logo
Big increase in winter flights at Dublin Airport expected after cap suspended

Big increase in winter flights at Dublin Airport expected after cap suspended

The number of seats that will be available on flights in and out of the capital will rise to just under 17.9 million for the season, a 23pc increase on last winter.
Last winter, just under 14.4 million seats were set to be made available by carriers as the Irish Aviation Authority (IAA) decided to limit numbers to ensure Dublin Airport adhered to its annual 32 million passenger cap.
While the number available next winter is expected to shoot back up to 17.9 million, that is still below the near 18.4 million that were being made available for winter 2023-2024.
Aer Lingus intends to have more than 4.7 million seats available this winter. That's 560,000 more than last winter. Ryanair will have 7.54 million, compared with the 6.25 million it had last season.
Other international operators, from Gulf carriers Emirates and Etihad to US airlines including United, Delta and American, will have hundreds of thousands of extra seats available between them.
Dublin Airport's passenger cap is due to a planning condition attached in 2007 to the construction of Terminal 2.
However, this year Dublin Airport will handle about 36.3 million passengers, following decisions by the High Court that effectively paused the cap while certain matters related to aircraft take-off and landing slot allocations are being examined by the European Court of Justice. It is not likely to deliver a ruling on those matters until summer next year.
Dublin Airport's slots are managed by UK-based firm Airport Coordination.
Its initial co-ordination report for the coming winter period, which covers ­October 26 to March 28 next year, shows the dramatic increase in the planned seat availability now that the IAA cannot, for the time being at least, limit the number at Dublin Airport.
The report shows there was demand for 103,020 take-off and landing slots for the season, with 102,754 allocated.
New slots for the period were requested by a slew of airlines, from Aer Lingus and Ryanair, to Hainan Airlines, Emirates and Etihad.
Ryanair remains by far the biggest operator at Dublin Airport for the season, with 39pc of allocated slots for the winter. Aer Lingus has 23pc. Emerald Airlines, which operates the Aer Lingus Regional service, has just under 13pc.
The largest non-Irish long-haul carrier out of Dublin is United Airlines, with 1,080 slots for the winter, followed by Emirates and Qatar Airways.
The report from Airport Coordination notes that some new destinations which intended to be operated next winter include routes to Albania's capital, Tirana, as well as to Rabat in Morocco and a direct service to Derry.
The Government has pledged to have the cap removed. While Transport Minister Darragh O'Brien has suggested legislation will be brought forward in the autumn to address the cap, it could take some time before it is removed.
Dublin Airport is set for its busiest ever summer, with passenger numbers expected to surpass 10 million for the season. It expects to have a number of days where passenger numbers will significantly exceed 100,000.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

I am quite good with money. I know exactly how to spend it all
I am quite good with money. I know exactly how to spend it all

Irish Times

time2 hours ago

  • Irish Times

I am quite good with money. I know exactly how to spend it all

I am quite good with money . I know exactly how to spend it all for a maximum return on happiness. Really I should be given loads of it on this basis. I wouldn't squirrel it away in anything as selfish as 'savings' where it wouldn't do the economy much good. I'd be out there stimulating it away, one unnecessary TK Maxx scented candle at a time. That's the kind of thoughtful, community-minded gal I am. You would think from this attitude that I grew up wealthy and insulated from knowing the cost of anything. That I never saw a bill on the kitchen table. That I ate an avocado before the age of 25. Instead I grew up in a family constantly trying to save money. I suspect it's the thing holding us together at this point. I'm not sure my parents even like each other but they'll be damned if they let legal fees eat into their retirement pot. My place in the family may only be determined by my Netflix and newspaper subscriptions plus my willingness to share passwords. [ As an Irish person in Australia there is one question I'm always asked Opens in new window ] My father will turn off the air conditioner in the car – on a 45-degree day – when it's going up a hill. What he saves on fuel, we all pay for in physical and mental health. He refuses to unlock the car door with anything other than the physical key because the car door clicker only has an infinite number of 'clicks' in it. Hell will freeze over before he lets the car door clicker industrial complex scam him into forking out for a replacement key. My older brother, meanwhile, still insists on me buying child tickets for the football. What might have worked when I was an underdeveloped 16-year-old is fooling no one now I'm in my 30s. The collagen has gone from my face, along with the light behind my eyes. It's why I spend money now like I'm trying to buy my way out of feeling poor. READ MORE If money doesn't buy happiness, it sure creates the conditions most conducive to it I cannot empathise with Irish friends when they reminisce about when they used to have more money than they do now accompanied by a sighed 'but that was in the boom times'. I never had a boom time but on the other hand I was privileged enough to not get hit personally by the recession. I've just gone from being paid minimum wage and having no savings to being paid a salary and having a small amount of savings that I can't really do anything with. As house prices and rent go up, it's looking less likely it will ever be enough for a house deposit. Or an investment I can whack away for 10 years. It's a paper-thin buffer between me and being homeless if I suddenly lost my job. And I'm grateful for it; it's more than a lot of people have. A little emergency fund makes me one of the lucky ones in this cost-of-living crisis. But it makes sacrificing life's small joys to save cash hard, when you're not sure it will be enough to get you the most modest of homes – rented or bought. The social contract of 'work hard and save and you'll be comfortable' doesn't work in this housing crisis. [ Brianna Parkins: Posh people know I don't belong in fancy places Opens in new window ] Which makes my love of watching 'Extreme Cheapskates' and obsession with frugal content makers feel like self-flagellation. I don't even like the sound of the word 'frugal' – it feels cold and plastic, like a thin polyester jumper that lets the wind cut right through you. Part of me wishes I could be like these people who can retire early or work part-time because they charge their phones on the train to save on the electricity bill. There's a lot to learn from them, like focusing on spending quality time with the kids in your life instead of guilt-buying presents. Or decoupling our self-worth from spending. But then I'll see someone water down cottage cheese or mix cold mayonnaise into pasta and commit defamation by calling it dinner. They may have paid the mortgage off by 40 but at what cost? If money doesn't buy happiness, it sure creates the conditions most conducive to it. Winning the lotto would solve 90 per cent of my immediate problems which, in turn, would make me pretty happy. I would be able to delete LinkedIn forever. I would be free. But until that happens, all I have are the small treats to make life worth living. The little cake from the bakery, the taxi when it's raining and fast-track passes for airport security. Stopping at school fetes to buy some truly atrocious arts and crafts by proud children. Overpriced movie popcorn with that inimitable butter taste you can't get from a microwave. Follow me for more sound financial advice. You can't go wrong.

Women are lagging behind on AI but they can catch up
Women are lagging behind on AI but they can catch up

Irish Times

time2 hours ago

  • Irish Times

Women are lagging behind on AI but they can catch up

Women are more likely than men to be in jobs at risk of being automated, but they are also 25 per cent less likely than men to have basic digital skills, separate studies show. The findings, from the International Labour Organisation and the UN respectively, highlight an urgent challenge for women across the world. The artificial intelligence -driven industrial revolution ought to offer a unique opportunity for everyone to shape the future of work, but many women are already behind. A 2024 Danish study of 100,000 workers found 'a staggering gender gap in the adoption of ChatGPT: women are 20 percentage points less likely to use ChatGPT than men in the same occupation'. The researchers found the gap persisted when people in the same workplaces were compared. So how can women keep up with AI developments – especially those who might feel too busy to take time off for training within a part-time schedule, or who may be in denial about AI's all-consuming importance? The challenges are understandable: it is hard to know where to start. READ MORE A useful resource is research company Charter's Guide to AI in the Workplace. Instead of focusing on ideas and AI's 'maybe' impacts, this report has case studies on how some prominent companies are working with staff to share AI best practice. But small employers don't have anything like these resources and, as the UK's Pissarides Review into the future of work and wellbeing points out, 'good impacts – including upskilling and the substitution of routine tasks – cannot be assumed and must be proactively shaped'. So how can you use AI yourself, even when there is no corporate, or even team-level, push for change? The best advice I have seen is from Slack , the workplace collaboration platform, which recommends setting aside time for experimentation and learning. It is also good to be curious about AI, more generally. My recent reading includes 'AI will change what it is to be human. Are we ready?' by economist Tyler Cowen and Avital Balwit of AI software developer Anthropic. [ Are fears of an AI slash and burn of white-collar roles well founded? Opens in new window ] I am also experimenting. I asked the FT's ChatGPT Enterprise to tell me what is holding women back in adopting AI. It pointed to a 2024 study on women and generative AI by Deloitte, the consultancy. The researchers expected 'the proportion of women experimenting with and using gen AI for projects and tasks will match or surpass that of men in the United States by the end of 2025'. So it is not all doom and gloom. Caution is still good. As noted last month, generative AI chatbots such as ChatGPT and Anthropic's Claude may sometimes demonstrate how 'the potential biases of those working at AI companies can seep into their models'. An FT reporter ran a series of questions about AI bosses through different chatbots, and each model was far more favourable about its own leader. Women make up just a third of the AI workforce, according to world Economic Forum figures. But that should give us all the more reason to learn more about large language models and AI-powered agents – and start to influence how to build knowledge in our own organisations. You will know the saying that 'AI is not going to take your job – someone using AI will'. That sounds reassuring for anyone who has mastered AI and validates those who are experimenting. Unfortunately, like many things in the AI spin cycle, even this idea may be outdated. Sangeet Paul Choudary, a tech author and adviser, says this idea is 'true, but utterly useless'. In his Substack newsletter, he says the statement 'directs your attention to the individual task level – automation vs augmentation of the tasks you perform – when the real shift is happening at the level of the entire system of work'. That difference takes some processing but is a useful way to see the bigger picture. If you have yet to use generative AI, don't panic. Time is on your side. Consultancy McKinsey has found that, despite the hype, only 1 per cent of leaders say their companies are 'mature' on AI deployment. The other 99 per cent? That's where the rest of us work. – Copyright The Financial Times Limited 2025

Live updates as shop that sold €250m EuroMillions ticket goes public
Live updates as shop that sold €250m EuroMillions ticket goes public

Irish Daily Mirror

time3 hours ago

  • Irish Daily Mirror

Live updates as shop that sold €250m EuroMillions ticket goes public

The long-awaited mystery surrounding Ireland's staggering €250 million EuroMillions jackpot will finally be solved today, as the shop that sold the winning ticket will be revealed. It has already been confirmed that the ticket was purchased at a retail store in Cork. This historic win marks a first for the Rebel County and is the largest prize ever claimed in Ireland since EuroMillions launched here in 2004. It is also the 18th time an Irish player has landed the jackpot. After days of speculation and excitement, the National Lottery confirmed that the lucky winner has made contact with their Prize Claims team, officially ending the guessing game. Spokesperson Emma Monaghan said: "We are absolutely thrilled to have heard from our EuroMillions winner. At this point, our priority is to give them the necessary time and space to make arrangements and let this life-changing news sink in. No other details will be revealed at this stage, however, the name of the winning Cork shop will be announced on Friday." The news has sparked celebrations across Cork as locals revel in the historic jackpot. Stay tuned for live updates below as the lucky shop that sold Ireland's biggest-ever EuroMillions jackpot goes public.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store