Arkansas coalition submits proposal to protect ‘fundamental right' to direct democracy
An Arkansas ballot question committee announced Monday it had submitted a proposed constitutional amendment to protect voters' right to direct democracy.
The Arkansas Ballot Measure Rights Amendment, sponsored by Protect AR Rights, would amend Article 5 Section 1 of the Arkansas Constitution, the section that governs the state's initiative and referendum process, to designate voters' right to propose laws and constitutional amendments that can be put to a statewide vote as a 'fundamental right.'
This is the second such effort proposed this year in response to state lawmakers approving about a dozen direct democracy-related laws during the 2025 legislative session. Supporters of the new laws have said they will ensure the integrity of the initiative and referendum process, while opponents have argued it will make it more difficult for citizen-led initiatives to qualify for the ballot.
The direct democracy process allows Arkansans to propose new laws or constitutional amendments and put them to a statewide vote. Arkansas is one of 24 states that allows citizen-led initiatives, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures.
Members of the six organizations that comprise the coalition behind Protect AR Rights gathered inside the Capitol to formally announce their ballot measure Monday. During the press conference, Arkansas Public Policy Panel Executive Director Bill Kopsky said their proposal 'strengthens three fundamental citizen rights' in the state Constitution — the right to propose ballot measures, the right to gather signatures on petitions and the right to sign a ballot measure petition.
'Sadly some politicians don't trust voters…and they've stripped the right to the ballot measure process away from us,' Kopsky said. 'They are rigging the rules to make it nearly impossible for everyday Arkansans to propose ballot measures to ask their fellow citizens to sign and support measures and to even sign one themselves. We must stand up to this unprecedented power grab.'
Arkansas grassroots organizations seek to intervene in lawsuit challenging direct democracy laws
The Arkansas Ballot Measure Rights Amendment would make several changes to the state's initiative and referendum process, including prohibiting the General Assembly from amending or repealing constitutional amendments that voters approved; current law allows lawmakers to do so by a two-thirds majority vote. The proposed measure would only grant that authority for initiated acts.
The measure would also make changes to the signature-gathering process by prohibiting a requirement that signatures be collected from more than 15 counties. A 2023 law, which is being challenged in court, increased the threshold to 50 counties.
If a qualified voter's signature is deemed insufficient and therefore will be disqualified and not counted, the proposed measure would require the elector to be notified and given at least 10 business days to correct 'any identified insufficiency.' Notification and a minimum cure period of 10 business days would also be required for the sponsors of a measure if there is a filing error.
The proposed constitutional amendment would also require a ballot title challenge to be filed within 10 business days of the title's approval and be 'tried at once with expedited review if appealed.'
Additionally, the measure defines petition fraud and declares it a criminal offense.
The League of Women Voters of Arkansas is also pursuing its own proposed constitutional amendment aimed at protecting voters' right to direct democracy. Attorney General Tim Griffin has rejected the measure three times.
In his most recent rejection earlier this month, Griffin cited a new law that prohibits ballot titles from being written above an eighth-grade reading level. This was the first time he rejected a proposed ballot measure under Act 602, which became law in April.
Protect AR Rights tried to make its proposal 'as readable as possible,' but Kopsky said he doesn't think it's possible to meet the eighth-grade reading level and the clarity standard. For that reason, Protect AR Rights last week filed a motion to intervene in a League of Women Voters of Arkansas lawsuit challenging new state laws, he said.
'We believe we'll get injunctive relief,' Kopsky said. 'If we don't, we'll have to rethink our strategy.'
The League of Women Voters of Arkansas' lawsuit alleges eight recently approved laws governing direct democracy violate the First and 14th amendments to the U.S. Constitution. Protect AR Rights noted in its motion to intervene that the committee wants to challenge additional laws not included in the lawsuit, including Act 602 of 2025.
Arkansas Advocates for Children and Families is a member of the Protect AR Rights coalition. Executive Director Keesa Smith-Brantley said Monday that the group's goal is for the proposals from Protect AR Rights and the League of Women Voters of Arkansas to work together.
'We do not want there to be any confusion. We believe that they have critical components,' she said. 'There were things that we felt like we needed to equally add to make sure that we enshrine the rights of Arkansans in the Constitution, but we are hopeful to be able to work together in this process and talk about ways that we can make sure that both of the measures that we're working on get passed.'
Under state law, the attorney general's office has 10 business days to approve or reject the proposed ballot measures. The League of Women Voters submitted the latest version of its proposal May 7 and is owed a response from Griffin by Wednesday. The deadline for a response on Protect AR Rights' measure is June 3.
The attorney general's office does not have any other pending ballot title proposals, Griffin's communication's director Jeff LeMaster confirmed Monday.
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
UPI
28 minutes ago
- UPI
Tulsi Gabbard revokes security clearance for 37 intelligence officials
Aug. 19 (UPI) -- National Security Director Tulsi Gabbard has revoked the security clearances for 37 current and former intelligence officials, as directed by President Donald Trump. Gabbard acknowledged that the president directed her to revoke the security clearances in a social media post that she made on Tuesday afternoon. "Being entrusted with a security clearance is a privilege, not a right," Gabbard said. "Those in the intelligence community who betray their oath to the Constitution and put their own interests ahead of the interests of the American people have broken the sacred trust they promised to uphold," she added. Gabbard's post includes a copy of the department memorandum that was circulated on Monday and lists the 37 officials whose security clearances are revoked. Among those whose security clearances are revoked is Maher Bitar, who worked for Sen. Adam Schiff, D-Calif., when he was the House Intelligence Committee chairman during the first impeachment effort against President Donald Trump in 2019, The Hill reported. The Biden administration's National Security Council spokeswoman Emily Horne and Assistant Secretary of State for Intelligence and Research Brett Holmgren also are among those who lost their security clearances. Others with revoked clearances include officials who held senior positions within the State Department, the CIA, the National Security Agency, the Defense Department and the National Security Council, according to Politico. Several formerly advised Biden when he was the vice president under former President Barack Obama, and some also were involved in the investigation into claims that Trump colluded with Russia ahead of the 2016 election. The revocations are effective immediately, and those whose security clearances are revoked also have any related contracts or employment terminated and must surrender their credentials to security officers, Fox News reported. The revocations prompted criticism alleging that the Trump administration did so for political purposes. "Further proof of weaponization and politicization," Mark Zaid, a national security attorney, said in a post on X. He said most of those who lost their security clearances "are dedicated public servants who have worked across multiple presidential administrations." The Trump administration also revoked Zaid's prior security clearance. Many who lost their clearance also had spoken to media regarding decisions made by the Trump administration, according to The Hill.
Epoch Times
an hour ago
- Epoch Times
Gabbard Revokes Security Clearance for 37 Current and Former Officials
U.S. Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard on Tuesday announced the revocation of security clearances for 37 current and former intelligence community officials for allegedly 'politicizing and manipulating intelligence.' 'Being entrusted with a security clearance is a privilege, not a right. Those in the Intelligence Community who betray their oath to the Constitution and put their own interests ahead of the interests of the American people have broken the sacred trust they promised to uphold,' Gabbard said in a post on X.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Trump wants to end mail-in voting. DeSantis says Florida's system is fine
Gov. Ron DeSantis said Tuesday that he doesn't think President Donald Trump's desire to ban voting by mail applies to Florida. Asked about Trump's vow on Monday to 'lead a movement' to end the use of mail-in ballots, DeSantis said he thought it only applied to states that send mail ballots to all voters. 'What he means by vote my mail, I think, just in my conversations, is the states like California and Nevada and others, where they just send all these ballots out into the ether,' DeSantis said during a news conference. He defended Florida's system, in which voters have to request a vote-by-mail ballot. 'I think what Florida has is absentee voting,' he said. He noted that county elections supervisors don't mail ballots to anyone who hasn't requested one. Trump's post on Truth Social made no such distinctions. He wrote that he would issue an executive order to bring 'honesty' to the 2026 elections by getting 'rid of MAIL-IN BALLOTS' as well as 'Highly 'Inaccurate,' Very Expensive, and Seriously Controversial VOTING MACHINES.' 'It's time that the Republicans get tough and stop it, because the Democrats want it,' Trump later told reporters. Trump does not have the power to change voting laws. The Constitution gives states the power to set the 'times, places and manner' of elections. Trump's longstanding grievance with voting by mail — a method he has used to vote in Palm Beach County — has exposed rifts among Florida Republicans over the last few years. The state's GOP leaders have promoted the use of voting by mail over the last two decades, even changing the name from 'absentee' to 'vote by mail' to imply that voters don't have to be absent to make use of it. More than 3 million Floridians voted by mail in last year's election. But DeSantis and the party have had to bat down fringe elements who have embraced Trump's claims of widespread voter fraud, including with the use of mail-in ballots in Florida. Lawmakers have responded by making it harder to request, renew and submit mail ballots. DeSantis said Tuesday that voting by mail is 'popular' in Florida, and he questioned how banning it outright would work. 'Clearly, you would need some absentee [ballots] for military overseas [voters], right?' DeSantis said. 'I mean, so that's at a minimum, you'd need that.'
