Winnipeg woman launches hunger strike as ‘moral obligation'
Monique Vermette hasn't consumed anything except water with electrolytes since Sunday to protest Gaza citizens not getting enough food aid because of Israeli blockades 22 months into the war.
'I am on a hunger strike because the pain of Gaza screams louder every day, yet no one hears,' Vermette said. 'Because I have a moral obligation to speak out in the face of oppression. Because Canada is complicit in this genocide and refuses to act.
Ruth Bonneville / Free Press
Monique Vermette is on Day 2 of a hunger strike to protest Gaza citizens not getting enough food aid because of Israeli blockades outside the office of Liberal MP for Winnipeg West Doug Eyolfson, Monday.
'Wake up, Gaza is starving.'
Vermette said she protested at MP Doug Eyolfson's Portage Avenue office Monday and at Ben Carr's Corydon Avenue office Tuesday. On Wednesday, she promised to be outside city hall at noon and the Manitoba Legislative Building at 6 p.m. On Thursday and Friday, she expects to visit the offices of MPs Terry Duguid and Ginette Lavack respectively.
On Tuesday, Canada, Britain, Australia and 21 other European allies called on Israel to allow aid to enter Gaza with no restrictions.
Israel has accused Hamas of stealing aid shipments to Gaza, which Hamas has denied.
Gaza's health ministry has said 227 people, including 103 children, have died from starvation and malnutrition since the war started after Hamas-led militants crossed into Israel and killed 1,200 people and kidnapped 251 hostages on Oct. 7, 2023. It said last month more than 60,000 Palestinians have been killed and more than 145,000 injured during the war.
Vermette said she has encountered few people so far during her hunger strike. City hall was closed when she went there Sunday and Eyolfson's office was also shut.
'His office had a sign on it saying it was closed due to unforeseen circumstances,' she said.
As to whether it was closed because of her protest, Vermette said 'I can't say for sure, but I think it is definitely possible because there have been protests I have been part of in the past where MP offices just decided to close even though they are peaceful protests.
'I can't imagine them being scared of me with my sign, all alone, peacefully protesting outside when they are politicians and their job is to listen to what the people have to say.'
Carr said he was away and couldn't comment while the other MPs could not be reached for comment.
Another protest was set to be held outside Folklorama's Israeli pavilion Wednesday night.
Candice Bodnaruk, organizer with Peace Alliance Winnipeg, said the annual protest began in 2014 to oppose Israel's 51-day war on Gaza.
'The first few years people said they had no idea about any of this stuff that was going on,' Bodnaruk said.
'Now, I don't see how, after being in the news and the stories, how anybody can say now they don't know what is going on as they go into this pavilion.'
Bodnaruk said the group has asked Folklorama to exclude the pavilion from the annual festival because of Israel's actions in Gaza.
'The people that run that pavilion are part of a group in Winnipeg who are pro-Israel and many of them regularly travel to Israel to show support for the idea — they are not neutral,' she said.
'I don't know how you can call yourself an Israeli pavilion when they know what the state you are supporting is and what they are doing.'
Jeff Lieberman, president and chief executive officer of the Jewish Federation of Winnipeg, said the Israeli pavilion has been part of Folklorama since the festival began decades ago.
Sundays
Kevin Rollason's Sunday newsletter honouring and remembering lives well-lived in Manitoba.
'The pavilion has always been non-political and one of the more popular pavilions because of our excellent show, food and cultural display.'
Lieberman said protests have become common in recent years.
'The choice to protest outside a Jewish community centre, the heart of Jewish life in Winnipeg, is inappropriate and deeply troubling,' he said. 'Such actions create a hostile environment for people simply visiting the centre and cross the line between political expression and targeting an entire faith community.
'This intimidation must stop. We call on government authorities and law enforcement to ensure the safety of all who come to our pavilion and to protect the right of our community to celebrate our culture free from harassment or fear.'
kevin.rollason@freepress.mb.ca
Kevin RollasonReporter
Kevin Rollason is a general assignment reporter at the Free Press. He graduated from Western University with a Masters of Journalism in 1985 and worked at the Winnipeg Sun until 1988, when he joined the Free Press. He has served as the Free Press's city hall and law courts reporter and has won several awards, including a National Newspaper Award. Read more about Kevin.
Every piece of reporting Kevin produces is reviewed by an editing team before it is posted online or published in print — part of the Free Press's tradition, since 1872, of producing reliable independent journalism. Read more about Free Press's history and mandate, and learn how our newsroom operates.
Our newsroom depends on a growing audience of readers to power our journalism. If you are not a paid reader, please consider becoming a subscriber.
Our newsroom depends on its audience of readers to power our journalism. Thank you for your support.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
National Observer
an hour ago
- National Observer
Canada isn't losing the trade war — yet
Mark Carney told Canadians that he knew how to deal with Donald Trump. April's federal election results showed that voters wanted to believe him. But now, more than three months in and with the latest economic data starting to show signs of tariff-driven deterioration, Canadians are starting to wonder whether his handling of our relationship with America is going according to plan — and what that plan actually is. It's hardly surprising to see Conservative politicians, pundits and online influencers interpreting the developments coming out of Washington and Ottawa through the prism of their reflexive disdain for the Liberal government. There is an almost palpable glee in their mockery of the 'elbows up' catchphrase that helped him win the federal election in April. 'Explain to me about the elbows again,' CPC MP Michelle Rempel-Garner said on social media, citing a list of tariffs that are now higher than they were before Carney became Prime Minister in February (and before Trump officially launched his tariff war on the world on April 2). But it's not just Conservative partisans who are questioning Carney's ability to deliver. In a piece titled ' Let's Admit It: Donald Trump is Winning the Trade War with Canada,' Paul Wells argues that Carney's countermoves are so far coming up short. His efforts to remove interprovincial trade barriers are still largely symbolic, the president's love affair with tariffs continues apace and Carney's efforts to establish new or strengthened economic ties with other countries have yet to yield anything tangible. 'Replacing a lifetime of ever-closer integration with the vastly larger population next door, in favour of substantial new partnerships with distant lands, is really hard,' Wells writes. 'Actually, it's usually impossible.' That's the key word here: usually. As Carney has said, if Canada is going to survive the onslaught of economic and political idiocy coming from Trump's White House, it will have to ' do things that we haven't imagined before, at speeds we didn't think possible." That certainly helps explain the rushed passage of Bill C-5, which lays the groundwork for the acceleration of nation-building economic projects like pipelines and electricity grids. The hardest part there may still lie ahead, as Indigenous groups and local communities prepare to push back against the proposed barrage of building. But for all of his talk about the importance of moving quickly, the prime minister's approach to dealing with Trump seems to be all about doing the exact opposite. Carney, who has made no secret of his fondness for hockey, could be employing a strategy drawn directly from that sport: ragging the puck. As Rolling Stone's Guy Lawson wrote in a recent piece, 'the idea is simple: When you're ahead, don't give the other team any opportunity to win. Hold on to the puck, skate backward away from the play, making it seem like you're still playing the game when you're really playing the clock.' Carney has been criticized for not striking the sort of deals that Japan and Europe secured with Trump, ones that involve handshake agreements and loose pledges to purchase hundreds of billions worth of American exports. But it's worth remembering that these 'deals,' if you can even call them that, still create tariff structures that are higher than what Canadian exporters have to pay. That's because most of our exports still qualify for an exemption under the Canada-United States-Mexico Agreement. As Scotiabank Chief Economist Derek Holt wrote in a recent report, 'because of the exemption that the administration verified last night and because we've long argued that most exports are already CUSMA-compliant, Canada's ETR [effective tariff rate] remains at 4.6 per cent on total goods and services exports to the world and 6.3 per cent on total goods and services exports to the US.' Those international 'deals,' meanwhile, already look like they're barely worth the napkins they must have been written on. Trump has already suggested that the promised investment coming from Europe amounted to a slush fund that he can personally direct as he pleases. 'The details are $600 billion to invest in anything I want,' he said. 'Anything. I can do anything I want with it.' Canada's Conservatives seem to want Mark Carney to rush into a deal — any deal — with Donald Trump. Why his strategy of "ragging the puck" might be about to pay dividends, and what will happen to his government (and our country) if it doesn't. Not quite. The European Union can't tell businesses where or how to invest, as European Commission trade spokesperson Olof Gill told Politico after the deal was announced. "What we have transmitted to the U.S. administration is aggregate intentions as regards energy spending and as regards investment in the U.S. economy by EU companies. Those commitments are in no way binding.' Indeed, as The Atlantic 's Rogé Karma noted, those figures were 'mostly rough numbers based on what European companies were already planning to invest and buy.' As Karma wrote, the math wasn't any better for Trump on the promised investments coming from South Korea and Japan. 'Shortly after the deal with Japan was announced, the country's top trade negotiator said that he anticipated only one or two per cent of the $550 billion fund would come in the form of direct investment; the rest would mostly consist of loans that would need to be repaid with interest. South Korean officials have made similar statements.' In other words: no Trump-controlled slush fund here either. The Japanese deal, meanwhile, has been subject to other competing interpretations of the text. As the New York Times reported, the agreed-upon 15 per cent tariff was issued in a way that it 'stacked' on top of existing ones, which meant the effective rate on things like Japanese beef went up from 26.4 per cent to 41.4 per cent. Japan's lead negotiator claims the Trump administration has agreed to correct this 'extremely regrettable' mistake, while local Japanese media is reporting that the Trump administration hasn't actually made any such concession. Some deal. In this environment, and with Canada's pre-existing protection under CUSMA, the best way to win this trade war is not to engage. That's especially true if the 'deals' being struck right now can be changed at the whim of a president who seems to have an endless supply of them. As the Globe and Mail 's European correspondent Eric Reguly noted, 'there is a lesson for Canada: Nothing short of a congressionally approved trade deal is worth the paper it is written on.' That's the prize that Carney has his eyes on right now, and it's where his efforts ought to be judged most carefully. It's why Canada sent senior ministers to Mexico recently in order to discuss deepening the economic partnership between the two countries — and, likely, some game theory for dealing with Trump. And it's why Carney continues to let Trump stick daggers into his own economy's back rather than trying to insert them himself. Here again, time might be Carney's biggest asset. The closer Trump's allies in Congress get to the midterm elections in 2026, the more his growing unpopularity (and that of his tariff war) will matter to him. The passage of time also gives Carney more room to further develop Canada's economic alternatives: new infrastructure projects and new trade deals with other partners. All of this amounts to meaningful leverage for Canada in the inevitable renegotiation of CUSMA. Mark Carney may yet lose the trade war with America and Donald Trump. There might not even be a way to win that sort of war, if Trump persists in deliberately tanking his country's economy and taking everyone else's with it. But for now, at least, Carney's strategy appears to be working. One thing is certain: his political fortunes, and maybe even those of the country he now governs, depend on it.
Toronto Star
2 hours ago
- Toronto Star
European leaders to speak with Trump ahead of his Friday summit with Putin
BERLIN (AP) — Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy will join German Chancellor Friedrich Merz in Berlin on Wednesday for talks with European and U.S. leaders ahead of a Trump-Putin summit later this week, the German government said. Merz has convened a series of virtual meetings for Wednesday in an attempt to have the voice of European and Ukraine's leaders heard ahead of the summit in Alaska, where President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin are expected to discuss a path toward ending Moscow's war in Ukraine.
Winnipeg Free Press
2 hours ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
Former top general says reviewing medals for Afghan vets a ‘no-brainer' for Carney
OTTAWA – A former top general who led the military during the Afghanistan conflict is urging Prime Minister Mark Carney's government to revisit the files of soldiers who served there to see if any of their awards should be upgraded to the Victoria Cross. Rick Hillier said that despite the failure of recent attempts to trigger such an independent review, he thinks the odds are better now that Ottawa is bent on revitalizing the Canadian Armed Forces. 'I am more optimistic right now. I think for the government, this should be a no-brainer,' Hillier, chief of the defence staff from 2005-2008, told The Canadian Press. Hillier is part of the civil society group Valour in the Presence of the Enemy, which has been pressing Ottawa to consider awarding veterans of the 2001 to 2014 Afghanistan campaign the country's highest military honour. He said commendations awarded to Afghanistan veterans should be examined in light of new information to see whether any of them qualify for the Victoria Cross. 'Let's do an independent review, not committing to anything, which is right and appropriate,' he said. 'And if we should find that one or two or more individuals are deserving of the Victoria Cross, what a shot in the arm that would be for our soldiers and aviators and sailors.' In 2022, former Conservative leader Erin O'Toole pushed to have a the House of Commons endorse the creation of a review panel that would take a second look at military decorations. Hillier said it may have been a strategic error to have the former leader of the opposition bring that proposal forward, since it 'almost guaranteed' that the governing Liberal party would oppose it. The issue is being brought to the fore again through a parliamentary petition sponsored and endorsed by Liberal MP Pauline Rochefort which also calls for a review panel. Twenty Stars of Military Valour — Canada's second-highest military award — and 89 Medals of Military Valour were awarded to soldiers who served in Afghanistan. No serving Canadian soldier or veteran has been awarded the Victoria Cross since the Second World War. The Government of Canada says just 81 Canadians have ever been awarded the Victoria Cross — 4 from the Boer War, 64 from the First World War and 13 from the Second World War. Gen. Walter Natynczyk, chief of the defence staff from 2008 to 2012, ordered a review in 2012 of the 20 Stars of Military Valour awarded for the Afghanistan conflict. Ottawa has resisted calls in recent years for another review. Department of National Defence spokesperson Andrée-Anne Poulin said in an emailed statement the awards process is designed to be insulated from political influence and public pressure. 'All honours for the Afghanistan mission have been processed and the time limits for such nominations (two years between the action and the nomination for Military Valour and Bravery Decorations) have now elapsed,' she said. 'These time limits ensure events are judged by the standards and values of the time, are compared with other contemporary examples, past decisions are not second-guessed and history is not reinterpreted.' Many have cited the case of Jess Larochelle of North Bay, Ont., as one that deserves a closer look. The late army private's supporters maintain he should be awarded the Victoria Cross for his heroic actions in holding off a 2006 Taliban attack on an observation post after sustaining serious injuries. Hillier, who chaired the committee that awarded Larochelle his Star of Military Valour, said details of his story that came to light in the years since make his case worth a fresh look. 'I don't think we made a mistake, but having done something doesn't mean that it's cast in stone forever and ever,' he said. Hillier said new details about 'how badly injured' Larochelle was during the battle, and the fact that he volunteered to take the position, should merit a reappraisal of his case. Retired lieutenant-general Omer Lavoie suggested the Department of National Defence may be reluctant to reopen awards files because it would be a complex project that would stir up grim memories of the conflict — and because it could quickly give rise to claims of unfair treatment if veterans of other wars aren't also honoured. Hillier also observed that Canadians tend to be hesitant about lavishing praise on individual acts of greatness. 'We in Canada have forever been loath, reluctant, slow to recognize the very top acts of courage and valour,' he said. 'Throughout our history, we seem to have this sort of group-thought process sometimes, where it keeps people all in one level.' This report by The Canadian Press was first published Aug. 13, 2025.
