logo
This VE Day, ‘never again' has never rung so hollow

This VE Day, ‘never again' has never rung so hollow

The Guardian07-05-2025

Simon Tisdall (It's right to remember the dead of 1939-45. But keep the anger about current wars too, 4 May) asks of current global conflicts: why is this carnage tolerated, even normalised? He cites several reasons, but the one I identify with most is the overwhelming nature of it all – a world weariness shared by western governments. It is especially relevant to Gaza, which is in an extremely parlous state, yet the silence on its almost complete annihilation is thunderous. It is of great credit to the Guardian that it continues to publish articles on this.
Sheila Hancock (My VE Day was nothing like our image of it today. I hope we can honour what it really meant, 3 May) raises the sadness surrounding the decline of the legacy of that conflict, when 'never again' and the building of a better world was the mantra – something that for a while was achieved for some. As Tisdall writes, people feel powerless to change any of it, but I cannot help but observe that governments calling bad actors to account more publicly might have some effect.
Jillian Forster-Walmsley
Skipton, North Yorkshire
What a humane and sobering piece by Sheila Hancock. VE Day marks the defeat of fascism in Europe by the allied forces of the US, the Soviet Union, Britain, Canada and many others. The irony in Britain in May 2025 is that the victory over that far-right ideology is being commemorated in a hail of flags and poppies by a population that just a week ago voted convincingly for a nationalist party in the local elections. Perhaps the greatest vice of all is forgetfulness.
Adrian Hackford
Folkestone, Kent
Like Sheila Hancock, although she doesn't mention it in her article, I am a Quaker. It was impossible not to be moved by her reflective piece, which reminded me of a conversation I once had with my dear mother. One year, as VE Day approached, I asked her if she remembered the celebrations in 1945. There hadn't been much of that in her house, she said. It was just six months or so since her brother Harry had lost his life with the Eighth Army in Italy. There must have been many other families like the Whitticks who mourned while others partied.
Bill McMellon
Chichester
I am reminded of my mother's remark on the 50th anniversary. Then, as now, the media emphasised the relief and happiness of that day. My mother said bitterly: 'They never admit that the war changed life for the worse for many of us.' Her fiance had not returned from the Normandy landings, and her joy went with him.
Anne Maclennan
Cuguen, France
I welcomed your article on the lack of awareness of the contributions that Black, Commonwealth and Muslim communities made during the world wars (Britons largely unaware of Black and Asian contribution to WW2 effort, research shows, 4 May). As you highlight, the armies, in their ethnic and faith mix, looked very much like the Britain of 2025 and nothing at all like the Britain of 1914 or 1939. Our project, Great Faith: Stories of Sacrifice and Contribution, which we hope to tour around the country, comprises 80 portraits by the renowned artist Arabella Dorman, of Muslim servicemen and women who fought during the world wars, and those who serve today. We hope it will help raise awareness of all those who have contributed to making Britain great.
Nizam Uddin
Conven er, Great Faith: Stories of Sacrifice and Contribution
Have an opinion on anything you've read in the Guardian today? Please email us your letter and it will be considered for publication in our letters section.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Greta Thunberg projects the 'image of a heroine' and proudly 'mocks her critics'
Greta Thunberg projects the 'image of a heroine' and proudly 'mocks her critics'

Daily Mirror

timean hour ago

  • Daily Mirror

Greta Thunberg projects the 'image of a heroine' and proudly 'mocks her critics'

Greta Thunberg was deported by Israel on Tuesday, one day after the Gaza-bound ship she was on was dramatically seized by the Israeli military in "international waters" Greta Thunberg displayed more confidence than world leaders and "silently mocked her critics," a body language expert says. The climate campaigner yesterday described a "quite chaotic and uncertain" situation during her detention, following the capture of the Gaza-bound ship she was on. She spoke to reporters in Paris en route to her home country of Sweden and, during the address, the 22-year-old activist maintained composure and conviction, it is said. ‌ Judi James, a body language expert, said: "Her body language suggests a sense of powerful self-affirmation for her messages. Her conviction looks unassailable. She seems to offer facts not opinions and there is her wry smile that seems to mock anyone who disagrees with her." ‌ And Greta did cause controversy after repeatedly claiming she was "kidnapped" by the Israeli authorities. The campaigner said she and the other 11 activists on the boat, called Madleen, were taken "against our own will" after the interception. But the body language expert believes Greta used all the skill of a political pro to sway critics. Ms James added: "Her wry smile as she begins to talk gives that impression of superiority, as though she is silently mocking her critics... When she speaks she utilises many of the communication devices world leaders use to project power and authority." She also told Mail Online Greta's "youthful appearance tends to add to the image of a heroine as she appears as a loner". Madleen was carrying food and supplies for Gaza. However, the Israeli authorities branded the vessel "a selfie yacht" and said "unauthorised attempts to breach the blockade are dangerous, unlawful, and undermine ongoing humanitarian efforts" in a damning statement on Monday. Donald Trump also proved to be a fierce critic, describing Greta as a "young, angry person" and suggesting she should seek "anger management classes". In response to this, Greta said: "I think the world needs a lot more young angry women." Of the 12 activists onboard the boat, four including Greta agreed to be deported immediately. The Swede has now called for the release of the other campaigners, who are from all over the world. "We were well aware of the risks of this mission. The aim was to get to Gaza and to be able to distribute the aid," Greta told reporters in Paris. Israel has placed restrictions on aid to Gaza's population of more than two million people. The activists had called on governments to do more to help the citizens. Polling, though, shows almost two thirds of Brits believe the UK should suspend all arms sales to Israel, while 60% think a trade deal between the two nations should be suspended.

UN to vote on resolution demanding Gaza ceasefire, hostage release and aid access
UN to vote on resolution demanding Gaza ceasefire, hostage release and aid access

The Independent

timean hour ago

  • The Independent

UN to vote on resolution demanding Gaza ceasefire, hostage release and aid access

The U.N. General Assembly is expected to vote Thursday on a resolution demanding an immediate ceasefire in Gaza, the release of all hostages held by Hamas, and the opening of all Israeli border crossings for deliveries of desperately needed food and other aid. The resolution, drafted by Spain and obtained Wednesday by The Associated Press, 'strongly condemns any use of starvation of civilians as a method of warfare.' Experts and human rights workers say hunger is widespread in Gaza and some 2 million Palestinians are at risk of famine if Israel does not fully lift its blockade and halt its military campaign, which it renewed in March after ending a ceasefire with Hamas. Last week, the U.N. Security Council failed to pass a resolution demanding a ceasefire in Gaza and calling on Israel to lift all restrictions on the delivery of aid. The United States vetoed the resolution because it was not linked to the release of the hostages, while all 14 other members of the council voted in favor. There are no vetoes in the 193-member General Assembly, where the resolution is expected to pass overwhelmingly. But unlike in the Security Council, assembly resolutions are not legally binding, though they are seen as a barometer of world opinion. After a 10-week blockade that barred all aid to Gaza, Israel is allowing the United Nations to deliver a trickle of food assistance and is backing a newly created U.S. aid group, which has opened several sites in the center and south of the territory to deliver food parcels. But the aid system rolled out last month by the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation has been troubled by near-daily shootings as crowds make their way to aid sites, while the longstanding U.N.-run system has struggled to deliver food because of Israeli restrictions and a breakdown of law and order. The draft resolution being voted on Thursday references a March 28 legally binding order by the top United Nations court for Israel to open more land crossings into Gaza for food, water, fuel and other supplies. The International Court of Justice issued the order in a case brought by South Africa accusing Israel of acts of genocide in its war in Gaza, charges Israel strongly denies. The resolution stresses that Israel, as an occupying power, has an obligation under international law to ensure that humanitarian aid reaches those in need. It reiterates the assembly's commitment to a two-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, with the Gaza Strip as part of a Palestinian state. The assembly is holding a high-level meeting next week to push for a two-state solution, which Israel has rejected. The resolution supports mediation efforts by Egypt, Qatar and the United States aimed at implementing a January ceasefire agreement. When the U.S. vetoed last week's Gaza resolution, acting Ambassador Dorothy Shea said it would have undermined the security of Israel and diplomatic efforts to reach a ceasefire 'that reflects the realities on the ground.' Like the failed Security Council resolution, the resolution to be voted on Thursday also does not condemn Hamas' deadly attack in southern Israel on Oct. 7, 2023, which ignited the war, or say the militant group must disarm and withdraw from Gaza. Both are U.S. demands. The Hamas-led militants killed around 1,200 people, mostly civilians, and took 251 hostage. About 55 hostages are still being held. Israel's military campaign has killed over 55,000 Palestinians, according to Gaza's Health Ministry. It says women and children make up most of the dead, but doesn't distinguish between civilians and combatants. Israel says it has killed more than 20,000 militants, without providing evidence.

United Nations to vote to demand immediate Gaza ceasefire over US, Israel opposition
United Nations to vote to demand immediate Gaza ceasefire over US, Israel opposition

Reuters

timean hour ago

  • Reuters

United Nations to vote to demand immediate Gaza ceasefire over US, Israel opposition

UNITED NATIONS, June 12 (Reuters) - The United Nations General Assembly will vote on Thursday on a draft resolution that demands an immediate, unconditional and permanent ceasefire in the war in Gaza after the United States vetoed a similar effort in the Security Council last week. The 193-member General Assembly is likely to adopt the text with overwhelming support, diplomats say, despite Israel lobbying countries this week against taking part in what it called a "politically-motivated, counter-productive charade." General Assembly resolutions are not binding but carry weight as a reflection of the global view on the war. Previous demands by the body for an end to the war between Israel and Palestinian militants Hamas have been ignored. Unlike the U.N. Security Council, no country has a veto in the General Assembly. Thursday's vote also comes ahead of a U.N. conference next week that aims to reinvigorate an international push for a two-state solution between Israel and the Palestinians. The United States has urged countries not to attend. In a note seen by Reuters, the U.S. warned that "countries that take anti-Israel actions on the heels of the conference will be viewed as acting in opposition to U.S. foreign policy interests and could face diplomatic consequences." The U.S. last week vetoed a draft U.N. Security Council resolution that also demanded an "immediate, unconditional and permanent ceasefire" and unhindered aid access in Gaza, arguing it would undermine U.S.-led efforts to broker a ceasefire. The other 14 countries on the council voted in favor of the draft as a humanitarian crisis grips the enclave of more than 2 million people, where the U.N. warns famine looms and aid has only trickled in since Israel lifted an 11-week blockade last month. The draft resolution to be voted on by the General Assembly on Thursday demands the release of hostages held by Hamas, the return of Palestinian prisoners detained by Israel and the full withdrawal of Israeli forces from Gaza. It demands unhindered aid access and "strongly condemns the use of starvation of civilians as a method of warfare and the unlawful denial of humanitarian access and depriving civilians ... of objects indispensable to their survival, including willfully impeding relief supply and access." "This is both false and defamatory," Israel's U.N. Ambassador Danny Danon wrote in a letter to U.N. member states, sent on Tuesday and seen by Reuters. Danon described the General Assembly draft resolution as an "immensely flawed and harmful text," urging countries not to take part in what he said was a "farce" that undermines hostage negotiations and fails to condemn Hamas. In October 2023 the General Assembly called for an immediate humanitarian truce in Gaza with 120 votes in favor. In December 2023, 153 countries voted to demand an immediate humanitarian ceasefire. Then in December last year the body demanded - with 158 votes in favor - an immediate, unconditional and permanent ceasefire. The war in Gaza has raged since 2023 after Hamas militants killed 1,200 people in Israel in an October 7 attack and took some 250 hostages back to the enclave, according to Israeli tallies. Many of those killed or captured were civilians. Israel responded with a military campaign that has killed over 54,000 Palestinians, according to Gaza health authorities. They say civilians have borne the brunt of the attacks and that thousands more bodies have been lost under rubble.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store