logo
Polling on Jeremy Corbyn party is uncertain. Labour's worries are not

Polling on Jeremy Corbyn party is uncertain. Labour's worries are not

The National7 hours ago
It appears on the face of it to be the delicious, ultimate irony. Self-styled "moderates" within Labour spent years undermining Corbyn's leadership and ultimately drove him out of the party completely – all supposedly in the interests of "electability". They have now discovered that he's actually more than electable enough to pose an existential threat to Labour from the outside.
A note of caution is called for, though, because there's a long track-record of hypothetical polling questions exaggerating the likely popularity of new parties that are in the process of being set up.
There were a number of polls in early 2019 suggesting that the breakaway centrist party Change UK could be a major player in British politics – but that failed to materialise and the party folded within less than a year.
In 2007, Archie Stirling commissioned a YouGov poll that seemed to suggest his new centre-right Scottish Voice party could expect to take around 20% of the vote in that year's Holyrood election. In the event, Scottish Voice's actual support was only one-hundredth of that estimate.
READ MORE: 'Unacceptable': SNP hit out as Labour 'keep Tory-era veto on Scottish laws'
It's true that Corbyn is a far better-known figure than Stirling, and will almost certainly attract much more than 0.2% of the vote. It's also true that the Find Out Now poll showing him level with Labour can be regarded as more credible than Stirling's 2007 poll, because it allowed respondents to make a direct comparison between the Corbyn party and the full menu of other parties.
But it's still unavoidably a flawed poll, because it's impossible to ask a hypothetical question of this type without drawing special attention to the addition of a new party that does not yet exist. That may in itself have been sufficient to artificially inflate the apparent support for the Corbyn party in the poll.
In truth, there's no way to meaningfully measure public backing for the new party until it's up and running, with a name, a public face, and a set of policies. But where the Find Out Now poll – and others like it – are of some value is in identifying which parties Corbyn can expect to attract votes from, if he does indeed enjoy some support.
The answer is clear: his votes will be coming overwhelmingly from Labour and the Greens.
Former Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn (Image: Lucy North) A YouGov poll last week found that 31% of people who voted Labour in last year's General Election, and 58% of people who voted Green, are likely to consider voting for the Corbyn party.
The Greens are fortunate in that they have an obvious method of transforming the threat into an opportunity. Zack Polanski is currently standing for the Green leadership in England and Wales, and has indicated that he may be open to an electoral pact with Corbyn and Sultana.
But there is no equivalent get-out clause for Labour, who burnt their bridges with Corbyn when they expelled him and put up a candidate against him in Islington North.
Even if the real support for the Corbyn party turns out to be only half of the 15% suggested by the Find Out Now poll, it looks highly likely that would still harm Labour's vote significantly, possibly reducing them to third or fourth place – and to below 20% of the vote.
The UK may start to look very much like a country that is moving on decisively from the Conservative-Labour two-party system that has been in place for a full century.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

CHRIS HUGHES: 'Afghans who helped our troops deserve loyalty - they were betrayed'
CHRIS HUGHES: 'Afghans who helped our troops deserve loyalty - they were betrayed'

Daily Mirror

time15 minutes ago

  • Daily Mirror

CHRIS HUGHES: 'Afghans who helped our troops deserve loyalty - they were betrayed'

Brave Afghan colleagues gave British troops invaluable eyes and ears on the ground over many years of war, saving countless lives - but they were betrayed when Kabul fell to the Taliban British troops who spent years on the Afghan frontline know first-hand many of their Afghan colleagues and friends were invaluable. ‌ Of course many of the Afghans allowed to come to the UK because of their UK associations had jobs outside translating or working with the military. There were civilian contractors throughout from Helmand Province to Kabul, employing hundreds of locals for a variety of jobs. Embassies, consular buildings, charities, foreign office schemes all had the opportunity to employ or have links to local Afghans. They felt safe and committed to the coalition project to dispense democracy, education, security, investing in a future vibrant and bustling economy. ‌ ‌ In 2021 that all fell to dust as the Taliban stormed Kabul, surprising everyone even though they had been bragging this was what they planned to do for a decade. In 2013 in Peshawar, Pakistan veteran Taliban commander Qari Nasrullah met me and gave me an interview and bragged about Taliban plans for Afghanistan. He said openly that the Taliban had shadow governments set up throughout Afghanistan and that soon they would retake the entire country. It took them a little longer but they did just that and Afghanistan's hopes for democracy fell to dust - and our Afghan friends were betrayed. They had gambled on UK promises we were there to stay and could not believe it when the last plane left Kabul in a hurry. ‌ On many occasions whilst embedded with UK forces in Helmand Province I witnessed translators intercepting Taliban radio calls and warning of forthcoming ambushes. These brave souls gave UK troops eyes and ears on the ground and save many lives - and they deserved our loyalty. Many made it to the UK but we may never know what sad ends some of them may have come to in mountain and desert villages throughout Afghanistan. I saw how hard the interpreters worked. ‌ Often they were at opposite ends of Afghanistan to where their families were yet they took enormous risks. I saw them hunched over radios all night listening to local Taliban chatting and suddenly they would call over an officer. After hours of listening they would learn of an arms cache, a roadside bomb being planted or plans to attack the base. The information - especially in real time during a patrol - was life-saving, especially if an ambush was planned. Without them the troops could not talk to local farmers and pick up crucial information about Taliban movements. Always cheery and affable, these highly educated Afghans were alone, foreigners in their own land and surrounded by troops. And yet they always seemed to be smiling and unconcerned for their own safety. And some were killed or injured too. What has happened to some of them is tragic and clearly a betrayal.

British children recruited by Russia and Iran to spy against their own country and research potential targets
British children recruited by Russia and Iran to spy against their own country and research potential targets

Scottish Sun

time21 minutes ago

  • Scottish Sun

British children recruited by Russia and Iran to spy against their own country and research potential targets

Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) BRITISH children are being recruited by Russia and Iran to spy against their own country, it was revealed today. The kid spooks are said to be carrying out research and conducting reconnaissance on potential targets after being recruited online by the two hostile states. Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up 2 British children recruited by to spy against their own country and research potential targets Credit: Getty 2 The schoolchildren are spying on the behalf of hostile states such as Russia Credit: Reuters Several schoolchildren, in their mid-teens, have been arrested for allegedly gathering intelligence to be used against the UK, it emerged. And more children of the same age are being investigated for clandestine activities on behalf of the hostile states. They are being recruited through online forums and then lured into working for anonymous Russian and Iranian spymasters offering financial inducements. The UK's Counter Terrorism Policing Senior Coordinator Vicki Evans said: 'Children and young people are vulnerable to this type of hostile activity,' adding; "It is a huge concern for us.' Met deputy assistant commissioner Ms Evans urged parents and carers to be 'vigilant and careful.' Ms Evans revealed how the threat from hostile states to the UK is now five times greater than at the time of Russia's 2018 Novichok nerve agent attack in Salisbury. The threat from Russia, China and Iran accounts for more than a fifth of the counter terror policing network's caseload in the UK, she said. Criminals are increasingly being used by hostile states to spy against Britain by proxy after being recruited online and promised cash which rarely materialises. Ms Evans said the use of low level criminals was 'an increasing theme' on how hostile states are working, adding the proxies and assets were 'quite disposable' once they had served their use. The C-T policing boss said international frictions and the two wars in Ukraine and the Middle East were fuelling aggressive intelligence operations in the UK and elsewhere. Is THIS the US missile that will force Putin to make peace? JASSM cruise missile could obliterate 30 key Russian bases They include arson attacks, assassinations plots and threats to journalists. Five men are facing long sentences over an arson attack on an East London warehouse storing satellite equipment for Ukraine which was ordered by the Russian Wagner group. And six Bulgarians were jailed for a total of more than 50 years at the Old Bailey in May this year for spying for Putin. Commander Dominic Murphy, head of the Met's SO15 counter-terrorism command, said he was surprised 'by the breadth and complexity of these operations…' Cdr Murphy added: 'We are increasingly seeing threats to life and our way of life.' He urged any criminals approached by spymasters online to get in touch with police.

This was too little, too late from the ‘iron' Chancellor
This was too little, too late from the ‘iron' Chancellor

Telegraph

time21 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

This was too little, too late from the ‘iron' Chancellor

There will be a round of deregulation. Lending rules will be relaxed. And new listings will be accelerated. Rachel Reeves did everything she could in her Mansion House speech this evening to win back the City. From any other Chancellor it might have been greeted with loud applause. From this one, however, it will be dead on arrival. The relationship with finance is irretrievably broken – and is too late to win it back now. The bankers and brokers listening to Reeves this evening will like much of what she had to say. The relaxation of lending rules will be welcomed, even if it is questionable whether the British housing market needs yet more debt instead of more supply. Easing some red tape is always helpful, and something needs to be done to encourage more new listings. In reality, however, Labour's relationship with business is now broken beyond repair. When Reeves took office there was plenty of goodwill. Business was ready for a change of 14 years of a Conservative government that seemed more and more chaotic with every year that passed. She even had one or two ideas that sounded good, even if they were thin on detail. By now, however, the City feels completely betrayed. The assault on non-doms has driven wealthy clients out of the country, and many successful entrepreneurs as well, with nothing to replace them. The steep rise in employers' National Insurance has drained money out of companies, and hit profits and dividends. Her changes to inheritance tax have hammered not just farmers but every privately owned business, and many of those are still crucial to the economy. The extra employment rights might please the unions but they could be ruinous for the City. The list goes on and on. Business was told that Reeves was a pro-growth, pro-enterprise Chancellor. Instead she has led an assault on the private sector with no parallel in recent British history. It looks as if it will only get worse over the next year. We all know that there will be another huge round of tax rises in the autumn, and business may well bear the brunt of that. It could be higher business rates, a windfall tax on the banks or utilities, or even a 'temporary' surcharge on corporation tax, similar to the levy imposed in France earlier this year. Likewise, the plutocrats of the Square Mile are likely to be squeezed for extra tax revenue. We may well see a return of the 50 per cent top rate of tax. Or, even worse, a wealth tax, catastrophic for the City where £10 million is regarded as a respectable annual bonus, and not an obscene fortune to be taxed away. Sure, a few reforms are worth having. And it is good that Reeves recognises how crucial the City and financial services are to the British economy, even if many of the Left-wingers on her backbenchers won't agree with her. Finance has always been one of the key drivers of growth, as well as generating huge tax revenues. But the blunt truth is this. Reeves has lost the trust of the City. And no matter how hard she tries, it's surely gone forever.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store