logo
Cambridge risks losing ‘unbelievable talent' amid PhD funding cut

Cambridge risks losing ‘unbelievable talent' amid PhD funding cut

The Guardian08-02-2025

The University of Cambridge risks 'losing unbelievable talent' owing to a drop-off in funding for PhDs, the vice-chancellor has cautioned.
Prof Deborah Prentice, who took over as vice-chancellor in 2023, described PhD students as 'the lifeblood' of the university's research and innovation work, and expressed concern that funding from research councils had 'dropped off significantly'.
Her caution came after the chancellor, Rachel Reeves, announced a new partnership with the 800-year-old university, putting it at the heart of the government's growth agenda, including plans for 'Europe's Silicon Valley' in the corridor between Cambridge and Oxford, which could add £78bn to the economy.
In an exclusive interview with the Guardian, Prentice said she was 'thrilled' to be working closely with the government on its industrial growth strategy. On Tuesday the university hosted a visit by the Cabinet Office minister Pat McFadden, who came to see the university's Dawn supercomputer and discuss how AI could transform public services and healthcare. Prentice then attended a reception at No 10 in the evening.
Prentice said one of her chief concerns for the future was the decline in PhD funding, which had been flagged during talks with the university's six academic schools and was her 'number one priority'.
'PhDs are the lifeblood of so much of what we do here,' she said. 'They're critical to our education mission. They're the worker bees that power the research mission. They're critical to our innovation mission. They are the genesis of many a startup company and we've got to be able to fund them. We lose unbelievable talent because we can't fund it.'
Only about 15% of Cambridge's PhD students remain in academia. The rest go on to power the knowledge economy, she said. 'It's so important for the country, not just Cambridge.'
Prentice, an eminent American psychologist with academic expertise in the study of social norms that govern human behaviour, was provost at Princeton University before she became Cambridge's 347th vice-chancellor.
After a challenging start in the aftermath of Covid, at a time of high inflation and strikes by university staff, she was hopeful the new partnership with the government would herald a golden era for Cambridge.
The university is situated in one of the world's largest technology clusters, which is home to more than 5,000 knowledge-intensive companies and the birthplace of innovative businesses that contribute £30bn to the UK economy.
There are also plans for a flagship startup and innovation hub at the centre of the city, modelled on The Engine near Boston and Station F in Paris, which promises to transform the best research ideas from across the UK into the companies of tomorrow.
The vice-chancellor acknowledged the enormous financial difficulties faced by much of the sector and said Cambridge was fortunate to be largely protected by its £4.2bn endowment fund and its income from Cambridge University Press and Assessment. PhD funding would be a priority in the next fundraising campaign.
Prentice's two other main concerns were the affordability of Cambridge for young academics and maintaining global competitiveness. 'Our priorities are our people, our talent. Getting the very best talent that's going to power this push forward in AI and so many other areas.'
Critics have raised concerns about a gender attainment gap in the awarding of firsts, with men significantly more likely to gain the highest class of degree, which Prentice described as shocking. Oxford has a similar problem.
In the 2023/24 academic year, Cambridge averaged a 9.2 percentage point gap favouring men. This is in stark contrast to the UK higher education sector as a whole, where women are generally more likely to achieve first-class honours and upper seconds.
'It's shocking, right?' she said. 'It's not necessary. So that means that we have to look closely at it and we have to understand how it's being produced. Our starting assumption is that it must be something about the way the determination is made.'
Prentice was, however, relaxed about criticism of her pay package for her first year at Cambridge. At £577,000, including salary and relocation costs, it was among the highest received by Russell group vice-chancellors. 'I make a lot less than I made in the US, and I wasn't even head of an institution in the US, right?' she said.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

London was once the tech capital of Europe. Where did it all go wrong?
London was once the tech capital of Europe. Where did it all go wrong?

Telegraph

time25 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

London was once the tech capital of Europe. Where did it all go wrong?

Baroness Helena Morrissey DBE is a City 'superwoman' who, among other senior roles, ran Newton Investment Management for 15 years while supporting a family of 11. She also founded the 30 Percent Club, which seeks to bring more women on to company boards. London is no longer Europe's tech capital. Paris has taken that title, coming in fourth in the league table of the world's top technology centres, while London has slipped to sixth, according to Dealroom's 2025 report. Both are flanked by American cities. This shift signals a troubling loss of momentum, and is underscored by KPMG data showing UK fintech investment at a four-year low in 2024 – $9.9bn (£7.3bn) compared with 2021's spike of $48.1bn. For years, London led Europe's fintech boom. Fuelled by world-class developers, creative talent and a deep venture capital market that consistently funded innovative start-ups, the City fostered a vibrant tech ecosystem. Shoreditch, London's start-up destination of choice, became synonymous with fintech and new agile ways of working. The proof of success? London's tally of 125 tech unicorns – companies valued at $1bn or more – far outpacing Paris (53) and Munich (17). Yet past success guarantees nothing. Dealroom's data reveals a stark contrast: 'total funding growth' for technology companies based in Paris is up nearly 24pc over the past four years and a whopping 60pc for Austin, Texas – but London has seen a 7pc decline. Where has it all gone wrong? As a country we have taken our eye off the ball when it comes to creating an attractive environment for start-ups and scale-ups – just as others have raised their game. In 2015, I was a member of the UK's Financial Services and Trade Investment Board (FSTIB), a partnership between government and industry formed by George Osborne, the then chancellor, to help propel high-growth areas. Fintech was a top priority, with five key ingredients identified to maintain the UK's attractiveness: supportive regulation, plentiful investment, global connections, top talent and integration with other financial and professional services. However, FSTIB was disbanded in 2019 and, while trade bodies have been doing what they can, no one has been pulling it all together – a challenge exacerbated by the frequent change of leaders in government. As a result, our early advantage has slipped away. Revolut, a fintech star, offers a perfect – if depressing – case study. Founded in 2015, the digital bank was valued at $45bn last August, making it Europe's most valuable private technology company, but it took three years for Revolut to secure a UK banking licence.

Labour needs an abundance mindset
Labour needs an abundance mindset

New Statesman​

time29 minutes ago

  • New Statesman​

Labour needs an abundance mindset

Photo byIt once looked like Keir Starmer was going to be a pro-growth prime minister. Alas. It seems increasingly obvious that the government isn't committed enough to the reforms that are needed. The problems run deep. Growth and productivity have been slow, nearly flat, since 2008. The housing shortage in London and the south-east is getting worse. Cambridge is an economic powerhouse thanks to scientific research. But planning rules means there is no spare laboratory space. We cannot build any. We produce far less energy than France, and it costs a lot more. Cities like Manchester ought to be flourishing, but productivity is far lower in British cities than in other countries. Outside London, we are sluggish. A hundred years ago, Birmingham was a rival power to the capitol; today it is bankrupt and wretched. The reason is simple. We have too many rules that make everything too complicated and too slow. The tallest building outside of London was going to be built in Manchester but the process has been stalled because of an administrative error. An application to build a mansard roof on a house in Lambeth was rejected by the council because the house would 'dominate' the local area which is of 'low-scale character.' Imagine the horror of a discrete third floor in a two-floor neighbourhood! To get planning permission for a twenty-home development, developers must provide things like an Aviation Impact Assessment and a Public Art Strategy, among many others. Remember, this is before planning permission. In 2013 there was a proposal to build three nuclear reactors in Wales. Four of these exact reactors are already working in Japan, where they have been proven safe during significant earthquakes. Works in Progress reported that the Office for Nuclear Regulation demanded design changes for four and a half years. The aim was to reduce the amount of radiation being discharged. And they succeeded. The radiation was reduced by the amount that 'a human ingests when they consume a banana.' The planning permission alone for the Lower Thames Crossing was twice as expensive as an actual tunnel in Norway. If the government is going to fix this, it needs to get radical. In the USA, the need for similar reforms have become much more prominent recently thanks to Abundance, written by the journalists Ezra Klein and Derek Thompson. They argue that the American left is too concerned with blocking development. Worried that even something simple like building a toilet in a public park has become expensive and complicated, they argue for deregulation. This is a major shift on the American left from writers at the New York Times and the Atlantic. Subscribe to The New Statesman today from only £8.99 per month Subscribe As Klein points out, what matters is the default. France is doing better than the UK on this because the default is that it is easier to build. Klein and Thompson have started the important work of reframing what seem like neo-liberal economic concerns into political reality. If Britain wants to be a country with a generous welfare system, it needs to be a country that actually builds enough decent homes for people. If we want to be a country that has excellent hospitals, we need cheap energy to run them. If we want Britain to thrive outside of London, we need the trains, roads, and laboratories to enable that thriving. If we want to have good jobs for working people, we need to have enough homes for them to live where they need to work. If we want our provincial cities to flourish, they need to be able to build transport infrastructure without spending an expensive decade in regulatory review. If we want energy bills to be cheaper for working families, we need to spend less than four years reducing the amount of radiation from a nuclear reactor by a literal banana's worth. We need this attitude shift in Britain. And fast. Apparently a lot of people in Labour are reading Abundance. And yet the government is planning to control where pensions are invested 'for the benefit of the economy.' America has the abundance movement. We have central planning for pension schemes. It will lead to lower returns, disincentivising savings. It's also deeply illiberal. Instead of building roads the government thinks it can plan my pension from Whitehall. Get real! And yet, as the economist Sam Bowman says, Britain is fixable. We don't need to invent anything. We simply need to build trams, homes, and energy plants like they do in other countries. The Democrats are waking up to the importance of this across the Atlantic. It is time for Labour to make the same shift. As well as Bowman, people like Ben Southwood, Samuel Hughes, Tim Leunig, Sam Dumitriu and Britain Remade, Stian Westlake, and many others are all working to raise these issues to the attention of policy makers and the public. But progress is slow. The government probably isn't going to do what is necessary. Ambitious talk of planning reform has become the petty chorus of telling developers to 'get on with it.' Rachel Reeves has promised more than a hundred billion of capital spending. This is as much as the government spends on debt repayment every year, which now costs more than Universal Credit. And spending all of that money is not much use if it all goes down the perpetual sink-hole of regulation and approvals. Despite the extent of the problems, the government is more interested in adjusting the ISA rules. This is destructive in itself, but while there is so much that needs doing, it is truly fiddling while Rome burns. There's another reason for the left to become more like Ezra Klein. Soon there won't be another option. If Starmer doesn't start ripping up the rule book, someone else will do it. Sooner or later, reform will come. Taxes and spending can only rise for so long while growth remains stagnant. And another decade of low productivity, low GDP-per-capita growth, not enough houses, energy infrastructure, roads, or reservoirs, and an over burdensome tax-and-spend regime to cap it all, will leave us requiring more and more radical reform. The longer the government runs a deficit (while already spending so much on debt repayments) without improving the economy, the more unavoidable the solution will become. Left long enough, that will mean another Margaret Thatcher. Sooner or later, there really will be no alternative. If Starmer wants to avoid empowering a new Thatcher as his eventual successor, he should take a lead from Klein and Thompson and act now. [See also: Why George Osborne still runs Britain] Related

Unlock this Secret Workflow Hack that Combines Claude 4 & Gemini 2.5
Unlock this Secret Workflow Hack that Combines Claude 4 & Gemini 2.5

Geeky Gadgets

timean hour ago

  • Geeky Gadgets

Unlock this Secret Workflow Hack that Combines Claude 4 & Gemini 2.5

What if the secret to unlocking your most productive workflow wasn't about choosing the best tool, but about how you combine them? In a world where artificial intelligence is reshaping how we work, the pairing of Claude 4 and Gemini 2.5 offers a innovative approach that many professionals are overlooking. Imagine seamlessly transitioning from raw data analysis to polished storytelling, or from technical precision to strategic insight—all within one integrated system. These two AI powerhouses, each with their own unique strengths, aren't just tools; they're collaborative partners that can transform the way you tackle complex projects. Yet, most people miss the opportunity to harness their full potential together. In this perspective, Grace Leung explores how Claude 4 and Gemini 2.5 complement each other to create a workflow that's both efficient and impactful. You'll discover how Gemini's technical prowess in processing multimodal data and Claude's strategic depth in refining insights can work in tandem to elevate your results. Whether you're managing large datasets, crafting compelling narratives, or making high-stakes decisions, this workflow offers a fresh way to approach your challenges. By the end, you might just rethink how you integrate AI into your daily processes—and uncover untapped possibilities hiding in plain sight. Claude 4 & Gemini 2.5 Synergy What Makes Each AI Model Unique? Claude 4 and Gemini 2.5 are designed to address different challenges, making them ideal partners for a wide range of workflows. Their distinct strengths complement each other, allowing users to tackle complex tasks with greater ease and precision. Gemini 2.5: Renowned for its speed, scalability, and ability to handle large datasets, Gemini 2.5 is a robust tool for technical and data-intensive tasks. Its extensive context window allows it to process multimodal inputs, including text, images, and structured data. This makes it particularly valuable for analyzing complex datasets, building prototypes, or managing large-scale projects. Gemini's technical efficiency ensures reliable and consistent results, even under demanding conditions. Renowned for its speed, scalability, and ability to handle large datasets, Gemini 2.5 is a robust tool for technical and data-intensive tasks. Its extensive context window allows it to process multimodal inputs, including text, images, and structured data. This makes it particularly valuable for analyzing complex datasets, building prototypes, or managing large-scale projects. Gemini's technical efficiency ensures reliable and consistent results, even under demanding conditions. Claude 4: Focused on strategy, storytelling, and detailed analysis, Claude 4 excels in refining insights and crafting polished outputs. Its autonomous memory system enables it to maintain contextual understanding across multiple stages of a project, making sure seamless updates and continuity. Claude is particularly effective for high-level decision-making, creating visually engaging presentations, and developing narratives that resonate with audiences. How to Combine Their Strengths To fully harness the potential of Claude 4 and Gemini 2.5, a sequential workflow that uses their individual strengths is recommended. This approach ensures that each model contributes its unique capabilities to the overall process. 1. Begin with Gemini 2.5: Start by using Gemini to process and analyze large datasets or multimodal inputs. Its technical precision and scalability provide a solid foundation for your project, allowing you to extract raw insights and identify key patterns efficiently. 2. Transition to Claude 4: Once the data has been processed, shift to Claude for deeper analysis, storytelling, and strategic refinement. Claude's ability to contextualize information and present it in a compelling manner ensures that your outputs are both insightful and impactful. This workflow allows you to combine Gemini's technical expertise with Claude's strategic depth, resulting in outputs that are both data-driven and contextually rich. By dividing tasks according to each model's strengths, you can save time while making sure high-quality results. The Workflow Most People Miss : Claude 4 + Gemini 2.5 Watch this video on YouTube. Explore further guides and articles from our vast library that you may find relevant to your interests in Claude 4. Practical Applications The integration of Claude 4 and Gemini 2.5 offers fantastic potential across various industries. Their combined capabilities can be applied to a wide range of scenarios, enhancing workflows and delivering superior outcomes. Strategic Dashboards: Use Gemini to analyze large datasets and extract raw insights. Claude can then organize these insights into actionable intelligence, complete with visual aids and strategic recommendations tailored to decision-makers. Use Gemini to analyze large datasets and extract raw insights. Claude can then organize these insights into actionable intelligence, complete with visual aids and strategic recommendations tailored to decision-makers. Audience Intelligence: Process customer data with Gemini to uncover trends, behaviors, and preferences. Claude can interpret this data to craft targeted messaging and develop marketing campaigns that resonate with specific audiences. Process customer data with Gemini to uncover trends, behaviors, and preferences. Claude can interpret this data to craft targeted messaging and develop marketing campaigns that resonate with specific audiences. AI-Powered Speaking Coaching: Analyze speaking patterns and presentation data using Gemini. Claude can refine scripts, suggest improvements, and even generate audio for practice sessions, helping users enhance their communication skills. Analyze speaking patterns and presentation data using Gemini. Claude can refine scripts, suggest improvements, and even generate audio for practice sessions, helping users enhance their communication skills. Visual Storytelling for Presentations: Gemini provides the data analysis needed for creating charts, graphs, and visuals. Claude transforms these into compelling narratives, making sure that presentations are both informative and engaging. Gemini provides the data analysis needed for creating charts, graphs, and visuals. Claude transforms these into compelling narratives, making sure that presentations are both informative and engaging. Collaborative Critique Workflow: Let Gemini generate initial outputs, such as drafts or prototypes, and have Claude critique and enhance them. This iterative process ensures polished, high-quality deliverables that meet professional standards. Why This Workflow Works The effectiveness of this workflow lies in the complementary nature of Claude 4 and Gemini 2.5. Gemini handles the heavy lifting of data processing and analysis, providing a strong technical foundation. Claude, on the other hand, refines and contextualizes the results, adding strategic depth and narrative clarity. This division of labor not only streamlines the workflow but also ensures that the final outputs are both accurate and meaningful. By combining these models, you can achieve a balance between technical precision and strategic insight. This approach is particularly valuable for professionals who need to manage complex projects, make data-driven decisions, or communicate findings effectively. Additional Insights Claude 4's autonomous memory system plays a crucial role in managing project contexts, making sure that no detail is overlooked, even in multi-stage workflows. This feature is especially useful for long-term projects that require consistent updates and contextual understanding. Meanwhile, Gemini's ability to process multimodal inputs and scale efficiently makes it indispensable for handling data-heavy tasks. Together, these models provide a comprehensive solution for professionals seeking to optimize their workflows with AI. Rather than viewing Claude 4 and Gemini 2.5 as standalone tools, consider them as collaborative partners. Their combined strengths allow you to approach tasks with both technical accuracy and strategic foresight. By integrating these models into your workflow, you can elevate your work to new levels of efficiency and impact. Whether you're analyzing data, crafting narratives, or making high-level decisions, this duo offers a powerful way to achieve your goals. Media Credit: Grace Leung Filed Under: AI, Guides Latest Geeky Gadgets Deals Disclosure: Some of our articles include affiliate links. If you buy something through one of these links, Geeky Gadgets may earn an affiliate commission. Learn about our Disclosure Policy.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store