Wikipedia operator loses court challenge to regulations under UK Online Safety Act
LONDON (Reuters) -The operator of Wikipedia on Monday lost a legal challenge to parts of Britain's Online Safety Act, which sets tough new requirements for online platforms but has been criticised for potentially curtailing free speech.
The Wikimedia Foundation took legal action at London's High Court over regulations made under the law, which it said could impose the most stringent duties on Wikipedia.
The foundation said if it was subject to so-called Category 1 duties – which would require Wikipedia's users and contributors' identities to be verified – it would need to drastically reduce the number of users who can access the site.
Judge Jeremy Johnson dismissed its case on Monday, but said the Wikimedia Foundation could bring a further challenge if regulator Ofcom "(impermissibly) concludes that Wikipedia is a Category 1 service".
The Online Safety Act was criticised earlier this month by social media site X, which said significant changes were needed to the law.
Free-speech campaigners and content creators have complained its rules had been implemented too broadly, resulting in the censorship of legal content.
The British government says the law is designed to protect children and remove illegal content and Technology Secretary Peter Kyle has said those who wanted to overturn it were "on the side of predators".
(Reporting by Sam Tobin; editing by William James)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Sun
2 minutes ago
- The Sun
Najib: Apex Court dismisses AG'S appeal on additional document, remits matter to KL High Court
PUTRAJAYA: The Federal Court today unanimously dismissed the Attorney-General's (AG) appeal regarding the purported existence of an additional document allegedly authorising former prime minister Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak to serve the remainder of his prison sentence under house arrest. The decision was delivered by a three-member bench comprising Chief Judge of Malaya Tan Sri Hasnah Mohammed Hashim and Federal Court Judges Datuk Zabariah Mohd Yusof and Datuk Hanipah Farikullah. Justice Zabariah, while reading the judgment, directed that the matter be remitted to the High Court to be heard on its merits before a new judge. On April 28, the Federal Court granted the AG leave to appeal against the Court of Appeal's ruling concerning the alleged additional document related to Najib. Najib, 72, is seeking a mandamus order compelling the respondents to confirm and disclose the existence of the purported document dated Jan 29, 2024. He named the Home Minister, Commissioner-General of Prisons, Attorney-General, Pardons Board for the Federal Territories of Kuala Lumpur, Labuan and Putrajaya, Minister in the Prime Minister's Department (Law and Institutional Reform), Director-General of the Legal Affairs Division in the Prime Minister's Department, and the Government of Malaysia as respondents. The former Pekan MP also sought an order that, if the additional document is proven to exist, all or any of the respondents be compelled to enforce it immediately and transfer him from Kajang Prison to his residence in Kuala Lumpur to serve the remainder of his sentence. On July 3 last year, High Court Judge Datuk Amarjeet Singh dismissed Najib's application for leave to commence judicial review proceedings, ruling that the four supporting affidavits submitted, including statements from UMNO president Datuk Seri Dr Ahmad Zahid Hamidi and vice president Datuk Seri Wan Rosdy Wan Ismail, constituted hearsay and were inadmissible as evidence. Najib has been serving his sentence at Kajang Prison since Aug 23, 2022, following his conviction for misappropriating RM42 million from SRC International Sdn Bhd. The High Court initially sentenced him to 12 years in prison and fined him RM210 million, a decision which was subsequently upheld by the Court of Appeal and the Federal Court. However, his petition for a royal pardon on Sept 2, 2022, resulted in the Pardons Board halving his prison sentence to six years and reducing his fine to RM50 million. - Bernama
Sinar Daily
an hour ago
- Sinar Daily
AG fails appeal, review on Najib's Addendum Order issue to proceed
The review will proceed at the Kuala Lumpur High Court according to the dates that have been set. The Attorney General (AG) failed in his appeal at the Federal Court here on Wednesday to overturn a decision allowing Datuk Seri Najib Razak to commence judicial review proceedings for an order compelling the government or six other parties to answer and confirm the existence of the Addendum Order. PUTRAJAYA – The Attorney General (AG) failed in his appeal at the Federal Court here on Wednesday to overturn a decision allowing Datuk Seri Najib Razak to commence judicial review proceedings for an order compelling the government or six other parties to answer and confirm the existence of the Addendum Order. Following this, the review will proceed at the Kuala Lumpur High Court according to the dates that have been set. The unanimous decision was made by a three-judge panel led by the Chief Judge of Malaya, Tan Sri Hasnah Mohammed Hashim, who sat with Federal Court judges Datuk Zabariah Mohd Yusof and Datuk Hanipah Farikullah. On Jan 6, the Court of Appeal allowed Najib's appeal to initiate judicial review proceedings at the High Court for an order compelling the government or six other parties to answer and confirm the existence of the Addendum Order dated January last year. In the judicial review, Najib named the Home Minister, the Commissioner General of Prisons, the Attorney General, the Pardons Board for the Federal Territories of Kuala Lumpur, Labuan and Putrajaya, the Minister in the Prime Minister's Department (Law and Institutional Reform), the Director-General of the Legal Affairs Division in the Prime Minister's Department and the Government of Malaysia as respondents. Among the relief sought in the judicial review was for all or any of the respondents to provide a copy of the main decree by the 16th Yang di-Pertuan Agong regarding the reduction of his prison sentence and fine. Former Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak was brought into the Palace of Justice in Putrajaya today. Photo by Bernama Najib is also seeking an order that, if the decree exists, all or any of the respondents must implement it by transferring him from Kajang Prison to his residence in Kuala Lumpur immediately to serve the remainder of his sentence under house arrest. Najib, who has been serving his sentence in Kajang Prison since 23 August 2022 after being convicted of misappropriating RM42 million from SRC International Sdn Bhd, filed a petition for royal pardon on Sept 2, 2022. The Pardons Board later reduced his prison sentence from 12 years to six years, while the fine was reduced from RM210 million to RM50 million. On July 3 last year, the High Court rejected Najib's application to initiate judicial review proceedings, before he appealed the decision at the Court of Appeal. The High Court ruled that four affidavits supporting Najib's claims, including statements by Umno President Datuk Seri Ahmad Zahid Hamidi and Vice President Datuk Seri Wan Rosdy Wan Ismail, were hearsay and inadmissible as evidence. MORE TO COME More Like This
New Straits Times
an hour ago
- New Straits Times
A-GC fails in final bid to block Najib's royal addendum judicial review
PUTRAJAYA: The Federal Court has dismissed the Attorney-General's Chambers' final appeal to stop Datuk Seri Najib Razak's judicial review over a royal addendum allowing him to be placed under house arrest. The ruling paves the way for Najib to proceed with his challenge in the High Court, seeking to enforce the order. The Federal Court said there were no appealable errors by the lower court. Najib is currently serving a six-year prison sentence for misappropriating RM42 million from SRC International Sdn Bhd. He was originally sentenced to 12 years in prison with a fine of RM210 million, a decision upheld by the Court of Appeal and the Federal Court. After a petition for a royal pardon on Sept 2, 2022, Najib's sentence was reduced to six years and his fine lowered to RM50 million.
