not safe'. Their concerns about the Bill include that it will 'widen inequalities' and 'provide inadequate safeguards'. The proposed legislation 'does not protect against the risk of coercion, particularly for women and the elderly', the letter added. The Bill is set to return to the House of Commons for debate this Friday, with MPs expected to consider further amendments. In an open letter to MPs, doctors from across the NHS warned the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill poses a 'real threat to both patients and the medical workforce' Campaigners opposed to the Bill recently claimed the 'momentum is against' Ms Leadbeater's legislation. They highlighted how a number of MPs who previously backed the Bill last year have since withdrawn their support, as it moves through its parliamentary stages. Last month, MPs approved a change in the Bill to ensure no medics would be obliged to take part in assisted dying. Doctors already had an opt-out but the new clause extends that to anyone, including pharmacists and social care workers. Encouraging or assisting suicide is currently against the law in England and Wales, with a maximum jail sentence of 14 years. In their open letter, the doctors pleaded with MPs to block the Bill at its Third Reading, which is expected later this month. They wrote: 'As experienced medical professionals who regularly work with dying patients and who have reviewed the worldwide evidence on assisted dying, it is our opinion that this Bill poses a real threat to both patients and the medical workforce, and we urge you to vote against it. 'We are concerned that the private member's Bill process has not facilitated a balanced approach to the collection of evidence and input from key stakeholders including doctors, people with disabilities and other marginalised groups. 'This Bill will widen inequalities, it provides inadequate safeguards and, in our collective view, is simply not safe. 'This is the most important piece of healthcare legislation for 60 years and we urge you to listen to the doctors who would have to deliver the consequences of this deeply flawed Bill.' Liberal Democrat leader Sir Ed Davey welcomed the doctors' letter, saying he had 'real concerns' about the pressure on those who feel a 'burden' on their families. 'I hope, as time has gone on, as the arguments have been better exposed, that MPs will switch sides and join the side that I and many MPs are on,' he told Sky News. But Labour minister Sir Chris Bryant said he would now be voting in favour of the Bill having previously abstained. 'The Government doesn't have a formal position at all and individual members are free to choose how they vote,' he said. 'I'm not going to hide my own personal preference. I abstained on the first time round, I decided I wasn't going to vote because I wanted to hear the debate. 'I have listened to a lot of the debate. Of course, I don't want anybody to feel that they are a burden on society and that should lead them towards taking their own life. 'But I also have heard the cries of people who are absolutely miserable, and that's why I will be voting for the Bill.' Last month, Justice Secretary Shabana Mahmood - an opponent of the Bill - warned assisted dying legislation was being rushed through Parliament with too little time for proper scrutiny. In an historic vote in November, the Commons voted in favour of the Bill at its Second Reading and sent it for line-by-line scrutiny by the committee of MPs. But Ms Leadbeater subsequently sparked anger when she made a major change to the Bill from when it was first introduced to Parliament. It had initially been said assisted dying applications would only be allowed with the approval of two doctors and a High Court judge. But Ms Leadbeater later proposed scrapping the High Court oversight in favour of an assisted dying commissioner and expert panels. Under her new plans, the panels will feature a senior legal figure, a psychiatrist and a social worker who will decide on assisted dying applications. While Friday is expected to see debate on further amendments to the Bill, it is thought a vote on the overall legislation might not take place until the following Friday, June 20. Ahead of last month's Commons debate on the Bill, two royal medical colleges raised concerns over the proposed legislation. The Royal College of Physicians (RCP) said it believes there are 'concerning deficiencies', while the Royal College of Psychiatrists (RCPsych) said it has 'serious concerns' and cannot support the Bill.
