logo
Discovered: A Neanderthal ‘fat factory' from 125,000 years ago

Discovered: A Neanderthal ‘fat factory' from 125,000 years ago

CNNa day ago
Stone Age humans living by a lake in what's now Germany systematically processed animal carcasses for fatty nutrients — essentially running what scientists describe as a 'fat factory' to boil bones on a vast scale, according to new research.
Archaeologists uncovered the factory by analyzing some 120,000 bone fragments and 16,000 flint tools unearthed over several years at a site known as Neumark-Nord, south of the city of Halle, they reported in a study published Wednesday in the journal Science Advances. Excavators found the artifacts alongside evidence of fire use.
The researchers believe that Neanderthals, an extinct species of human known to have lived in that area as far back as 125,000 years ago, smashed the marrow-rich bones into fragments with stone hammers, then boiled them for several hours to extract the fat, which floats to the surface and can be skimmed off upon cooling.
Since this feat would have involved planning hunts, transporting and storing carcasses beyond immediate food needs, and rendering the fat in an area designated specially for the task, the finding helps paint a picture of the group's organization, strategy and deeply honed survival skills.
'This attitude that Neanderthals were dumb — this is another data point that proves otherwise,' said Wil Roebroeks, study coauthor and professor of Paleolithic archaeology at Leiden University in the Netherlands.
A string of archaeological discoveries in recent decades have showed that Neanderthals were smarter than their original brutish stereotype might suggest. The ancient humans lived across Eurasia and disappeared 40,000 years ago, and previous studies have found they made yarn and glue, engraved bones and cave walls, and assembled jewelry from eagle talons.
Details in the new research suggest that Neanderthals may have been unexpectedly sophisticated in their approach to nutrition, too.
The Neanderthals living at the German site over a 300-year period also clearly understood the nutritional value of the bone grease they produced, according to the study.
A small amount of fat is an essential part of a healthy, balanced diet. The substance was even more essential for hunter-gatherers, such as Neanderthals, who likely depended heavily on animal foods.
A diet dominated by lean meat and deficient in fatty acids can lead to a debilitating and sometimes lethal form of malnutrition, in which the capacity of liver enzymes to break down the protein and get rid of excess nitrogen is impaired, the researchers noted in their paper. Known today as protein poisoning, the condition earned a reputation among early European explorers of North America as 'rabbit poisoning' or 'mal de caribou.'
Hunter-gatherers such as Neanderthals, with average body weights between 50 kilograms and 80 kilograms (110 pounds and 175 pounds), would have had to keep their consumption of dietary protein below 300 grams (about 10 ounces) per day to avoid the condition. That amounts to around 1,200 calories — a level of intake far short of daily energy needs, according to the research. As a result, the Neanderthals likely needed to source the remaining calories from a nonprotein source, either fat or carbohydrate.
Cuts of meat from animal muscle contain very little fat, making bones — which contain marrow and other fatty tissue even when an animal is malnourished — a more important resource.
The researchers discovered that the overwhelming majority of remains at the site came from 172 individual large animals, including horses, deer and aurochs, large cow-like creatures that are now extinct. Neanderthals had selected the longest bones that would have contained the most marrow, the study found.
Exactly how the Neanderthals processed the bones isn't clear, according to the study authors. The ancient humans likely fashioned containers or pots from birch bark, animal skins or other body parts such as stomach linings, filling them with water and hanging them over a fire, Roebroeks said.
Neanderthals could have consumed the fat they produced as a 'greasy broth' to which plants may have been added for flavor as well as nutritional value, suggested study coauthor Geoff Smith, a senior researcher in zooarchaeology at the University of Reading. The charred remains of hazelnut, acorn and sloe plum were also found during the excavations, he noted.
'These weren't simple hunter-gatherers just getting by day to day — they were master planners who could look ahead, organise complex tasks, and squeeze every last calorie from their environment,' Smith said.
The findings are 'exciting,' according to Ludovic Slimak, an archaeologist at the French National Centre for Scientific Research (CNRS) and Paul Sabatier University in Toulouse, France. Slimak wasn't involved in the study.
'They finally offer clear archaeological confirmation of what many of us had long suspected: that Neanderthals not only valued within-bone lipids but developed specific strategies to extract and process them,' said Slimak, who is the author of the 'The Last Neanderthal,' which will be published in English later this year.
Discover your world
Go beyond the headlines and explore the latest scientific achievements and fascinating discoveries. Sign up for CNN's Wonder Theory science newsletter. 'This aligns closely with the broader archaeological record, which shows Neanderthals as highly skilled big-game hunters with a refined sense of ecological adaptation,' he added.
The Neumark-Nord site is 'the best example yet of bone-grease rendering,' from this period of the Stone Age, said Bruce Hardy, the J. Kenneth Smail Professor of Anthropology at Kenyon College in Gambier, Ohio. Hardy also was not involved in the research.
'The combination of evidence presented here at Neumark-Nord is impressive,' Hardy said. 'It may well represent the smoldering gun, or simmering bone broth, of Neanderthal bone-grease rendering.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Farmers sound the alarm over rapid spread of insect that evolves to eat more crops: 'Further spread ... to other European countries is to be expected'
Farmers sound the alarm over rapid spread of insect that evolves to eat more crops: 'Further spread ... to other European countries is to be expected'

Yahoo

time3 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Farmers sound the alarm over rapid spread of insect that evolves to eat more crops: 'Further spread ... to other European countries is to be expected'

A new agricultural threat is quickly spreading through Europe, and it's only a few millimeters long, according to Euractiv. Farmers in Germany are raising the alarm about a tiny insect, known as the reed leafhopper, that has evolved to feed on and destroy critical crops like sugar beet and potatoes. Once a harmless resident of wetland reeds, this adaptable pest is now rapidly expanding its range and appetite, with troubling implications for food security and farming across the continent. The reed leafhopper ("Pentastiridius leporinus") is now known to spread a bacterial plant disease called syndrome "basses richesses" (SBR). Different leafhopper variants have also been found in nations like Argentina. The disease significantly reduces crop yields and sugar content, making affected harvests far less valuable. Over 100,000 hectares of farmland in Germany were infested in 2023 alone. Originally found in reed beds and considered harmless, the insect has since adapted to new host plants, including tomatoes, celery, and beetroot. Entomologist Dr. Michael Rostás of the University of Göttingen confirmed the insect's spread and evolution, warning, "Further spread of the leafhopper and the diseases it transmits to other European countries is to be expected." The reed leafhopper's expansion is a growing threat to European agriculture. Because it weakens crops from the inside out, it's hard to detect until the damage is done. As it adapts to more host plants and benefits from warmer conditions, experts believe rising temperatures may be helping it thrive. Farmers face a unique challenge: this new pest is evolving faster than they can keep up with. It can now even survive the winter by living in the roots of cereal crops like wheat, making traditional crop rotation methods less effective. If left unchecked, it could threaten the stability of food supply chains across Europe. Should the government be paying people to hunt invasive species? Definitely Depends on the animal No way Just let people do it for free Click your choice to see results and speak your mind. Germany has issued emergency authorizations for pesticide use in crops to slow the insect's spread. But experts say this is only a stopgap measure. The German Farmers' Association is calling for long-term solutions, including changes to European Union regulations that would allow for new genomic breeding techniques like CRISPR. These methods could help develop crop varieties resistant to the disease the insect carries. Until those tools are approved, farmers will need to rely on careful crop management, timely planting decisions, and community-level monitoring. When it comes to protecting our food supply from fast-moving threats, innovation and cooperation remain our best lines of defense. Join our free newsletter for easy tips to save more and waste less, and don't miss this cool list of easy ways to help yourself while helping the planet.

AI chatbots oversimplify scientific studies and gloss over critical details — the newest models are especially guilty
AI chatbots oversimplify scientific studies and gloss over critical details — the newest models are especially guilty

Yahoo

time3 hours ago

  • Yahoo

AI chatbots oversimplify scientific studies and gloss over critical details — the newest models are especially guilty

When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. Large language models (LLMs) are becoming less "intelligent" in each new version as they oversimplify and, in some cases, misrepresent important scientific and medical findings, a new study has found. Scientists discovered that versions of ChatGPT, Llama and DeepSeek were five times more likely to oversimplify scientific findings than human experts in an analysis of 4,900 summaries of research papers. When given a prompt for accuracy, chatbots were twice as likely to overgeneralize findings than when prompted for a simple summary. The testing also revealed an increase in overgeneralizations among newer chatbot versions compared to previous generations. The researchers published their findings in a new study April 30 in the journal Royal Society Open Science. "I think one of the biggest challenges is that generalization can seem benign, or even helpful, until you realize it's changed the meaning of the original research," study author Uwe Peters, a postdoctoral researcher at the University of Bonn in Germany, wrote in an email to Live Science. "What we add here is a systematic method for detecting when models generalize beyond what's warranted in the original text." It's like a photocopier with a broken lens that makes the subsequent copies bigger and bolder than the original. LLMs filter information through a series of computational layers. Along the way, some information can be lost or change meaning in subtle ways. This is especially true with scientific studies, since scientists must frequently include qualifications, context and limitations in their research results. Providing a simple yet accurate summary of findings becomes quite difficult. "Earlier LLMs were more likely to avoid answering difficult questions, whereas newer, larger, and more instructible models, instead of refusing to answer, often produced misleadingly authoritative yet flawed responses," the researchers wrote. Related: AI is just as overconfident and biased as humans can be, study shows In one example from the study, DeepSeek produced a medical recommendation in one summary by changing the phrase "was safe and could be performed successfully" to "is a safe and effective treatment option." Another test in the study showed Llama broadened the scope of effectiveness for a drug treating type 2 diabetes in young people by eliminating information about the dosage, frequency, and effects of the medication. If published, this chatbot-generated summary could cause medical professionals to prescribe drugs outside of their effective parameters. In the new study, researchers worked to answer three questions about 10 of the most popular LLMs (four versions of ChatGPT, three versions of Claude, two versions of Llama, and one of DeepSeek). They wanted to see if, when presented with a human summary of an academic journal article and prompted to summarize it, the LLM would overgeneralize the summary and, if so, whether asking it for a more accurate answer would yield a better result. The team also aimed to find whether the LLMs would overgeneralize more than humans do. The findings revealed that LLMs — with the exception of Claude, which performed well on all testing criteria — that were given a prompt for accuracy were twice as likely to produce overgeneralized results. LLM summaries were nearly five times more likely than human-generated summaries to render generalized conclusions. The researchers also noted that LLMs transitioning quantified data into generic information were the most common overgeneralizations and the most likely to create unsafe treatment options. These transitions and overgeneralizations have led to biases, according to experts at the intersection of AI and healthcare. "This study highlights that biases can also take more subtle forms — like the quiet inflation of a claim's scope," Max Rollwage, vice president of AI and research at Limbic, a clinical mental health AI technology company, told Live Science in an email. "In domains like medicine, LLM summarization is already a routine part of workflows. That makes it even more important to examine how these systems perform and whether their outputs can be trusted to represent the original evidence faithfully." Such discoveries should prompt developers to create workflow guardrails that identify oversimplifications and omissions of critical information before putting findings into the hands of public or professional groups, Rollwage said. While comprehensive, the study had limitations; future studies would benefit from extending the testing to other scientific tasks and non-English texts, as well as from testing which types of scientific claims are more subject to overgeneralization, said Patricia Thaine, co-founder and CEO of Private AI — an AI development company. Rollwage also noted that "a deeper prompt engineering analysis might have improved or clarified results," while Peters sees larger risks on the horizon as our dependence on chatbots grows. "Tools like ChatGPT, Claude and DeepSeek are increasingly part of how people understand scientific findings," he wrote. "As their usage continues to grow, this poses a real risk of large-scale misinterpretation of science at a moment when public trust and scientific literacy are already under pressure." RELATED STORIES —Cutting-edge AI models from OpenAI and DeepSeek undergo 'complete collapse' when problems get too difficult, study reveals —'Foolhardy at best, and deceptive and dangerous at worst': Don't believe the hype — here's why artificial general intelligence isn't what the billionaires tell you it is —Current AI models a 'dead end' for human-level intelligence, scientists agree For other experts in the field, the challenge we face lies in ignoring specialized knowledge and protections. "Models are trained on simplified science journalism rather than, or in addition to, primary sources, inheriting those oversimplifications," Thaine wrote to Live Science. "But, importantly, we're applying general-purpose models to specialized domains without appropriate expert oversight, which is a fundamental misuse of the technology which often requires more task-specific training." In December 2024, Future Publishing agreed a deal with OpenAI in which the AI company would bring content from Future's 200-plus media brands to OpenAI's users. You can read more about the partnership here.

Neanderthals extracted animal fat in advanced food prep process 125,000 years ago: report
Neanderthals extracted animal fat in advanced food prep process 125,000 years ago: report

Fox News

time20 hours ago

  • Fox News

Neanderthals extracted animal fat in advanced food prep process 125,000 years ago: report

Neanderthals living 125,000 years ago in what is now modern-day Germany may have extracted and eaten fat from animal bones through an organized food preparation process that scientists describe as a 'fat factory.' While excavating the site of a former lake landscape called Neumark-Nord, archaeologists discovered thousands of bones from at least 172 large mammals, along with flint artifacts. The bones, which date back to an interglacial period in which Neanderthals lived, were from animals like red deer and horses, according to a study published on July 2 in Science Advances. While many of the bones that contained less bone marrow were spread out across the archaeological site, researchers observed that many of the marrow-rich bones were located in clusters — sites they call 'fat factories.' Researchers believe our extinct ancestors used tools to smash the bones into small fragments and then boiled them for hours. The grease, which then floated to the surface of the water, could be skimmed off the top and eaten — providing a calorie-dense food source for the archaic people. Prior to this, evidence of the practice had only dated back to 28,000 years ago, according to the research. "Neanderthals were clearly managing resources with precision — planning hunts, transporting carcasses, and rendering fat in a task-specific area," Dr. Lutz Kindler, the study's first author, said. "They understood both the nutritional value of fat and how to access it efficiently — most likely involving caching carcass parts at places in the landscape for later transport to and use at the grease rendering site. Fat was a "life-sustaining" resource for Neanderthals, especially during the winter and spring seasons when carbohydrates were scarce. Their diets consisted largely of animal protein, and consuming lots of protein without other nutrients could lead to a sometimes deadly condition called protein poisoning, the research noted. "The sheer size and extraordinary preservation of the Neumark-Nord site complex gives us a unique chance to study how Neanderthals impacted their environment, both animal and plant life," Dr. Fulco Scherjon, data manager and computer scientist on the project, said. "That's incredibly rare for a site this old—and it opens exciting new possibilities for future research." In recent years, scientists have also discovered that Neanderthals went diving for seashells that they could chip with stone hammers into thin and sharp cutting edges. Similarly, another study suggested Neanderthals may have buried their dead with flowers. Researchers Lutz Kindler and Wil Roebroeks did not immediately respond to Fox News Digital's request for comment.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store