Businessman backs off using anti-stalking laws to curb reporter
Landlord-turned-screenwriter Christian Carter has backed off from using anti-stalking laws to stop an RTÉ reporter writing stories about him but has been hit with a €5,000 legal bill.
Mr Carter had secured interim restraining orders on 9 April, temporarily stopping Amy Molloy, the Irish Independent's Social Affairs Correspondent, and Maura Fay, a Today with Claire Byrne reporter on RTÉ Radio 1, from publishing stories about him.
Both of the journalists resisted his attempts to extend the interim order for five years.
However, last month at Dublin District Court, Judge Anthony Halpin threw out Mr Carter's bid to "silence" Amy Molloy before lifting reporting restrictions and landing him with an order to pay €10,000 to cover expenses incurred by Mediahuis, the publishers of the Irish Independent, in fighting the case.
Today, Mr Carter's case against Ms Fay was listed again for hearing. However, during the call-over of the day's cases, his barrister, Stephen Wilson, instructed by solicitor Alex Rafter, said he was instructed to withdraw the matter.
Judge Halpin noted two similar previous attempts against Ms Fay had failed. Following an application by Rebecca Tierney BL for Ms Fay, he ordered Mr Carter to pay her legal costs of €5,000.
Furthermore, he again lifted the in-camera rule, allowing the parties to be named.
The businessman's U-turn follows a resounding courtroom defeat on 16 April in his action against the Irish Independent journalist.
In that case, Judge Halpin criticised Mr Carter's use of the process, saying it was not the purpose of the civil restraining orders introduced last year.
The judge had heard that Amy Molloy had broken stories and covered court cases about Mr Carter's days as a landlord and his tax affairs.
"I was just doing my job," the journalist emphasised when she testified at the hearing.
Judge Halpin dismissed that case: "I never envisaged that this forum would be used to dilute journalistic freedom or restrict publication of certain matters."
He held that Mr Carter endeavoured to use this legal remedy to "suppress" the legitimate publication of facts he did not want in the public domain.
Ronan Lupton SC for the newspaper described that civil restraining order application as a collateral attack that tramples on the right of freedom of expression.
In evidence, the journalist rejected suggestions from the applicant's solicitor that she had stepped over the line, telling Judge Halpin she was simply seeking a comment, offering Mr Carter the right to reply, which was a fundamental part of journalism, and that she was just doing her job.
Mr Carter claimed that she had written 50 articles and had rehashed stories about him since 2017.
In response to his claims, Ms Molloy said since 2017, she had written 17 or 18 articles concerning properties Mr Carter rented out and when he appeared on the tax defaulters list last year.
One of the properties featured in her work was a Cabinteely property, which she alleged had 70 tenants, while Mr Carter claimed it was a 6,000 sq ft, 25-roomed mansion with 40 tenants. The Circuit Court had ordered him to pay €20,000 to some of his tenants.
The court heard he was also featured in a 2017 RTÉ Investigates broadcast called Nightmare to Let.
Ms Molloy explained she had written about his issues with the Residential Tenancies Board, a council and the Revenue Commissioners.
The journalist said that a source informed her that Mr Carter had recently travelled to various destinations, including South America, Canada, and Hawaii.
Ms Molloy asserted that in light of that, she attempted to reach out to him for a comment on whether he had paid up following his settlement of nearly €1m with the Revenue Commissioners after under-declaring income tax.
She stated: "If Mr Carter had paid his taxes and had not dangerously overcrowded houses, I would never have had to write about him."
Breaching a civil restraining order can result in a €4,000 fine, a criminal conviction and a 12-month prison sentence.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RTÉ News
3 hours ago
- RTÉ News
All you need to know about voice spoofing and audio deepfakes
Analysis: Biometric fraud like voice spoofing and audio deepfakes are part of broader social engineering attacks by scammers and criminals Voice spoofing involves using digital technology such as artificial intelligence to mimic someone's voice so accurately that it can deceive both humans and automated speaker verification systems. With recent rapid advancements in AI, creating these fake voices—often called "audio deepfakes"—has become alarmingly easy. Today, with just a few seconds of recorded speech from platforms like podcasts, YouTube or TikTok, machine learning models can generate highly realistic synthetic voices that mimic real individuals. It is a type of biometric fraud and often part of broader social engineering attacks. How does voice spoofing work? AI-powered tools analyses the unique patterns of a person's speech—such as tone, pitch, and rhythm—and use this data to produce synthetic speech that closely resembles the original voice. The technology have become so advanced that distinguishing between a real voice and a fake one is increasingly challenging. From RTÉ Radio 1's The Business, BBC's File on 4. reporter Paul Connolly on how criminals are now using AI-generated voices to scam people out of their money Typically, the process usually begins with an attacker collecting voice clips from online sources like social media or videos. Specialized AI models, like VGGish or YAMNet analyze these voice samples to extract important acoustic patterns from the voice, turning them into digital fingerprints called embeddings. These embeddings are then fed into voice generation systems such as Tacotron, WaveNet, or FastSpeech that produce new speech mimicking the original voice. The resulting fake voice can be used in phone calls or apps to impersonate someone in real time. How is this going to impact us in the real world? Financial scams are a growing problem and we've all had a (fairly ridiculous) phone call where a robot voice purporting to be from a company tries to get information or money, but more sophisticated versions have worked. In the UK, fraudsters used AI-generated voices to impersonate financial advisors, leading to a multi-million euro scam targeting crypto investors. In the US, the FBI has warned about scammers using AI to mimic senior US officials' voices, deceiving individuals into sharing confidential information. There have also even been cases where scammers cloned the voices of loved ones, calling individuals and pretending to be in distress to extract money. These incidents highlight the disturbing reality that even the sound of someone's voice can no longer be trusted. From CNN, can Donie O'Sullivan's parents tell the difference between RealDonie's voice and AI-Donie's voice? Celebrities, politicians, and influencers are particularly at risk because their voices are widely available online. The more audio content (voice data) available publicly, the easier it is for AI tools to replicate their voice. This is a basic principle of AI: more data = better performance. However, it's not just public figures who are at risk. If you've ever posted a video or audio clip on platforms like Facebook, Instagram, or YouTube, your voice could potentially be cloned. What are the difficulties in detecting voice spoofing? Detecting synthetic voices is a complex task. Most traditional security systems and speaker verification systems often rely on voice recognition for authentication, but AI-generated voices have become sophisticated enough to deceive these systems. Some of the core technical challenges include: Spectro-temporal similarity Fake voices closely mimic both pitch and timing patterns of natural speech. Data imbalance: Real-world datasets typically contain fewer examples of spoofed voices, making it harder for AI to recognize these cases. Generalisation: Many detection models struggle when faced with spoofing methods they weren't specifically trained on. How to protect yourself While the threat is real, there are steps you can take to safeguard against voice spoofing: Be sceptical: If you receive an unexpected call requesting sensitive information or money, verify the caller's identity through another channel. Use safe words: Establish a unique code word with family and close contacts that can be used to confirm identities during emergencies. Limit voice sharing: Be cautious about sharing voice recordings online, especially on public platforms. Stay informed: Keep abreast of the latest scams and educate yourself on how to recognize potential threats. Voice spoofing poses a growing threat as AI continues to advance, making it easier than ever to mimic someone's voice convincingly. Whether you're a public figure or an everyday social media user, the potential to become a victim of voice cloning exists. From RTÉ Radio 1's Ray D'Arcy Show, AI expert Henry Ajder talks on how deepfakes are damaging online trust and what some platforms are doing to rebuild it How our research work is helping Our recent research proposes an innovative and effective approach for detecting voice spoofing by using a hybrid deep learning (DL) architecture called VGGish-LSTM. We used VGGish, a pre-trained model developed by Google, to extract robust acoustic embeddings from audio data. These embeddings capture detailed features that are often not noticeable by human listeners but are critical in distinguishing synthetic voices. Once extracted, these acoustic features are then analysed by a Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) network, a type of artificial neural network designed specifically to detect long-term patterns and dependencies in sequential data. These networks excel at identifying variations in speech rhythm, tone, and pitch that could indicate synthetic or manipulated speech. The advice for users is to stay vigilant, limit how much voice data you share online and adopt simple safety practices Evaluated on the widely used ASV Spoof 2019 dataset, our model achieved an outstanding accuracy of over 90%. This performance demonstrates our model's ability to detect spoofing effectively and can be used in real-world scenarios such as banking authentication, call centre security, or smart home voice verification systems. With ongoing research into detection technologies, such as the VGGish-LSTM model described here, we can continue developing robust defences to cope with voice spoofing scams. But for users, the advice is to stay vigilant, limit how much voice data you share online and adopt simple safety practices.
RTÉ News
4 hours ago
- RTÉ News
Abuse survivors 'retraumatised' by family law system, says Women's Aid
Child and adult survivors of domestic abuse say that going through the Irish family law system is traumatic and causes "secondary victimisation" and "increased vulnerability", new research has shown. The report, commissioned by Women's Aid, showed that the family law system is "completely inadequate" when it is not attuned to the tactics and impacts of domestic abuse post-separation, Chief Executive Sarah Benson said. Speaking on RTÉ's Morning Ireland, Ms Benson said the research was a 360 degree examination of the experiences of abuse survivors, with the focus particularly in the context of guardianship and custody and access proceedings. She said it showed that unfortunately the feedback from those "who have navigated that system whilst also experiencing post separation abuse, found that [the actual experience] was tantamount to secondary victimisation". Ms Benson said international research shows that between 49% and 62% of all family law proceedings will have a component of domestic violence. However, she said, this is not being addressed in custody and access proceedings in the same way as it might be in domestic violence hearings and this is causing risk. She said everyone in the legal system must be trained to understand domestic violence and in particular coercive control as the research is "telling us overwhelmingly" that coercive control is "something that abuses will use in the courts". Women's Aid said the research "reveals the urgent need" for the law system to develop a holistic response to domestic violence and abuse (DVA). The national charity said that the system is not sufficiently informed or aware of DVA and this undermines rights and comprises the safety of victim-survivors. Although individual workers such as legal practitioners and judges within the courts system were mentioned positively by victim survivors, respondents felt that the system as a whole was a negative and traumatic experience. Two-thirds of adult victim survivors reported that judges failed to take their experiences of domestic violence and abuse into account when making decisions about guardianship, custody, and access involving the perpetrator. "We have witnessed how complex, disjointed and arbitrary the system is." Other issues brought up in the report included lack of access to legal representation, lack of time to consult and prepare for cases, significant financial burdens, and a generally overwhelmed system. Ms Benson said the family law system often assumes that when a couple separates, if domestic violence or abuse was taking place, it has now ended. However, Ms Benson said sometimes the abuse takes other forms, for example, economic abuse or using children to denigrate the non-abusing parent. "Participants in the research spoke of having to adhere to court ordered access to avoid being charged with violating a court order, requiring them to regularly engage with their abuser," Ms Benson said. "This frequently provided court-sanctioned opportunities for further abuse to occur," she added. Some participants in the research said their experience of the family justice system was even worse than the abuse. Ms Benson said this was a "shocking situation, but sadly, not a surprising one". "Women's Aid are in the family law courts daily with women who must navigate an unforgiving system while still being subjected to devastating abuse from their partners or ex-partners. "We have witnessed how complex, disjointed and arbitrary the system is," she said. Ms Benson added: "We are really concerned about the lack of comprehensive training and understanding of domestic violence and the impact of abuse on victim-survivors at every level of the family law system. "This was especially evident in the reported experiences of court-appointed assessors. "In many instances when women raised legitimate safety concerns for their children, they were often inappropriately accused of engaging in the highly contested concept of 'parental alienation' while the possibility of DVA as a reasonable concern was not meaningfully considered." The research examined how adult and child survivors of domestic violence and abuse access and navigate the family law system. It comprised a research team from both Trinity College Dublin and University College Cork and involved court observations, surveys, interviews and focus groups with children, aged-out minors, adults, domestic violence practitioners, health, social care and legal professionals and judges. The researchers spoke to both adult and child victim survivors of their experience of guardianship, custody and access proceedings in Ireland. Adults who took part in the research described their experiences as "relentless, overwhelmingly negative and retraumatising," the report found. Children and young people reported that the family law system failed to listen or respect their independent views. Women's Aid is calling on the Government to reform the family law system as part of the family justice strategy in a way that is informed by domestic violence and abuse. This would include compulsory domestic abuse training for all professionals in the system and improved access to legal representation. In a statement, the Department of Justice said that tackling domestic violence and supporting victims of crime are "central priorities" for the minister. The department said the family justice strategy 2022-2025 and the Family Courts Act 2024 aim to make family courts work better for those engaged with it.
Irish Examiner
6 hours ago
- Irish Examiner
‘Something isn't working': Leona Macken urges cervical screening reform after HSE apology over smear failures
Leona Macken, the 38-year-old woman with incurable cancer who received a court apology on Tuesday from the HSE over the failures in two smear tests that led to her diagnosis, has said she would still encourage women to get screened and would ensure her daughters are vaccinated. However, she said she believes there is 'something wrong' with the cervical screening programme that must be identified and addressed. Speaking on Newstalk Breakfast and later on RTÉ's Today with Claire Byrne, Ms Macken said she was 'overwhelmed' by the public support she has received. She said the HSE's court apology 'meant a huge amount' to her. 'Just the acknowledgement alone from the failures and everything, and even the words that they used, it was a really good conclusion, I suppose, to everything for us. We kind of didn't know whether we were going to get it, and there's been a lot of women in my position that didn't get that, so it is something that I don't take for granted,' she told Newstalk. The mother of two girls, aged five and eight, said on Today with Claire Byrne that while she trusted the system, its failure in her case does not mean it won't work for others. 'I would never tell someone not to get a smear. It didn't work for me, but that doesn't mean it won't work for you. 'I have two little girls, they'll be definitely getting the vaccinations. I don't want people to take from this that I'm saying smears don't work, it's just they need to be checked more like. Something isn't working somewhere and that's what we need to find out.' Receiving the apology was crucial for both her and her husband, Alan as she had felt that she needed 'to stick up for myself.' She had done 'everything right' and had even paid for smears herself having seen the experience of Jade Goody. 'I did everything I was meant to and for them to then validate that was huge for me.' Leona Macken and her husband Alan settled their legal action against the HSE, arising from what they said were failures in the CervicalCheck screening programme in 2016 and 2020. Picture: Collins Courts Despite two clear smear results, she said she always felt something was wrong. After two pregnancies, she assumed her symptoms might be due to hormonal changes, polycystic ovaries, endometriosis or perimenopause. But blood tests and ultrasounds were clear. 'I just did not think cancer at all because I knew I'd been so careful and I also knew it was a slow progressing cancer so I knew like that if there was something there I would have had abnormalities at some stage.' Ms Macken's current stage 4 diagnosis means 'it's treatable to a certain extent, but not curable.' "When I went in first, as you can imagine, being told you have stage 4 cancer, after being through everything else, and knowing this could have been avoided, it was gut-wrenching. I felt like, so hard done by, I'd done everything I could do. How did I get to this point,' she said. Telling her family was 'horrific.' She is currently undergoing quadruple therapy—'two chemotherapies and one or two immunotherapies,' she said. "At this point, I'm just still not giving in. I want to be the one to do it. 'I have two little girls growing up now and I'm worried about them. What's going to happen, you know? It's not good enough what's happening. I shouldn't be going through this today. I shouldn't be living this today.' Ms Macken welcomed an apology from health minister Jennifer Carroll MacNeill and said she would love to meet her. 'I'm a very open person and I'm very open to a chat," she said. "They need to see these people in real life and see what they're going through, that they're not just a cancer, there are stories behind these people, where it's affecting my mom, my dad, where people's daughters, mothers, you know, and we shouldn't be going through it. "That's the most frustrating part is it could have been avoided.' Leona Macken settled her legal action against the HSE, arising from what they said were failures in the CervicalCheck screening programme in 2016 and 2020. Picture: Collins Courts She said she refused to give up. 'I have too much to live for. It's such a beautiful life. I have two beautiful children. I have an amazing family and a huge support behind me. In every other aspect of my life, I've always said I'm so lucky. I just have the most beautiful life and I just don't want to leave it." But, she added, serious reform is needed. "The auditing was stopped in 2018. It hasn't been picked up since. It was stopped weeks after Vicky Phelan's case," she said on Newstalk. "The Patient Safety Act of 2013 states that if this is even picked back up, it must remain anonymous. So the patients aren't necessarily being told the results. There are so many things in the system that need to be rectified like it needs to be looked at. It's just not good enough. It's people's family, it's people's daughters, kids are losing their mommies." On Morning Ireland, Minister Carroll MacNeill offered a personal apology and said that women should not have to fight for access to their medical history. 'There should be open disclosure and that's very, very clear and I want to offer my apology too in this case because what you have here is a 38-year-old woman who has been impacted in this way and so have her family and that is so, so important.' The Minister acknowledged that all screening programmes have limitations but said 'this should never have happened.' "What we want is people in medical negligence cases to have absolutely timely open disclosure, they need a resolution to their case and they do not need additional stress going through the court process. 'Obviously the state needs to manage it to a certain extent in terms of the broader liability but these are very, very clear cases and it is really important that people are treated and not provided additional stress and additional hurt through a court process."
