Norfolk villagers angry after letter says their homes could be 'required' for East Pye solar farm
A great-grandmother has told ITV News she feels "overwhelmed" after dozens of residents in her village received a letter saying their homes "may be required" by a solar farm developer.
The East Pye Solar Project would see more than 2,500 acres of countryside across 100 fields in south Norfolk turned into one of the UK's biggest solar farms, affecting villages including Hempnall, Saxlingham and Tasburgh.
Proposed last year, it would power around 115,000 homes and a statutory consultation will begin this summer.
But 89-year-old Yvonne Davy and dozens of fellow residents have received a letter from developer Island Green Power's lawyers which has left them "alarmed".
The letter, from firm Dalcour Maclaren, said East Pye Solar Ltd believe they may have an interest in the residents' land or property, which could be "required for the project".
Ms Davy told ITV News Anglia she was "absolutely appalled" to receive the letter, which she feels implies residents' property could be acquired.
The great-grandmother, who has solar panels on her roof and drives an electric car, said: "I thought, they'll get my property over my dead body, which is a bit extreme but it would really damage me a great deal.
"I'm just overwhelmed by it, really."
The project is deemed to be of national significance, meaning the final decision will be made by the Planning Inspectorate.
That could give the developer the power to compulsory purchase land, but they have said their intention is to deliver the scheme without doing that.
"It left me feeling unsettled": Rob Setchell spoke to Hempnall residents who received the letter
The parish council said residents felt "harassed" after residents were also contacted on their personal mobile phones.
David Hook, chairman of Hempnall Parish Council, told ITV News Anglia the power to compulsory purchase property and land is "a very worrying thing".
He said: "Everyone should love the countryside, it's a precious national asset.
"We should be protecting it, not destroying it.
"It's everybody's legacy."
Island Green Power said: "East Pye Solar will be undertaking Land Interest Questionnaires (LIQ) to identify people and organisations that have a legal interest in land or property that may potentially be impacted by the Scheme.
"This is a statutory obligation under the 2008 Planning Act and is routine for helping to identify those with legal interest in land.
"Completing land referencing questionnaires allows these stakeholders to be consulted on the Development Consent Order (DCO) application and ensures they receive formal notification such as when the Scheme is accepted for examination."
It said East Pye is crucial for meeting climate targets to triple solar power by 2030.
Around three quarters of people who responded to the first local consultation last autumn were against the plan.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
STV News
a day ago
- STV News
Trump says he won't speak to Musk 'for a while' as public feud escalates
The relationship between Donald Trump and Elon Musk has collapsed less than a week after the pair poured praise on each other in the Oval Office, as ITV News Correspondent Geraint Vincent reports Donald Trump has said he won't be speaking to Elon Musk 'for a while' after the billionaire speculated about the US president's links to paedophile Jeffrey Epstein. Trump's comments come a day after his falling-out with Musk turned into a public row, sparked by the president saying he was 'very disappointed' with Musk's opposition to his key policy plans. Musk hit back, claiming Trump wouldn't have won the election without his financial backing. Trump then threatened to cancel Musk's government contracts, prompting Musk to accuse Trump, without evidence, of hiding Epstein files that mention him. On Friday, Trump told ITV News' US partner CNN that he is 'not even thinking about' the tech billionaire. 'I'm not even thinking about Elon. He's got a problem. The poor guy's got a problem,' Trump said. He went on to say: 'No. I won't be speaking to him (Musk) for a while I guess, but I wish him well.' Trump is also planning to get rid of the Tesla he bought in March, a senior White House official told CNN. Another official said the red car may be sold or possibly given away. In March, Trump turned the South Lawn at the White House into what looked like a Tesla showroom – an apparent nod to Musk, who was then an adviser. That same day, Trump announced he was buying a Tesla and had also purchased a Cybertruck for his granddaughter. Musk's speculation, including reposting a 1992 video of Trump and Epstein on his platform X, has drawn global attention. On Thursday night, he wrote: 'Time to drop the really big bomb: @realDonaldTrump is in the Epstein files. That is the real reason they have not been made public.' The insinuations tapped into long-standing suspicions among conspiracy theorists and online sleuths that incriminating and sensitive files in the government's possession have yet to be released. Last year, Trump lashed out at allegations that he was on the plane of the disgraced financier, saying: 'I was never on Epstein's Plane, or at his 'stupid' Island.' How did their public spat unfold? The spectacular blow-up between the president of the United States and the world's richest man played out on their respective social media platforms after Trump first broached the topic in a White House meeting with Germany's new leader. He suggested using the US government to financially harm his fellow billionaire. He told reporters during a sit-down with Friedrich Merz on Thursday: 'Elon and I had a great relationship. I don't know if we will anymore.' The bitter breakup happened just days after they appeared together at the White House, and Trump thanked Musk for his brief but tumultuous time in the government. Trump had largely remained silent as Musk stewed over the last few days on his social media platform X, condemning the president's signature tax cuts and spending bill. But Trump clapped back Thursday in the Oval Office, lamented their frayed relationship and said he was 'very disappointed in Musk.' Musk responded on his social media as Trump's meeting with Merz was aired. Trump then turned to his own social media network, Truth Social, and threatened to use the US government to hurt Musk's internet company, Starlink, and rocket company, SpaceX. 'The easiest way to save money in our Budget, Billions and Billions of Dollars, is to terminate Elon's Governmental Subsidies and Contracts,' Trump wrote on his social media network. 'I was always surprised that Biden didn't do it!' 'This just gets better and better,' Musk quickly replied on X. 'Go ahead, make my day.' The public row quickly unfurled online, and very quickly hit Musk financially. Elon Musk and Donald Trump in the White House last week. / Credit: AP Shares of Tesla, his electric vehicle company, accelerated following Trump's speech, falling by 9% – their latest notable move since the election. The shares doubled in the weeks after Trump was elected, gave back those gains and more during Musk's time at Doge and then rallied after he vowed in April to focus much more on Tesla and his other companies. Musk later offered up an especially stinging insult to a president sensitive about his standing among voters: 'Without me, Trump would have lost the election,' Musk retorted. 'Such ingratitude,' Musk said in a follow-up post. Trump and Musk have not spoken since Musk's initial outburst, multiple sources told CNN. The back-and-forth between Trump and his megadonor, former 'first buddy', marked a very public breakup of a former centre of power for the second Trump administration. The pair's stunning statements on Thursday called into question what Musk would do with his expansive wealth in future elections. Musk, who was the largest publicly disclosed donor in last year's federal elections, had vowed to give millions to Republican candidates in 2026, then later indicated that he planned to scale back his political spending. Get all the latest news from around the country Follow STV News Scan the QR code on your mobile device for all the latest news from around the country
STV News
4 days ago
- STV News
M&S faces 'unprecedented' customer lawsuit over cyberattack data breach
M&S is facing an 'unprecedented' class action lawsuit from Scottish law firm Thompsons Solicitors as a result of the cyber attack which affected their operations more than a month ago. Scottish customers who had their data stolen as part of a cyber attack that caused widespread disruption across the retailer's operations are being encouraged to join the claim. Last month M&S admitted to customers their personal information may have been stolen as a result of the cyberattack. M&S are still unable to take online orders and are alerting customers in app and online that products are only available to browse. / Credit: PA In a statement at the time, the retailer said: 'Unfortunately the nature of the incident means some personal customer data has been taken. 'Importantly, there is no evidence that this data has been shared and it does not include useable card or payment details, or account passwords, so there is no need for customers to take any action.' Customers were prompted to reset their password though the store assured customers this was only for 'extra peace of mind.' The theft of customer data, while not an immediate concern on its own, does open up customers to a greater risk of fraud and scams with people either posing as M&S or using the stolen data to feign knowledge of the customer. Thompsons Solicitors says customers joining the legal claim could be entitled to compensation for this increased risk as well as financial losses (now or in the future), distress, anxiety, and time spent resolving issues or securing accounts. Speaking to ITV News, senior partner Patrick Mcguire, said: 'The clients who have joined our class action against Marks and Spencers have done so because their valuable confidential personal details were stolen. 'It was the responsibility of M&S to protect that information and they failed completely to do so. They have breached data regulations and caused distress to our clients a significant number of whom have already been the victims of attempted scams.' Thompsons Solicitors say more than 350 people have joined the class action so far, adding the level of response has been 'unprecedented' for a case of its type in Scotland. In response, M&S told ITV News: 'We communicated to our customers as soon as we could and told them that the data taken does not include any useable card or payment details, or account passwords. M&S does not hold full card details on its systems.' M&S say they 'have not received any claims.' M&S is still struggling to restore full operations after a cyber attack left them unable to take contactless payments, handle click and collect orders, keep shelves stocked and take online orders. Last month the retailer admitted the attack could cost as much as £300m, with these latest legal troubles only adding to the company's difficulties. Speaking to ITV News, retail and PR expert Rhea Freeman, said regardless of this claim's outcome, 'any time a brand is involved in a lawsuit they're receiving publicity for the wrong reasons.' Despite this, she believes the long-term damage to M&S' brand will be minimal. 'I think the way that M&S dealt with the issue from a PR perspective – keeping customers informed, messages from the CEO, explaining the steps they were taking, and being fully transparent, means that the brand damage will be less. 'The issue that's being raised with the lawsuit has been well documented – so there's no shock factor. 'Many people feel sorry for M&S and their team as they have worked so hard and tried to balance issues with customer care and satisfaction, so whilst this definitely isn't good for the brand, I think it could have been a lot worse from a brand image point of view.' Outside of any potential lawsuits, Rhea says how M&S continues to 'nurture the customers they have,' keeping them informed and 'acknowledging the inconvenience,' will go a long way to mitigating potential damage to the brand. Get all the latest news from around the country Follow STV News Scan the QR code on your mobile device for all the latest news from around the country
ITV News
4 days ago
- ITV News
M&S faces 'unprecedented' customer lawsuit over cyberattack data breach
M&S is facing an "unprecendented" class action lawsuit from Scottish law firm Thompsons Solicitors as a result of the cyber attack which affected their operations more than a month ago. Scottish customers who had their data stolen as part of a cyber attack that caused widespread disruption across the retailer's operations are being encouraged to join the claim. Last month M&S admitted to customers their personal information may have been stolen as a result of the cyberattack. In a statement at the time, the retailer said: "Unfortunately the nature of the incident means some personal customer data has been taken. "Importantly, there is no evidence that this data has been shared and it does not include useable card or payment details, or account passwords, so there is no need for customers to take any action." Customers were prompted to reset their password though the store assured customers this was only for "extra peace of mind." M&S reveals hackers accessed customer data Marks & Spencer blames 'human error' as cyber attack set to cost £300m The theft of customer data, while not an immediate concern on its own, does open up customers to a greater risk of fraud and scams with people either posing as M&S or using the stolen data to feign knowledge of the customer. Thompsons Solicitors says customers joining the legal claim could be entitled to compensation for this increased risk as well as financial losses (now or in the future), distress, anxiety, and time spent resolving issues or securing accounts. Speaking to ITV News, senior partner Patrick Mcguire, said: "The clients who have joined our class action against Marks and Spencers have done so because their valuable confidential personal details were stolen. "It was the responsibility of M&S to protect that information and they failed completely to do so. They have breached data regulations and caused distress to our clients a significant number of whom have already been the victims of attempted scams." Thompsons Solicitors say more than 350 people have joined the class action so far, adding the level of response has been "unprecedented" for a case of its type in Scotland. In response, M&S told ITV News: "We communicated to our customers as soon as we could and told them that the data taken does not include any useable card or payment details, or account passwords. M&S does not hold full card details on its systems." M&S say they "have not received any claims." M&S is still struggling to restore full operations after a cyber attack left them unable to take contactless payments, handle click and collect orders, keep shelves stocked and take online orders. Last month the retailer admitted the attack could cost as much as £300m, with these latest legal troubles only adding to the company's difficulties. Speaking to ITV News, retail and PR expert Rhea Freema, said regardless of this claim's outcome, "any time a brand is involved in a lawsuit they're receiving publicity for the wrong reasons." Despite this, she believes the longterm damage to M&S' brand will be minimal. "I think the way that M&S dealt with the issue from a PR perspective - keeping customers informed, messages from the CEO, explaining the steps they were taking, and being fully transparent, means that the brand damage will be less. "The issue that's being raised with the lawsuit has been well documented - so there's no shock factor. "Many people feel sorry for M&S and their team as they have worked so hard and tried to balance issues with customer care and satisfaction, so whilst this definitely isn't good for the brand, I think it could have been a lot worse from a brand image point of view." Outside of any potential lawsuits, Rhea says how M&S continues to "nurture the customers they have," keeping them informed and "acknowledging the inconvenience," will go a long way to mitigating potential damage to the brand.
