F1 tycoon pleads guilty in rare Singapore corruption case
Ong Beng Seng has admitted to abetting the obstruction of justice by helping ex-transportation minister Subramaniam Iswaran cover up evidence while he was being investigated for corruption.
Ong gave expensive gifts, including an all-expenses paid trip which included a private jet ride, to Iswaran while they were engaged in official business.
Ministers in Singapore cannot keep gifts unless they pay the market value of the gift to the government, and they must declare anything they receive from people they have business dealings with.
Ong will be sentenced on 15 August.
He originally faced up to two years in jail for abetting a public servant in obtaining gifts, while the maximum jail term he faced for the abetment of obstruction of justice is seven years.
However, both prosecutors and Ong's lawyers agreed that given his poor health, a fine should be imposed instead of a jail term, with the prosecution saying "judicial mercy" should be exercised.
Ong has a rare bone marrow cancer, and the court previously allowed him to travel abroad for medical and work purposes.
Prosecutors argued that while Ong was pivotal in Iswaran's attempt to cover his tracks, he was much less culpable than Iswaran, who had been a sitting minister.
Ong's lawyers argued that he had "simply complied" with the plan thought up by Iswaran.
At Iswaran's sentencing last October, the court heard that Iswaran requested Ong bill him for a business class flight from Doha to Singapore, after he discovered that he could have been implicated while police were investigating a separate incident.
The judge said that he acted with deliberation and premeditation to avoid a probe.
On Monday, the 79-year-old Ong pleaded guilty to belatedly billing Iswaran for the expense.
A second charge of abetting Iswaran's acceptance of the all-expenses paid trip to Doha, said to be worth around S$20,850 ($16,188; £12,194), was also taken into account.
In December 2022, Ong had invited Iswaran on the trip to Qatar, saying he would take care of the trip's expenses, which included hotel accomodation and a flight to Doha on Ong's private jet.
Iswaran accepted the invitation but said he would need to arrive in Singapore on a specific date, with Ong responding that he would arrange for Iswaran to travel from Doha to Singapore on a commercial flight.
It was this flight, said to be worth around S$5,700, that Iswaran belatedly made payment to Ong's company for, after he found out that Singapore's corruption bureau was investigating a separate investigation relating to Ong's associates - and had seized the flight manifest which had details of his trip to Doha as part of it.
He then asked Ong to have his company, Singapore GP, bill him for the trip.
The two men were arrested in July 2023 and charge sheets revealed that Iswaran was gifted more than S$403,000 ($311,882; £234,586) worth of flights, hotel stays, musicals and grand prix tickets.
At the time of the offences Iswaran was in the government's F1 steering committee and the chief negotiator on F1-related business matters.
Born in Malaysia in 1946 - which was then Malaya - Ong moved to Singapore as a child and founded a hotel and property company in the 1980s.
Ong helped bring the F1 Grand Prix to Singapore and his company Hotel Properties Limited (HPL) has brands like the Four Seasons and Marriott operating under it.
Hotel Properties Limited had earlier in April said that Ong would step down as its managing director to "manage his medical conditions".
Singapore's lawmakers are among the highest-paid in the world, with leaders justifying the handsome salaries by saying it combats corruption.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
11 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump Slaps Tariffs, Modi Fires Back -- Is India Breaking Away from the US?
Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi isn't backing down. Days after President Donald Trump slapped a surprise 25% tariff on Indian exports and warned of more action over India's oil ties with Russia, Modi doubled down on his buy local message. He urged citizens to prioritize Indian-made goods, while sources familiar with the matter told Bloomberg that New Delhi hasn't ordered refiners to stop buying Russian crude. Instead, refinersboth public and privateare still choosing suppliers based on commercial logic. The backdrop: Trump is ramping up pressure on India for its energy and diplomatic relationship with Moscow, just as global markets remain uneasy over war financing and shifting trade alliances. Warning! GuruFocus has detected 9 Warning Signs with GS. The rhetoric is heating up fast. Trump's team has accused India of cheating the US on trade and immigration, and signaled that all options are on the table to respond to its Russian oil purchases. But while the public messaging may sound tough, India isn't giving up much. Officials said US trade talks are still on, but they won't open up politically sensitive sectors like agriculture and dairy. And recent dealslike the one India just signed with the UKsuggest that Modi's government is moving at its own pace, carefully protecting domestic interests even while staying at the negotiating table. The pushback highlights how India, now the world's fastest-growing large economy, is becoming less willing to compromise under outside pressure. Despite the rising tension, markets aren't panicking. Indian equities climbed on Monday, while the rupee and government bonds also strengthened. The boost came after oil prices dropped sharplythanks to OPEC+ signaling it could raise output in Septemberwhich is a major win for India, a net fuel importer. While Indian refiners are preparing fallback plans in case Russian crude becomes unavailable, there's no sign of a near-term disruption. India is signaling it may not easily yield to pressure, even from a key partner. For global investors watching this unfoldincluding those with exposure to geopolitical-sensitive names like Tesla (NASDAQ:TSLA)India's balancing act between Washington and Moscow could become a defining theme for emerging market strategy in the months ahead. This article first appeared on GuruFocus.


Axios
42 minutes ago
- Axios
How the Supreme Court kickstarted the redistricting arms race
Republicans' plan to redraw Texas's congressional district map years early launched a nationwide battle, with Democrats promising to retaliate with new partisan maps of their own. The big picture: The war to win the congressional maps is a result of a 2019 Supreme Court decision eliminating federal guardrails against partisan gerrymandering. President Trump has urged Texas Republicans to draw a new map more favorable to the GOP before the 2026 midterms. Democrats in New York and California have vowed to retaliate in kind. Context: The Supreme Court ignited the new wave of gerrymandering with a 2019 opinion authored by Chief Justice John Roberts that held that partisan gerrymandering claims "present political questions beyond the reach of the federal courts." "Federal judges have no license to reallocate political power between the two major political parties," Roberts wrote. Roberts added that "the fact that such gerrymandering is 'incompatible with democratic principles,' ... does not mean that the solution lies with the federal judiciary." What they're saying: Georgetown University Law Center professor Steve Vladeck said that the Supreme Court's decision "left it as open-season for whatever the legislature can get away with" in states where lawmakers control the maps. The other side: Justice Elena Kagan in her 2019 dissent warned that "[o]f all times to abandon the Court's duty to declare the law, this was not the one." She added, "The practices challenged in these cases imperil our system of government." Zoom out: In 2024, the Supreme Court made it even more difficult to challenge congressional maps when it upheld a South Carolina district map that a lower court found was an unconstitutional racial gerrymander. Writing for the majority, Justice Samuel Alito rejected the lower court's conclusion. He wrote that "inferring bad faith based on the racial effects of a political gerrymander in a jurisdiction in which race and partisan preference are very closely correlated" could allow future litigants to sidestep the 2019 decision that partisan gerrymandering claims are out of the federal courts' reach. Friction point: Kagan, who again authored the dissent, said the decision sent a message to state legislators and mapmakers, who may use race "as a proxy to achieve partisan ends" or "straight-up suppress" minority voters' electoral influence: "Go right ahead, this Court says to States today." State of play: Texas could be just the tip of the iceberg, as the redistricting push sparks a chain reaction beforethe 2026 midterms. As Axios' Alex Isenstadt and Megan Stringer report, redistricting for partisan advantage is nothing new — but the mid-decade scramble comes well ahead of the 2030 census, after which redistricting normally takes place. Kagan in her 2019 dissent, said gerrymandering "helps create the polarized political system so many Americans loathe." She continued, "Is it conceivable that someday voters will be able to break out of that prefabricated box? Sure. But everything possible has been done to make that hard. To create a world in which power does not flow from the people because they do not choose their governors."


Washington Post
43 minutes ago
- Washington Post
Authority restored, Ukraine agency charges six with arms-related corruption
KYIV — Ukrainian authorities have charged six people, including a member of parliament and a national guard official, with misappropriating funds intended for drones and electronic warfare systems, in a wide-ranging anti-corruption case, officials said. The wide-ranging anticorruption investigation was announced just days after President Volodymyr Zelensky reversed course in response to angry public protests and agreed to restore the independence of the country's two main anti-corruption agencies.