Unite could move to disaffiliate from Labour in future, union boss warns
Unite general secretary Sharon Graham criticised the Deputy Prime Minister after her union voted to suspend Ms Rayner's membership on Friday.
Speaking on BBC Radio 4's Today programme on Saturday, Ms Graham said: 'Angela Rayner refuses to get involved, and she is directly aiding and abetting the fire and rehire of these bin workers, it is totally and utterly abhorrent.'
At their conference in Brighton, Unite members also voted to 're-examine' their relationship with Labour.
Unite is one of a number of unions which are affiliated with the Labour Party, and pay hundreds of thousands of pounds towards it each year, as well as making donations to individual Labour MPs.
Ms Graham told the BBC that re-examining the union's relationship with Labour could mean disaffiliation, potentially leaving the party without a major donor it has previously relied upon.
Unite members have to see that the fee to affiliate with Labour is 'worth something', she said.
Ms Graham added: 'At this present moment in time, it is hard to justify it, if I'm being honest.
'Would that money be better spent on frontline services for my members?
'But the decision will be a serious decision.
'It's not a rash decision.'
Such a decision would go to a rules conference of the union, she said, adding that she was 'having pressure to have an emergency rules conference, which would mean we would disaffiliate'.
Ms Graham said: 'If it was me and I had a major backer like Unite, that has everyday people in it, remember, this was a vote of members at the parliament of our union, that were saying that we don't believe that Labour defends workers in the way that we thought they would, we believe that they're making the wrong decisions, I would be concerned about that.'
After Unite announced it had suspended the Deputy Prime Minister's membership, a source close to Ms Rayner said she had already resigned her membership of the union in April.
The union boss suggested Ms Rayner may have attempted to do a 'Houdini act' in recent months by leaving Unite.
Membership is counted in quarters of the year, Ms Graham said, and the Deputy PM was a member as of the March records.
She added: 'Now, if she has over the last couple of weeks, because she's seen the mood music, because this isn't the first time that we've discussed that we're not happy with what's going on, then she may well have done that.'
Unite also voted on Friday to suspend the union membership of John Cotton, the Labour leader of Birmingham City Council, and other union members on the authority.
The strikes have resulted in unsanitary conditions throughout the city, with large piles of rubbish in the streets.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Spectator
23 minutes ago
- Spectator
Can Rachel Reeves be trusted not to bring in a wealth tax?
The government is briefing that Rachel Reeves is ruling out a wealth tax, and won't surrender to pressure from the left on the Labour backbenches to raid the assets of the rich. It will only accelerate the exodus of the wealthy from the UK, they say. It won't raise any serious money. And just about every other country that has tried it has had to abandon it. That may reassure a few millionaires anxiously scanning property websites in Dubai and the Caribbean. But there is just one catch: the Chancellor has broken every other promise she has made so far – so why not this one as well? Reeves will almost certainly have to break her election pledge not to raise any of the three main taxes The spin could hardly be clearer. Lord Kinnock, the former Labour leader who in many ways still speaks for the soul of the party, may have backed a wealth tax, suggesting a 2 per cent annual levy on fortunes over £10 million, and it may have been backed by an increasing number of MPs. Even so, the Chancellor is standing firm. She is not going to go anywhere near it. It will damage the economy too much, and countries such France, Ireland and Denmark have tried wealth taxes and quickly concluded that they don't work. The only reason Reeves is not ruling it out in public, apparently, is because taxes such as a capital gains tax, which could be construed as a levy on wealth, may go up, and she doesn't want to be boxed in. The better-off can breathe a sigh of relief. It is not going to happen. But why would anyone believe Reeves any more? She told us she was going to scrap the winter fuel allowance, but reversed that after losing a by-election. She told us she was going to reform welfare, but caved in to pressure from the left of her party. She told us she was not going to raise taxes on 'working people' but raised them on employer's National Insurance instead, which amounts to the same thing. And she told us her tax rises last autumn would not be repeated, but now it is clear she will raise them again in October. The list goes on and on. Reeves shamelessly breaks every promise she makes. It is hard to understand why this one will be any different. With the fiscal mess getting worse and worse, Reeves will almost certainly have to break her election pledge not to raise any of the three main taxes. A 2 per cent increase in either the basic rate of income tax or VAT is the only real way to bring in the money she needs. And yet, with ordinary working people forced to pay more, surely the left will demand a wealth tax in the interests of 'fairness' and 'social justice'? Against that backdrop, it may be the only way to hold the party together. Reeves can spend the summer briefing that is not going to happen – but she is no more likely to keep that promise than any of the others.
New Statesman
an hour ago
- New Statesman
The opportunity of expanding free school meals
Photo by School Food Review Last monthmarked a defining moment for the government. Coming up to their one-year anniversary in office, Labour took their most meaningful step yet towards honouring their manifesto commitments to break down barriers to opportunity and to make this the healthiest generation of children ever. The relentless combined efforts of celebrities such as Marcus Rashford, Jamie Oliver and Emma Thompson, leading health and education experts, young people and parents, politicians across the political spectrum, many NGOs including the Feed the Future campaign (an initiative run by the School Food Review), all finally culminated in a game changing commitment from government; Kier Starmer announced that all children in families receiving Universal Credit in England will become able to register for free school meals, helping an estimated 500,000 children who previously did not meet the criteria to qualify despite living in poverty. 'A few weeks ago, I met with Stephen Morgan and told him straight: the current system is broken — too many kids are falling through the cracks. So hearing the government actually listened feels like a huge step forward. But this isn't the end. We need proper investment in food quality, shorter queues, longer lunchtimes, and canteens that don't feel chaotic,' said Yusuf, a Bite Back Campaigner. This investment will be genuinely life changing for the children impacted. Over the years we have heard haunting stories of children hiding in the playground or pretending to eat out of empty lunchboxes because they're too embarrassed to let anyone see they can't afford anything for lunch, and teachers digging into their own pockets to give hungry children some food. Hopefully this will now come to an end. But expanding Free School Meals is not just a fair intervention; it's a smart economic one. Children who are not distracted by their stomachs rumbling from hunger do better at school, ultimately resulting in higher earning potential, a stronger workforce and better off economy. To realise this full potential, a clear next step should be to automatically register children who qualify, removing the unnecessarily arduous application process which currently prevents many eligible children from benefitting. Beyond this, there is an exciting prospect for government to make their investment in Free School Meals go even further. Ministers would be wise to recognise the scale of the opportunity before them and seize the chance to revolutionise school food. With children spending 190 days a year in school, the school food system offers huge potential just waiting to be tapped into. Subscribe to The New Statesman today from only £8.99 per month Subscribe A healthy school lunch can provide essential nourishment for children to grow up strong and healthy. The need for this is undeniable when looking at the latest worrying government stats on overweight and dental decay in children as young as five years old. With children on average consuming half the recommended intake of fruit and veg and twice the maximum recommended intake of sugar, improving the quality of what our children are given to eat in school creates a real opportunity to turn the tide on children's health. 'As a parent, I'm thrilled the government is extending free school meals. This is such a huge step forward – every child deserves a proper, nutritious meal to help them learn, play and enjoy their school day. I'd love to see the government go even further to improve the quality of food offered to children, especially in secondary schools where the options can be really hit or miss,' said Mandy, a Sustain Children's Food Ambassador. Thankfully, government has also announced a review of the School Food Standards – the very outdated, mandatory-but-not-enforced guidance intended to help schools serve children food that is healthy, but in need of ambitious changes to deliver this aim. To really be effective, monitoring of compliance is also needed to hold schools to account and support given to them when falling short. Even better, these changes will make expanding Free School Meals deliver even greater long-term financial savings to our drowning healthcare system. Government could go even further still in their ambition. School food creates an ideal opportunity for government to demonstrate some much-needed support for British farmers by updating the rules on procurement, simultaneously benefiting local economies while ensuring our children are eating more minimally processed foods produced here in the UK. The power of food in shaping our society should never be underestimated. The culture created in school canteens, eating together and trying new foods, can foster community and establish healthy eating habits that will stick with children for life. If government choose to be bold, this could be the first step in unlocking the full potential of school food and turning it into a real national asset. Related
The Herald Scotland
3 hours ago
- The Herald Scotland
If Labour and SNP won't push for change, populists will
What mainstream parties lack is the bite. The impetus to be unashamedly radical with the powers of the parliament to introduce wealth taxes on income, property and assets. But there's some new players in the game. 'New' is perhaps stretching it a bit given Jeremy Corbyn is hardly a fresh face to political proceedings. But his new party may be. And in the other corner, we have the Reform steam train pulling into town. Announced a few weeks ago by former Labour MP Zarah Sultana, the ex-Labour leader and Ms Sultana look set to lead a new left leaning political party. We have few details, if any, on the policy platform this party will stand on. We don't even have a name. But that's hardly been a barrier when, according to YouGov, 18% of Britons would consider voting for them already and other polls put them neck and neck with Labour at a UK level. Will voters flock to a new party led by Jeremy Corbyn? (Image: PA) That tells us two things that should send alarm bells ringing in Labour HQ. Firstly, yes, polls are fickle and being the party of government is never a popularity contest but if you're neck and neck with a party of no-name and the haunting spectre of your ex-leader is looming large over you, you've got some serious reflecting to do. Secondly, in the process of that reflection, the penny may finally drop that appeasing the right-wing of the electorate isn't where electoral salvation will be found. Becoming a pale imitation of the Tories or Reform, with the Prime Minister himself cosplaying their patter with his 'island of strangers' immigration speech – words he has since admitted regret over – won't turn his ship around. Read more Roz Foyer: It's been abundantly clear that working people are searching for a radical solution to their ills. Look at the rallies that we saw the length and breadth of the country during the cost-of-living crisis demanding an urgent solution to sky-high bills, increasing inflation and rising mortgage payments. The Enough is Enough movement lit a fire in folks' bellies. The momentum was there. The people turned out. Rallies in every city and town, from village hall to community centre, clearly looked for an alternative to what is being served by mainstream politicians in Westminster and in Holyrood. It was a tremendous, heartening collective of energised working class people looking for an alternative, but rallies alone can't maintain the momentum, and those who turned out in their thousands drifted back to either voting for one of the mainstream or not voting at all. Perhaps this new project can be different. Time will tell. But this could have implications as we hurtle towards the Scottish Parliament elections next year. Scottish Labour and the SNP now find themselves at a crossroads. They can either step forward with a bold, progressive vision that speaks to working people, or retreat into the familiar comfort of caution. If they choose the latter, they risk not only losing ground to Reform UK on the right but potentially ceding space on the left to a new political force that may well speak the language of trade unionists, campaigners and working-class communities more vociferously than they do. For Anas Sarwar, if he wishes to be the next First Minister and stave off the threat of Reform and a potential challenge from a new left project then he must act as the workers' champion. [[Scottish Labour]] must show that it is ready not just to manage [[Holyrood]] but to lead in the interests of Scotland's working-class. That it will build a Scotland where workers' rights are protected – through the devolution of employment law; where unions are seen as partners in progress, not problems to be sidelined; and where public services are fully funded and [[pub]]licly owned. Is it time for John Swinney to reflect on the SNP's current policies? (Image: Gordon Terris) For John Swinney, if he wants to be seen as more than a First Minister that steadied the ship, then he must be bolder. In an era of low-growth and stagnant living standards it isn't enough to be all things to all sides. You can't bring down energy bills while giving unconditional support to the private companies that run our energy system. You can't bring down rents while exempting developers from rent controls; and you can't build first-class [[pub]]lic services while cutting more than 12,000 [[pub]]lic sector workers. It's about offering hope. Hope means confronting inequality. It means redistributing wealth. It means building homes, raising wages, investing in care and green unionised jobs and giving people real power over their lives and communities. It means collective bargaining, workplace democracy and an end to exploitative employment. If Labour and the SNP won't lead that charge, then others will. We're already bearing witness to it. Reform has stolen some of the clothes of the left. Farage's bombastic promises on re-opening mining pits and nationalising steelworks, whilst pledging to reinvigorate high streets and bring jobs into local communities that have been left behind by deindustrialisation, is striking a chord with folk who, otherwise, were disposed to voting for left-leaning parties. Read more Roz Foyer: Now, of course, this is the quintessential privately educated, super-rich career politician trying to speak the language of working people. But understandably when someone who isn't Labour, Tory or the SNP promises the world to folk who are feeling disenfranchised or sick of politicians not delivering change, people will gravitate. The message is therefore simple: to those drafting Scottish Labour's and SNP's 2026 manifesto: you are running out of time to show you're serious. You can't defeat the far-right by chasing their rhetoric. Nor can you dismiss demands from the left as irrelevant. The only path forward is to offer a vision worth voting for: a Scotland of fairness, dignity and collective strength. Roz Foyer is the general secretary of the STUC
