
Letters, Aug. 11
Budgets and belt-tightening
Re: NDP's balanced-budget dreams hit by fiscal reality, June 27 and NDP, living in fiscal fantasy world, must face reality, Aug. 6
After laying out the challenges of balancing the budget anytime soon, the first opinion piece ends with the following advice: 'Being honest with Manitobans about the province's fiscal challenges is the best policy right now.'
After noting that the current and projected deficits are a result of a structural imbalance, the second opinion piece states: 'You don't close a gap of that size in two years without serious belt-tightening or significant tax increases.'
I couldn't agree more, we should expect the government to be honest and forthright about the fiscal challenges we are facing. And yes, let's have a discussion about how much of each — belt-tightening and tax increases — should be done to address the problem rather than kicking the can down the road and saddling future generations with excessive debt and interest payments.
As a starting point, I suggest we begin with a discussion regarding the following propositions.
First, the least well-off among us should not be subject to any further belt-tightening.
Second, the tax decreases brought in by the former government were ill-advised, as was the decision to retain them by the current government.
And as we are doing this, let's remind ourselves of the extent of child poverty and homelessness in this province, and that both the personal income tax top rate and the retail sales tax rate in Manitoba are the third-owest in the country.
So yes, let us all be as honest as possible, have the discussion, and then do what needs to be and should be done.
Gerald Farthing
Winnipeg
Emissions and disagreement
There are many points to disagree with in Robert Parsons' article What do we do now regarding emissions, Aug. 7, but I will only deal with two of his statements.
Parsons dismisses ground source heat pumps as an alternative to natural gas as unaffordable. He mentions community loops and neighbourhood systems as a way to implement them but quickly dismisses the idea. Not so fast, Mr. Parsons.
Natural gas is primarily methane and is a potent source of greenhouse gas emissions both in its extraction and in its consumption. Heat pumps are largely benign as far as greenhouse gas production.
District heating is in widespread use in European countries. What we need in Manitoba is a mandate for Manitoba Hydro to install ground source heat pumps and district heating in all new developments and to have homeowners pay it off gradually on their Hydro bills.
It can be sold as a positive as it will save them money over time while benefiting the planet.
Parsons likewise dismisses solar energy as a source of electricity for the province in favour of gas turbines. This argument is even more unconvincing, as it is widely known that solar energy production is now the least expensive alternative for electricity generation. Some 600 gw of solar were installed worldwide last year (Manitoba's entire capacity is about 6 gw). When combined with large scale battery storage, solar has gas beaten on all counts, particularly in friendliness to the planet.
Parsons ends his opinion piece by saying that we need to be realistic and think things through.
Doing what is good for our children and grandchildren is the height of thinking things through.
Joe Leven
Winnipeg
Nuclear nightmares
Re: The little-known dangers we live with, Think Tank, July 30
To accompany this very timely article and the mentioned Annie Jacobsen book Nuclear War: A Scenario would be the Eric Schlosser non-fiction book and PBS documentary of the same name Command – and Control about the real accidental explosive self-destruction in September 1980 of a Titan 2 missile and its silo in Arkansas and the subsequent search for the nuclear warhead (found in a ditch unexploded), and the 700-1,000 known accidents since.
And the 1957 fiction book On the Beach by Nevil Shute about MAD (Mutually Assured Destruction) by accident (made into a movie of the same name starring Gregory Peck, Ava Gardner) foretelling the possible self-annihilation of the human race well before the real 16-28 Oct. 1962 Kennedy/ Kruschev Cuban Missile Crisis nuclear standoff.
Only a matter of time before hubris gets us all, and remember that the Orange Menace now has the nuclear codes, as do Netanyahu and Putin (with International Criminal Court warrants out for their arrest), and North Korea, Pakistan and India; all involved in wars and standoffs as we speak.
The Sword of Damocles.
Andy Maxwell
Winnipeg
Respecting elders
The editorial Seniors deserve decent care home food, Aug. 7, builds on John Longhurst's article Driven by faith, frustrated by funding, which was on the front page on Aug. 5. Both articles have a common theme. In the world of 'trickle down funding,' not much money is trickling down from the regional health authorities to the folks who are trying to make ends meet operating personal care homes (PCHs).
Our provincial government was elected to fix health care. There have been no notable improvements and some areas are likely worse than before.
Meanwhile, the health authorities are shorting the funding of elder care to fund other areas, meaning that they are driving the one area of health care that was sort of functioning into a desperate situation. In John Longhurst's article, there is much discussion on the trade-offs that faith-based PCH's make in providing decent food to those in their care.
Just imagine the choices that are being made in the for-profit PCH's, where return on investment is the guiding principle!
Many families visit loved ones regularly to help in feeding, to provide companionship and in some cases help with care. This is laudable but it shouldn't be the de facto fallback to adequate funding. Some families due to geography or other limitations cannot do this. Who feeds them? Who makes sure they get their meds? Who makes sure that their undergarments are clean?
Wab Kinew comes from a culture with a tradition of respecting its elders. It's time to walk the walk, Premier Kinew.
Tom Pearson
Winnipeg
Doing something
Another article in the Free Press again chronicles choking smoke in Manitoba and across Canada.
Given that, according to the current U.S. administration, climate change is a hoax, we're not likely to see the reduction of vehicle speed limits on their highways as we did during the oil 'crisis' of the 1997's.
Canada and much of the rest of the world are on board with the idea that something needs to be done about climate change. The lack of infrastructure for electric vehicles and the high cost of their purchase makes the shift to electric cars a challenge and yes, there are some issues related to the batteries that power them.
That said, every driver on every highway is capable of reducing their speed to the 90 km/h that we maintained when we were so concerned about running out of oil.
Running out of oil is one thing.
Running out of time is a much bigger problem.
George Bednarczyk
Winnipeg

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Toronto Sun
2 hours ago
- Toronto Sun
Letters to the Editor, Aug. 13, 2025
CANADA HAS FALLEN BEHIND This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. THIS CONTENT IS RESERVED FOR SUBSCRIBERS ONLY Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. SUBSCRIBE TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. REGISTER / SIGN IN TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account. Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments. Enjoy additional articles per month. Get email updates from your favourite authors. THIS ARTICLE IS FREE TO READ REGISTER TO UNLOCK. Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments Enjoy additional articles per month Get email updates from your favourite authors Don't have an account? Create Account I am usually not a conspiracy theorist; however, there is no doubt in my mind the weak-kneed federal government of the last 10 years here has been played like a harp. Russia, Saudi Arabia, and other oil-producing countries have paid sycophants doing amazing work spreading the worst-case scenario of climate change to suckers like our federal government — all the while reaping the benefits of the growing demand for fossil fuels. So while the federal Liberals were drafting horrible, debilitating anti-oil and gas legislation, we lost billions of energy dollars. And we also are more than 10 years behind on energy infrastructure. Does anyone other than myself see how the federal Liberals sold us out? Paul Reidt St. Agatha, Ont. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. (Former prime minister Justin Trudeau took the Liberals down an ideological path which was more akin to the NDP. He was enabled by incompetent cabinet ministers and a politically driven staff who were more interested in fawning headlines than doing what was good for Canada's economy) BUILD SOME JAILS This letter is a little off topic in recent current events. I wanted to touch base on our prison bail system and how people accused of serious are getting bail so easily. This is ridiculous. The reason for this is because of overcrowding in our jails. Our government spends billions of dollars on homeless people, immigration and our welfare system. I have not heard any politician mention anything about building more jails, prisons or penitentiaries. We, as a society, have to realize that this is the only solution for the law-abiding citizens living here. This would not only create jobs for people, but also keep innocent people safe from others doing terrible crimes. To me this is a no-brainer. Come on, Premier Ford. Get with the program. Thomas McKenna Toronto (Sadly, this issue is never off topic — since it happens nearly every week. When is the public going to say,'Enough is enough?') DEFEAT IN HAND Re 'Carney in cruise control' (Warren Kinsella, Aug. 10): What we really need to do is to get this closet-communist, dictator, minority government into Parliament, and defeat them! Geoffrey Corfield London, Ont. (The Liberals are going to be in control for quite a while, unfortunately) Toronto Blue Jays Canada Toronto Blue Jays Sunshine Girls Toronto & GTA


Edmonton Journal
2 hours ago
- Edmonton Journal
Putin wants the rest of Ukraine's Donetsk region as part of a ceasefire, Zelenskyy says
Article content KYIV, Ukraine — Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said Tuesday that Russian President Vladimir Putin wants Ukraine to withdraw from the remaining 30% of the Donetsk region that it controls as part of a ceasefire deal, a proposal the leader categorically rejected. Article content Zelenskyy reiterated that Ukraine would not withdraw from territories it controls, saying that would be unconstitutional and would serve only as a springboard for a future Russian invasion. Article content Article content Article content He said diplomatic discussions led by the U.S. focusing on ending the war have not touched on security guarantees for Ukraine to prevent future Russian aggression and that meeting formats currently being discussed do not include Europe's participation, both key demands of Kyiv. Article content Article content Zelenskyy said the necessity of territorial concessions was conveyed to him by U.S. officials ahead of a summit Friday between U.S. President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin, and in further meetings at the level of national security officials. Article content It remained unclear whether Ukraine would take part in the Friday summit. European Union leaders also have been sidelined from the meeting, and they appealed to Trump on Tuesday to protect their interests. Article content Article content Article content Zelenskyy said Putin wants the remaining 9,000 square kilometres (3,500 square miles) of Donetsk under Kyiv's control, where the war's toughest battles are grinding on, as part of a ceasefire plan, in a press briefing on Tuesday in Kyiv. Article content Doing so would hand Russia almost the entirety of the Donbas, a region comprising Ukraine's eastern industrial heartland that Putin has long coveted. Article content Zelenskyy learned of Russia's position after holding a call with Trump and special envoy Steve Witkoff, after the latter's bilateral meeting with Putin. Witkoff told Zelenskyy that Russia was ready to end the war and that there should be territorial concessions from both sides. Some European partners were also part of the call.


Vancouver Sun
2 hours ago
- Vancouver Sun
Putin wants the rest of Ukraine's Donetsk region as part of a ceasefire, Zelenskyy says
KYIV, Ukraine — Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said Tuesday that Russian President Vladimir Putin wants Ukraine to withdraw from the remaining 30% of the Donetsk region that it controls as part of a ceasefire deal, a proposal the leader categorically rejected. Zelenskyy reiterated that Ukraine would not withdraw from territories it controls, saying that would be unconstitutional and would serve only as a springboard for a future Russian invasion. He said diplomatic discussions led by the U.S. focusing on ending the war have not touched on security guarantees for Ukraine to prevent future Russian aggression and that meeting formats currently being discussed do not include Europe's participation, both key demands of Kyiv. Start your day with a roundup of B.C.-focused news and opinion. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. A welcome email is on its way. If you don't see it, please check your junk folder. The next issue of Sunrise will soon be in your inbox. Please try again Interested in more newsletters? Browse here. Meanwhile, Russian forces on the ground have been closing in on a key territorial grab around the city of Pokrovsk. Zelenskyy said the necessity of territorial concessions was conveyed to him by U.S. officials ahead of a summit Friday between U.S. President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin, and in further meetings at the level of national security officials. It remained unclear whether Ukraine would take part in the Friday summit. European Union leaders also have been sidelined from the meeting, and they appealed to Trump on Tuesday to protect their interests. Zelenskyy says Ukraine will not withdraw from the Donbas Zelenskyy said Putin wants the remaining 9,000 square kilometres (3,500 square miles) of Donetsk under Kyiv's control, where the war's toughest battles are grinding on, as part of a ceasefire plan, in a press briefing on Tuesday in Kyiv. Doing so would hand Russia almost the entirety of the Donbas, a region comprising Ukraine's eastern industrial heartland that Putin has long coveted. Zelenskyy learned of Russia's position after holding a call with Trump and special envoy Steve Witkoff, after the latter's bilateral meeting with Putin. Witkoff told Zelenskyy that Russia was ready to end the war and that there should be territorial concessions from both sides. Some European partners were also part of the call. 'And that, probably, Putin wants us to leave Donbas. That is, it didn't sound like America wants us to leave,' he said, recounting the call. Zelenskyy reiterated that withdrawing from Ukraine-controlled territory was out of the question, especially as the question of security guarantees for Ukraine, were not being discussed. 'We will not leave Donbas. We cannot do this. Everyone forgets the first part – our territories are illegally occupied,' Zelenskyy told reporters at a briefing on Tuesday. 'Donbas for the Russians is a springboard for a future new offensive.' Zelenskyy said this is what occurred in 2014 when Russia illegally annexed the Crimean Peninsula. Trump has said he wants to see whether Putin is serious about ending the war, now in its fourth year. The U.S. president has disappointed allies in Europe by saying Ukraine will have to give up some Russian-held territory. He also said Russia must accept land swaps, although it was unclear what Putin might be expected to surrender. The Europeans and Ukraine are wary that Putin, who has waged the biggest land war in Europe since 1945 and used Russia's energy might to try to intimidate the EU, might secure favorable concessions and set the outlines of a peace deal without them. Referring to the format for ceasefire talks, Zelenskyy said on Tuesday that the U.S. proposed a bilateral meeting, between the U.S. and Russia, and then a trilateral meeting that would include Ukraine. Zelenskyy said the presence of Europe was important for Kyiv because these were the only partners offering security guarantees, including funding the Ukrainian army. European countries' overarching fear is that Putin will set his sights on one of them next if he wins in Ukraine. Their leaders said Tuesday they 'welcome the efforts of President Trump towards ending Russia's war of aggression against Ukraine.' But, they underlined, 'the path to peace in Ukraine cannot be decided without Ukraine' and 'international borders must not be changed by force.' The Europeans on Wednesday will make a fresh attempt to rally Trump to Ukraine's cause at virtual meetings convened by German Chancellor Friedrich Merz. Trump did not confirm whether he would take part but did say 'I'm going to get everybody's ideas' before meeting with Putin. Russia holds shaky control over four of the country's regions, two in the country's east and two in the south. Mykhailo Podolyak, an adviser to the chief of Zelenskyy's office, said anything short of Russia's strategic defeat would mean that any ceasefire deal would be on Moscow's terms, erode international law and send a dangerous signal to the world. A 'profoundly alarming moment for Europe' Trump's seemingly public rehabilitation of Putin — a pariah in most of Europe — has unnerved Ukraine's backers. The summit in Alaska is a 'profoundly alarming moment for Europe,' said Nigel Gould-Davies, senior fellow at the International Institute for Strategic Studies in London. According to Gould-Davies, Putin might persuade Trump to try to end the war by 'accepting Russian sovereignty' over parts of Ukraine, even beyond areas that it currently occupies. Trump also could ease or lift sanctions which are causing 'chronic pain' to the Russian economy. That would provoke a 'really serious split in the transatlantic alliance,' he said. The war isn't about Russia's territorial expansion but about Putin's goal of subordinating Ukraine, which would create the opportunity to threaten other parts of Europe, Gould-Davies said. It was unclear whether the Europeans also were unsettled by Trump mistakenly saying twice he would be traveling to Russia on Friday to meet Putin. The summit is taking place in the U.S. state of Alaska, which was colonized by Russia in the 18th century until Czar Alexander II sold it to the U.S. in 1867. Tuesday's European joint statement was meant to be a demonstration of unity. But Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban, who is Putin's closest ally in Europe and has tried to block EU support for Ukraine, was the only one of the bloc's 27 leaders who refused to endorse it. Russia closes in on Pokrovsk Russia appeared closer to taking an important city in the Donetsk region, Pokrovsk. Military analysts using open-source information to monitor the battles said the next 24-48 hours could be critical. Losing Pokrovsk would hand Russia an important victory ahead of the summit. It also would complicate Ukrainian supply lines to the Donetsk region, where the Kremlin has focused the bulk of military efforts. 'A lot will depend on availability, quantity and quality of Ukrainian reserves,' Pasi Paroinen, an analyst with the Finland-based Black Bird Group, wrote on social media late Monday. Ukraine's military said its forces are fending off Russian infantry units trying to infiltrate their defensive positions in the Donetsk region. The region's Ukrainian military command on social media Monday acknowledged that the situation remains 'difficult, unpleasant and dynamic.' Elsewhere in Ukraine, a Russian missile attack on a military training facility left one soldier dead and 11 others wounded, the Ukrainian Ground Forces posted on social media. ___ Associated Press writer Hanna Arhirova in Kyiv, Ukraine, and Emma Burrows in London contributed to this report. Cook reported from Brussels. Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here .