Three Days Left To Buy ITV plc (LON:ITV) Before The Ex-Dividend Date
Readers hoping to buy ITV plc (LON:ITV) for its dividend will need to make their move shortly, as the stock is about to trade ex-dividend. The ex-dividend date is usually set to be two business days before the record date, which is the cut-off date on which you must be present on the company's books as a shareholder in order to receive the dividend. The ex-dividend date is important as the process of settlement involves at least two full business days. So if you miss that date, you would not show up on the company's books on the record date. Therefore, if you purchase ITV's shares on or after the 10th of April, you won't be eligible to receive the dividend, when it is paid on the 22nd of May.
The company's next dividend payment will be UK£0.033 per share, on the back of last year when the company paid a total of UK£0.05 to shareholders. Based on the last year's worth of payments, ITV has a trailing yield of 7.1% on the current stock price of UK£0.709. Dividends are a major contributor to investment returns for long term holders, but only if the dividend continues to be paid. So we need to check whether the dividend payments are covered, and if earnings are growing.
Trump has pledged to "unleash" American oil and gas and these 15 US stocks have developments that are poised to benefit.
Dividends are typically paid out of company income, so if a company pays out more than it earned, its dividend is usually at a higher risk of being cut. That's why it's good to see ITV paying out a modest 48% of its earnings. That said, even highly profitable companies sometimes might not generate enough cash to pay the dividend, which is why we should always check if the dividend is covered by cash flow. It paid out more than half (70%) of its free cash flow in the past year, which is within an average range for most companies.
It's encouraging to see that the dividend is covered by both profit and cash flow. This generally suggests the dividend is sustainable, as long as earnings don't drop precipitously.
Check out our latest analysis for ITV
Click here to see the company's payout ratio, plus analyst estimates of its future dividends.
Companies that aren't growing their earnings can still be valuable, but it is even more important to assess the sustainability of the dividend if it looks like the company will struggle to grow. If business enters a downturn and the dividend is cut, the company could see its value fall precipitously. With that in mind, we're not enthused to see that ITV's earnings per share have remained effectively flat over the past five years. Better than seeing them fall off a cliff, for sure, but the best dividend stocks grow their earnings meaningfully over the long run.
Many investors will assess a company's dividend performance by evaluating how much the dividend payments have changed over time. ITV has seen its dividend decline 4.3% per annum on average over the past 10 years, which is not great to see.
From a dividend perspective, should investors buy or avoid ITV? Earnings per share are down very slightly in recent times, and ITV paid out less half its profit and more than half its cash flow as dividends, which is not the worst combination but could be better. To summarise, ITV looks okay on this analysis, although it doesn't appear a stand-out opportunity.
If you want to look further into ITV, it's worth knowing the risks this business faces. For instance, we've identified 3 warning signs for ITV (1 is significant) you should be aware of.
If you're in the market for strong dividend payers, we recommend checking our selection of top dividend stocks.
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Miami Herald
31 minutes ago
- Miami Herald
The 10 most popular new cars & SUVs of 2025 (so far), according to Consumer Reports
Looming economic uncertainties, stubbornly high interest rates, and Trump's tariffs on imported auto parts and automobiles might lead you to think that 2025 is the worst time ever to buy a new car. But 3.9 million new vehicles were sold in the first few months of the year, which represented a 4% increase over 2024. And while current economic headwinds have caused Cox Automotive to reduce its full-year new vehicle sales estimates from 16.3 million to 15.6 million, that still means millions of people are heading over to their dealerships to purchase a new car or SUV. Because the simple fact is, if you need a new car, you need a new car. Don't miss the move: Subscribe to TheStreet's free daily newsletter Buying a new vehicle seems to be an increasingly smart investment, due to the fact that used cars aren't the steals they used to be. Their prices have also been on the rise: According to data from Edmunds, the average price of a three-year-old vehicle is now an incredible $30,522, which significantly narrows the cost differential between new and used vehicles. There are plenty of advantages to buying a new vehicle, with safety and reliability at the top of the list. Related: The 10 most reliable car brands in 2025 according to Consumer Reports New cars are safer Due to advancements in safety technologies and structural designs, new cars typically have more standard safety features than used vehicles. These days, automatic emergency braking (AEB) comes standard on most new vehicles, while blind-spot monitoring and rear cross-traffic warning systems are other common new-vehicle features that can often help to prevent accidents from occurring in the first place. New cars are more reliable In addition, shiny new cars come with shiny new components, lessening the chance of immediate mechanical issues. They also have the added benefit of a factory warranty, which covers repairs for a certain period-something older, pre-owned vehicles might not. Consumer Reports (CR), the venerable product testing and consumer advocacy organization, has been in business since 1936, which means it has weathered economic ups and downs for 89 years. In fact, its entire purpose, which is to provide unbiased reviews of tens of thousands of products in order to inform consumers on product quality and safety, was shaped by the harsh economic realities of the Great Depression. Related: The 10 best compact crossover SUVs according to Consumer Reports Acknowledging the challenges car buyers face in 2025, CR put together a few helpful hints for consumers so they can avoid overpaying for their vehicles. They include: Avoid buying first-year "redesigned" models, which have received plenty of media hype and, often, a steep price tag to match. Instead, CR suggests waiting another year so that the vehicles' inflated sticker price comes down-and any "kinks" the new model experiences have been worked out, consumers should select smaller vehicles, or ones with fewer features, simply due to the fact that they have lower material and manufacturing costs. Because smaller vehicles weigh less, they also experience lower destination charges, which get passed on to the consumer. CR suggests that car buyers do their research online and find out what prices cars in their area are selling for, as well as what their MSRP is. That can help you determine a vehicle's true value-as well as how much you're willing to spend to get it. Consumer Reports listens to the feedback it receives from its 6 million members; in fact, it takes into account which cars and SUVs consumers are searching for online when it compiles its list of "most popular" vehicles. More on Consumer Reports: The best gas grills under $250, ranked by Consumer Reports dataThe least expensive car brands to repair & maintain according to Consumer ReportsTop 10 electric cars that aren't Tesla, based on Consumer Reports data But the venerable consumer advocacy group doesn't stop at data. It then cross references these vehicles with results from its own, extensive internal tests in order to rank its list in order of highest-rated vehicles. This helps consumers to know they're making the smartest possible buying decision-no matter what's going on in the world at large. CR road-tests dozens of vehicles at its testing facility in Colchester, Connecticut, putting each car and SUV through a barrage of tests, including acceleration, braking, crash testing, emergency handling, smoothness of ride, and fuel economy, to name a few. It then surveys its members on metrics such as reliability and overall satisfaction, combining all results together into its Overall Score. CR notes that each of the vehicles on its list of "Most Popular New Cars and SUVs" have received high Overall Scores. And, all of these vehicles are categorized as SUVs. However, while all of the vehicles that made its list come with standard automatic emergency braking (AEB), it notes which ones also come with blind-spot monitoring and rear cross-traffic warning systems. Here's the list: 2025 Subaru Forester MPG: Overall 29 / Hwy 39 Price: $29,995–$43,295 2025 Toyota RAV4 MPG: Overall 27 / Hwy 38Price: $29,250–$40,605 2025 Honda CR-V MPG: Overall 26 / Hwy 33Price: $30,100–$50,000 OWS Photography, CC BY 4.0, via Wikimedia Commons 2025 Subaru Crosstrek MPG: Overall 29 / Hwy 41 Price: $26,560–$33,360 2025 Toyota RAV4 Hybrid MPG: Overall 37 / Hwy 41 Price: $28,850–$40,205 Ethan Llamas, CC BY-SA 4.0, via Wikimedia Commons 2025 Mazda CX-5 MPG: Overall 24 / Hwy 33 Price: $28,770–$40,800 2025 Honda CR-V Hybrid MPG: Overall 35 / Hwy 38 Price: $34,650–$41,100 2025 Toyota Highlander MPG: Overall 22 / Hwy 33 Price: $39,820–$53,975 2025 Toyota Highlander Hybrid MPG: Overall 35 / Hwy 41 Price: $39,520–$53,675 Related: 8 popular vehicles that are less reliable than you think, according to Consumer Reports The Arena Media Brands, LLC THESTREET is a registered trademark of TheStreet, Inc.
Miami Herald
31 minutes ago
- Miami Herald
AMD CEO Su turns heads with comments at AI event
Lisa Su has seen the future and she wants to tell you all about it. The chairwoman and CEO of Advanced Micro Devices (AMD) took the stage at the chipmaker's "Advancing AI" developers conference to give the attendees an idea of what's next. Don't miss the move: Subscribe to TheStreet's free daily newsletter "At AMD, we're really focused on pushing the boundaries of high performance and adaptive computing to help solve some of the world's most important challenges," Su said during her keynote address. "Frankly, computing has never been more important in the world. "I'm always incredibly proud to say that billions of people use AMD technology every day, whether you're talking about services like Microsoft Office 365 or Facebook or Zoom or Netflix or Uber or Salesforce or SAP and many more running on AMD infrastructure." Su said her company's latest AI processors can challenge Nvidia's (NVDA) chips in a market she now expects to soar past $500 billion in the next three years, according to Bloomberg. The new installments in AMD's MI350 chip series are faster than Nvidia's counterparts and represent major gains over earlier versions, Su said at a company event Thursday in San Jose, Calif. I-The MI355 chips, which started shipping earlier this month, are 35 times faster than predecessors, she said. Though AMD remains a distant second to Nvidia in AI accelerators - the chips that help develop and run artificial intelligence tools - it aims to catch up with these new products. More Tech Stocks: Palantir gets great news from the PentagonAnalyst has blunt words on Trump's iPhone tariff plansOpenAI teams up with legendary Apple exec The stakes are higher than ever: Su previously predicted $500 billion in market revenue by 2028, but she now sees it topping that number. "People used to think that $500 billion was very large number," she said in a briefing following her presentation. "Now it seems well within grasp." In February, AMD's forecast for its data center business reflected slower growth than some analysts predicted. AMD says the new update to its MI range will restore momentum and prove it can go toe to toe with a much bigger rival. AMD said that the MI355 outperforms Nvidia's B200 and GB200 products when it comes to running AI software and equals or exceeds them when creating the code. Purchasers will pay significantly less than they would versus Nvidia, AMD said. Nvidia did not immediately respond to a request for comment. AMD, like Nvidia, is restricted from shipping its most powerful components to China under U.S. trade curbs. The company is lobbying hard to try to get the Trump administration to allow them to freely offer AI components to other countries. AMD shares are down 4.1% this year and off nearly 28% from a year ago. Several investment firms issued research reports following AMD's "Advancing AI" event, including Evercore ISI analyst Mark Lipacis, who raised his price target on the company to $144 from $126 and affirmed an outperform rating on the shares. The AI event indicated that AMD is making progress on the ROCm software stack as well as in penetrating hyperscalers' internal inferencing workloads, the analyst tells investors. The hyperscalers are the major providers of cloud infrastructure and services. The AMD Instinct customer list expanded from Meta Platforms (META) , Oracle (ORCL) and Microsoft (MSFT) to OpenAI, xAI, Cohere, RedHat IBM's (IBM) software subsidiary, and Humain, said Lipacis. He says that increased visibility into AMD's data-center graphics-processing units warrants a higher price-to-earnings multiple. Yahoo Finance calculates the forward p/e at just under 30 for AMD and under 34 for Nvidia. Related: Analysts reboot Oracle stock price targets after earnings Roth Capital analyst Suji Desilva raised the firm's price target on AMD to $150 from $125 following AMD's AI event and affirmed a buy rating on the shares. The analyst said he was encouraged by AMD's artificial intelligence portfolio progress across processors, AI GPUs, networking, software and rack systems. Desilva said he expected faster 2026 growth with the ramp of the MI350 accelerator-based Helios rack solution. AMD sees the addressable market growing faster than previously expected, with AI inferencing and agentic AI trending as growth drivers on top of "significant" AI training investment to date, the analyst tells investors in a research note. Citi analyst Christopher Danely maintained a neutral rating on AMD with a $120 price target after the "Advancing AI" event and the launch of its latest artificial intelligence chip, the MI355X. He noted that AMD raised the AI total addressable market and announced a new customer, xAI, but it did not provide a revenue forecast for its AI business, which would benefit the stock. Related: Fund-management veteran skips emotion in investment strategy The Arena Media Brands, LLC THESTREET is a registered trademark of TheStreet, Inc.
The Hill
36 minutes ago
- The Hill
After the Trump-Musk dustup, NASA has much to consider
The social media-driven feud between President Donald Trump and SpaceX CEO Elon Musk may have simmered down a bit, with the rhetoric cooling and Musk even deleting some of his ill-considered posts about Trump from X and then apologizing for them. But the shockwaves generated by the tit-for-tat insults and threats still reverberate through NASA and the commercial space sector. When Trump threatened to pull all of SpaceX's government contracts and Musk responded by threatening to decommission the Dragon spacecraft, an apocalyptic scenario that would have cripped NASA loomed. Fortunately, both men have since backed off. Even so, according to the Washington Post, NASA and the Defense Department are quietly urging commercial space companies to hurry the development of hardware that can compete with what SpaceX has to offer. Encouraging competition with SpaceX is sound policy regardless of the relationship between Trump and Musk. However, that competition is months, if not years, in the future. The next flight of the Boeing Starliner, which failed so spectacularly in 2024, will be early next year at the earliest. The Blue Origin New Glenn, an answer to the SpaceX Falcon family of rockets, may launch once more this year and is a long way from achieving Falcon-level launch cadence. It is in Trump's and Musk's interests, and that of the American space effort, that both men repair their relationship and move on. One of the issues that drove Trump and Musk apart was Trump's abrupt and inexplicable withdrawal of the nomination of Jared Isaacman, a billionaire entrepreneur and private space traveler, for NASA administrator. Musk had championed Isaacman, who is well regarded in the aerospace community, and took it to heart when Trump changed his mind about his own nominee. The resulting leadership vacuum at NASA is being filled by Congress. The Senate Commerce Committee, chaired by Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas), has offered its own ideas for a NASA budget. The Senate Commerce document is at odds with the White House proposal in one important aspect. Whereas the Trump budget eliminates the Space Launch System after Artemis III and the Lunar Gateway, Senate Commerce would retain the massive, expensive rocket at least through Artemis V and would build the Gateway to support future Artemis missions. A NASA administrator such as Isaacman would be able to argue for the White House's approach. As for Isaacman, some people in the MAGA world, no doubt stung by the near-universal outrage sparked by his treatment at the hands of the White House, have started to trash the former nominee in the media. A recent Daily Caller story quoted unnamed White House officials accusing Isaacman of not only giving money to Democrats but of supporting diversity, equity and inclusion initiatives at his companies and in his private spaceflights. But both of these facts were known when Isaacman was nominated. According to the story, the officials said, 'Isaacman would have been a black spot on an administration otherwise filled with Republican Trump supporters or, at least, individuals like Robert F. Kennedy Jr. who backed the president prior to the election.' To hear these unnamed sources talk, Isaacman is no better than left-wing House members Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.), Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.) and their Squad. It should be noted that even if Isaacman wanted to impose DEI policies at NASA, he couldn't because of Trump's executive order prohibiting it across the federal government. Isaacman posted to X in his own defense: 'I am a moderate and donated to both parties for different reasons … my largest contribution was to President Trump — because I support many of his policies. I definitely did not like the direction this country was going over the last 4 years.' He went on to state, 'I have never spoken against the President. I have never voted against him.' It sounds like Isaacman is very loyal to Trump, remarkable under the circumstances. The suggestion of disloyalty is spurious and against the White House's interests. Isaacman's situation could provide the basis of a rapprochement between Trump and Musk. Musk has already apologized to the president for some of his posts on X, particularly the one suggesting that Trump is named in the Department of Justice's files on Jeffrey Epstein. But the president should admit fault as well. He was deceived by some of his staff about Isaacman's character. If it is not too late, he should reverse himself a second time and send his fellow billionaire's name back into nomination. NASA, the U.S., and the Trump-Musk partnership would gain as a result. Mark R. Whittington, who writes frequently about space policy, has published a political study of space exploration entitled 'Why is It So Hard to Go Back to the Moon?' as well as 'The Moon, Mars and Beyond,' and, most recently, 'Why is America Going Back to the Moon?' He blogs at Curmudgeons Corner.
