ConCourt set to rule at 2 pm on Ramaphosa's police minister move
Image: Kamogelo Moichela/IOL
MK Party said it would not be surprised if the Constitutional Court rules in favour of President Cyril Ramaphosa after 'unlawfully' placing Police Minister Senzo Mchunu on special leave — accusing the judiciary of being "captured" and complicit in political manoeuvring.
The ConCourt is expected to hand down judgment in Johannesburg on Thursday.
This is after it heard the MKP's urgent application challenging Ramaphosa's decision to place Mchunu on special leave and appoint Professor Firoz Cachalia, a non-MP, in an acting oversight role over the police portfolio.
Cachalia is expected to begin his duties on Friday, August 1.
MK Party insisted the move was unconstitutional, flagging serious legal and procedural violations.
'Well, we know that, as you heard KZN Police Commissioner Lt-Gen Nhlanhla Mkhwanazi saying, the judiciary is complicit and implicated. So, that alone is telling,' said MKP national spokesperson, Nhlamulo Ndhlela.
Ndhlela said they hoped that the court would consider the merits of the case and not politicise the issue.
Citing sections 91 and 98 of the Constitution, Ndhlela contended that only a current member of Cabinet can temporarily assume the powers of the police minister. 'Section 98 is very clear,' he argued.
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Advertisement
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Next
Stay
Close ✕
'You can't appoint someone from outside Parliament in an acting Cabinet role. That's constitutional delinquency, and it cannot be allowed.'
The party said the decision to appoint Cachalia — a respected academic, who is not currently in Cabinet — bypassed constitutional requirements and set a dangerous precedent.
'You must first appoint a person to the Cabinet, and then they can serve. Not the other way around. That's not semantics — it's the law.'
MKP's court challenge comes amid growing tension between the party and state institutions, particularly the judiciary, which it accuses of favouritism and political bias.
'Even during the elections, one of our consistent messages was to expose how polarised the judiciary has become,' the party said. 'The law is applied selectively, and that's a reality South Africans need to confront.'
While expressing hope for a fair outcome, MKP made it clear that it would view any adverse ruling as further proof of institutional decay.
'If the outcome goes against us, then the judiciary will continue to expose itself. But our case is honest, and the President is being dishonest with the public. That's what this is really about.'
kamogelo.moichela@iol.co.za
IOL Politics
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Citizen
14 hours ago
- The Citizen
ConCourt declares appointment of 5 CGE commissioners invalid due to limited public participation
The CGE acknowledged the ruling in a brief statement on Friday. The Constitutional Court (ConCourt) has ruled that the appointments of five commissioners to the Commission for Gender Equality (CGE) are invalid, citing Parliament's failure to ensure adequate public participation in the selection process. The ruling follows a legal challenge brought by the non-profit organisation Corruption Watch. The respondents in the matter included the speaker of the National Assembly, the president, the Information Regulator, and the five CGE commissioners. ALSO READ: Reserve Bank unlawfully interfered in Absa chair appointment, says court Media Monitoring Africa was admitted as amicus curiae (friend of the court). Corruption Watch contested the appointments of CGE commissioners chairperson Nthabiseng Sepanya-Mogale, deputy chairperson Prabashni Subrayan Naidoo, Thando Gumede, Bongani Ngomane, and Leonashia Leigh-Ann Van Der Merwe, all of whom took office in March 2023. These appointments, for terms of up to five years, were made by the president upon recommendation by Parliament. CGE commissioners' appointment process challenged The nomination process was led by Parliament's Portfolio Committee on Women, Youth and Persons with Disabilities. It began in June 2022 and closed nearly a month later. A shortlist of four candidates was compiled in late August, while public comment was invited between 2 and 16 September. Submissions were to be made via an online form linked through Parliament's website. The link led to a spreadsheet listing candidates' names and qualifications, but their full CVs were not published. READ MORE: Initiation schools: Commission wants answers on why recommendations haven't been carried out Despite Corruption Watch requesting an extension of the public comment period to 30 days, the removal of the character limit on submissions, and the release of CVs, the National Assembly proceeded with its recommendations to the president following candidate interviews. The appointments were announced on 25 February 2023, and the commissioners assumed office on 1 March. Corruption Watch then brought its application before the ConCourt under section 167(4)(e) of the Constitution, which grants the court exclusive jurisdiction to determine whether the National Assembly has failed to fulfil a constitutional obligation. The organisation argued that Parliament's process was flawed due to the limited public access to information about candidates, a 2 000-character restriction on submissions, and the short 14-day window for public comment. (4/4) CCT 333/23 Corruption Watch (RF) NPC v Speaker of the National Assembly and Others August 1, 2025 The speaker defended the process, stating it was reasonable and consistent with past procedures. It was argued that the 14-day period was sufficient, that public comments were properly considered, and that CVs could not be published without candidates' consent in accordance with the Protection of Personal Information Act (Popia). However, the Information Regulator clarified in an affidavit that such consent is not required when the information is needed for the performance of public duties. ConCourt judgment In a unanimous ruling delivered on Friday, the ConCourt sided with Corruption Watch and found that the public participation process was insufficient. 'In the circumstances, the appointment process conducted by the National Assembly therefore did not comply with the obligations imposed by section 59(1)(a) of the Constitution and is therefore invalid,' the summary of the 1 August judgement reads. The declaration of invalidity has been suspended for 12 months from the date of the order, giving Parliament time to conduct a constitutionally compliant appointment process and allowing the president to make appointments. Reactions The CGE acknowledged the ruling in a brief statement on Friday. 'The commission remains committed to its legislative mandate and will continue to discharge its responsibilities while Parliament undertakes its processes. 'The commission will not make further public pronouncements or respond to media enquiries on this matter,' the statement reads. In addition, Corruption Watch welcomed the outcome. 'South African citizens have a right to participate fully in these processes, particularly where such institutions are at the forefront of ensuring justice and enforcement of human rights in the country. 'The opportunity for people to have their say in the appointment of representatives to Chapter 9 institutions like the CGE, is an important example of that process,' the organisation said in a statement. The CGE operates under section 187 of the Constitution, with a mandate to promote and protect gender equality. In March last year, six other commissioners – Seeham Samaai, Mulalo Grace Nemathaheni, Mfundo Nomvungu, Yanga Malotana, Kamohelo Rodney Teele, and Marion Lynn Stevens – were recommended by Parliament and subsequently approved by the president. NOW READ: MK party and Zuma suffer blow as ConCourt rules in Ramaphosa's favour
Eyewitness News
15 hours ago
- Eyewitness News
ConCourt sets aside five appoinments to the gender commission
CAPE TOWN - Parliament's public participation process has been found wanting by the Constitutional Court, which has set aside five appointments to the Commission of Gender Equality on Friday, including its chairperson and her deputy. Although the appointments were made more than two years ago and their suitability for the posts was not in dispute on Friday, the court said it could not allow the appointments to stand, given the flawed process followed. Parliament has now been given a year to restart the process. In 2022, Corruption Watch challenged the process by the Portfolio Committee on Women, Youth and Persons with Disabilities for inviting public comment on the shortlisted candidates to serve as commissioners on the Commission for Gender Equality. The watchdog complained that 14 days was not enough time to make submissions, which were limited by length and could only be submitted online. The committee also refused to publish detailed information from candidates' CVs, such as their work experience, citing the Protection of Personal Information Act. However, the Constitutional Court said this interpretation of the act was incorrect and rendered the committee's conduct unreasonable. It added that had parliament published the candidates' CVs, the committee would have provided the type of information upon which meaningful and effective public participation could be based. 'Furthermore, even though the commissioners may have met the criteria for appointment, they were not necessarily the only candidates who did so or the most suitable candidates for selection. It follows that the appointment process is unconstitutional and that the appointments of the commissioners are invalid,' reads the unanimous judgment. The court said that although parliament's failures were procedural, with no suggestion that the commissioners did not meet the criteria for appointment, the public interest in a lawful appointment process outweighs the personal interests of the commissioners. The Commissioners could thus have their terms cut short within the next 12 months once a new process has been carried out. The five commissioners affected by this ruling include the chairperson, Advocate Nthabiseng Sepanya-Mogale, deputy chairperson Prabashni Naidoo, Thando Gumede, Bongani Ngomane, and Leonashia van der Merwe. They were appointed by the president on the recommendation of Parliament, for a five-year term from 1 March 2023.
The South African
16 hours ago
- The South African
New police minister warns against 'shoot to kill' tactics
Newly appointed Police Minister, Professor Firoz Cachalia, has warned against the abuse of police power and the use of deadly force, stating it could lead to tragic incidents like the Marikana massacre or the killing of Andries Tatane during a service delivery protest. Speaking shortly after his swearing-in at the Union Buildings in Pretoria on Friday, Cachalia rejected any 'shoot to kill' approach within the South African Police Service (SAPS). Cachalia, a constitutional law expert and former chair of the National Anti-Corruption Council, said he intends to serve with integrity and independence. 'I'm not driven by ambition or political ambition. I've been given a task, and I'm going to tackle that task without fear or favour, subject, of course, to the President's guidance as a member of Cabinet.' Cachalia faced political pressure and ongoing allegations of corruption within the SAPS but maintained a calm, resolute stance, saying external noise would not distract him. 'I understand the moment the country is in and the awesome weight of the responsibility I carry, along with others in government,' he added. Cachalia said a key part of his agenda would be addressing police conduct and reforming accountability systems. He intends to meet National Police Commissioner General Fannie Masemola on Thursday to discuss operational matters and existing task teams. 'It wouldn't be appropriate to speak before that discussion,' he said. As the outgoing chairperson of the National Anti-Corruption Council, whose term ends this month, Cachalia pledged to advance the council's recommendations in his new role. 'I'm now in a better position than I was as chairperson to take those recommendations forward, and I certainly will,' he said. He plans to bring the council and SAPS leadership together to align on reforms, particularly focusing on whistleblower protection and internal accountability mechanisms. Cachalia also plans to work closely with Justice Minister Ronald Lamola, stating that the fight against corruption must be a joint effort. 'The recommendations impact both of our portfolios,' he said. Cachalia addressed speculation about his status and confirmed, 'Today I was appointed minister, not acting.' Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1 Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X and Bluesky for the latest news.
