Britain's Centrica signs $27 billion deal for gas from Norway's Equinor
Britain is seeking to cut its reliance on gas to help meet climate targets but around 70% of its homes are heated using the fossil fuel while gas-fired power plants account for around a quarter of the country's electricity supply.
"This landmark agreement underscores the vital role that natural gas plays as a transition fuel as we navigate towards a low carbon energy future," Centrica CEO Chris O'Shea said in a press release.
Equinor will supply five billion cubic meters (bcm) of gas a year until 2035, equivalent to around 8% of Britain's gas demand.
The contract also allows for natural gas sales to be replaced with hydrogen in the future.
Britain's North Sea fossil fuel production has declined sharply since its peak in the late 1990s and the Labour government has said it will not issue any new oil and gas licences as part of its efforts to meet climate goals.
Britain imported almost two-thirds of its gas demand last year, with half of the imports coming from Norway.
Centrica last signed a deal with Equinor in June 2022 for the firm to deliver additional gas for the following three winters as countries across Europe grappled with supply concerns following Russia's invasion of Ukraine and a huge reduction in Russian gas flows to Europe.
Centrica also has liquefied natural gas deals with U.S. firms Coterra Energy and Delfin Midstream, and Brazil's Petrobras.
($1 = 0.7389 pounds)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
24 minutes ago
- The Independent
Calm down, homeowners – Rachel Reeves' property tax might be an improvement
Another day, another idea that Rachel Reeves is said to be considering. It's as if the chancellor is putting suggestions out there to see what sticks. Either that, or she just wants to be seen to be busy and to let it be known she has considered all options before delivering her autumn Budget, which is when we will discover for certain. What is clear is that Reeves has a funding gap to fill, and the backdrop – of stretched national and local public services and a flatlining economy – isn't pretty. Nor too is a regime of anachronistic, complex and often unfair taxes, especially regarding homes. The latest possibility for dissection and reaction then, is a new property tax, to replace stamp duty and council tax. First up would be an annual tax to replace stamp duty on homes worth more than £500,000, to be paid by owner-occupiers. The amount charged would be based on the value of the property according to a rate set by the government; HMRC would collect payment. The annual levy would not apply to second homes because they would still be subject to stamp duty, including the 5 per cent second home surcharge. The aim of this new national property tax would be the creation of a revenue source that is more reliable and not so prone to fluctuations in the housing market as stamp duty. It would be more efficient and practical, reflective of a current Britain (stamp duty, the oldest of all taxes, was born in 1694) and, crucially, would not be such a drag on home sales. Properties in the bracket below £500,000, upwards of £250,000, would be freed. Given that the average price of a home in the UK was £272,664 according to Nationwide, most homes would be liberated, including starter homes. It would prove easier and cheaper to move house and encourage greater mobility. Inevitably, the new tax will, and is, already being criticised as another 'wealth tax'. Quickest out of the traps was Location, Location, Location presenter Kirstie Allsopp who decried the suggestion of a property tax as 'really destabilising for the property market – and when I say the property market, I mean people's homes. This government seems to want to punish people for making the sacrifices they've made to buy their own homes.' Reeves and her advisers are letting it be known that they are following a report from the centre-right (so not leftist) think tank, Onward. It was Onward that came up with the £250,000-to-£500,000 net. Under the Onward plan, the suggested annual rate above £500,000 would be 0.54 per cent, and a home worth more than £1m would pay 0.81 per cent on the portion over that limit. Important, given the state of the nation's finances, is the possibility it will not actually raise more than stamp duty. Onward's recommendation that it should not be retrospective would mean stamp duty would not be scrapped in one go, the substitute being phased in gradually. So, it is no fiscal panacea, rather a nice thing to have. Onward also recommended ditching council tax, also loathed by left and right, and introducing a local proportional property tax. It would be charged yearly to homeowners, not residents, on properties up to £500,000. Like council tax, the rate would be set by local authorities, but Onward's guide of 0.44 per cent would mean a maximum bill of £2,196 a year, payable to the council. With properties worth more than £500,000, the government will step in and take an additional 0.54 per cent, also annually, on the portion above £500,000. Out would go the outdated and flawed council tax banding system assessed on property values from 1991. It would be fairer and would allow councils to retain a strong lever over their own finances. It could head off some of the council bankruptcies that are brewing. Unfortunately, though, it too is unlikely to prove a quick fix – experts are predicting it will take a while to implement. A test for Reeves and for Sir Keir Starmer would be, given their talk of wanting to go 'further and faster' and their commitment to removing bureaucracy, is just how soon any of these changes could come on-stream. The new local tax is also not especially redistributive – poor areas would still remain disadvantaged, affluent ones would still be able to bask in their good fortune. The new, national and local property tax would enjoy another advantage, in that Britain would operate under one structure. At present, stamp duty exists in England and Northern Ireland – Wales and Scotland do it their way. This would cut across, and while it might not be popular with nationalists it would be uniform. Above all, what is under discussion, if it is Onward, bearing in mind that other think tanks have their own ideas, is more appealing than the current mess. It is true that it is not hard, that anything would be better, but this does begin to feel like genuine reform and modernisation.
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Higher airfares and hotel prices predicted to push up UK inflation in July
Prices in the UK are set to have risen faster last month as school holidays boosted travel costs and grocery bills remain elevated, economists said. Some experts said an ' Oasis bump' could have contributed to higher accommodation prices in July. The Office for National Statistics (ONS) will publish the latest inflation dataset on Wednesday. The rate of Consumer Prices Index (CPI) inflation is widely expected to have increased to 3.7% in July, from the 3.6% recorded in June. The school summer holidays are likely to have seen airfares rise considerably, with airlines typically bumping up prices in July amid stronger demand from families. Analysts for Pantheon Macroeconomics forecast that airfares could surge by 17.1% between June and July. Rail costs and package holidays are also set to have jumped amid the spike in summer travel. July's Retail Prices Index (RPI) measure of inflation will also be announced on Wednesday. The Government has not confirmed how it will determine the cap on regulated train fare rises in England in 2026, but this year's 4.6% hike was one percentage point above RPI in July 2024. Banking group Investec has forecast this year's July RPI figure will be 4.5%, which means fares could jump by 5.5%. Pressure group Railfuture told the PA news agency 'it would be outrageous' if fares rose by that much. Meanwhile, economists have pointed to a possible spike in hotel prices helping drive up CPI inflation in July. Sanjay Raja, senior economist for Deutsche Bank, said this could partly be attributed to British band Oasis kicking off their reunion tour in July. The concerts brought in hordes of fans to arenas in Cardiff, Manchester, London and Edinburgh, which could have driven greater demand for hotel rooms. Accommodation prices could rise by as much as 9% in July, compared with June, 'with the Oasis concerts having a strong impact on Manchester prices alone', the economist said. Mr Raja is predicting headline UK inflation will have risen to 3.8% in July. Susannah Streeter, head of money and markets for Hargreaves Lansdown, said: 'The Oasis tour, which saw high demand for hospitality around the gig dates, has the potential to push up inflation in the sector during July. 'We are unlikely to see the Gallagher effect show up in quite the same way as Taylor Swift's bump to prices in June 2024. 'But demand for hotel rooms, beer, bucket hats and Nineties-style gear could be one of the factors that keep inflation heading higher.' Food prices have also been rising in recent months – partly driven by higher ingredients, labour and regulatory costs. Annual food price inflation increased for the third month in a row in June, hitting the highest rate since February 2024. Victoria Scholar, head of investment for Interactive Investor, said there were 'particular worries about domestic food price inflation as well as uncertainty around how (US President Donald) Trump's tariffs could push up prices'. The Bank of England is forecasting that inflation will increase further this year and peak at about 4% in September, before easing throughout the next two years. The central bank said accelerating food and energy prices have been key drivers in the uptick in inflation.
Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
Reeves's headroom wiped out by surge in borrowing costs
Rachel Reeves's headroom to balance Britain's public finances has been wiped out by higher borrowing costs and a humiliating climbdown on welfare reform. Economists warned that the Chancellor would have to raise taxes by 'at least' £20bn in the autumn Budget against a backdrop of weak growth and interest rates that are likely to stay higher for longer. Borrowing costs on UK government debt have climbed sharply since the Spring Statement in March, with long-term gilt yields now at their highest rate since 1998. The Chancellor has just a £9.9bn buffer on her main borrowing rule to ensure tax revenues cover day-to-day spending. Andrew Goodwin, the chief UK economist at Oxford Economics, said roughly £6.5bn of her headroom had already been wiped out from the rise in borrowing costs and investors believing the Bank of England will not cut interest rates again from 4pc this year. Separate analysis by Capital Economics showed £2.5bn of this had been wiped out over the past seven days alone amid a rise in longer-term yields. Official data published on Wednesday are expected to show that inflation rose to 3.7pc in July – its highest rate since the start of 2024 and almost twice the Bank's 2pc target. Policymakers are increasingly worried that rising food prices will fuel demands for higher pay. Mr Goodwin said this presented a 'challenging' backdrop for the Chancellor who less than a year ago announced record tax rises of £40bn. Ms Reeves was also forced to backtrack on a series of reforms to disability and incapacity benefits in the spring as well as restoring winter fuel payments to most pensioners in an about-turn that will cost £5bn. Mr Goodwin said: 'Rising gilt yields and markets reacting to the Bank of England's more hawkish commentary are making the fiscal arithmetic look increasingly challenging. If market pricing stays where it is today, it will knock about £6.5bn off the £9.9bn of headroom. When you factor in the u-turns on welfare reforms and winter fuel payments for some pensioners, all of the headroom disappears.' It came as a British hedge fund warned that bond vigilantes were poised to ramp up the cost of government borrowing around the world over fears about the size of the US debt pile. FTSE 250-listed Man Group, which manages $193bn (£143bn) of assets, said investors unhappy at Donald Trump's tax-cutting plans would soon 'come out in force and drive yields up '. Since early August, the 10-year Treasury bond yield – a benchmark for the cost of government borrowing – has climbed from 4.19pc to 4.33pc. Kristina Hooper, at Man Group, said: 'At some point, I would expect bond vigilantes to come out in force and drive yields up sustainably, but we will have to wait and see when'. Oxford Economics expects Britain's fiscal watchdog to announce a downgrade in productivity alongside its latest assessment of the economy and public finances in the autumn, which Mr Goodwin said would reflect 'a more realistic view of long-term growth prospects'. Ms Reeves has ordered officials to prioritise productivity-enhancing reforms in the Budget amid fears that a significant downgrade to the country's growth prospects will force her to backtrack on a manifesto pledge to shield working people from tax rises. The Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR) has previously warned that nudging down Britain's long-term growth prospects by just 0.1pc would blow a £7bn hole in the Chancellor's fiscal plans. Mr Goodwin warned: 'We could easily be looking at the Government needing to tighten policy by at least £20-30bn, and possibly more, at the Budget.' Alex Kerr, at Capital Economics, estimated that the Chancellor would have to raise taxes by between £17bn to £27bn at the Budget 'most of which will probably be funded by tax rises'. Others have warned of a black hole of up to £50bn in the public finances. It came as separate data showed that the UK economy grew faster than thought following the end of lockdown. However, in another blow to Britain's statistics office, the Office for National Statistics (ONS) postponed its latest retail sales data which were due on Friday 'to allow for further quality assurance'.
