
Experts urge caution over use of Chinese AI DeepSeek
Experts have urged caution over rapidly embracing the Chinese artificial intelligence platform DeepSeek, citing concerns about it spreading misinformation and how the Chinese state might exploit users' data.
The new low-cost AI wiped $1tn off the leading US tech stock index this week and it rapidly became the most downloaded free app in the UK and the US. Donald Trump called it a 'wake-up call' for tech firms.
Its emergence has shocked the tech world by apparently showing it can achieve a similar performance to widely used platforms such as ChatGPT at a fraction of the cost.
Michael Wooldridge, a professor of the foundations of AI at Oxford University, said it was not unreasonable to assume data inputted into the chatbot could be shared with the Chinese state.
He said: 'I think it's fine to download it and ask it about the performance of Liverpool football club or chat about the history of the Roman empire, but would I recommend putting anything sensitive or personal or private on them? 'Absolutely not … Because you don't know where the data goes.'
Dame Wendy Hall, a member of the United Nations high-level advisory body on AI, told the Guardian: 'You can't get away from the fact that if you are a Chinese tech company dealing with information you are subject to the Chinese government's rules on what you can and cannot say.'
The prime minister's spokesperson, when asked if Downing Street would rule out using Chinese AI in Whitehall, said he would not 'get ahead of specific models'. He said the advancements showed that the UK must 'go further and faster to remove barriers to innovation' in AI.
DeepSeek is an open-source platform, which means software developers can adapt it to their own ends. It has sparked hopes of a new wave of innovation in AI, which had appeared to be dominated by US tech companies – which were relying on huge investments in microchips, datacentres and new power sources.
Wooldridge said: 'It does rather forcefully signal, in case anybody hadn't got the message, that China is not behind in this space.'
Some people testing DeepSeek have found that it will not answer questions on matters such as the Tiananmen Square massacre. When asked about the status of Taiwan, it repeats the Chinese Communist party line that the island is an 'inalienable' part of China.
'The biggest problem with generative AI is misinformation,' Hall said. 'It depends on the data in a model, the bias in that data and how it is used – you can see that problem with the DeepSeek chatbot.'
One user, Azeem Azhar, an AI expert, who asked about the events in Tiananmen Square, was told that DeepSeek could not provide detailed information and that 'this topic is highly sensitive and often censored in many countries, including China'.
Sign up to TechScape
A weekly dive in to how technology is shaping our lives
after newsletter promotion
However, the AI then did explain that the events were 'widely recognised as the suppression of pro-democracy protests' and said: 'The Chinese government responded with a violent crackdown, resulting in the deaths of hundreds (or possibly thousands) of people, including both protesters and soldiers.'
People use AI models such as DeepSeek and ChatGPT to help them process personal papers or documents for work, such as meeting minutes, but anything uploaded can be taken by the owner of the company and used for training the AI or for other purposes.
DeepSeek is based in Hangzhou and makes clear in its privacy policy that the personal information it collects from users is held 'on secure servers located in the People's Republic of China'.
It says it uses data to 'comply with our legal obligations, or as necessary to perform tasks in the public interest, or to protect the vital interests of our users and other people'.
China's national intelligence law states that all enterprises, organisations and citizens 'shall support, assist and cooperate with national intelligence efforts'.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

South Wales Argus
6 minutes ago
- South Wales Argus
Ukraine says Russia launched 479 drones in war's biggest overnight bombardment
Apart from drones, 20 missiles of various types were fired at different parts of Ukraine, according to the air force, which said the barrage targeted mainly central and western areas of Ukraine. Ukraine's air defences destroyed 277 drones and 19 missiles in mid-flight, an air force statement said, claiming that only 10 drones or missiles hit their target. It was not possible to independently verify the claim. Russia's aerial attacks usually start late in the evening and end in the morning, because drones are harder to spot in the dark. Russia has relentlessly battered civilian areas of Ukraine with Shahed drones during the more than three-year war. The attacks have killed more that 12,000 Ukrainian civilians, according to the United Nations. Russia says it targets only military targets.


The Independent
8 minutes ago
- The Independent
What does the law say about Trump sending troops to LA and ICE protests?
Donald Trump has deployed National Guard troops to California following two days of protests against immigration raids. The demonstrations, involving hundreds of people, were described by Trump as interference with federal law enforcement, even suggesting they could be a "form of rebellion" against the US government. California Governor Gavin Newsom has pushed back against the move. On Sunday, Newsom said he had formally requested that the Trump Administration rescind "its unlawful deployment of troops in Los Angeles County" and return them to his command. What laws did Trump cite to justify the move? Donald Trump invoked Title 10 of the US Code, a federal law defining the role of the US Armed Forces, in his June 7 order to federalise members of the California National Guard. Section 12406 of Title 10 permits the president to deploy National Guard units into federal service in specific circumstances, including invasion, rebellion, or if the president deems regular forces insufficient to enforce US laws. What are National Guard troops allowed to do under the law cited in Trump's order? An 1878 law, the Posse Comitatus Act, generally forbids the US military, including the National Guard, from taking part in civilian law enforcement. Section 12406 does not override that prohibition, but it allows the troops to protect federal agents who are carrying out law enforcement activity and to protect federal property. For example, National Guard troops cannot arrest protesters, but they could protect US Immigration and Customs Enforcement who are carrying out arrests. What are the implications for freedom of speech? The First Amendment of the US Constitution guarantees the right to assembly, freedom of speech and the press. Experts have said that Trump's decision to have US troops respond to protests is an ominous sign for how far the president is willing to go to repress political speech and activity that he disagrees with or that criticizes his administration's policies. Is Trump's move susceptible to legal challenges? Four legal experts from both left- and right-leaning advocacy organizations have cast doubt on Trump's use of Title 10 in response to immigration protests calling it inflammatory and reckless, especially without the support of California's Democratic Governor Gavin Newsom, who has said Trump's actions would only escalate tensions. The protests in California do not rise to the level of 'rebellion' and do not prevent the federal government from executing the laws of the United States, experts said. Title 10 also says "orders for these purposes shall be issued through the governors of the States," but legal experts said that language might not be an obstacle. Legislative history suggests that those words were likely meant to reflect the norms of how National Guard troops are typically deployed, rather than giving a governor the option to not comply with a president's decision to deploy troops. Could California sue to challenge Trump's move? California could file a lawsuit, arguing that deployment of National Guard troops was not justified by Title 10 because there was no 'rebellion' or threat to law enforcement. A lawsuit might take months to resolve, and the outcome would be uncertain. Because the protests may be over before a lawsuit is resolved, the decision to sue might be more of a political question than a legal one, experts said. What other laws could Trump invoke to direct the National Guard or other US Military troops? Trump could take a more far-reaching step by invoking the Insurrection Act of 1792, which would allow troops to directly participate in civilian law enforcement, for which there is little recent precedent. Casting protests as an 'insurrection' that requires the deployment of troops against US citizens would be riskier legal territory, one legal expert said, in part because mostly peaceful protests and minor incidents aren't the sort of thing that the Insurrection Act were designed to address. The Insurrection Act has been used by past presidents to deploy troops within the US in response to crises like the 1794 Whiskey Rebellion and the rise of the Ku Klux Klan in the immediate aftermath of the American Civil War. The law was last invoked by President George H.W. Bush in 1992, when the governor of California requested military aid to suppress unrest in Los Angeles following the Rodney King trial. But, the last time a president deployed the National Guard in a state without a request from that state's governor was 1965, when President Lyndon Johnson sent troops to protect civil rights demonstrators in Montgomery, Alabama.


The Sun
9 minutes ago
- The Sun
Los Angeles rioters battle National Guard & cops over ICE immigration raids as Marines put on standby to tackle carnage
LOS ANGELES has faced another day of carnage with troops and armed police fiercely clashing with lawless immigration rioters. The National Guard has been called into action by a furious Donald Trump as he blasted illegal aliens and criminals for "invading and occupying" LA. 8 8 8 8 Violent protesters have looted shops, attacked police and vandalised cars before setting them ablaze in the middle of the street. Horrifying footage captured police trapped under a highway bridge as rioters launched fireworks and dropped heavy rocks and blocks of cement onto their patrol cars. In response, agents in riot gear unleashed tear gas, flash-bang explosives and pepper balls to push back the lawless demonstrators. Trump also ordered the National Guard to storm LA early on Sunday morning to try and restore order. But the city has continued to brace for violent clashes over the controversial ICE immigration raids. Now, 500 Marines are in a "prepared to deploy" status at a base sat just 230km east of Los Angeles. Trump vowed to make sure his administration would "send whatever we need to make sure there's law and order". The President later wrote on his Truth Social platform that "violent, insurrectionist mobs are swarming and attacking our Federal Agents to try and stop our deportation operations". Speaking online again today the president called for anyone hiding their identities behind masks to be arrested immediately. Trump added: "Order will be restored, the Illegals will be expelled, and Los Angeles will be set free." 8 8 Tensions have escalated between police and protesters in LA after sweeping raids by ICE agents saw more than 100 immigrant arrests in the city over the past week. The confrontations mainly took place in the predominantly Latino suburb of Paramount. Police patrolled the streets on horseback while others with riot gear lined up behind Guard troops. Protesters directed chants of "shame" and "go home" at members of the National Guard, who stood shoulder to shoulder, carrying long guns and riot shields. Footage showed one demonstrator being knocked to the ground as they tried to stop an ICE vehicle, which then sped off. Elsewhere, trains were halted after protesters jumped on the tracks near an immigration detention centre. Trump's "border tsar" Homan has warned that someone could "lose their life" if the clashes continue. 8 8