Why King Charles' Historic Speech in Canada Could Have 'Gone Off the Rails' (Exclusive)
King Charles' Canada trip included a speech to Parliament that championed the country's independence amid tensions with the United States, a key U.K. ally
Royal experts tells PEOPLE that the monarch "could give a master class in diplomatic relations" and his speech was "pitch perfect"
The King recently invited President Donald Trump to the U.K. for a state visitKing Charles' visit to Canada included a speech that championed the country's independence without escalating current tensions with the United States, and royal experts say the monarch could "give a master class in diplomatic relations."
On May 27, the King and Queen Camilla attended the State Opening of Parliament in Ottawa, where the sovereign gave a historic speech in English and French. All eyes were on King Charles and his address, which carefully navigated his role as Canada's head of state and the U.K.'s allyship with the U.S. amid Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney's recent election. His victory was widely viewed as a rejection of President Donald Trump's agenda, including his push for higher tariffs and his remarks that Canada could be "merged with the U.S." and become the '51st state.'
Ailsa Anderson, former press secretary to the late Queen Elizabeth, tells PEOPLE that King Charles pulled it off.
'Clearly, the government wrote it for him, but I liked the personal touches," she says. "Canada was one of the countries he wanted to go to first. But then he had the cancer diagnosis, so it had to be postponed. From my own experience, the late Queen always got an incredibly warm welcome when she visited. And he had been 19 times before as Prince of Wales, so it's a country he knew really, really well."
Anderson said that the King "could give a master class in diplomatic relations," adding, "It was a tricky tightrope to read, but I think he did it."
King Charles subtly addressed the strained relationship with the U.S. but stressed the strengths of Canada, quoting their anthem, "The True North is indeed strong and free!" The speech also came in the wake of the monarch's invitation for President Trump to come to the U.K. for a state visit.
"The speech was really well handled," says Anderson. "It could have gone off the rails, and it didn't.'
"The speech was pitch perfect," royal historian Dr. Ed Owens, author of After Elizabeth: Can the Monarchy Save Itself? tells PEOPLE. "What he doesn't want to do is jeopardize the future state visit to the United Kingdom by [President] Donald Trump."
'What was most remarkable about it was that it tackled the Canada-U.S. relationship head-on," Owens continues. "It talked directly about the relationship between the two countries, the importance of that relationship evolving along the lines of mutual respect and the importance of economic and defense cooperation."
Can't get enough of PEOPLE's Royals coverage? to get the latest updates on Kate Middleton, Meghan Markle and more!
Royal author Sally Bedell Smith tells PEOPLE that King Charles "deftly threaded the needle and handled everything really well."
"His message to Canada and its southern neighbor is that there is something very distinctive about Canada and emphasized the multi-cultural heritage," she says. "The very fact that half of it was in French underlined that. For the Canadians, it was very good because it underlined how different culturally Canada is from the U.S."
She adds, "He did the monarchy a lot of good because he emphasized correctly how deeply entwined Canada is with the crown. It is something that distinguishes Canada from the United States."
Bedell Smith says Trump's comment about Canada becoming the "51st state" had to be taken seriously.
"It could never have come to pass. But Trump has said it enough and, if nothing else, the elegant way Charles gave a history lesson to the world and one person in particular, puts to rest that notion of what Trump called a wonderful marriage with the United States," she says.
Catherine Mayer, author of Charles: The Heart of a King, says that for some people who might have previously been skeptical about the King, he has now become a beacon who expresses sentiments that they now agree with.
"To those who value it, a monarchy most shows its value in times of turbulence – and we're in a time of extreme turbulence. In a historical context, people always said of [his mother] Elizabeth that she was a fixed point and her father performed that role during the Second World War,' Mayer says.
'We have at the helm a man, who is old enough and experienced enough, and seems to be saying the right things," she adds. "This is somebody who's looking out on the world with decades of experience and, in theory, understanding."
"He looks like a steady and fixed point. When you think how difficult his reputation has been in terms of his comparisons with Elizabeth, that is quite a move."
The Governor General of Canada usually gives the speech from the throne on the monarch's behalf and sets out the government's agenda, and the speech has only been made by the sovereign once before — by Charles' late mother, who did so in October 1957.
Carney asked King Charles to give the speech this year. In doing so, the King is drawing on his extensive diplomatic experience gleaned from more than five decades of frontline public service. He must reflect the policies and priorities of the prime minister, demonstrating his solidarity with the government and the people of the nation he serves as head of state.
Read the original article on People
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
41 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Official: Toyota to build GR Corolla in UK
Toyota will build the GR Corolla hot hatch in the UK from next year in a bid to cater to increasing demand. Confirming this week's report from Reuters, the Japanese manufacturer said it had chosen the Corolla plant in Burnaston, Derbyshire, to boost GR Corolla production and preparations had been under way since last year. The hot Corolla will be the first GR model to be built outside Japan. Toyota said Burnaston – Toyota Manufacturing UK – was a natural fit because of the capability of the factory and its staff. It also pointed to the "deep motorsport culture" in the UK aligning with its GR (Gazoo Racing) sub-brand. The business case was almost certainly swayed by the fact that Burnaston also has a large and ready supply of Corolla bodies and ancillaries. Toyota added that the decision comes as part of a wider production overhaul aimed at accelerating production and customer delivery times. Indeed, GR Corolla buyers in the US have typically faced long waiting lists and dealer-added cost mark-ups since the car's launch in 2022, owing to strong demand for the model. Production and investment levels will be announced by the firm at a later date, but Reuters previously said it would cost £41 million to add the new line at Burnaston and that would give a capacity of 10,000 cars annually. Reuters added that Toyota's Motomachi plant in Japan – the so-called GR Factory, responsible for output of the GR Corolla, GR Yaris and GR86 – is currently at full capacity. It assembled 25,000 GR cars last year, of which around a third were Corollas. As well as boosting overall output of GR Corollas, the addition of UK production will surely give Toyota additional flexibility to build other models at Motomachi. It could ramp up GR Yaris production, for example, or add entirely new models at the factory. As previously reported by Autocar, Toyota-owned Lexus is priming a new flagship sports car that is expected to compete in GT3 racing series from next year. It is most likely that Motomachi would host assembly of this model, given it previously housed its predecessor, the LFA supercar. The GR division has also been working on an all-new Celica coupé and is thought to be considering replacements for the MR2 (discontinued in 2007) and Supra, plus a Mazda MX-5 rival. Although the plan to boost GR Corolla production through the UK has not been informed by US president Donald Trump's tariffs, given it pre-dates Trump's presidency, the decision to export from the UK surely benefits the company on that front. The US currently charges a tariff of 25% on all cars imported to the country from abroad, including Japan. However, the UK recently agreed to negotiate a deal that will cut the fee for its exports to 10%, within a national quota of 100,000 cars. Final details have yet to be confirmed but at present Toyota would have to pay a smaller fee on UK-built GR Corollas than on those from Japan. The prospect of adding production in the UK also lends weight to the possibility that the GR Corolla – currently offered in only a handful of markets, including the US and Japan – could be set for a launch in Europe. Prototypes were last year spotted testing at Germany's Nürburgring, hinting at a launch. A spokesperson suggested it was standard procedure to test global products at the circuit but did not deny the prospect. Toyota currently sells the GR Yaris and the GR Supra in Europe, the GR86 having been killed off in that market (including the UK) by the European Union's GSR2 safety regulations. The Supra is soon to follow. Regardless, the plan to produce GR Corollas in the UK will come as welcome news to staff at the Burnaston plant, which last year built its five millionth car since opening in 1992. In a statement, Yoshihiro Nakata, president and CEO of Toyota Motor Europe, said: 'We are proud that TMUK, our first plant in Europe, has also been selected as the first overseas Toyota plant to produce GR vehicles, securing this expansion project for TGR worldwide. We very much appreciate the historical support and recognition of the United Kingdom and would like to continue to contribute to UK society as a 'Best in Town' company.' ]]>
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Ukrainian drones destroyed Putin's bombers. A secret smuggling operation made it possible
It hardly seemed credible. Drone after drone, emerging from the top of a shipping container parked by the side of an unremarkable road somewhere deep inside Russia. Each tiny device buzzed as it rose laden with explosives on its kamikaze mission to destroy some of the Russian military's most prized assets. As they flew overhead, filming their progress, their targets came into view: rows of strategic bombers, some capable of carrying nuclear weapons. Ukraine's domestic intelligence agency, the SBU, said it was responsible for the attacks on four bases, and a security official said a total of 41 Russian warplanes worth some $7 billion were hit. The attack comes at a critical juncture in the war, with Donald Trump's peace plan hanging by a thread. But the extraordinary story of how the drones were deployed to launch their attack started many months earlier. Over a period of weeks, they were smuggled into Russia under the supervision of the SBU, which presumably had to alter its targeting plans after Russia relocated the bulk of its strategic bomber fleet. The drones were then concealed inside special containers placed inside commercial cargo lorries whose roof panels had been modified to retract at the touch of a remote control button. By all accounts, the drivers had no idea about the nature of the dangerous cargo they carried. Credit: Telegram / russianocontext Local residents near the Olenya base in Russia's far north described watching a driver running around in panic as FPV drones repeatedly launched from the back of his lorry. He later told police that he had been instructed to park his vehicle in a lay-by near the town of Olenegorsk where somebody would meet him. Footage from elsewhere in Russia showed drones rising from the back of another lorry as passers-by stood by helplessly. It was not the first time that lorries had been used by the Ukrainians in the war. A truck carrying explosives was remotely detonated to help bring down part of the Kerch Bridge connecting Crimea to the Russian mainland in 2020. But this was rather more sophisticated, with reports that the drones had been trained using artificial intelligence to hit the weakest points of the bombers parked along the aprons of the airbases. Fearing Ukraine's growing strike capacity, Russia had only weeks earlier moved many of its strategic bombers to bases like Olenya and Belaya, 1,000km and 2,500km from the front line, where it was assumed they would be well beyond the enemy's reach. Other bases in Ryazan and Ivanovo were also targeted, both of which are within 600 miles of the Ukrainian border. For the Russian air force, the planes targeted were prize assets: the iconic Tupolev Tu-95 'Bear', a long-range strategic bomber capable of carrying both nuclear and conventional warheads; the Tu-160 'Blackjack', the largest combat aircraft in the world, and the Tu-22M3 'Backfire', the supersonic strike workhorse of the fleet. The Russians, however, had not counted on Ukraine's Mossad-like ingenuity nor their desperation to strike at the long-range bombers that had inflicted so much destruction and bloodshed on its cities and people. For the most part, Operation Spiderweb, as it has been designated, did not rely on long-range drones or missiles, but instead on small, hand-held first-person view drones of the kind that has proved so effective on the battlefield. Russian military bloggers were quick to liken it to the Japanese surprise attack on Pearl Harbour in 1941 An exaggeration, clearly — yet in terms of chutzpah, in terms of scope and quite possibly in terms of damage, Ukraine's near-simultaneous attacks on four airfields deep inside Russia marks an unprecedented moment in the war. If Ukrainian officials are to be believed, as many as 40 of Russia's most sophisticated, expensive and destructive strategic bombers were eliminated in little more than a couple of hours. Such claims await the confirmation of an independent battle damage assessment, yet whatever the real number is there can be little doubt what a humiliating blow Ukraine has inflicted on Russia – or what a powerful message Kyiv has sent its allies in the West. For night after night before the surprise assault, Ukraine's cities had reeled under some of the most intense Russian bombardment of the war. Dozens had died, children among them, yet there was no sign of the Kremlin relenting. As his envoys prepared to present his peace terms at a second round of negotiations in Istanbul, Vladimir Putin seemed determined to project Russia's total military dominance. So confident does he remain that his forces will prevail on the battlefield that the Russian president contemptuously ignored requests to share his proposals with Kyiv in advance. Yet hours before the talks were due to begin, Volodymyr Zelensky, the Ukrainian leader, had a pointed message of his own to deliver. He had been involved in Operation Spiderweb from its conceptualisation 18 months ago. There had been coordinated attacks on Russian airfields before. On the night of August 13 last year, Ukraine unleashed what was then its largest drone assault of the war on Russian territory, striking four airbases in Kursk, Voronezh and Nizhny Novgorod. Yet these bases were all within a few hundred miles of the Ukrainian border. Operation Spiderweb was conceived on a much, much grander scale. On the night before it was initiated, Ukraine had suffered perhaps its most intense airstrikes of a bloody week, with officials in Kyiv saying that 472 drones and seven ballistic and cruise missiles had struck targets across the country, including the capital. By Sunday morning, Ukraine appeared to have exacted a measure of revenge after two transport bridges were blown up in the neighbouring regions of Bryans and Kursk just as trains were passing. Seven people were killed, Russians officials said, blaming Ukraine. Yet these attacks were but a prelude. Among the planes destroyed, Ukrainian intelligence officials said, were not just Tu-95 and TU-22M3 bombers but also an A-50 'Mainstay', one of just a handful of Airborne Early Warning and Control aircraft Russia has left in its arsenal. The A-50, worth an estimated £230 million, is a flying radar and command post that is vital for coordinating fighter jets and air defences as well as for situational awareness. They are thought to be irreplaceable. According to Ukrainian intelligence officials, all those knowingly involved in the operation have returned safely home, their mission accomplished in the most astonishing way.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
2 No-Brainer Artificial Intelligence (AI) Stocks to Buy Hand Over Fist During the TACO Trade
Close analysis of President Trump's tariff rhetoric has shed light on some interesting patterns in the stock market. Semiconductor stocks have proven vulnerable during this period of new tariffs, but buying the dip could be a smart idea. Cloud infrastructure is another area that has strong long-term tailwinds as the AI narrative continues to chug along. 10 stocks we like better than Nvidia › As of closing bell on May 29, the S&P 500, Nasdaq Composite, and Dow Jones Industrial Average have each generated roughly breakeven returns on the year. Normally, returns this mundane wouldn't be celebrated. But when you consider that each of the major stock market indexes declined by double digits just a month ago, getting back to even seems like a win. One of the more interesting aspects of the price movement in the stock market this year is annotating precisely when major volatility occurred. According to recently published data, it appears that the market's most pronounced declines and gains throughout 2025 can be traced back to major announcements from Washington, D.C. Going a little deeper, whenever President Donald Trump has announced new tariff policies, the market reacted negatively. But when he has eased the pressure, stocks experienced sharp rebounds. This dynamic has become known as the TACO trade -- which stands for "Trump always chickens out." Considering the tariff situation is still very much ongoing, I suspect the capital markets will continue operating under heightened levels of uncertainty. Nevertheless, I see two no-brainer artificial intelligence (AI) stocks that look like great buys right now -- regardless of TACO trade volatility. After all, trading based on what you think Trump may or may not do next is a short-term and risky approach to investing, but focusing on solid long-term opportunities amid the chaos is a wise choice. Let's explore which stocks smart investors may want to consider buying the dip in as the TACO trade continues to make waves. The first AI stock on my list is semiconductor king Nvidia (NASDAQ: NVDA). Not only does Nvidia dominate the market for high-performance chipsets known as graphics processing units (GPUs), but the company's overall performance has essentially become the ultimate barometer by which the AI industry is measured. Said differently, if Nvidia's business is growing, investors tend to remain bullish on the AI boom. From a macro standpoint, Nvidia stands to benefit from ongoing investment in AI infrastructure. So long as cloud hyperscalers Amazon, Microsoft, and Alphabet, as well as tech titans like Meta Platforms, Oracle, and Apple, are building out data centers and buying chips, Nvidia is positioned to capture a portion of this multitrillion-dollar opportunity. As far as tariffs go, the biggest threat to Nvidia's business right now is its limited opportunity in China. New export controls coupled with rising competition from China-based Huawei has put Nvidia in a tough spot. Nevertheless, Nvidia has opportunities to maneuver around China-related headwinds. For instance, the company recently won multiple contracts in the United Arab Emirates (UAE) Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA) -- each of which will be outfitting AI data centers with Nvidia's latest Blackwell GPUs. Moreover, rumors are swirling that Elon Musk's AI start-up, xAI, could be purchasing an estimated $40 billion worth of chips for its next GPU cluster. As I previously predicted, I think Nvidia stock is going to rebound considerably throughout the latter half of 2025 as I suspect tariff-driven fears will subside. While there has been some recent valuation expansion following Nvidia's monster first-quarter earnings report, the stock still looks reasonable compared to historical levels on a forward price-to-earnings (P/E) basis. Next up on my list is Amazon. On the surface, this might look like a head-scratcher. I'll concede that Amazon's core e-commerce business is pretty vulnerable to tariffs. However, I'm not distracted by these headwinds at the moment. Instead, I've been analyzing Amazon based on two other areas of the business. First, the company's cloud infrastructure unit, Amazon Web Services (AWS), continues to accelerate sales and widen operating margins. To me, this signals that the company's investments in AI have, so far, paid off. What's more lucrative, however, is that AWS accounts for the majority of operating profits for Amazon's entire business. This is important, because even during a time of economic uncertainty, the performance from AWS has remained strong and continued minting heaps of cash flow for Amazon. These robust unit economics provide Amazon with a high degree of operating leverage -- allowing the company to double down and reinvest in high-growth areas. In turn, Amazon has a unique ability to stitch more AI-driven investments across the broader fabric of its ecosystem -- from e-commerce, logistics, brick-and-mortar retail, advertising, streaming, subscription services, and even direct-to-consumer healthcare. It's these dynamics that may have caught the eye of billionaire hedge fund manager Bill Ackman, who recently joined Warren Buffett and Cathie Wood in adding Amazon to his portfolio. I think Amazon is well on its way to becoming Wall Street's first $5 trillion company. While the company could face some turbulence in the near term due to tariffs, this is not the first time the tech giant has dealt with a challenging regulatory environment. Yet, in the long run, Amazon has continued to manage to diversify its platform and build a number of multibillion-dollar businesses profitability. I see Amazon as an under-the-radar opportunity right now and I would take advantage of any dips as the TACO trade plays out. Before you buy stock in Nvidia, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Nvidia wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $651,049!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $828,224!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 979% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 171% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join . See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of May 19, 2025 Suzanne Frey, an executive at Alphabet, is a member of The Motley Fool's board of directors. Randi Zuckerberg, a former director of market development and spokeswoman for Facebook and sister to Meta Platforms CEO Mark Zuckerberg, is a member of The Motley Fool's board of directors. John Mackey, former CEO of Whole Foods Market, an Amazon subsidiary, is a member of The Motley Fool's board of directors. Adam Spatacco has positions in Alphabet, Amazon, Apple, Meta Platforms, Microsoft, and Nvidia. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Alphabet, Amazon, Apple, Meta Platforms, Microsoft, Nvidia, and Oracle. The Motley Fool recommends the following options: long January 2026 $395 calls on Microsoft and short January 2026 $405 calls on Microsoft. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. 2 No-Brainer Artificial Intelligence (AI) Stocks to Buy Hand Over Fist During the TACO Trade was originally published by The Motley Fool Sign in to access your portfolio