logo
Live Updates: Trump Says He Hasn't Made Up His Mind on Iran Strikes

Live Updates: Trump Says He Hasn't Made Up His Mind on Iran Strikes

New York Times18-06-2025
Al Asad Air Base Many of the approximately 2,500 U.S. troops in Iraq are located at this Iraqi base.
Al Asad Air Base Many of the approximately 2,500 U.S. troops in Iraq are located at this Iraqi base.
Al Asad Air Base Many of the approximately 2,500 U.S. troops in Iraq are located at this Iraqi base.
Al Asad Air Base Many of the approximately 2,500 U.S. troops in Iraq are located at this Iraqi base.
Kuwait Five installations are located here. They can hold more than 13,500 troops.
Kuwait Five installations are located here. They can hold more than 13,500 troops.
Thousands of American troops could be in Iran's direct line of fire if President Trump joins Israel in attacking Tehran's nuclear program and military, as he said on Wednesday that he may or may not do.
Many would have only minutes to take cover from an incoming Iranian missile.
Experts expect that if Mr. Trump orders the American military to directly participate in Israel's bombing campaign, Iran will quickly retaliate against U.S. troops stationed across the Middle East.
'The Americans should know that any U.S. military intervention will undoubtedly be accompanied by irreparable damage,' Iran's supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, warned on Wednesday, according to state news media.
More than 40,000 U.S. active-duty troops and civilians are working for the Pentagon in the Middle East, and billions of dollars in weapons and military equipment are stored there. Over decades, both during and after war, the American military has fortified its defenses in the region, said Dana Stroul, the Pentagon's top official for Middle East policy during the Biden administration.
The United States further strengthened those defenses, she said, after Hamas's brutal attacks on Israel in October 2023, which set off a broader conflict between Israel and Iran's regional allies.
'In some ways, the U.S. military has absolutely set the theater to respond to Iranian attacks, should the regime choose to turn its missiles or activate its militias against U.S. forces,' Ms. Stroul said on Wednesday.
She added, 'The tipping point in whether this expands, is what decisions the United States makes in the coming days, with respect to partnering with Israel in offensive operations.'
Hundreds of, if not a few thousand, American troops are stationed elsewhere in the Middle East, including in Jordan, Syria and Oman, on bases run by those countries. The precise numbers weren't available as the Trump administration looks to trim its footprint in some places, like Syria.
Adel Abdel Ghafar, a senior analyst at the Middle East Council on Global Affairs in Doha, Qatar, predicted that American troops stationed in Iraq, Bahrain and Kuwait would be Iran's first targets. Nonessential American personnel and family have already been withdrawn from the embassies in those three countries.
Iran's proxy fighters in neighboring Shiite-majority Iraq and elsewhere pose a formidable ground threat to American military and diplomatic outposts, Mr. Abdel Ghafar said. And it would take only three or four minutes for a ballistic missile fired from Iran to hit bases in Gulf countries housing U.S. troops, he said.
'This gives much less time for air defenses' to intercept incoming missiles, he said, 'so it would be disastrous.'
Here is where American troops in the Middle East might be most vulnerable.
Iraq
As many as 2,500 American troops and military contractors are in Iraq, based in the capital, Baghdad, as well as in the northern Kurdish region and in the western desert. The Al Asad desert base, which is controlled by the Iraqi military, was targeted by Shiite forces backed by Iran earlier this week in drone strikes. American forces stationed there shot down the weapons.
The American military has a fraught relationship with the Iraqis, after the eight-year war and the occupation that ended in 2011, but U.S. troops were welcomed back just a few years later to fight Islamic State militants who had seized control of areas in the country's north and west. In 2020, the Trump administration ordered an airstrike that killed the commander of Iran's elite Quds Force, Maj. Gen. Qassim Suleimani, as he arrived in Baghdad to meet with Iraq's prime minister. The strike escalated tensions between Washington and Tehran.
Bahrain
The headquarters of the Navy's Fifth Fleet are in Manama, Bahrain, and host about 9,000 U.S. military and civilian personnel. Part of its mission is to ensure safe passage for commercial ships through the Strait of Hormuz, where 20 percent of the world's oil supply flows through. Iran has threatened to seed the strait with as many as 6,000 naval mines, a tactic meant to pin American warships in the Persian Gulf. It would also disrupt global oil trade, especially for Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates, which ship a lot of oil through the strait, as well as energy buyers like China and India.
Kuwait
Five bases in Kuwait, where about 13,500 American troops are stationed, have served for decades as an essential staging point for forces, weapons and military equipment on their way to battlefields around the world.
Military ties between Kuwait and the United States have remained strong since the Persian Gulf war of 1991. After Iraq invaded Kuwait in 1990, the United States led a coalition to contain Saddam Hussein's forces in the region and keep him from seizing Saudi Arabia. Within months, U.S. forces had chased Saddam's troops back into Iraq, liberating Kuwait. American troops have been based in Kuwait ever since.
More than a decade later, in 2003, U.S. and international troops used Kuwait as a launchpad to invade Iraq and oust Saddam.
Qatar
The Al Udeid Air Base in Qatar is the largest U.S. military site in the Middle East and is the regional headquarters for the U.S. Central Command, which oversees forces in the region. About 10,000 troops are stationed there.
The U.S. military has been using Al Udeid since the days after the Sept. 11 attacks, when it positioned planes there to target the Taliban and Al Qaeda in Afghanistan. Two years later, Al Udeid became the main U.S. air operations hub in the region. U.S. commanders used it to coordinate a wide variety of missions during the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, as well as strikes against ISIS in Syria. The Air Force has deployed a wide variety of aircraft there, from advanced fighters and long-range bombers to drones, transport planes and in-flight refueling tankers.
It also became the central evacuation point for tens of thousands of Afghans and Americans who fled Afghanistan in 2021 when the U.S. military withdrew.
United Arab Emirates
About 3,500 U.S. military personnel are at the Al Dhafra Air Base, outside Abu Dhabi, where the United States has deployed F-22 fighter jets in recent years, including to protect Emirati fuel tankers that were attacked by Iran-linked Houthi fighters in 2022.
The 380th Air Expeditionary Wing of the U.S. Air Force is based at Al Dhafra, from where it has launched combat operations against the Islamic State and the Houthis, and in Afghanistan. It also has been used as an intelligence-gathering and surveillance unit during the U.S. wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, as well as for aerial refueling.
Graphic by Daniel Wood .
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Bessent calls for internal review of Fed and 'deeper reforms' of big bank rules
Bessent calls for internal review of Fed and 'deeper reforms' of big bank rules

Yahoo

time17 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Bessent calls for internal review of Fed and 'deeper reforms' of big bank rules

Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent on Monday took aim at both the Federal Reserve and the rules the Fed enforces as a supervisor of big banks. He said on X that there should be a review of the central bank's $2.5 billion renovation of its headquarters and a review of its non-monetary policy operations, arguing that 'significant mission creep and institutional growth have taken the Fed into areas that potentially jeopardize the independence of its core monetary policy mission.' He posted the comments on the same day he spoke at the opening of a Fed conference designed to review the capital framework governing big banks. That conference continues Tuesday. There he made a separate call for 'deeper reforms' of the regulations governing the nation's biggest banks, arguing that 'outdated capital requirements' impose 'unnecessary burdens on financial institutions.' Specifically he suggested that regulators scrap a dual capital structure proposed during the last administration but never enacted, calling it 'flawed.' "We need deeper reforms rooted in a long-term blueprint for innovation, financial stability, and resilient growth," Bessent said in his remarks. Bessent is among the candidates being considered to replace Jerome Powell as chair of the central bank once Powell's term expires in 10 months. President Trump and other White House officials have been hammering Powell and the Fed over the slow pace of interest rate cuts, with none being made so far in 2025, as well as the costs involved in the Fed's $2.5 billion renovation of its headquarters complex along the National Mall in Washington. Bessent joined that chorus on Monday. 'While I have no knowledge or opinion on the legal basis for the massive building renovations being undertaken on Constitution Avenue, a review of the decision to undertake such a project by an institution reporting operating losses of more than $100 billion per year should be conducted,' Bessent said in his Monday post on X. Trump has considered firing Powell and has encouraged him to resign. Powell has said repeatedly that he intends to serve out his term as chair and that his removal is not permitted by law. Bessent on Monday expressed support for the Fed's independence on the subject of monetary policy, saying that autonomy is 'a jewel box that should be walled off' and that the Fed's independence 'is a cornerstone of continued US economic growth and stability.' But the White House has also made it known that it wants greater control over the Fed's operations outside monetary policy, including the supervision of the nation's biggest banks. Bessent earlier this year said he would be coordinating a broad re-examination of financial regulation, with an eye toward making it easier for banks to lend as a way of boosting the US economy. And he said again Monday that the Treasury would be playing a central role. "The department will break through policy inertia, settle turf battles, drive consensus, and motivate action to ensure no single regulator holds up reform," Bessent said of the Treasury. "We need deeper reforms rooted in a long-term blueprint for innovation, financial stability, and resilient growth." US regulators have already proposed one of the most dramatic rollbacks of bank capital rules since the 2008 financial crisis, saying last month they wanted to alter the so-called enhanced supplementary leverage ratio (eSLR). Banks have complained that this ratio penalizes them for holding lower-risk assets such as Treasury bonds. Doing away with it "should simplify bank capital management" and "that will bring down costs and help banks more effectively manage their capital levels," TD Securities analyst Jaret Seiberg said in a Tuesday morning research note. Even with proposed curtailing this leverage ratio, large banks would still be bound by their risk weighted capital constraints, Seiberg said. "This is not going to produce material capital relief for banks," Seiberg added. More regulatory changes for big banks could still be on the way. Michelle Bowman, the Fed's top banking regulator appointed by Trump, said in a speech last month that revisiting the eSLR requirement is just the start of broader capital rollback considerations. "More work on capital requirements remains, especially to consider how they have evolved and whether changes in market conditions have revealed issues that should be addressed," she said. Click here for in-depth analysis of the latest stock market news and events moving stock prices

White House's savage response as Hunter Biden drops 6 F-bombs in 30 seconds in rant about the border
White House's savage response as Hunter Biden drops 6 F-bombs in 30 seconds in rant about the border

New York Post

time18 minutes ago

  • New York Post

White House's savage response as Hunter Biden drops 6 F-bombs in 30 seconds in rant about the border

The White House savagely tore into Hunter Biden and his drug-addled past after the former first son managed to drop six f-bombs in just 30 seconds as he raged about President Trump's immigration crackdown. The 55-year-old son of former President Joe Biden went on the profanity-laden rant in a sit-down with YouTube personality Andrew Callaghan that aired Monday, arguing that the Trump administration's deportation blitz is a 'f–king crime.' At one point, the Biden scion had a fit as he suggested that booting migrants would leave no one to clear hotel rooms, wash dishes or tend gardens. Advertisement Hunter Biden rips the Trump admin and Democrats in a new interview. YouTube / Channel 5 with Andrew Callaghan White House spokeswoman Abigail Jackson swiftly picked up on Hunter's twisted priorities given the ongoing chaos caused by his dad's border policies. 'A CBP agent was just shot in the face by two criminal illegal aliens that Joe Biden let into the country but Hunter is more concerned about who is going to clean up his hotel room after his benders,' she said in an X post, referring to the Illegal migrant arrested in the shooting of an off-duty Border Patrol agent in New York City. Advertisement 'This sort of callous, self-interested maliciousness from the entire Biden Crime Family is exactly why Joe Biden left office with record-low approval ratings,' Jackson added in a statement to Fox News. It came after Hunter managed to fire off half a dozen profanities in a mere 30 seconds. 'Am I not supposed to feel for someone? Am I going to be like all these Democrats say, 'You have to talk about and realize that people are really upset about illegal immigration?' F–k you,' Hunter said. Inside El Salvador's notorious CECOT prison. EL SALVADOR'S PRESIDENCY PRESS OFFICE/AFP via Getty Images Advertisement 'How do you think your hotel room gets cleaned?' How do you think your hotel room gets cleaned? How do you think you have food on your f–king table? Who do you think washes your dishes? Who do you think does your f–king garden? 'Who do you think is here, by the f–king sheer f–king just grit and will, that they figured out a way to get here because they thought that they could give themselves and their family a better chance and [Trump's] somehow convinced all of us that these people are the f–king criminals.' Elsewhere in the three-hour interview, the younger Biden laid into White House deputy chief of staff of policy Stephen Miller — who is widely seen as one of the driving forces behind Trump's immigration agenda. Advertisement 'There is something f–ked up about that mother f–ker,' Hunter griped.

Yet another Trump ultimatum falls flat in Moscow
Yet another Trump ultimatum falls flat in Moscow

The Hill

time18 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Yet another Trump ultimatum falls flat in Moscow

President Trump's 50-day ultimatum is apparently the new two-week deadline. And now it is the latest White House demand to Moscow to fall flat. Last Tuesday, Russia rejected Trump's ultimatum. Deputy Foreign Minister Sergey Ryabkov said 'any attempts to make demands, especially ultimatums, are unacceptable to us. If we cannot achieve our goals through diplomacy, then the [war in Ukraine] will continue.' The Kremlin then promptly returned to its terror tactics of bombing Ukrainian cities with ballistic missiles and drones. The White House and mainstream media seem to have moved on. Ultimata from U.S. presidents do not seem to carry the same weight today as they once did. Words like 'Don't,' uttered by both President Joe Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris, had no deterrence on Iran. Nor did Trump's demand for an unconditional surrender. Tehran simply 'did,' then declared victory. President Theodore Roosevelt's 'walk softly and carry a big stick' proverb only carries weight if that big stick is used in a convincing manner. What the Kremlin needs right now is a punch in the face — not another 50 days to attack Ukraine. Trump's 50-day grace period essentially gives Russian President Vladimir Putin a license to kill and sets conditions for him to mount another offensive to dethrone Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky. Reports suggest that 160,000 Russian troops are massing along the frontlines and another 30,000 North Korean soldiers are preparing to deploy to Russia. It is not the American military that our adversaries have a lack of respect for — they know all too well what its capabilities are. No, it is the American commander-in-chief, who needs to be much harder on our adversaries than our allies. Trump may authorize more strikes but has yet to finish the task. The man who authored ' The Art of the Deal ' needs to start removing threats from the battlefield. Missing is the bold determination and sheer will to win that Generals Ulysses S. Grant and George S. Patton brought to the battlefield. De-escalation has become a principle of war for the White House, Foggy Bottom, and the Pentagon. Concerns over possible outcomes and counteractions have overcome the necessity of doing the hard right. Diplomacy has its place — just not with evil. Evil needs to be dealt with directly or it will come back stronger. We see the cost in Ukrainian civilian lives. Unenforced red lines are neither compelling nor convincing. Neither are two-week extensions, ransom payments, lifting of sanctions, or airstrikes on targets not posing threats. Our adversaries see these as examples of weakness, and they exploit them. Trump has continued Biden's least intrusive means strategy, and he opts to deliver strategic messages that our adversaries simply ignore. The result: The behavior that led to the strikes resumes — one step forward, two steps back. For example, Operation Rough Rider commenced on March 15 and concluded on May 5. U.S. Central Command stated the purpose of the campaign was to 'target Houthi rebels in Yemen in order to restore freedom of navigation and American deterrence.' During that period, CENTCOM reportedly struck more than 1,000 Houthi rebel targets in Yemen, expending upwards to 2,000 bombs and missiles. The strikes reportedly 'killed hundreds of Houthi fighters and numerous Houthi leaders … destroying multiple command-and-control facilities, air defense systems, advanced weapons manufacturing facilities, and advanced weapons storage locations.' But the strikes neither defeated nor deterred the Houthi rebels, who were still able to attack U.S. Naval vessels in the Red Sea and Gulf of Aden and launch ballistic missiles towards Israel throughout the operation. On May 4, a Houthi hypersonic missile managed penetrated Israel's missile defense system, impacting near the Terminal 3 parking lot at the Ben Gurion Airport, injuring eight and temporarily shutting down the airport. They still fire ballistic missiles towards Israel. The latest came on Friday. And they are still targeting and sinking commercial shipping in the Red Sea, including two last week — the Liberian-flagged, Greek-operated cargo ship, Magic Seas and the Liberian-flagged, Greek-operated Eternity C. Operation Midnight Hammer, the bomber strike on the Fordow nuclear facility in Iran, was precision at its absolute best. The B-2 pilots and their support package delivered their bombs precisely where intelligence said the targets were, while an additional 75 precision guided weapons fired by other U.S. aircraft and a guided-missile submarine found their targets at the Natanz and Isfahan nuclear facilities as well. But Iran was able to strike back, firing ballistic missiles at the mostly abandoned American Al Udeid Air Base in Qatar in retaliation, which were successfully intercepted by U.S. Patriot missile batteries. Then, like their Houthi counterparts, Iran declared victory and agreed to a U.S. brokered ceasefire to protect what was left of their nuclear and ballistic missile programs and their Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps from additional Israeli airstrikes. The Iranian government remains intact and the status of its nuclear program uncertain. It continues to threaten Israel and will likely, with the assistance of Russia and China, rebuild its air defense network and ballistic missile inventories. Surviving is winning. And its leaders now gloat under the protection of the Trump ceasefire. Iran, Russia, China, North Korea, and even Yemen know weakness when they see it, and they are prepared to exploit it. The U.S. has held Ukraine and Israel back on multiple occasions. It is time to take the handcuffs off and enable both to win. Moscow and Tehran should be the ones pleading with the U.S. to resume ceasefire talks. According to Foreign Affairs, 'Putin shows no intention of abandoning his objectives in Ukraine or ending the war. Even under the threat of new sanctions, he appears ready to go to extremes.' Russia has publicly rejected Trump's 50-day proposal, so the grace period must end now. Trump has an opportunity to back up his ultimatum immediately — not in September. Threats of sanctions will not sway Putin, but significant combat power will. Together, they may very well force Russia out of Ukraine and undermine China's sights on Taiwan. Trump must stop considering military assistance and economic sanctions and instead just provide it. Winning solves a lot of problems. Enabling Ukraine and Israel to defeat Russia and Iran sends a strong message to the likes of China and its delinquent North Korean neighbor.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store