Vi Hausia Urges Community Engagement, Voter Turnout In Local Elections
The civil engineer is one of the youngest elected Pacific members on the Auckland Council, serving as deputy chair of the tara-Papatoetoe Local Board.
As Auckland approaches local elections, 31-year-old Vi Hausia is calling on more Pacific people to take on leadership roles and vote.
The civil engineer is one of the youngest elected Pacific members on the Auckland Council, serving as deputy chair of the Ōtara-Papatoetoe Local Board.
During the day, he manages stormwater infrastructure, while in his governance role, he addresses community concerns and manages public assets.
'My experience so far on the board is that our people is not often the people that complain,' Hausia says.
'There's other squeaky wheels of Auckland that are very squeaky. From my experience, the louder you squeak, that tends to follow the response that council gives. Because our people generally have low engagement doesn't necessarily mean they don't care.
'There's a lot of other barriers and issues. As elected members, we have to work twice as hard to engage our community and amplify their voices with the little engagement that we do get.'
Hausia recently shared his insights on the role of elected officials during Auckland Council's Pasifika Local Elections talanoa, a live-streamed panel event aimed at increasing civic engagement ahead of the vote in October.
Hausia describes the responsibilities of a local board member as straightforward: meetings, readings, and community engagement. Each month involves formal decision-making meetings, workshops, reviewing extensive briefing documents, and regular interactions with councillors, staff, and residents.
A key part of his role is translating complex council reports into meaningful outcomes for local residents.
'Every item on our workshop will have a presentation, and a lot of those items will also have supplementary information like memos or multiple memos, reports, and briefing videos with council staff,' he says. 'You prioritise what you read. It's about turning council-speak into real-life results.'
Hausia often shadows board chair Apulu Reece Autagavaia to stay informed about major local issues. When constituents raise concerns, such as traffic safety or funding for Polyfest, he ensures their voices reach the appropriate channels.
'Our job isn't just attending meetings, it's showing up, listening, and fighting for what matters.'
Balancing a full-time job with council responsibilities is a challenge. Hausia negotiated flexible working hours with his employer before running for office. He considers this arrangement essential for young Pacific professionals managing both careers and community responsibilities.
'Before I ran for elections, I let my job know that my intention is to run for local government,' Hausia says. 'I'm very fortunate my job is supportive and they do everything to allow enough time to attend the board. If you have a full-time job and you're likely to still work while on the board, just make sure you're able to have that flexibility.'
He says many Pacific candidates underestimate their abilities, believing that a background in politics or law is necessary. But he says that council need more than just credentials.
'Just understand the difference between local board decision making, governing body, and central government. Don't go in saying you're going to save the world and then realise you're just deciding on a swing on a playground.'
Both Auckland Council and the Electoral Commission have pledged to improve Pacific voter turnout by 2025. Erin Temu, an adviser for the Electoral Commission who also participated in the talanoa session, highlighted that only 25 per cent of voters from Pacific, Māori, and ethnic communities cast ballots in 2022.
'The Pacific population in Auckland has gone from 13 per cent to 16.6 per cent and growing, which is 275,079 people with approximately 195,000 eligible voters,' Temu says. 'If even half of these eligible Pacific voters turned out, the potential for greater representation is significant.'
Hausia's advice to aspiring Pacific leaders is clear: 'You're not alone. We need leaders who reflect us, who sound like us, and who are proud of their roots. If you're the first in your area, you won't be the last.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scoop
2 days ago
- Scoop
'We need to be involved': Pasifika candidates running in Auckland local election
Grace Tinetali-Fiavaai, RNZ Pacific journalist There are former Pacific candidates and new faces putting their names forward for this year's Auckland local government election in Aotearoa. The final confirmed list of candidates is out. In the Manukau ward, Councillor Lotu Fuli, one of three current Auckland councillors of Pacific descent, has also served on the local board and is seeking re-election. "Currently, we only have three Pasifika councillors at the governing body table, the mayor and 20 councillors. Out of 21, only myself, Councillor Bartley and Councillor Filipaina, who's half Samoan, sit around that very important decision-making table," Fuli said. She said she feels the weight of responsibility of her role. "I know that I'm here in this space to speak up and advocate for them, because with all due respect to the mayor and to our other councillors from other areas, they don't know what it's like for a Pasifika person growing up in Aotearoa New Zealand - in Manukau, in Otara, in Papatoe, in Magele [Māngere], or Otahuhu or Maungakiekie, Glen Innes. They don't know because they haven't lived that experience. "They haven't lived that struggle, and so they can't really, truly relate to it." Twelve individuals have put their names forward for the mayoralty, including current mayor Wayne Brown. Ted Johnston is the only mayoral candidate with Pasifika links. Each Auckland ward has a set number of council seats. For example, in Manukau, there are only two seats, currently held by incumbents Alf Filipaina and Lotu Fuli. In the Manurewa-Papakura ward, there are two seats, and in Maungakiekie-Tāmaki there is one, held by Josephine Bartley. For local board nominations, the number of seats varies. Those elected make decisions about things like community funding, sports events, water quality, and even dog walking regulations. Vi Hausia, one of the youngest Pacific candidates this year, is running for the Ōtara-Papatoetoe Local Board (Papatoetoe subdivision. He said he was born and raised in south Auckland. "Growing up I've always had the sense of, 'oh, it is what it is. It's always been like that'. And then you get a bit older and you realise that actually things isn't 'is what it is'. It's been as a result of people who make decisions in important forums, like local board." Safety and strengthening youth engagement are issues for him. "Ensuring that when kids come out of high school there's a strong pathway for them to get into work or into training, whether that's a vocational training like builder apprenticeship or university, because that's the link to ensure that our people, particularly our Pacific people, are engaged within our society, and are able to to find who they are and to be able to contribute back to society." He said Māori and Pasifika youth are overrepresented in the statistics of high school leavers who come out of high school and there's quite a high number of people who go straight onto welfare. "So we've got a responsibility on the local board as well as central government, to be able to understand what the issues are, and to ensure that young people are having the opportunity to be able to be the best versions of themselves." Another current Auckland Councillor Josephine Bartley said it iss vital that Pasifika are at the table. "It's important because if you look at the make-up of the city, we have a large percentage of Pasifika, and we need to be active. We need to be involved in the decision-making that affects us, so at a local board level and at a city council, at a governing body level." She said she is hopeful voter registrations will go up. "It's always difficult for people to prioritise voting because they have a lot on their plate. "But hopefully people can see the relevance of local government to their daily lives and make sure they're enrolled to vote and then actually vote." 'Stop blaming' Pasifika Reflecting on Pacific representation in mayoral races, Ōtara-Papatoetoe Local Board chairperson Apulu Reece said the 2022 race, where Fa'anana Efeso Collins came second to now-mayor Wayne Brown, could have had a different outcome. Apulu said it is time to stop blaming communities for low turnout and instead question the structure. "There's probably some value or truth in the fact that we needed to get more people out voting for Efeso and Māori and Pacific people often too busy to worry about the voting paper that they've left on the fridge. "But I want to twist that and and ask: why didn't the white people vote for Efeso? Why is it always put on us Pacific people and say 'oh, it's your fault?' when, actually, he was one of the best candidates out there. "In fact, one of the candidates, the palagi [Pākeha] lady, dropped out so that her supporters could vote for Wayne Brown. "So no one talks about the tactics that the palagis (Pākeha) did to not get Efeso in. "That's his legacy is us actually looking at the processes, looking at how voting works and and actually dissecting it, and not always blaming the brown people, but saying, 'hey, this system was built by Pākeha for Pākeha." There is a total of 12 mayoral candidates, 80 council ward candidates, 386 local board canddiates and 80 licensing trust candidates. Voting papers will be posted in early September.
Newsroom
3 days ago
- Newsroom
‘Insulted' Wayne Brown and council tell Govt to stick its local government reform
'The cheek,' exclaimed Mayor Wayne Brown, as he led criticism of a Government bill that tells councils what they should focus on and how they should behave. 'The temerity.' Brown is not only angry at Wellington trying to force councils nationwide to act the same, he's irritated ministers don't recognise how distinct Auckland Council is from the rest, and boiling over at an attempt to impose a state-declared code of conduct. He's threatening to write a code of conduct and send it to Parliament to bring MPs' behaviour under control. Auckland councillors voted by a large, voice majority on Thursday to tell the coalition in a submission to Parliament that it cannot support the Local Government (Systems Improvement) Amendment Bill and doesn't need Beehive politicians telling Auckland what to do. The Government has given councils and others just four weeks to submit on the bill, despite it recasting local government's main focus, setting out 'core' services and eliminating 'four wellbeings' such as cultural, community and environmental priorities. It argues the rules are needed to make councils provide better core services of roads, rubbish and water and stop spending on nice-to-haves, thus limiting the chance of rates increases. Councils nationwide argue the real driver of high rates is the cost of infrastructure they are being forced to shoulder. As well as the 'core services' edict, the bill contains a range of changes including removing a requirement for six-yearly service delivery reviews, adding new principles on openness of information for elected councillors, and requiring councils to report on use of contractors. In Auckland, the strength of the pushback, from almost all political persuasions around the council table at a policy and planning committee meeting, was compelling. For the mayor and the policy committee chairman Richard Hills, who have worked hard to find ways of cooperation with Wellington, the bill has caused disappointment and frustration. There was much criticism of a coalition of political parties that had promised devolution and deregulation ending up attempting to regulate local government and take away its decision-making and flexibility. The committee passed a motion, inspired by the mayor's strong rejection of the bill, that read: 'The policy and planning committee oppose this bill as it does not adequately acknowledge that Auckland Council has special legislation that applies to Auckland Council and any new legislation that affects Auckland Council to this degree should be negotiated with us in partnership.' The partnership wording plays back to the Government its own reputed desire to have Auckland Council support its initiatives in housing, infrastructure and planning reforms – and in an upcoming City Regional Deal. Two councillors abstained, citing concerns about the current lack of definitions for the 'four wellbeings' in the Local Government Act and council policies. One, Maurice Williamson, backed the overall motion opposing the bill but voted against officials' proposed submissions on specific aspects. Retiring councillor Chris Darby renamed the proposed law the 'Local Government (Especially Auckland and its People) Neutering Bill because it neuters this council and its communities'. He said it was an insult it had got this far without proper consideration of the international city of Auckland and had been put together by 'Johnny-come-latelys that are so badly informed.' He defended the 'four wellbeings' as dynamic considerations that guided him in decision-making. 'There's a lot in this bill that is kicking mud in the face of not just this council but the people of Auckland.' Manukau councillor Lotu Fuli said the move was 'real overreach. We've said all term long we don't want Wellington to be running Auckland and this is an attempt to do that.' She argued 'core' council business was people and communities. 'It's what makes us human, our music, our dogs we keep at home … and therefore they are core to what we should do.' Wayne Brown took particular umbrage at Auckland's special status, with 30 percent of the population and its own special statute, being ignored by the one-size-fits-all approach to constrain councils nationwide. Worse, ministers had not consulted Auckland Council before introducing the bill in July with a deadline for public submissions by August 27. 'We are a product of the Local Government (Auckland Council) Act and we are not like the others. 'For instance the standardised code of conduct: The problems of Gore are not the problems of Auckland. 'The very fact that a Government whose standard of behaviour inside their own thing is appalling should have the temerity to tell us about standards of behaviour is a bit rich,' Brown said. 'This is a third of New Zealand. We don't really need any of this actually. We'll decide what wellbeings for Aucklanders are. 'The whole point is that we are different… the cheek of them to suggest that we are going to do something by the 27th of August for a third of New Zealand without even coming to talk to us is a good enough reason for us to oppose the whole bloody thing.' He said right at the start of its submission Auckland Council should say: 'Where are you? How dare you post us a letter and tells us we've got to behave. It's insulting. I'm quite prepared to put in there that we'll form a group here for a code of conduct for their behaviour and send it down to them and see how they like it.' Another retiring councillor, Manurewa's Angela Dalton, said the bill was a 'one-size-fits-all. This is just so far away from localism it isn't funny.' She was mystified how central government came to think removing the 'four wellbeings' would lead to rate decreases or constraints on rate increases. 'There seems to be a view there's some mamby pamby stuff going on and we're all sitting around hugging each other.' Many things the council did were forced on it by other legislation. 'We have a role to be leaders for our city and our people. If that means giving a damn then we will give a damn. Because if we don't, central government won't be there. They're actually proving that at the moment. They are not there for our people. 'I just want to see the evidence, the data and the analysis that says the four wellbeings is costing us more.' Measures in the bill such as removing a requirement for councils to consider tikanga Māori in appointing council company directors were 'just appalling.' Dalton said she'd love to throw the bill back at the Government and say 'you've got to be kidding.' 'For a Government that is right into people being in control of their own destiny and removing regulation and rules, look what they're doing to the councils: 'This is what you will do and we are going to take this power off you.'' Councillor Julie Fairey said of the Government's moves: 'It's not supposed to be a parent-child relationship … It should not be the case we have this parent coming in over the top all the time.' Recalling repeated rejections of Auckland's advocacy for a bed night levy to fund development and destination functions, her message to Wellington was: 'If you are worried about rates, let central government give us some power to raise funds in some other ways.' Committee chair Hills noted all the accountability demands on councils that didn't apply to central government like having to consult for six months on annual budgets. 'And we have to provide a balanced budget every year, by statute. They don't have to do that. We do.' He defended the consideration of the four wellbeings as having highlighted and helped address issues like homelessness and public safety. 'It's annoying to have to get told how bad we are,' he said. 'I hope the Government can come back to us and look at a different model.' The council will submit against the overall bill, opposing specific measures on the grounds of unclear policy rationale, unclear definitions and risks that alternative paths to improve efficiency might be negated.
Scoop
3 days ago
- Scoop
RMA Reforms To Deliver Jobs And Growth
Minister for RMA Reform The Government's second RMA Amendment Bill has passed into law, bringing in sweeping changes to many of the handbrakes on New Zealanders' lives, helping to drive economic growth, and laying the groundwork for job creation,' RMA Reform Minister Chris Bishop says. 'The Resource Management Act (RMA) has been holding New Zealand back for decades. It has let successive governments and councils say 'no' to progress, 'no' to development, and 'no' to building the houses, infrastructure, clean energy and other important projects that New Zealanders need to get ahead,' Mr Bishop says. 'Our full replacement for the RMA will be introduced to Parliament this year, be passed into law next year, and be in effect by 2027- but in the meantime, through this Amendment Bill, we're making it quicker and simpler to consent renewable energy, boost housing supply, and reduce red tape for the primary sector. 'The Bill contains five broad packages of changes which will remove roadblocks and cut red tape holding back progress for: Infrastructure and renewable energy Housing, including a streamlined process for removing heritage protections Farming and the primary sector Emergency and natural hazards package Resource Management system improvements 'We also added a new provision which requires Auckland Council to allow even greater housing and development around key stations benefitting from City Rail Link investment, to ensure Aucklanders reap the full benefits of this transformational investment into the city. 'We added changes to ensure a more cost-effective transition between the current RMA and the upcoming new planning system by putting a stop to councils making RMA plan or policy statement changes until the new system is in place in 2027. There will be some exemptions for important work that aligns with Government priorities, or for activities such as managing natural hazards. 'Alongside this change, we added a new a new regulation making power that will allow the responsible Minister to recommend changes or even removal of parts of council RMA plans and policy statements that are proven to be holding back economic growth, development, or job creation. 'This week we also took urgent action to prevent what could have amounted to a 'stop work' notice for thousands of New Zealand farmers, by further amending the Bill to broaden what water discharges can be allowed as a permitted activity. 'And, to the great excitement of countless Wellingtonians, we added a provision that removes heritage protections from the unsafe and derelict Gordon Wilson Flats in Wellington, clearing the way for the flats to be demolished so that new student accommodation can be built.' 'This legislation is part of our wider three-phase RMA reform programme. In Phase One, before Christmas last year, we repealed the previous government's overly complex RMA changes. 'Phase Two is now well underway, with our Fast-track one-stop shop up and running, the biggest package of national direction changes in New Zealand's history being worked through with decisions due before the end of this year, and this second Amendment Bill delivering meaningful improvements. 'Phase Three will see the complete replacement of the RMA with two new laws that better reflect the importance of private property rights. The new planning system legislation will be introduced to Parliament before the end of this year, pass into law next year, and be in effect by 2027.' The Resource Management (Consenting and Other System Changes) Amendment Bill will be enacted the day after it receives royal assent, which is expected in the coming days. Fact sheet for a summary of changes to be enacted through the Resource Management (Consenting and Other System Changes) Amendment Bill here.
