
Teacher fired for wearing blackface to school as part of Halloween costume should be reinstated: arbitrator
A teacher fired nearly four years ago for wearing blackface makeup to school during Halloween celebrations should be reinstated, an arbitrator has found.
The decision, published last week, relates to an incident in October 2021 at Parkdale Collegiate Institute that left students shocked and upset, and had parents demanding action from the Toronto District School Board.
Gorian Surlan, a teacher at Parkdale Collegiate Institute, was fired in November 2021 after he came to class dressed in a "Halloween costume" wearing black clothing and his face painted in black makeup, with the intention of presenting "a scary persona, like that of a zombie," says the ruling from arbitrator Norm Jesin.
Surlan later filed a grievance under Ontario's Labour Relations Act that he was unjustly discharged from his employment. The Ontario Secondary School Teachers' Federation argued his case against the Toronto District School Board before Jesin.
While the teacher's actions warranted a "significant penalty," Jesin found that a lengthy suspension would have been more appropriate because the teacher showed remorse and tried to remedy the situation immediately.
"He quickly studied the issue, apologized for his actions and was clearly very contrite," Jesin wrote, also noting that the teacher had a long history of service with the school and had no prior discipline on his record.
"All of these facts demonstrate that a significant suspension would be likely to have the desired effect of ensuring that the grievor would be more sensitive to the cultural sensitivities that present in a diverse community and would be unlikely to commit such misconduct a second time."
Students reported incident
Jesin's decision says that on the day of the incident, both the principal and vice-principal saw Surlan in his costume when he arrived at school, but that they didn't realize he was wearing blackface makeup because he was wearing a black, hockey-style mask as well.
Later that morning, students took pictures of Surlan wearing blackface makeup in case, and three students approached the school's vice-principal to express their concerns while appearing "visibly upset," the decision says.
The teacher was then called into a meeting with the school's principal and vice-principal, who told the teacher that students were upset over seeing him in blackface. The teacher "did not seem to understand the issue but apologized anyways," Jesin wrote, adding that the teacher said he "was not trying to depict any person" but was attempting to portray a zombie.
The teacher was told to wash his face and return to class, which he did. That same day, he was placed on a leave of absence pending investigation.
That evening, the teacher went home and conducted some self-education on anti-Black racism and blackface. Jesin's decision also notes that Surlan was born in Serbia, and immigrated to Canada in 1992.
"He was horrified to learn about the history of blackface and the implications of his wearing of black make-up to cover his face," Jesin wrote.
The incident was later reported in multiple media outlets, and resulted in a huge uproar from the Parkdale community, Jesin's decision says.
The school board terminated Surlan on Nov. 15, 2021, on that basis that he knew or ought to have known that his conduct was contrary to board policy, and that the impact of his behaviour was "severe, long-lasting and irreversible."
Arbitrator accepts teacher had 'no idea' what makeup represented
In his ruling, Jesin said he agreed that Surlan's actions "caused a great deal of upset among the student body of the school as well as parents of those students and the community at large."
However, Jesin wrote that he accepts that Surlan — given his background of not being born in Canada — had "no idea" what his costume represented and that he was horrified and apologetic when he realized the gravity of his actions.
With these factors in mind, Jesin said he believed this was an appropriate case for reinstatement.
He also ruled that Surlan should be compensated for all wages and benefits lost from Oct. 1, 2023 onwards — the date Surlan completed a course on anti-Black racism and blackface that were recommended by the Ontario College of Teachers.
CBC Toronto has reached out to the Toronto District School Board and the Ontario Secondary School Teachers' Federation for comment.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CTV News
25 minutes ago
- CTV News
‘No absolute right to self-defence': What to know about defending yourself from intruder in wake of Ont. man being charged
A home invasion on Monday that resulted in criminal charges against a Lindsay, Ont. man, who police say assaulted an intruder and left them with life-threatening injuries, is raising questions around what constitutes reasonable force. The incident happened at around 3 a.m. on Monday at an apartment on Kent Street. Police have said that a 44-year-old man was asleep when he awoke to find an intruder inside his unit. An altercation then ensued, which resulted in the suspect sustaining serious, life-threatening injuries. Police later filed criminal charges against both the intruder and the tenant, prompting Ontario Premier Doug Ford to speak out about what he said was a 'broken' system. Federal Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre also took to social media on Thursday and appeared to draw attention to the case, saying: 'If someone breaks in, you deserve the right to defend your loved ones and your property - full stop.' Your home. Your family. Your life. If someone breaks in, you deserve the right to defend your loved ones and your property - full stop. — Pierre Poilievre (@PierrePoilievre) August 21, 2025 The case drew so much attention, in fact, that Kawartha Lakes Police Chief Kirk Robertson issued a statement responding to criticism of the arrest. 'Under Canadian law, individuals have the right to defend themselves and their property,' he wrote. 'However, it is important to understand that these rights are not unlimited in Canada. The law requires that any defensive action be proportionate to the threat faced. This means that while homeowners do have the right to protect themselves and their property, the use of force must be reasonable given the circumstances.' A lawyer for the tenant in Lindsay told Newstalk 1010 on Thursday that his client 'maintains his innocence' and believes that 'their conduct was lawful.' 'Everyone is concerned regarding the situation because everyone wants to feel safe in their home,' Steven Norton said. In the U.S., several states have the Castle Doctrine, which allows a person to use reasonable force, including deadly force, to protect themselves against an intruder. Canada doesn't have a similar law in place, though. CTV News Toronto spoke to several legal experts on what there is to know when to it comes to the legalities of protecting oneself against potential harm from an intruder. Self-defence claim may not be successful at trial Kent Roach, professor of criminal law at the University of Toronto, said that these types of cases have become more common since Canada's self-defence laws were changed in 2012. Since then, it has become more challenging to predict if a self-defence claim would be valid. Ultimately, it comes down to the police to determine if there are grounds to lay charges, he said. 'The homeowner can certainly advance an argument of self-defence and defence of property, but it may or may not be successful at trial, but that's the way things generally operate,' he said. A widely referenced example of this is the Supreme Court of Canada case, R. v. Khill, where, in 2016, Hamilton resident Peter Khill shot and killed a man who was in his pickup truck on his property. While Khill was acquitted by a jury, the Ontario Court of Appeal went on to overturn the verdict and ordered a new trial, based on the jury's instructions around Khill's role in the incident and whether there was a reasonable assessment of self-defence. The Supreme Court upheld the request for a new trial in 2021, citing some of Khill's actions like not turning on his porch light or calling 911. After a new trial in 2022, he was convicted of manslaughter and sentenced to eight years in prison. Roach said there are no different rules that apply whether someone is on your property or in your home, meaning 'there's no absolute right to self-defence.' 'It's ultimately up to a judge and jury to determine what is reasonable in the circumstances,' he explained. 'The accused will have the benefit of a reasonable doubt at trial if he or she acted in self-defence, but there are no guarantees, that just because someone thinks that the amount of force that they are using is reasonable to them, that's not really the issue,' he said. 'The issue is, is it reasonable to the judge or the jury.' Circumstances considered Criminal defence lawyer Joseph Neuberger said that Canadians have the right to protect themselves, their property or anyone in their home from a threat. However, he said that many cases hinge on what the suspect is using to commit the crime. 'If they're in possession of a knife, that's certainly a heightened risk where there is clear imminent risk of harm or death,' he said 'You're allowed to use fairly significant force to repel that individual and you may have no choice because you're protecting others in your home and yourself.' The same goes for if the introducer has a gun, which would put the homeowner at significant risk of harm or death. Neuberger said in that case a person could use significant force, including lethal force. He explained that it gets murky if there's another form of weapon outside of a knife or gun. Self-defence law makes allowances for an individual who's responding to a threat and could be extremely traumatized, resulting in them not being able to measure their level of force in the moment, he said. But if the person uses force with a baseball bat, for example, to disarm the intruder, and then continues to assault them, those circumstances are considered 'excessive force' and could result in aggravated assault charges, or more serious charges, against the homeowner, according to Neuberger. He noted that there's no duty to retreat in Canada, which means that if someone comes into your property, you don't have to run away. 'If there's imminent risk to you right away, you're allowed to response to that with reasonable force,' he said. He added that Canadians shouldn't want to be more like the U.S., because we have sufficient and broad enough self-defence laws that if an individual enters your property with a knife or gun and you are at serious risk of bodily harm or death, you can respond with lethal force. 'There will be all sorts of circumstances that will look at what weapon you were using, or if you're a lawful gun owner,' he said. 'We do have sufficient allowance and broadness of the law for those circumstances to happen. But we do not want to go down the road of the United States, where you strictly have the Castle law, in my opinion.'


Vancouver Sun
an hour ago
- Vancouver Sun
'It's pretty straightforward': Danielle Smith objects after Ontario man charged with assaulting home intruder
OTTAWA — Alberta Premier Danielle Smith is echoing Ontario counterpart Doug Ford's bafflement after learning that a Lindsay, Ont. man is facing criminal charges for injuring a home intruder. Smith was quick to dispense some folk wisdom to the wounded trespasser when asked about the incident on Thursday. 'Well if you don't want to get shot or beaten up don't break into people's houses. It's pretty straightforward,' quipped Smith, drawing a smattering laughter and applause from the room. 'We do expect that people are going to use a reasonable (amount) of force to defend themselves and their families, and I support that,' she continued. Start your day with a roundup of B.C.-focused news and opinion. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. A welcome email is on its way. If you don't see it, please check your junk folder. The next issue of Sunrise will soon be in your inbox. Please try again Interested in more newsletters? Browse here. Smith was speaking at the opening of a new provincial drug recovery centre in Calgary. Her remarks came a day after Ford blasted Ontario police for arresting the trespassing victim, lamenting that 'something is broken' in Canada's criminal justice system. The alleged intruder was already wanted by police for multiple unrelated offenses, including breach of probation, when he broke into the man's home in the early hours of Monday morning, according to court filings. Police arrived at the scene to find the intruder with serious, life-threatening injuries arising from an altercation with the resident, who now faces aggravated assault and weapons charges. Smith said the incident reflected a lingering Canada-wide problem with criminal recidivism, touching on every province and territory. 'We all have had instances where somebody has been released on their own recognizance and then been repeat offenders … so we know that this is a problem that needs to be solved through (federal) legislation,' she said. Smith said she hopes tough on crime legislation will be high on the agenda when Parliament resumes next month. The Alberta premier wasn't the only out-of-province politician to speak out on the incident. Federal Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre, Alberta's newest MP , shared a pithy reaction on social media earlier in the day. 'If someone breaks in, you deserve the right to defend your loved ones and your property — full stop,' wrote Poilievre. National Post rmohamed@ Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here .


CTV News
an hour ago
- CTV News
Man charged in alleged kidnapping in Airdrie has prior child porn convictions
Investigators believe a Calgary man accused of kidnapping a 12-year-old boy picked him up near the Cooper's Crossing neighbourhood in Airdrie on Monday evening. A Calgary man accused of kidnapping a 12-year-old boy in Airdrie had twice been convicted of child pornography-related offences, court documents show. Zain Alnoor Merchant, 37, is facing nine charges after RCMP say a child escaped an abduction when a group of teens arranged to meet the man in a To Catch a Predator-style scheme. ADVERTISEMENT Merchant's most recent charges include kidnapping, forcible confinement, sexual contact with a child and three counts of failing to comply with a prohibition order. According to investigators, the teens and the man exchanged messages over Snapchat before meeting in person near the Coopers Crossing neighbourhood in Airdrie on Monday evening. 'The investigation has revealed that there are numerous youth — ages 12, 13, so quite young — that have been involved in a 'catch the predators' scheme. So apparently this is a new scheme on social media,' said Cpl. Gina Slaney with Alberta RCMP. The boy willingly got into the man's vehicle, police say, and the man drive off with the teen still inside. The boy was able to escape when the vehicle stopped at a red light a short time later. Multiple teens and other witnesses phoned 911 and the man was later arrested in northeast Calgary. Police file photo Police (File photo) (Jordan Kanygin, CTV Calgary) 'In my knowledge, this has not been done before here in Airdrie. In my service time of 23 years, I haven't been involved in a similar investigation where we have somebody setting up To Catch a Predator or anything along those lines,' Cpl. Christopher Hrynyk of the Airdrie RCMP said Wednesday. 'This is a very unique incident,' he added. The Internet Child Exploitation (ICE) unit confirmed the accused had previously been the subject of multiple of investigations. Previous convictions Court documents obtained by CTV News show Merchant was first charged with possession of child pornography in May of 2021. He was convicted and sentenced to two years in prison in March of 2022. Documents also show Merchant was sentenced to 11 months in jail in September of 2023 for accessing child pornography. Part of his previous sentencing includes orders prohibiting Merchant from communicating with anyone under the age of 16 without parental supervision, which he is accused of breaching. Duty counsel appeared briefly in Airdrie court on Thursday afternoon on Merchant's behalf. He remains in custody.