Canada to boost defence spending to 2% of GDP this fiscal year, reach NATO target: Carney
Prime Minister Carney announces Canada will achieve the 2 per cent NATO target five years ahead of schedule and further accelerate funding in the coming years.
Canada will boost defence spending by billions of dollars to meet NATO's two per cent of GDP target this fiscal year, Prime Minister Mark Carney announced Monday, in a speech focused on 'threats from a more dangerous and divided world.'
The pledge comes ahead of next week's G7 summit, hosted by Canada in Kananaskis, Alta.
'We will further accelerate our investments in the years to come, consistent with meeting our new security imperatives,' Carney announced during a speech at the Munk School in Toronto.
'We will ensure every dollar is invested wisely, including by prioritizing made-in-Canada manufacturing and supply chains,' he added.
Canada has never met NATO's existing spending target, despite its 2014 pledge to do so, and has faced public pressure from member countries for years to meet its commitment.
NATO allies initially signed on to hit the two per cent target by last year — when former NATO secretary general Jens Stoltenberg then said the figure should be a floor instead of a ceiling — but former prime minister Justin Trudeau's government said Canada wouldn't get there until 2032.
Carney's new timeline comes well ahead of that 2032 goal, and of the 2030 target he pledged during the federal election.
Canada spending on submarines, aircraft, artillery
To reach the two per cent number, the federal government says it needs to spend an additional $9.3 billion beyond what it has already laid out in previous defence-spending plans.
Among the new spending — included in the government's supplementary estimates tabled Monday morning — are funding for Canadian Armed Forces salary increases, and to diversify Canada's partnerships beyond the U.S., among other line items.
Part of Carney's spending plan also includes Canada's participation in the $234-billion (€150 billion) ReArm Europe program, a commitment that was highlighted during the speech from the throne late last month.
The prime minister added it will help to diversify Canada's military suppliers with 'reliable European partners,' and saying later in the speech Canada is 'too reliant on the United States.'
'We should no longer send three quarters of our defence capital spending to America,' Carney said.
Canada is also expanding Canadian Coast Guard's mandate to better integrate it into Canada's NATO defence capabilities. Carney says it will 'better secure our sovereignty and expand maritime surveillance.'
The prime minister said Canada will be boosting its defence spending by investing in new submarines, aircraft, ships, armed vehicles and artillery. Carney said there will also be investments in new radar, drone and sensors to monitor the seafloor and the Arctic. The government has not laid out any details of those commitments, however, including specifically what it plans to buy or how much it'll cost.
'Our fundamental goal in all of this is to protect Canadians, not to satisfy NATO accountants,' Carney said.
Defence spending on NATO summit docket
Defence spending is expected to be a major focal point at the NATO summit in The Hague later this month, where Secretary General Mark Rutte has signalled he will propose an overall investment plan that would increase defence investment to five per cent of GDP — 3.5 per cent for core defence spending and 1.5 per cent in defence-related investments like infrastructure.
The most recent NATO figures show Canada spent 1.45 per cent of its GDP on defence in 2024. Most other NATO allies, 22 of the 32 member countries, meet or exceed NATO's current two per cent target.
According to National Defence, Canada is projected to spend $52.3 billion on defence in the 2025-26 fiscal year.
A report released last fall from the parliamentary budget officer (PBO) stated the federal government would need to spend $81.9 billion to hit the two per cent of GDP target by 2032-33.
But, according to the federal government, the PBO and NATO have differing methods for calculating GDP. The $9.3 billion in new spending announced Monday will get Canada past the two per cent mark, according to NATO's guidelines.
'None of it is going to be creative accounting,' Carney insisted, when asked by reporters on Monday afternoon about the difference in calculations and his ability to meet the spending target several years earlier than Trudeau had said was possible.
In a press conference on Parliament Hill Monday, Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre said his party supports getting to the two per cent target as soon as possible, and is in favour of additional funding for the military.
'That's why we're calling on the government to bring in a budget, because all of this will require a budget,' Poilievre said. 'A budget that not only puts this money forward, clearly identifies where it comes from, but cuts waste in bureaucracy, consultants, foreign aid, corporate welfare and other areas, so that the necessary increase in the military does not come as an inflationary burden on the backs of our Canadian taxpayers, who've been suffering for far too long.'
After criticism from the opposition for not tabling a spring budget, Carney has promised one is coming in the fall.
New defence policy coming
'Canada's Department of National Defence will immediately design a new defence policy that reflects both today's and tomorrow's threats,' Carney said.
The new policy comes just 14 months after Trudeau's government released 'Our North, Strong and Free: A Renewed Vision for Canada's Defence.'
With files from CTV News supervising producer Stephanie Ha
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Winnipeg Free Press
an hour ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
What are ‘nation-building projects' anyway?
Opinion The Canadian Press reports that 38 CEOs of Canadian energy companies signed a letter to Prime Minister Mark Carney, congratulating him for his election win and pitching policy measures like overhauling (read 'gutting') the Impact Assessment Act, scrapping federal emissions caps on oil and gas and repealing industrial carbon pricing. Carney met with them and thanked them for their communications. (Carney talks partnerships with energy execs, Free Press, June 2). Then, 13 premiers met with the PM to pitch their favourite projects which include pipelines and nuclear plants. The process sounds more like a high-stakes version of Dragons' Den, with the feds ready to dole out the public purse, than it does a thoughtful, serious assessment of the very real dangers that Canada faces — not just from the U.S. tariffs and the economy, but also from climate change. Couldn't the premiers smell the smoke emanating from the infernos blazing across the northern forests as they sat behind closed doors in a Saskatoon hotel room? Now the PM and cabinet will make decisions about which of these projects make the cut — which ones will be 'pre-approved' and fast-tracked. A few hints are leaking out: looks like nuclear will make the short list, along with 'decarbonized barrels of oil' — which is shorthand for as yet unproven carbon capture, but which sounds like a perfect oxymoron. What are the criteria for these decisions? Does anyone know? Will the public get that information? Will Parliament? Just a week before that, 130 civil society organizations from across the country, representing many thousands of Canadians, also wrote the PM, reminding him that the 'nation-building' energy and infrastructure projects that Canada needs will not only create good jobs and build the economy, but also respect Indigenous rights and protect the climate. Oil and gas development and pipelines will not meet these goals, never mind the threats of Alberta separation. Did Alberta Premier Danielle Smith not get the memo that several oilsands sites were evacuating due to wildfires? Oh, the irony). Nuclear builds are too slow to address the global warming crisis and nuclear is among the most expensive forms of electricity production. Taxpayer dollars can be invested way more efficiently in actual renewable energy sources (including efficiency and storage) — all available now and ready to be deployed, and regional and national grid interconnections that are so sorely needed. These are the best investment for energy supply, requiring less capital investment and providing the best return on the dollar in terms of energy production, job creation, and rapid greenhouse gas reduction. And imagine for a moment a remote nuclear plant engulfed in a wildfire. (Thinking here about Saskatchewan Premier Scott Moe who promotes 'small modular nuclear reactors' for remote communities while acknowledging at the time that his province 'cannot manage and handle a single other fire'). Oil, gas and nuclear projects are more properly 'nation destroying' projects. Ask any of the First Nations currently evacuating their homes and territories as climate change creates prime conditions for out-of-control fires. It's unlikely the PM will meet with civil society groups (though we did ask). Will he meet with and more importantly, hear the concerns of, First Nations worried that 'fast tracking' impact assessments will only run rough-shod over their rights and lands? As Assembly of Manitoba Chiefs Grand Chief Derek Nepinak put it 'We need to talk about these issues collectively… our inherent rights, treaty rights and human rights are at issue…' Also at issue: our children's future. How is it that we can be at this point in history where we know without a doubt what the impacts of climate change are — and yet our governments seem prepared to invest and go whole hog into the very same industrial development schemes that created the problem in the first place? If it's true as the International Energy Agency has stated that countries will be seeking non-fuel-dependent sources of energy and actually winding down fossil fuel infrastructure by 2030, why would Canada spend crucial resources (our money) on exactly these fuel dependent technologies? (For the record, nuclear is dependent on uranium and therefore not renewable). Can you say, 'stranded assets'? Not only are we at risk of betting the farm on unsustainable projects and creating even more economic chaos for the future, by not changing the development paradigm we put at risk the very building blocks and sustainers of life itself — water, air, forests, oceans, the ability to grow food. We owe it to future generations (as well as ourselves and especially those being drastically impacted by climate change today) to turn this ship around. The energy CEOs might not agree, but that's what our premiers should be calling for. That's what our new government should be determined to do. Anne Lindsey volunteers with the No Nukes MB campaign of the Manitoba Energy Justice Coalition and has been monitoring nuclear waste since the 1980s.

CTV News
3 hours ago
- CTV News
CTV National News: Former PM Chretien's advice on dealing with Trump
Watch Jean Chretien's advice to world leaders on how to deal with U.S. President Trump is to keep their cool, before joking about grabbing him by the neck.


CTV News
3 hours ago
- CTV News
Report paints Calgary's startup ecosystem in a positive light
The 2025 Global Startup Ecosystem Report has Calgary ranked inside the top 50 cities globally when it comes to having an emerging startup ecosystem. Loading the player instance is taking more time than usual Loading the player instance is taking more time than usual In the 2025 Global Startup Ecosystem Report, Calgary was ranked inside the top 50 cities globally when it comes to having an emerging startup ecosystem. Specifically, the report cites the city's talent affordability and 'bang for your buck' for startup companies setting up shop. While the results are a positive step forward, there's still a push to keep the momentum moving. 'I think one of the big things for us is unlocking the capital. There's a lot of wealth in our city, and I think for us, what we need to see is local investors invest in local companies,' said Brad Parry, president and CEO of Calgary Economic Development. 'And the second piece for us is procurement. We need Calgary companies to buy Calgary products and services from our startup and ecosystem players.' Parry says diversifying the city's economy into sectors like life sciences and agriculture has helped make Calgary a global up-and-comer.