EFF files urgent interdict to stop proposed fuel levy hike
In his budget speech, Finance Minister Enoch Godongwana announced the fuel levy would take effect on 4 June.
Finance Minister Enoch Godongwana is facing another legal challenge after the EFF filed court papers in a bid to halt a proposed increase in fuel levies.
This is the latest twist in a months-long tussle over the budget after the value-added tax (VAT) debacle.
Fuel levy
In his budget speech last week, Godongwana announced a fuel levy increase of 16c for petrol and 15c for diesel, which would take effect on June 4.
Godongwana stated that the levy increase was the only new tax proposal in the third version of his budget.
He, however, did note that this alone will not close the fiscal gap over the medium term.
The levies are part of the government's revenue generation for 2025-26, following the withdrawal of the 0.5 percentage point increase in VAT in April.
ALSO READ: Treasury reverses proposed VAT hike, will remain at 15%
Legal challenge
In papers filed in the Western Cape High Court, the EFF stated that it wrote to Godongwana, arguing that raising the fuel levy would harm the poorest South Africans and undermine economic growth.
'We took this action after repeated efforts to caution the minister and appeal to his conscience failed. We wrote to the Minister, urging him to consider the impact of this increase on the poor and working-class people of South Africa, especially during a time when the cost-of-living crisis is deepening.
'We also reminded him that, just like the VAT increase, raising the fuel levy without introducing a proper Money Bill is unlawful and undermines parliamentary oversight,' the EFF said.
Letters to parliament
The EFF said it has also written to the Speaker of the National Assembly, Thoko Didiza, and the Chairperson of the Standing Committee on Finance, Dr Joseph Maswanganyi, about the fuel levy hike.
'We warned them that if parliament proceeds to adopt the 2025 Fiscal Framework and Revenue Proposals that include this illegal fuel levy increase, the entire budget process will be placed in jeopardy, the party said.
'Allowing such an increase without a Money Bill risks the entire national budget being declared invalid by the courts, potentially long after funds have already been spent.
'This would severely damage the constitutional standing of parliament, undermine financial accountability, and cause serious consequences for service delivery and public confidence in government,' the EFF said.
What is the fuel levy?
The EFF has warned that failure to comply with these demands may result in further legal action.
The fuel levy is a tax charged on every litre of fuel sold, with a portion going to the government and another to the Road Accident Fund (RAF levy) to compensate victims of motor vehicle accidents.
It amounts to 18% of the retail price, while the RAF levy is about 10%.
This has remained unchanged since 2022 to mitigate the effects of higher inflation resulting from increased fuel prices.
ALSO READ: EFF calls for 'apartheid tax' counter instead of VAT hike [VIDEO]
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The South African
44 minutes ago
- The South African
SASSA Older Person grants in June 2025 disbursed this WEEK
SASSA Older Person grants in June 2025 will be disbursed this week, on Tuesday 3 June 2025. And not a moment too soon, following the uncertainty over Finance Minister Enoch Godongwana's Budget. As many will remember, SASSA grant increases were actioned back in April 2025, however, there was uncertainty whether VAT increases being overruled might lead to a reduction in SASSA Older Person grants in June 2025 Nevertheless, it's been confirmed that the Department of Social Development (DSD) budget allocation of R285-billion for social grants in the 2025/26 is unchanged. However, recipients of SASSA Older Person grants in June 2025 should make the most of the above-inflation adjustment. Because the allotment actually drops again in 2026/27, to just R260-billion, due to the redistribution/repurposing of SRD grants from next year … However, over 60s receiving SASSA Older Person grants in June 2025 needn't worry for now about their portion. The South African Social Security Agency's rejig of SRD into a universal basic income grant could actually free up even more money for SASSA 'core' grants like Older Persons, for those who actually need the financial assistance. For now, South Africa's elderly enjoy above-inflation increases from earlier this year. In fact, South Africa's pensioners over 75 enjoy the highest grant paid out nationally – R2 330. While over 60s receive R2 310 monthly. Let's remind you who is eligible. And if you haven't done so already, how you can apply … The 2025 Postbank Black card debacle has left SASSA wanting to cut ties completely with Postbank. Image: File Roughly 28-million residents receive SASSA grants each month (45% of the population) in South Africa. The vast majority of these are R370 SRD grants and child support. However, many would argue the most critical are more than 4-million elderly pensioners. If you are over 60 and meet the following financial qualifying criteria, you should absolutely apply for SASSA Older Person grants in June 2025. Note that all applications must be done at a SASSA office with an official present to oversee and assist you. Be sure to present the following documents and biometric data: Official identity document (ID) – smart card or green booklet. Documents proving marital status. Proof of residence (a utility bill with your name on it qualifies). Confirmation of proof of income and/or financial dividends. All information regarding your assets, including a valuation of property. Declaration of any private pension in your name (if applicable). Valid three months' statements certified by your bank (not more than three months old). Unemployment Insurance Fund (UIF) membership book, or discharge certificate from your previous employer. A copy of your will, and first and final liquidation and distribution accounts if your spouse has passed away in the last five years. Take note of the remaining SASSA Older Person grant pay dates for 2025. Image: File Furthermore, SASSA has started strict mandatory data checks with Home Affairs, Correctional Services, and the Unemployment Insurance Fund for grant applicants. Likewise, SASSA now has biometric verification for grant beneficiaries using alternative forms of identification, other than the standard 13-digit South African ID number. These checks will only increase in voracity as SASSA expects to deliver quarterly reports to Parliament on the efficiency of its progress. This is all in the name of ensuring grants are reviewed and cancelled in good time to save money per recipient. Millions are spent annually on paying grants to long-dead recipients (presumably to other family members still collecting the grants). More importantly, the agency needs to be able to confirm an applicant's income and assets. Those who have sufficient means through a private pension, savings and personal assets, will not be granted SASSA Older Person grants in June 2025. Moreover, it was announced in Parliament recently that SASSA will conduct stricter financial checks on beneficiaries in a bid to keep fraud/wastage down. This takes the form of monthly spot-checks on applicants' bank accounts to ensure they're not lying about their income. And this is not just for SASSA Older Person grants in June 2025 but also SRD, child support, disability and care dependency. If you're over 60, here's how you can apply for SASSA Older Person grants in June 2025. Image: File SASSA officials will enforce the following income and asset limits: You cannot earn more than R8 070 per month ( R96 840 per year) if single. per month ( per year) if single. The income limit is R16 140 per month ( R193 680 per year) if married. per month ( per year) if married. Total value of your assets declared must not exceed R1 372 800 if single. if single. And your assets cannot be valued higher than R2 745 600 if married. Thankfully, these asset and means tests have not changed in several years. Even though SASSA Older Person grants in June 2025 are higher than they've ever been. And remember, if your grant application is denied, you have 90 days to appeal the decision with the Department of Social Development. For application queries you can contact SASSA directly here: SASSA Toll-Free Call: 0800 60 10 11 SASSA Head Office: 012 400 2322 Email SASSA: grantenquiries@ Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1. Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X and Bluesky for the latest news.
IOL News
an hour ago
- IOL News
Most South African farmers are black: why Trump got it so wrong
There are more black farmers in South Africa than white farmers,says the authors Image: Karen Sandison/ Independent Newspapers When world leaders engage, the assumption is always that they engage on issues based on verified facts, which their administrative staff are supposed to prepare. Under this assumption, we thought the meeting at the White House on 21 May between South Africa's president, Cyril Ramaphosa, and US president Donald Trump would follow this pattern. Disappointingly, the televised meeting was horrifying to watch as it was based on misrepresenting the reality of life in South Africa. Issues of agriculture, farming and land (and rural crime) were central to the discussions. What is clear to us as agricultural economists is that the skewed views expressed by Trump about these issues originate in South Africa. This includes Trump's statement: 'But Blacks are not farmers.' In our work as agricultural economists, we have, in many pieces and books (our latest titled The Uncomfortable Truth about South Africa's Agriculture), tried to present South Africans with the real facts about the political economy policy reforms and structural dimensions of South African agriculture. Writing on these matters was necessary given that official data – agricultural census 2017, as well as the official land audit of 2017 – all provide an incomplete picture of the real state and structure of South African agriculture. The reason is that the agricultural census, which is supposed to provide a comprehensive and inclusive assessment of the size and structure of the primary agricultural sector, and the land audit, which was supposed to record the ownership of all land in South Africa, are incomplete in their coverage. The incomplete and inaccurate official data provides fertile ground for radical statements by the left and the right – and novices on social media. This is why South Africa has to deal with falsehoods coming from the US. These include Trump's statement that black people are not farmers in South Africa. South Africa is to blame for providing inaccurate data to feed these false narratives. The facts presented here should allow a more nuanced interpretation of South Africa's farm structure. Firstly, there are more black farmers in South Africa than white farmers. And not all white commercial farm operations are 'large-scale', and not all black farmers are 'small-scale', 'subsistence' or 'emerging'. Most farm operations can be classified as micro, or small in scale. This is important so that one doesn't view South Africa's agriculture as mainly white farmers. Indeed, we are a country of two agricultures with black farmers mainly at small scale and accounting for roughly 10% of the commercial agricultural output. Still, this doesn't mean they are not active in the sector. They mainly still require support to expand and increase output, but they are active. The facts In the wake of the circus in the Oval Office, we were amazed by the total silence of the many farmers' organisations in South Africa. We have not seen one coming out to reject all of Trump's claims. The only thing we can deduce from this is that these falsehoods suit the political position of some farmer organisations. But at what cost? Will many of their members be harmed by trade sanctions or tariffs against South Africa? The US is an important market for South Africa's agriculture, accounting for 4% of the $13.7 billion (R247bn) exports in 2024. When Ramaphosa highlighted the fact that crime, and rural crime in particular, has an impact on all South Africans and that more black people than white people are being killed, Trump's response was disturbing, to say the least: 'But Blacks are not farmers'. This requires an immediate fact check. We returned to the text from our chapter in the Handbook on the South African Economy we jointly prepared in 2021. In the extract below, we discuss the real numbers of farmers in South Africa and try to provide a sensible racial classification of farmers to denounce Trump's silly statement. As highlighted earlier, the two latest agricultural censuses (2007 and 2017) are incomplete as they restricted the sample frame to farm businesses registered to pay value added tax. Only firms with a turnover of R1 million qualify for VAT registration. We were able to expand the findings from the censuses with numbers from the 2011 population census and the 2016 community survey to better understand the total number of commercial farming units in South Africa. The Community Survey 2016 is a large-scale survey that happened between Censuses 2011 and 2021. The main objective was to provide population and household statistics at municipal level to government and the private sector, to support planning and decision-making. Data from the 2011 population census (extracted from three agricultural questions included in the census) shows that 2 879 638 households out of South Africa's total population, or 19.9% of all households, were active in agriculture for subsistence or commercial purposes. Only 2% of these active households reported an annual income derived from agriculture above R307 000. This translates into 57 592 households that can be considered commercial farmers, with agriculture as the main or only source of household income. This corresponds in some way with the 40 122 farming businesses that are registered for VAT as noted in the 2017 agricultural census report. If we use the numbers from the agricultural census it is evident almost 90% of all VAT-registered commercial farming businesses could be classified as micro or small-scale enterprises. If the farm businesses excluded from the census are accounted for under the assumption that they are too small for VAT registration, then the fact still stands that the vast majority of all farm enterprises in South Africa are small family farms. Graphic Image: Source: StatsSA There are, however, 2 610 large farms (with turnover exceeding R22.5 million, which are responsible for 67% of farm income and employed more than half the agricultural labour force of 757 000 farm workers in 2017. Graphic Image: Source: StatsSA (2020b) – based on additional analysis of the 2016 Community Survey Another way to get to farm numbers is to use the 2016 Community Survey. Using the shares as shown in Table 2, we estimate there are 242 221 commercial farming households in South Africa, of which only 43 891 (18%) are white commercial farmers. (This is very much in line with the VAT registered farmers but also acknowledging the fact that many white farm businesses are not necessarily registered for VAT.) Let's consider only the agricultural households with agriculture as their main source of income, surveyed in the 2016 community survey. We end up with a total of 132 700 households, of whom 93 000 (70%) are black farmers. This reality is something that policy makers and farm organisations find very difficult to deal with and it seems that Trump also found this too good to be true. We have tried here in a long winded way to deal with farm numbers and how to get to a race classification of farmers in South Africa. In the end we trust that we have managed to show that there are more black farmers in South Africa than white farmers. Their share in total output is smaller than that of their white counterparts. The National Agricultural Marketing Council puts black farmers' share of agricultural production as roughly 10%. But these numbers are also incomplete and largely an undercount. It will always be challenging to get to the real number of black farmers' share of agricultural output as nobody would ever know whether the potato or the cabbage on the shelf came from a farm owned by a black farmer or a white person but operated by a black farmer, for example. As South Africans know, the labour on farms, in pack houses, distribution systems and retail are all black. So, the sweat and hard work of black South African workers are integral to the food supply chain in South Africa. Let's get these facts straight and promote them honestly. The Conversation Image: Supplied
IOL News
2 hours ago
- IOL News
We are an evil and irresponsible nation, write our readers
As an evil nation, we got what we deserved The US President went out to humiliate the South African President. The issue of farmers and the 'genocide' of which they are victims as white people was clearly not on the agenda. The agenda focused on 'resetting relations and bilateral matters', according to the presidency. However, it is surprising that Ramaphosa invited white golfers and the minister of agriculture. That can only mean that South Africans were always wary of giving Trump an excuse to bring up the white farmer genocide. Nonetheless, the South African government received what it deserved. Also, the media, which has long protected Ramaphosa, received what it deserved. Trump humiliated all South Africans, so there was no chance to play great public relations. Indeed, the entire concept of a democratic South Africa that is 'non-sexist', 'non-racial', and has the 'sweetest Constitution and free media' facade has been exposed as the satanic lie it has always been. And the 'self-proclaimed' guardians of democracy known as the South African media were caught off guard, and Trump accused them of concealing the alleged genocide. The democratic government has done an excellent job of concealing the fact that the majority of people are Christians, the majority of violence victims are Black men, and the majority of marginalised people are Black. It hid God's role in South Africans' resolve to end apartheid. The government and biased media highlighted a few examples of Black and foreign pastors as the face of a 'rotten Christianity' and a God unneeded in our constitutional democracy, while ignoring the positive work of churches and pastors. This nation has hidden God from its children's education and attempted to justify xenophobia by citing frustration among the people. Many evil things have occurred in this country, but all have one common theme: to humiliate the God of Christians and demonstrate that we can do so through our secular Constitution! South Africa was becoming so arrogant in its devil-may-care attitude and 'Madiba magic' nonsense that it thought it could take it to the ICJ and get its way, just as it had done with Christianity and people like Bushiri. However, it has been exposed for the emptiness and hypocrisy that define it, as no one can be above their spirituality. As a Christian nation, South Africa's ethos and political stance should be based solely on Christianity, including championing human rights at the International Court of Justice. | Khotso Moleko Bloemfontein Let's sacrifice in solidarity with others Across the globe, countless countries have borne the brunt of war, devastating conflicts leaving behind a trail of destruction and despair. As we Muslims approach Eidul Adha, consider prioritising helping war victims, like in Gaza, by reducing personal extravagance, desire, overconsumption, and donate to bona fide humanitarian aid organisations. People in Gaza are facing enormous suffering and lack basic necessities like food, water, medical supplies and other human necessities. Currently, easing the suffering, pain and poverty in Gaza is the need of the hour and it is the time when help is most needed. Moreover, not only during Eid but also beyond Eid, as Muslims and human beings, we must lower the voice of our luxuriousness as around us are people in great agony and sorrow. The situation in Gaza has assumed apocalyptic proportions with hundreds of civilians being butchered on a daily basis. Those who are not killed by the Zionists regime face the grim and painful prospect of death through starvation. With humanitarian aid and commercial supplies blocked, nearly half a million people are facing imminent starvation. Let us do our best to assist. Besides prayers and aid we need to request the UN Security Council, EU and other nations to send in military support to stop apartheid Israel's egregious military offensive in Gaza and occupied Palestine. | MOHAMED SAEED Pietermaritzburg Investment in ESG is irresponsible It is saddening to note that the Coronation Fund Managers Stewardship Activities Report uncritically embraces the false globalist ideology of ESG (environmental social governance). Proudly the Coronation Fund Managers declare that they 'assess and advocate for improvements in their climate change strategies.' Clearly, despite Coronation's research capacity, they have wittingly or unwittingly allowed themselves to be shepherded by the controlled sirens of pliant science and the mass media in believing that human activity can influence climate change. Uncorrupted science and history have proved that warming periods occurred in millennia before fossil fuels were being widely used as they are today. Uncorrupted science has also shown that temperature changes occur as a result of the inconsistency of the earth's elliptical path around the sun and the slight variations that occur in the earth's tilt. So ignoring true science and history is really inexcusable. But what is worse is the agenda of the climate change globalists. It requires investing in the hugely expensive green deal – lithium powered vehicles, wind turbines and solar panels. It ignores the vast environmental damage the extraction of lithium causes and the unreliability of wind turbines with their terrible toll on bird life. By taking punitive action against what they condemn as carbon polluters like Sasol, the ESG disciples push up the cost of living and exacerbate impoverishment. Of course if they studied the science and history of carbon dioxide they would note that although it comprises less than one percent of the atmosphere, it is vitally important for plant and vegetation growth. The part of the Stewardship Report that shows double standards is Coronation's eye on the possible oil and gas bonanza off the Namibian coast. For all their green commitment, the allure of profitable investment in fossil fuel exploitation beckons. Although the Stewardship Report is silent on the social aspect of ESG, it needs to be pointed out that it concerns DEI – diversity, equity, inclusion. One wonders how that squares with Coronation's commitment to 'responsible investment' when it is a fact that the criterion of merit is excluded in the application of DEI policy. Given US President Donald Trump's administration's recognition of the globalists' green deal for the scam it is, in keeping with their commitment to responsible investment, Coronation's Fund Managers ought to be ditching ESG and focusing on the massive fossil fuel exploitation that is about to take off in the US. | DUNCAN DU BOIS Bluff DAILY NEWS
