
Rejuvenating state public universities
It duly acknowledged the significant role played by the SSPUs. SPUs are predominant in the university system of higher education. According to the All India Survey of Higher Education report, there are 445 SPUs as against only 53 central universities. By virtue of a policy shift at the Central and state levels, a new breed of institutions classified as deemed and private universities have mushroomed.
As per the AISHE report there are 81 private deemed Universities and 391 state private universities, forcing the pendulum to lean towards private participation. It is no secret that both the central and state governments have dumped the idea that education shall be a 'merit good' in precept and practice. It appears that it is the policy of the state governments to reduce the investment in higher education.
Despite the lukewarm treatment meted out to them, the mark of SPUs in the higher education sector remains indelible in terms of access to higher education, low-fee structure and supervision of the system.
As per the AISHE report 2021-22, SPUs account for 81 per cent of student enrolment, thereby shooting up the Gross Enrolment Ratio (GER) to the present level of 28.4 per cent. SPUs are also prime movers in maintaining Gender Parity Index (GPI) and enhancing the same from 0.87 in 2011-12 to 1.01 in 2021-22 for the entire nation.
However, despite such significance, SPUs are beset with insurmountable challenges and deep-rooted problems like acute shortage of faculty, inadequate infrastructure, comparatively inferior laboratories, insufficient grants and to cap it all n overwhelming political pressure.
The policy recommendations of NITI Aayog centred around four major challenges, including quality, funding, governance and employability.
The implementation roadmap is categorised into three time periods-short term (up to two years), medium term (2-5 years) and long term (over five years). It is quite laudable that Aayog has tried to identify the players responsible for implementing the roadmap. The irony of the situation is that none of the identified individuals is new to the system but integral to it.
Even then, they could not arrest the downfall of the PSUs. The ills besetting PSUs require a major surgery and not a 'pain balm treatment'.
An attempt is being made here to detail the major and serious issues faced by them and how infeasible are the recommendations of NITI Aayog team in this regard. I am also trying to offer a more direct and realistic implementation process towards ameliorating the plight of SPUs.
The first and foremost issue pertains to the acute shortage of faculty. As per one estimate, almost 50 per cent of the faculty positions in SPUs remain vacant. The entire activity is operated according to the whims and fancies of the state governments and mostly to the disadvantage of universities. We have come across instances wherein some state governments did not sanction a single faculty position, although new courses and programmes were incorporated into the curriculum. The common refrain of the authorities is 'budget' constraints. The recruitment processes of such institutes face litigation one too many, making it near impossible for the incumbent Vice-Chancellor to fill the vacancies during his three-year tenure.
The teaching deficiency is made good by the appointment of part-time, contract and guest faculty. The irony of the situation is that the average service of these temporary faculty is anywhere around 10-15 years; and many of them become ineligible, if the universities apply a cap on the age of entry into service. NITI Aayog puts the responsibility on the shoulders of the state government, but precious little progress is made on this front.
The second relates to lack of a sound base of research in terms of good quality infrastructure and trained faculty. Spending on research projects is miniscule, while the capability of these institutions to mobilise funds from agencies like DST, DBT, UGC, AICTE, other departments and ministries is dismal. This is exacerbated by the limited access to high-ranking quality journals.
To set the things right, the NITI Aayog called for formulation of a clear policy for research, allocation of funds for establishing research labs, boosting collaborations and the need to have more centres of excellence. But the sorry state-of-affairs is that those entrusted with this responsibility are in deep slumber.
The third factor relates to the complete absence of institution-industry interface in most SPUs. This needs to be stepped up to recognisable levels like the private institutions, which provide pre-placement training and long-term internships. Alternatively, SPUs can avail the opportunities provided through platforms like 'National Career Service' and AICTE's internship facility.
The fourth dimension relates to funding of SPUs. Compared to central universities, IITs and NITs, SPUs are totally dependent on block grants extended by the respective state governments or through self-finance courses. Projects and consultancy are quite unthinkable.
The final and fifth issue pertains to governance. At a time when universities were founded by princely states, the governing structures and funding were exemplary. The best example is the establishment of Osmania University by Nawab Osman Ali Khan in 1917. The iconic Arts College building remains a timeless architectural marvel.
In the given circumstances, it is the considered opinion of the author that measures be taken to categorise SPUs into teaching and research outfits with designated objectives and targets. As a matter of fact, this is also the prescription of the NEP, 2020.
The central government should take the lead by providing the necessary funding. It is time every HEI is allowed and provided with a congenial atmosphere to emerge as institutions of distinctive character and capable of creating their own USP and 'Brand Image'.
(The writer is a former Vice-Chancellor of Acharya Nagarjuna University)
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Hans India
2 hours ago
- Hans India
11 blocks under aspirational prog
Bhubaneswar: Eleven blocks of Odisha have been included in the Aspirational Block Programme of the NITI Aayog, according to a statement issued by the Chief Minister's Office (CMO) on Tuesday. The programme focuses on improving governance to enhance the quality of life of citizens and service delivery in the remotest and less developed blocks of India. This is done through converging existing schemes, defining outcomes and monitoring them constantly to bridge gaps. Five blocks of Keonjhar district and six of Mayurbhanj district have been added to the programme. With this, a total of 40 blocks of Odisha have now become Aspirational blocks. As per the statement, Chief Minister Mohan Charan Majhi had requested the NITI Aayog to include these blocks under its programme. Accepting Majhi's request, the NITI Aayog has included these blocks in the Aspirational Programme. The new blocks that have been included in the programme are Champua, Jhumpura, Keonjhar Sadar, Patna and Telkoi of Keonjhar district and Behalda, Bijataala, Jamada, Kusumi, Rairangpur and Tiringi of Mayurbhanj district. A notification in this regard was issued by the NITI Aayog on Tuesday. The broad contours of the programme are convergence of Central & State schemes, collaboration of Central, State-level nodal officers and district collectors and competition among blocks through monthly delta ranking.


Indian Express
3 hours ago
- Indian Express
India, China and the Brahmaputra front
Last week, the Chinese government started work on the construction of a massive hydropower project on the Yarlung Zangbo, just before the river bends and enters Arunachal Pradesh, where it is called the Siang. The river then flows into Assam, where it is called the Brahmaputra. The $170 billion project, linked to Beijing's developmental goals in the Tibetan region, is expected to generate 60 GW of electricity, roughly three times more than the Three Gorges Dam. The project has stirred old anxieties in the river's downstream, especially in Arunachal Pradesh and Bangladesh. Arunachal Chief Minister Pema Khandu has described the Chinese project as a 'ticking water bomb'. An increase in the Chinese capacity to manipulate the river's flows once the dam is constructed could increase the risks of floods in the country's Northeast, he has said. The fact that very little is known of the project's storage capacity has aggravated the unease. The risk could also stem from sudden surges in downstream flows — from unannounced water releases or from increased discharge as a result of the warming climate or even engineering errors. Hydrology experts fear that the Chinese project could disrupt water flow to the hydro projects proposed in the country's Northeast — the region holds nearly half of India's hydropower potential, over 80 per cent of which remains untapped. India's Brahmaputra predicament is unlike that of most lower riparian states. The river gains most of its volume only after it enters Arunachal Pradesh, fed by largely river-fed tributaries in the Eastern Himalaya, such as the Lohit and the Dibang. In the Brahmaputra's lower riparian regions, the unpredictability of flood patterns is already a big challenge. The fears about inundation due to the river's changing flows are, therefore, not unfounded. In 2013, India and China signed a MoU on sharing information on river flows. But, by all accounts, Beijing has not always been open to sharing hydrological data. A more effective response to the Chinese dam would be to build up the defences of vulnerable regions in the Northeast. In 2017, when the Yarlung Zangbo dam was still at a planning stage, Niti Aayog had proposed a multipurpose project in the Siang region as a strategic counter to the Chinese hydro station. Besides generating electricity, the project's storage facility can cushion the Northeast from the risks of being flooded by water released from the Chinese dam. However, work on the Siang dam has progressed at a slow pace, largely because a section of the local population has opposed the project. The Ministry of Jal Shakti tasked the National Hydro Power Corporation to prepare a pre-feasibility report but vital investigations have not been conducted. Fears about displacement and livelihood losses have found expression in the opposition to the Siang project. The political class and technical experts must come together to build safeguards and remove such apprehensions. The work on building storage facilities downstream of the Brahmaputra cannot be postponed.


India Today
a day ago
- India Today
In India, China inching closer, a Trump role he won't brag about
The Galwan crisis might not be a distant memory, but it no longer seems to dominate New Delhi's priorities. Beijing's intimidation tactics appear to have run its course. China, the hostile, irresponsible and unpredictable neighbour, is now slowly circling back, while India is sceptical, but cautiously positive. After a flurry of reactive bans on Chinese products, sharp rhetoric, and scores of diplomatic meetings, India, despite Beijing's open support to Pakistan during Operation Sindoor, seems to be reciprocating after China extended its the wildcard? Donald Trump's US is a key backdrop. With the US' diktats and its new worldview, and the growing realisation of mutual dependence and co-existance, on China's and India's part, are the key remains a huge market for Chinese goods, including for critical imports, while New Delhi, in turn, needs Beijing's raw materials and technological cooperation. And Trump's US, of late, has not been a partner, but a preacher for both the Asian powers. That's what's perhaps nudging New Delhi and Beijing toward a thaw in ties, cautious yet pragmatic, even as Operation Sindoor exposed the China-Pakistan military nexus. India is pursuing selective economic engagement while simultaneously diversifying its resources and Russia looks aligned with both, and the old RIC troika — Russia, India, China — seems set for a tentative revival, with all three on has tried to take credit for truce of India-Pakistan mini-war, to Ukraine and Russia war, but this is one thing he can't claim credit comes even as the Niti Aayog proposed allowing Chinese companies to acquire up to a 24% stake in Indian firms without prior approval, as the current rules have delayed several sizeable deals, news agency Reuters reported on July 18, citing three Indian government sources."Seems like New Delhi is preparing for a worse relationship with the US in the future," national security and Indo-Pacific analyst Derek Grossman posted on General GD Bakshi (retired) said China asking for a thaw makes "eminent strategic sense as hostility with India would put it in a two-front war situation".JAISHANKAR-XI HANDSHAKE AND A DIPLOMATIC MESSAGELast week, External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar, on his first visit to China in five years, met Chinese President Xi Jinping. The meeting came after India-China bilateral relations soured after the border standoff in eastern Ladakh that began in the two leaders shook hands, Jaishankar, in China for the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) foreign ministers' meeting, said he apprised Xi of recent developments in bilateral ties and conveyed the greetings of President Droupadi Murmu and Prime Minister Narendra on President Xi Jinping this morning in Beijing along with my fellow SCO Foreign Ministers. Conveyed the greetings of President Droupadi Murmu and Prime Minister Narendra Modi. Apprised President Xi of the recent development of our bilateral ties. Value the guidance of our leaders in that regard," Jaishankar posted on touched upon the border issue in his meeting with his Chinese counterpart Wang Yi, saying the countries must move forward on de-escalation at the Line of Actual Control (LAC). He underscored that differences should not become disputes and nor should competition become visit comes after Raksha Mantri Rajnath Singh's trip to Qingdao in June, the first by an Indian defence minister to China in over a called for a "structured roadmap of permanent engagement and de-escalation".These engagements pave the way for Prime Minister Narendra Modi's likely visit to China for the SCO Leaders' Summit later this AND CHINA STEP-UP COOPERATIONIndia, for some time now, has been cautiously rebuilding ties with October 2024, both countries agreed on patrolling arrangements along the LAC, resolving tensions from the 2020 Galwan flights resumed in January 2025, and Indian pilgrims regained access to Kailash Mansarovar for pilgrimage after six Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Lin Jian supported Russia's RIC proposal, stating, "China-Russia-India cooperation not only serves the respective interests of the three countries but also helps uphold peace, security, stability and progress in the region and the world"."China stands ready to maintain communication with Russia and India on advancing trilateral cooperation," Jian Russia's Deputy Foreign Minister Andrei Rudenko echoed this, saying Moscow is negotiating with Beijing and New Delhi to revive the RIC format, expecting agreement RIC troika, formalised in 2002, aims to discuss global and regional issues but stalled due to the 2020 India-China standoff and the Covid pandemic. Russia's push, as Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov noted in May, aims to leverage "improved India-China border relations" and "to pan-continental process, including the formation of a multipolar architecture".Through reference to "multipolar architecture", the Kremlin is likely hinting at US hegemony and its erratic use these INDIA AND CHINA ARE INCHING CLOSERIndia and China appear to be slowly getting closer, driven by strategic pragmatism. They are cautiously exploring avenues of cooperation to create alternative frameworks, even as the US continues to play its hegemon evolving engagement, however, does not imply any dilution of New Delhi's commitment to Atmanirbhar Bharat or other policy aimed at making India an industrial the looming unpredictability triggered by Trump's policies, including a proposed 500% tariff on countries trading with Russia, has pushed India and China heavily relies on Chinese imports, especially electronics, machinery, and chemical technology, and rare earth minerals. Commerce Minister Piyush Goyal had earlier resisted "unchecked Chinese investments", but batted for selective $85 billion trade deficit with China is a key Christopher Clary of the University of Albany told the BBC, "India thought it would be a very close strategic ally [of the US], but they were not getting the support they were expecting from Washington".This was clearly visible during the mini-war with Pakistan in Pant, foreign policy head at the Observer Research Foundation, told news agency Reuters, "Certainly there is an outreach to China, and I think it is mutual. China is also reaching out".International Relations professor and columnist Happymon Jacob, in his column for the Hindustan Times, wrote, "Even if none of India's minilaterals with Russia and China deliver anything useful, India must continue to engage them, for geopolitical loneliness can be more costly than the boredom of tiresome summitry".advertisementJacob's observation hints that India's cautious engagement with China, despite challenges of potential threats shaped by historical experiences, is a pragmatic hedge against "geopolitical loneliness".Meanwhile, Niti Aayog proposed easing rules that de facto require extra scrutiny for investments by Chinese companies, arguing that the rules have meant delays for some sizeable deals, reported news agency Reuters, citing three Indian government sources, last India-China handshake reflects a pragmatic realisation of mutual economic dependence amid uncertainties. Trump's erratic policies have catalysed this cautious detente. The thaw in ties might be with guards on, but it's shaped by realism.- EndsTune InMust Watch