logo
Labor recognising Palestinian statehood would ‘reward terrorism'

Labor recognising Palestinian statehood would ‘reward terrorism'

Sky News AU2 days ago

The Australian's Foreign Editor Greg Sheridan has described a potential move by the Albanese government to recognise Palestine as 'counterproductive'.
Former foreign minister Gareth Evans has called for Australia to recognise Palestinian statehood as well as demanding sanctions on Israel.
'It would be rewarding terrorism; Palestine doesn't satisfy the criteria for statehood,' Mr Sheridan told Sky News host Peta Credlin.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Albanese's gas project extension is a mistake - but it's not too late
Albanese's gas project extension is a mistake - but it's not too late

Sydney Morning Herald

time7 minutes ago

  • Sydney Morning Herald

Albanese's gas project extension is a mistake - but it's not too late

The Albanese government's approval of the North West Shelf gas extension to 2070 is not just a mistake – it's a devastating blow; a blow to voters who so recently backed a renewable-powered future, to young Australians hopeful for change, to the traditional owners caring for the Murujuga rock art, and to Labor's own proud tradition of acting for the benefit of all Australians. This is the most polluting fossil fuel project approved in Australia in a decade – more polluting than any project approved under coal-loving Scott Morrison. It will unleash more than 4 billion tonnes of climate pollution, equivalent to a decade of Australia's current emissions. It risks wiping out any climate progress this government has made and it tarnishes its legacy. This decision will cast a long shadow over the Albanese government. Visionary Labor prime ministers have stood up against short-term vested interests to protect Australia's environment: think saving the Franklin River; banning uranium mining at Coronation Hill; preventing oil drilling on the Great Barrier Reef. This decision does not fit with that proud history. It's a capitulation to one of the most powerful fossil fuel companies operating in Australia today: Woodside. Voters rejected Peter Dutton's gas expansion plan, yet the Albanese government is pressing ahead with it. The justifications don't stack up. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese keeps telling us this gas is needed for 'firming capacity' or to support our neighbours. But the WA gas markets are completely separate from those on the east coast. There is simply no pipeline connecting them. That's why the prime minister's comments this week, linking the North West Shelf extension to the need for gas in the eastern states, were hard to believe. It's frankly misleading to suggest this project will support energy reliability for most Australians. In reality, only a tiny fraction of the gas will be used in WA, and none of it will be used on the east coast. Most will be exported. And even our biggest customer, Japan, is now exporting more gas than it imports from us. The global market is heading for oversupply. Australia doesn't need this gas. The world doesn't want it. So who benefits? Not Australian households, who already pay the price for our over-reliance on gas. Not workers, whose skills should be helping build clean industries – not propping up a dying one. And not communities on the climate frontline – like flood-hit towns on the NSW coast or farmers battling drought in South Australia. Loading The only clear winners here are Woodside's executives and shareholders. This is a company that has long leveraged its political connections and its deep pockets to keep its polluting projects in business and the Albanese government just handed it a new lease on life. It is plundering petroglyphs for profit and burning down the prospect of a safer future for the next generation of Australians. Because this project is not just a climate disaster – it's a cultural and diplomatic disaster in the making.

Allan government urged to legislate two-year jail sentences for anyone caught with machete on the streets in Victoria
Allan government urged to legislate two-year jail sentences for anyone caught with machete on the streets in Victoria

Sky News AU

time2 hours ago

  • Sky News AU

Allan government urged to legislate two-year jail sentences for anyone caught with machete on the streets in Victoria

Premier Jacinta Allan is being urged to introduce two-year jail terms for anyone caught on Victorian streets carrying a machete ahead of a total ban in September. The state government used "extraordinary powers" to fast track a total ban on sales of machetes on Wednesday following two scary public incidents last weekend. On May 24, police were called to South Melbourne to reports a man was armed with a machete. While officers apprehended the man, a woman drove at them in a car. Police shot into the vehicle, fatally hitting a 34-year-old woman. While on Sunday, officers were called to Northland Shopping Centre in the city's north to reports a group of youths were fighting which allegedly saw machetes produced. Shoppers could be seen running for their lives in scenes reminiscent to the Westfield Bondi Junction stabbing attack in Sydney that claimed the lives of six people. Victoria's shadow police minister David Southwick said the Liberal Party had pushed to ban machetes five times in the past 15 months, which the government knocked back. He also argued the ban put in place was on sales and not possession. "So you can still carry one around," Mr Southwick told Sky News host Steve Price. The Caufield MP also raised concerns about the days leading up to the ban, claiming retailers were selling machetes for $4 to get rid of stock. "When the ban finally comes into play... are they hoping the $4 machetes that have been sold off will be handed into a police station in four month's time?" he asked. There has also been confusion around the description of a machete. Prior to the ban, the Victorian government said a machete is "broadly" classified as a "cutting edge knife with a blade of more than 20 centimetres". But on the day the restriction came in place, director of Consumer Affairs Victoria Nicole Rich said there were no particular lengths of the banned knives. The government has previously shown examples of machetes. Mr Southwick said he could not define the banned weapon and questioned how the government and police will encourage people to hand them in. He pushed for jail terms for anyone caught on the street with them. "What we've been calling for is pretty plain and simple: if you carry one on the street you should face a jail term of two years and the government won't legislate that until September. So between now and September people have got a holiday to carry them around on the streets, they just can't buy them from a retail store," he said. The government said an amnesty will begin from September 1 to November 30 where people can dispose machetes into bins at safe locations and police stations. In a statement, Ms Allan said community safety was her priority. "We must never let places we meet become places we fear," she said. 'I hate these knives and I will keep introducing as many laws as it takes to get them off our streets, out of our shops and out of our lives.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store