Crawley Labour MP Peter Lamb says welfare bill could be defeated
The Welfare Reform Bill could still be defeated at its second reading despite concessions from the government, a Labour MP has said.Speaking to BBC Politics South East, Peter Lamb, MP for Crawley in West Sussex, said: "I don't think it's inconceivable that we'll get back up to the numbers which potentially result in the bill being killed."Prime Minister Keir Starmer announced new stricter criteria would only apply to new claimants and reversed plans to freeze the health-related component of universal credit, with it rising in line with inflation for existing recipients.The government said it had listened to the rebels but "what we all agree on is that we have to reform the broken system".
Lamb said: "I'm part of a reasonably-sized group of people who are very clear that the conditions are still not acceptable."Responding to the changes the government has promised, he said: "This is ultimately still a cost-cutting measure and that means however they try and co-produce the system for these new people moving forwards, we're going to be taking billions of pounds out of the pockets of people with high levels of vulnerability when there are better alternatives on the table."Asked whether that meant the government could not rest easy, he replied: "They shouldn't rest easy because the proposals are not acceptable."
Lamb said he would vote against the bill, regardless of a three-line whip."I will be a Labour MP when I vote down these proposals," he said.When it was put to him that he might not be a Labour MP after the vote, he replied: "I'll be living up to the spirit of the party".He said he believed the government should invest instead in a preventative approach to mental health, which he said takes up 50% of Personal Independence Payments (PIP) claims.But he said he had not been listened to."I have made this argument for three months, three and a half months, at every possible level, and you can see the eyes glaze over," he told the BBC.
On Friday, Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall said: "Sometimes there is strength in listening. You end up in the right position when you talk to all of those with knowledge and experience."We've more to do to talk to the people over the coming days, but this plan is rooted in Labour values: work for those who can, security for those that can't."I am very hopeful that we'll get this bill through the House."
Politics South East is on BBC1 at 10:00 BST on Sunday, then on the iPlayer.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BreakingNews.ie
10 minutes ago
- BreakingNews.ie
Government at risk of normalising rising homlesssness, says Sinn Féin TD
Sinn Féin housing spokesperson Eoin Ó Broin says the Government are at risk of normalising rising numbers of homelessness. Mr Ó Broin made the comments as it was confirmed that homeless figures have once again risen to record levels, with 15,747 people now in emergency accommodation. Advertisement Of those people, 4,844 children were accessing emergency accommodation during the last week of May. Speaking to , Mr Ó Broin pointed out that the number of homeless people has increased every month under the current Government. "Every month since this Government has been in office, the numbers have increased. "The latest figures for May show increases across every level of homelessness. Adult homelessness, child homelessness, singles, children, families, and pensioners. Advertisement "The constant rise in child homelessness is deeply concerning, and a direct result of Government failure. "The policies they are pursuing are failing, and in particular, they are failing children. What we need is a radical change in direction. Without that, my concern is we will continue to see record highs every month. "They are in denial about the scale of the emergency we are in. They are in denial of how their policies have caused this crisis, and they are spending far too much time blaming everybody else, for an emergency of their making." The Sinn Féin TD says the Government are now at risk of normalising homelessness, and is not taking into account the effect homelessness has on people. Advertisement "I think the Government is at risk of normalising ever rising levels of homelessness, but also the enormous impact of staying in emergency accommodation has on adults, and particularly children. "Every time I hear a Government minister or the Taoiseach say housing the homeless is the number one priority, the problem is you can't keep saying that when month on month, your actions and inactions are leading to an ever greater number of people being homeless. "Ultimately, the solution to this is accelerating the delivery of social and affordable homes, and also the kind of homes in the right place." Mr Ó Broin also voiced his concern over changes to the Rent Pressure Zones which were recently confirmed by the Government. Advertisement New tenancies created from March 1st, 2026 onwards will be set at market value and offer six-year minimum rolling tenancies. At the end of the six-year tenancy, the rent can be reset and 'put back to the market', meaning the first series of rent resets under the reforms will take place in 2032. Mr Ó Broin says he fears rents will increase to a point which people will not be able to afford under the new changes. "One of the big concerns about the Rent Pressure Zones from March next year, when the rules come in, we are going to see over a period of time, rents right across the private rental sector reset to market rents, and that is something renters will not be able to afford. "It is important to remember the reason rent regulations were introduced in the first place in 2016 is because rents in the private rental sector were increasing 20 per cent plus a year. "Families were unable to afford those rents, falling into rental arrears and then emergency accommodation. "The idea that dismantling that is the solution, is utter madness."
The Independent
39 minutes ago
- The Independent
Starmer's start as PM worse than Liz Truss, claims expert
Leading historian Sir Anthony Seldon has described Sir Keir Starmer 's start as prime minister as the most inept in a century, suggesting it is even worse than Liz Truss 's brief tenure. Mr Seldon criticised Sir Keir for lacking a clear plan, not consulting previous prime ministers, and having an unclear purpose for his leadership. Polling expert Professor Sir John Curtice agreed, stating it has been the "worst start for any newly elected prime minister, Labour or Conservative". Sir Keir recently admitted he was slow to address a growing rebellion over welfare reforms as he was focussed on foreign affairs like G7, Nato summits, and Middle East tensions. Despite significant backbencher opposition, Starmer is expected to win a crucial vote on welfare reforms on Tuesday.
Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
Another fake Net Zero market that nobody wanted is set to collapse
This week came news that UK bioethanol producer Vivergo Fuels is once again on the brink of closure – this time as a result of the UK's trade deal with the US, which removes tariffs on cheaper American bioethanol imports. Its rival, Ensus UK, faces a similarly uncertain future. Vivergo produces enough bioethanol to supply about 30 per cent of the UK's bioethanol needs for low carbon road fuels. Government rules require a percentage of bioethanol to be blended into petrol before it can be sold in order to reduce the carbon dioxide emissions associated with transport – considered to be one of the hardest to abate sectors. This is not the first time that Vivergo has faced closure. Back in 2018 it shut down for four months due to uncertainty over government support. It only reopened when the Government created a subsidy scheme known as the Renewable Transport Fuel Obligation (RTFO), which forces fuel suppliers to sell renewable fuels. Bioethanol producers earn RTFO certificates, which they sell to fuel suppliers to help them meet their quotas. And that's the heart of the issue: the UK bioethanol industry wasn't created to meet any actual consumer demand – it exists to satisfy a policy target: the use of green fuel in transport. Now it faces extinction thanks to a different policy priority: that of securing an advantageous trade deal with the US. American bioethanol is cheaper to produce. If it now enters the UK tariff-free, it will almost certainly displace UK-made bioethanol. But once the emissions from transatlantic shipping are factored in, much of the carbon benefit from the RTFO is wiped out. In 2023, the UK as a whole emitted 375 million tonnes of greenhouse gases, about 0.7 per cent of global emissions. Road transport accounted for roughly 100 million tonnes. Using UK bioethanol cuts transport emissions by around 82 per cent, but switching to US imports halves those savings. The impact on global emissions? Negligible – effectively defeating the purpose of the policy. This is a textbook example of how net zero policies can create artificial markets that collapse as soon as political winds shift. Bioethanol was never commercially viable on its own, it was simply created to tick a box. And now, it's likely to be sacrificed for the greater prize of trade access – a goal with arguably broader economic value to the nation. There's no easy compromise here. If the UK wants its trade deal with the US, it's unlikely to be allowed to impose carbon border taxes or other constraints on US ethanol without breaching the deal. But any industry that only survives because overseas competitors are excluded isn't genuinely viable. Unless there's a clear national interest – such as energy security – consumers shouldn't be forced to pay higher prices to prop up policy experiments. The public didn't ask for biofuels, they were pushed into using them by renewable fuels mandates. And now the protections that insulated the UK bioethanol industry from international competition are being lifted, the future looks bleak for the sector. But then, the emissions savings were so paltry on a global scale that it's difficult to see the point of the complex system of mandates, certificates and subsidies that prop it all up. Worse still, both Vivergo and Ensus run on wheat, and together consume up to 15 per cent of UK wheat production when operating at full capacity. Their closure would deliver another blow to a farming sector already reeling from successive policy missteps. This is a cautionary tale. When governments create fake markets, they distort industries, misallocate capital, and raise consumer costs – all for gains that may prove illusory. There are very good reasons why we don't have a centrally planned economy, and it's time ministers stopped pretending we do.
